Injury risk prediction from computational simulations of ocular blast loading

A predictive Lagrangian–Eulerian finite element eye model was used to analyze 2.27 and 0.45 kg trinitrotoluene equivalent blasts detonated from 24 different locations. Free air and ground level blasts were simulated directly in front of the eye and at lateral offset locations with box, average, less...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology 2017-04, Vol.16 (2), p.463-477
Hauptverfasser: Weaver, Ashley A., Stitzel, Sarah M., Stitzel, Joel D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 477
container_issue 2
container_start_page 463
container_title Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology
container_volume 16
creator Weaver, Ashley A.
Stitzel, Sarah M.
Stitzel, Joel D.
description A predictive Lagrangian–Eulerian finite element eye model was used to analyze 2.27 and 0.45 kg trinitrotoluene equivalent blasts detonated from 24 different locations. Free air and ground level blasts were simulated directly in front of the eye and at lateral offset locations with box, average, less protective, and more protective orbital anthropometries, resulting in 96 simulations. Injury risk curves were developed for hyphema, lens dislocation, retinal damage, and globe rupture from experimental and computational data to compute risk from corneoscleral stress and intra-ocular pressure computational outputs. Corneoscleral stress, intra-ocular pressure, and injury risks increased when the blast size was larger and located nearer to the eye. Risks ranged from 20–100 % for hyphema, 1–100 % for lens dislocation, 2–100 % for retinal damage, and 0–98 % for globe rupture depending on the blast condition. Orbital geometry affected the stresses, pressures, and associated ocular injury risks of the blast conditions simulated. Orbital geometries that more fully surrounded the eye such as the more protective orbit tended to produce higher corneoscleral stresses and compression of the eye against the surrounding rigid orbit contributing to high stresses as the blast wave propagated. However, the more protective orbit tended to produce lower intra-ocular pressures in comparison with the other three orbital geometries which may indicate that the more protective orbit inhibits propagation of the blast wave and reduces ocular loading. Results of this parametric computational study of ocular blast loading are valuable to the design of eye protection equipment and the mitigation of blast-related eye injuries.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10237-016-0830-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1893881544</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4320654181</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-ae030f620c5360932200c81d6fbe62bc7b677cee22ec1da14a1bd805600e4a7d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctKxTAQhoMo3h_AjQTcuKnOJG2SLkW8geJG1yFNU-mxbY5Ju_DtTT1HEUEwm2SSb_7AfIQcIZwhgDyPCIzLDFBkoDhkuEF2UaDMZJnD5ve5KHfIXowLAAZc8W2yw6TI04Jd8nA3LKbwTkMbX-kyuLq1Y-sH2gTfU-v75TSa-cJ0NLb91H0WkfqGepuqQKvOxJF23tTt8HJAthrTRXe43vfJ8_XV0-Vtdv94c3d5cZ_ZAvIxMw44NIKBLbiAkjMGYBXWoqmcYJWVlZDSOseYs1gbzA1WtYJCALjcyJrvk9NV7jL4t8nFUfdttK7rzOD8FDWqkiuFRZ7_A1UohWIc_oEWpeS5UEVCT36hCz-FNKWZkhLScMuZwhVlg48xuEYvQ9ub8K4R9GxQrwzqZFDPBjWmnuN18lT1rv7u-FKWALYCYnoaXlz48fWfqR8ZwqTZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1877044495</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Injury risk prediction from computational simulations of ocular blast loading</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Weaver, Ashley A. ; Stitzel, Sarah M. ; Stitzel, Joel D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Ashley A. ; Stitzel, Sarah M. ; Stitzel, Joel D.</creatorcontrib><description>A predictive Lagrangian–Eulerian finite element eye model was used to analyze 2.27 and 0.45 kg trinitrotoluene equivalent blasts detonated from 24 different locations. Free air and ground level blasts were simulated directly in front of the eye and at lateral offset locations with box, average, less protective, and more protective orbital anthropometries, resulting in 96 simulations. Injury risk curves were developed for hyphema, lens dislocation, retinal damage, and globe rupture from experimental and computational data to compute risk from corneoscleral stress and intra-ocular pressure computational outputs. Corneoscleral stress, intra-ocular pressure, and injury risks increased when the blast size was larger and located nearer to the eye. Risks ranged from 20–100 % for hyphema, 1–100 % for lens dislocation, 2–100 % for retinal damage, and 0–98 % for globe rupture depending on the blast condition. Orbital geometry affected the stresses, pressures, and associated ocular injury risks of the blast conditions simulated. Orbital geometries that more fully surrounded the eye such as the more protective orbit tended to produce higher corneoscleral stresses and compression of the eye against the surrounding rigid orbit contributing to high stresses as the blast wave propagated. However, the more protective orbit tended to produce lower intra-ocular pressures in comparison with the other three orbital geometries which may indicate that the more protective orbit inhibits propagation of the blast wave and reduces ocular loading. Results of this parametric computational study of ocular blast loading are valuable to the design of eye protection equipment and the mitigation of blast-related eye injuries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1617-7959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1617-7940</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10237-016-0830-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27644440</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Biological and Medical Physics ; Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering ; Biophysics ; Blast Injuries - prevention &amp; control ; Computation ; Computer based modeling ; Computer Simulation ; Engineering ; Eye ; Eye injuries ; Eye Injuries - prevention &amp; control ; Eyes ; Eyes &amp; eyesight ; Health risks ; Humans ; Injuries ; Mathematical models ; Models, Theoretical ; Orbit - anatomy &amp; histology ; Original Paper ; Risk ; Risk Assessment - methods ; Risk factors ; Space life sciences ; Stresses ; Theoretical and Applied Mechanics</subject><ispartof>Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2017-04, Vol.16 (2), p.463-477</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016</rights><rights>Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-ae030f620c5360932200c81d6fbe62bc7b677cee22ec1da14a1bd805600e4a7d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-ae030f620c5360932200c81d6fbe62bc7b677cee22ec1da14a1bd805600e4a7d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10237-016-0830-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10237-016-0830-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27644440$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Ashley A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stitzel, Sarah M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stitzel, Joel D.</creatorcontrib><title>Injury risk prediction from computational simulations of ocular blast loading</title><title>Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology</title><addtitle>Biomech Model Mechanobiol</addtitle><addtitle>Biomech Model Mechanobiol</addtitle><description>A predictive Lagrangian–Eulerian finite element eye model was used to analyze 2.27 and 0.45 kg trinitrotoluene equivalent blasts detonated from 24 different locations. Free air and ground level blasts were simulated directly in front of the eye and at lateral offset locations with box, average, less protective, and more protective orbital anthropometries, resulting in 96 simulations. Injury risk curves were developed for hyphema, lens dislocation, retinal damage, and globe rupture from experimental and computational data to compute risk from corneoscleral stress and intra-ocular pressure computational outputs. Corneoscleral stress, intra-ocular pressure, and injury risks increased when the blast size was larger and located nearer to the eye. Risks ranged from 20–100 % for hyphema, 1–100 % for lens dislocation, 2–100 % for retinal damage, and 0–98 % for globe rupture depending on the blast condition. Orbital geometry affected the stresses, pressures, and associated ocular injury risks of the blast conditions simulated. Orbital geometries that more fully surrounded the eye such as the more protective orbit tended to produce higher corneoscleral stresses and compression of the eye against the surrounding rigid orbit contributing to high stresses as the blast wave propagated. However, the more protective orbit tended to produce lower intra-ocular pressures in comparison with the other three orbital geometries which may indicate that the more protective orbit inhibits propagation of the blast wave and reduces ocular loading. Results of this parametric computational study of ocular blast loading are valuable to the design of eye protection equipment and the mitigation of blast-related eye injuries.</description><subject>Biological and Medical Physics</subject><subject>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</subject><subject>Biophysics</subject><subject>Blast Injuries - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Computer based modeling</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Eye</subject><subject>Eye injuries</subject><subject>Eye Injuries - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Eyes</subject><subject>Eyes &amp; eyesight</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Orbit - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>Stresses</subject><subject>Theoretical and Applied Mechanics</subject><issn>1617-7959</issn><issn>1617-7940</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctKxTAQhoMo3h_AjQTcuKnOJG2SLkW8geJG1yFNU-mxbY5Ju_DtTT1HEUEwm2SSb_7AfIQcIZwhgDyPCIzLDFBkoDhkuEF2UaDMZJnD5ve5KHfIXowLAAZc8W2yw6TI04Jd8nA3LKbwTkMbX-kyuLq1Y-sH2gTfU-v75TSa-cJ0NLb91H0WkfqGepuqQKvOxJF23tTt8HJAthrTRXe43vfJ8_XV0-Vtdv94c3d5cZ_ZAvIxMw44NIKBLbiAkjMGYBXWoqmcYJWVlZDSOseYs1gbzA1WtYJCALjcyJrvk9NV7jL4t8nFUfdttK7rzOD8FDWqkiuFRZ7_A1UohWIc_oEWpeS5UEVCT36hCz-FNKWZkhLScMuZwhVlg48xuEYvQ9ub8K4R9GxQrwzqZFDPBjWmnuN18lT1rv7u-FKWALYCYnoaXlz48fWfqR8ZwqTZ</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Weaver, Ashley A.</creator><creator>Stitzel, Sarah M.</creator><creator>Stitzel, Joel D.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0W</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Injury risk prediction from computational simulations of ocular blast loading</title><author>Weaver, Ashley A. ; Stitzel, Sarah M. ; Stitzel, Joel D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-ae030f620c5360932200c81d6fbe62bc7b677cee22ec1da14a1bd805600e4a7d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Biological and Medical Physics</topic><topic>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</topic><topic>Biophysics</topic><topic>Blast Injuries - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Computer based modeling</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Eye</topic><topic>Eye injuries</topic><topic>Eye Injuries - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Eyes</topic><topic>Eyes &amp; eyesight</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Orbit - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>Stresses</topic><topic>Theoretical and Applied Mechanics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Ashley A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stitzel, Sarah M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stitzel, Joel D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DELNET Engineering &amp; Technology Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weaver, Ashley A.</au><au>Stitzel, Sarah M.</au><au>Stitzel, Joel D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Injury risk prediction from computational simulations of ocular blast loading</atitle><jtitle>Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology</jtitle><stitle>Biomech Model Mechanobiol</stitle><addtitle>Biomech Model Mechanobiol</addtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>463</spage><epage>477</epage><pages>463-477</pages><issn>1617-7959</issn><eissn>1617-7940</eissn><abstract>A predictive Lagrangian–Eulerian finite element eye model was used to analyze 2.27 and 0.45 kg trinitrotoluene equivalent blasts detonated from 24 different locations. Free air and ground level blasts were simulated directly in front of the eye and at lateral offset locations with box, average, less protective, and more protective orbital anthropometries, resulting in 96 simulations. Injury risk curves were developed for hyphema, lens dislocation, retinal damage, and globe rupture from experimental and computational data to compute risk from corneoscleral stress and intra-ocular pressure computational outputs. Corneoscleral stress, intra-ocular pressure, and injury risks increased when the blast size was larger and located nearer to the eye. Risks ranged from 20–100 % for hyphema, 1–100 % for lens dislocation, 2–100 % for retinal damage, and 0–98 % for globe rupture depending on the blast condition. Orbital geometry affected the stresses, pressures, and associated ocular injury risks of the blast conditions simulated. Orbital geometries that more fully surrounded the eye such as the more protective orbit tended to produce higher corneoscleral stresses and compression of the eye against the surrounding rigid orbit contributing to high stresses as the blast wave propagated. However, the more protective orbit tended to produce lower intra-ocular pressures in comparison with the other three orbital geometries which may indicate that the more protective orbit inhibits propagation of the blast wave and reduces ocular loading. Results of this parametric computational study of ocular blast loading are valuable to the design of eye protection equipment and the mitigation of blast-related eye injuries.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>27644440</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10237-016-0830-1</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1617-7959
ispartof Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2017-04, Vol.16 (2), p.463-477
issn 1617-7959
1617-7940
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1893881544
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Biological and Medical Physics
Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering
Biophysics
Blast Injuries - prevention & control
Computation
Computer based modeling
Computer Simulation
Engineering
Eye
Eye injuries
Eye Injuries - prevention & control
Eyes
Eyes & eyesight
Health risks
Humans
Injuries
Mathematical models
Models, Theoretical
Orbit - anatomy & histology
Original Paper
Risk
Risk Assessment - methods
Risk factors
Space life sciences
Stresses
Theoretical and Applied Mechanics
title Injury risk prediction from computational simulations of ocular blast loading
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T21%3A12%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Injury%20risk%20prediction%20from%20computational%20simulations%20of%20ocular%20blast%20loading&rft.jtitle=Biomechanics%20and%20modeling%20in%20mechanobiology&rft.au=Weaver,%20Ashley%20A.&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=463&rft.epage=477&rft.pages=463-477&rft.issn=1617-7959&rft.eissn=1617-7940&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10237-016-0830-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4320654181%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1877044495&rft_id=info:pmid/27644440&rfr_iscdi=true