Anaerobic Treatment of Wastewater in Colder Climates Using UASB Reactor and Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor

Direct anaerobic treatment in the main line of a wastewater treatment plant is a promising way of recovering chemical energy, even in moderate climates. Full-scale applications of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors are common in warm climates and have recently begun to appear in areas w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental engineering science 2016-11, Vol.33 (11), p.918-928
Hauptverfasser: Hejnic, Jakub, Dolejs, Petr, Kouba, Vojtech, Prudilova, Andrea, Widiayuningrum, Patria, Bartacek, Jan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Direct anaerobic treatment in the main line of a wastewater treatment plant is a promising way of recovering chemical energy, even in moderate climates. Full-scale applications of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors are common in warm climates and have recently begun to appear in areas with colder climate. Several new types of reactors optimized for low temperature treatment were proposed such as UASB-Digester or anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR). However, long-term operation of such systems treating real wastewater at winter temperatures is needed to assess their suitability. The aim of this article is to evaluate the operation of a laboratory-scale UASB reactor (1.9L) before and after the installation of ultrafiltration membrane for solids separation from the effluent. The laboratory model treated wastewater at 15 degree C for over 850 days. The organic loading rate of the UASB reactor and AnMBR was 1.4 and 1.6g COD/[L.d], respectively, while the hydraulic retention time was around 9 and 10h. Energy recovery from the wastewater in gaseous methane was 4% and 6% in the UASB reactor and AnMBR, respectively. The methane content was 63% plus or minus 17% and 64% plus or minus 2%, respectively. In the UASB reactor, 64% of the influent chemical oxygen demand (COD) was removed in long term. The AnMBR ran at average 85% COD removal. Results show that AnMBR can deliver more stable effluent quality for wastewater treatment even at low (15 degree C) temperature. However, even the AnMBR effluent requires further posttreatment. Thus, simpler and less energy demanding UASB appears more relevant for wastewater pretreatment under European conditions.
ISSN:1557-9018
1092-8758
1557-9018
DOI:10.1089/ees.2016.0163