A Comparison of the Bariatric Procedures that Are Performed in the Treatment of Super Morbid Obesity

Background We have experienced numerous cases of super morbid obesity (SMO), defined by a BMI of ≥50 kg/m 2 , in which laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) was not able to achieve a sufficient weight loss effect. However, the most appropriate procedure for the treatment of SMO has not yet been esta...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Obesity surgery 2017-10, Vol.27 (10), p.2537-2545
Hauptverfasser: Uno, Kohei, Seki, Yosuke, Kasama, Kazunori, Wakamatsu, Kotaro, Umezawa, Akiko, Yanaga, Katsuhiko, Kurokawa, Yoshimochi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2545
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2537
container_title Obesity surgery
container_volume 27
creator Uno, Kohei
Seki, Yosuke
Kasama, Kazunori
Wakamatsu, Kotaro
Umezawa, Akiko
Yanaga, Katsuhiko
Kurokawa, Yoshimochi
description Background We have experienced numerous cases of super morbid obesity (SMO), defined by a BMI of ≥50 kg/m 2 , in which laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) was not able to achieve a sufficient weight loss effect. However, the most appropriate procedure for the treatment of SMO has not yet been established. Methods The subjects included 248 successive patients who underwent surgery at our hospital from June 2006 to December 2012. We divided the subjects into an SMO group (BMI, 50 to
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11695-017-2685-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1893553850</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1940821864</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a7df644a101f0c38234979b9f4940254b96a9583387779ab5a753e9d0dfcd1883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9r20AQxZeSUjtuP0AuYSGXXNTuX-3u0TFpWnBJoOl5WUmjRMbSOrPSId--69oJIdDTMMzvvRnmEXLG2VfOmPmWOC-dLhg3hSitLswHMueG2YIpYU_InLmSFdYJOSOnKW0YE7wU4hOZCas0d8LOSbOkq9jvAnYpDjS2dHwEepXbMGJX0zuMNTQTQsqDMNIlAr0DbCP20NBu-IffI4Sxh2Hc639PO0D6K2LVNfS2gtSNz5_JxzZsE3w51gX58_36fvWjWN_e_Fwt10UtjRiLYJq2VCpwxltWSyukcsZVrlVOMaFV5crgtJXSGmNcqHQwWoJrWNPWDbdWLsjlwXeH8WmCNPq-SzVst2GAOCXPrZNaS6tZRi_eoZs44ZCv8zxvs4LbUmWKH6gaY0oIrd9h1wd89pz5fQT-EIHPEfh9BN5kzfnRearyk14VLz_PgDgAKY-GB8A3q__r-heI649u</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1940821864</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparison of the Bariatric Procedures that Are Performed in the Treatment of Super Morbid Obesity</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Uno, Kohei ; Seki, Yosuke ; Kasama, Kazunori ; Wakamatsu, Kotaro ; Umezawa, Akiko ; Yanaga, Katsuhiko ; Kurokawa, Yoshimochi</creator><creatorcontrib>Uno, Kohei ; Seki, Yosuke ; Kasama, Kazunori ; Wakamatsu, Kotaro ; Umezawa, Akiko ; Yanaga, Katsuhiko ; Kurokawa, Yoshimochi</creatorcontrib><description>Background We have experienced numerous cases of super morbid obesity (SMO), defined by a BMI of ≥50 kg/m 2 , in which laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) was not able to achieve a sufficient weight loss effect. However, the most appropriate procedure for the treatment of SMO has not yet been established. Methods The subjects included 248 successive patients who underwent surgery at our hospital from June 2006 to December 2012. We divided the subjects into an SMO group (BMI, 50 to &lt;70 kg/m 2 ) and a morbid obesity (MO) group (BMI, 35 to &lt;50 kg/m 2 ). The subjects underwent LSG, LSG with duodenojejunal bypass (LSG/DJB), or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). The weight loss effects, safety of surgery, and metabolic profile changes were compared. Results Sixty-two subjects were classified into the SMO group (25%). The percent excess weight loss (%EWL) after LSG among the patients in the SMO group was not significantly different from that of patients who underwent other procedures. LSG was associated with a significantly lower success rate in terms of weight loss (%EWL ≥ 50%), in comparison to the weight loss at 1 year after LRYGB and at 2 years after LSG/DJB and LRYGB. Among the patients in the MO group, the %EWL and the rate of successful weight loss did not differ to a statistically significant extent. Conclusion This study demonstrated that in patients with SMO, LSG/DJB and LRYGB can achieve superior weight loss effects in comparison to LSG.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-8923</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1708-0428</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11695-017-2685-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28451928</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult ; Body Mass Index ; Comparative studies ; Female ; Gastrectomy - adverse effects ; Gastrectomy - methods ; Gastric Bypass - adverse effects ; Gastric Bypass - methods ; Gastroplasty - adverse effects ; Gastroplasty - methods ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Laparoscopy - adverse effects ; Laparoscopy - methods ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Metabolome ; Middle Aged ; Obesity ; Obesity, Morbid - metabolism ; Obesity, Morbid - surgery ; Original Contributions ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery ; Surgical outcomes ; Treatment Outcome ; Weight control ; Weight Loss</subject><ispartof>Obesity surgery, 2017-10, Vol.27 (10), p.2537-2545</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017</rights><rights>Obesity Surgery is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a7df644a101f0c38234979b9f4940254b96a9583387779ab5a753e9d0dfcd1883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a7df644a101f0c38234979b9f4940254b96a9583387779ab5a753e9d0dfcd1883</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11695-017-2685-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11695-017-2685-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28451928$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Uno, Kohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seki, Yosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasama, Kazunori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wakamatsu, Kotaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umezawa, Akiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanaga, Katsuhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurokawa, Yoshimochi</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparison of the Bariatric Procedures that Are Performed in the Treatment of Super Morbid Obesity</title><title>Obesity surgery</title><addtitle>OBES SURG</addtitle><addtitle>Obes Surg</addtitle><description>Background We have experienced numerous cases of super morbid obesity (SMO), defined by a BMI of ≥50 kg/m 2 , in which laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) was not able to achieve a sufficient weight loss effect. However, the most appropriate procedure for the treatment of SMO has not yet been established. Methods The subjects included 248 successive patients who underwent surgery at our hospital from June 2006 to December 2012. We divided the subjects into an SMO group (BMI, 50 to &lt;70 kg/m 2 ) and a morbid obesity (MO) group (BMI, 35 to &lt;50 kg/m 2 ). The subjects underwent LSG, LSG with duodenojejunal bypass (LSG/DJB), or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). The weight loss effects, safety of surgery, and metabolic profile changes were compared. Results Sixty-two subjects were classified into the SMO group (25%). The percent excess weight loss (%EWL) after LSG among the patients in the SMO group was not significantly different from that of patients who underwent other procedures. LSG was associated with a significantly lower success rate in terms of weight loss (%EWL ≥ 50%), in comparison to the weight loss at 1 year after LRYGB and at 2 years after LSG/DJB and LRYGB. Among the patients in the MO group, the %EWL and the rate of successful weight loss did not differ to a statistically significant extent. Conclusion This study demonstrated that in patients with SMO, LSG/DJB and LRYGB can achieve superior weight loss effects in comparison to LSG.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastrectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Gastrectomy - methods</subject><subject>Gastric Bypass - adverse effects</subject><subject>Gastric Bypass - methods</subject><subject>Gastroplasty - adverse effects</subject><subject>Gastroplasty - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Metabolome</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Obesity, Morbid - metabolism</subject><subject>Obesity, Morbid - surgery</subject><subject>Original Contributions</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Weight control</subject><subject>Weight Loss</subject><issn>0960-8923</issn><issn>1708-0428</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9r20AQxZeSUjtuP0AuYSGXXNTuX-3u0TFpWnBJoOl5WUmjRMbSOrPSId--69oJIdDTMMzvvRnmEXLG2VfOmPmWOC-dLhg3hSitLswHMueG2YIpYU_InLmSFdYJOSOnKW0YE7wU4hOZCas0d8LOSbOkq9jvAnYpDjS2dHwEepXbMGJX0zuMNTQTQsqDMNIlAr0DbCP20NBu-IffI4Sxh2Hc639PO0D6K2LVNfS2gtSNz5_JxzZsE3w51gX58_36fvWjWN_e_Fwt10UtjRiLYJq2VCpwxltWSyukcsZVrlVOMaFV5crgtJXSGmNcqHQwWoJrWNPWDbdWLsjlwXeH8WmCNPq-SzVst2GAOCXPrZNaS6tZRi_eoZs44ZCv8zxvs4LbUmWKH6gaY0oIrd9h1wd89pz5fQT-EIHPEfh9BN5kzfnRearyk14VLz_PgDgAKY-GB8A3q__r-heI649u</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>Uno, Kohei</creator><creator>Seki, Yosuke</creator><creator>Kasama, Kazunori</creator><creator>Wakamatsu, Kotaro</creator><creator>Umezawa, Akiko</creator><creator>Yanaga, Katsuhiko</creator><creator>Kurokawa, Yoshimochi</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>A Comparison of the Bariatric Procedures that Are Performed in the Treatment of Super Morbid Obesity</title><author>Uno, Kohei ; Seki, Yosuke ; Kasama, Kazunori ; Wakamatsu, Kotaro ; Umezawa, Akiko ; Yanaga, Katsuhiko ; Kurokawa, Yoshimochi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a7df644a101f0c38234979b9f4940254b96a9583387779ab5a753e9d0dfcd1883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastrectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Gastrectomy - methods</topic><topic>Gastric Bypass - adverse effects</topic><topic>Gastric Bypass - methods</topic><topic>Gastroplasty - adverse effects</topic><topic>Gastroplasty - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Metabolome</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Obesity, Morbid - metabolism</topic><topic>Obesity, Morbid - surgery</topic><topic>Original Contributions</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Weight control</topic><topic>Weight Loss</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Uno, Kohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seki, Yosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasama, Kazunori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wakamatsu, Kotaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umezawa, Akiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanaga, Katsuhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurokawa, Yoshimochi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Obesity surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Uno, Kohei</au><au>Seki, Yosuke</au><au>Kasama, Kazunori</au><au>Wakamatsu, Kotaro</au><au>Umezawa, Akiko</au><au>Yanaga, Katsuhiko</au><au>Kurokawa, Yoshimochi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparison of the Bariatric Procedures that Are Performed in the Treatment of Super Morbid Obesity</atitle><jtitle>Obesity surgery</jtitle><stitle>OBES SURG</stitle><addtitle>Obes Surg</addtitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2537</spage><epage>2545</epage><pages>2537-2545</pages><issn>0960-8923</issn><eissn>1708-0428</eissn><abstract>Background We have experienced numerous cases of super morbid obesity (SMO), defined by a BMI of ≥50 kg/m 2 , in which laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) was not able to achieve a sufficient weight loss effect. However, the most appropriate procedure for the treatment of SMO has not yet been established. Methods The subjects included 248 successive patients who underwent surgery at our hospital from June 2006 to December 2012. We divided the subjects into an SMO group (BMI, 50 to &lt;70 kg/m 2 ) and a morbid obesity (MO) group (BMI, 35 to &lt;50 kg/m 2 ). The subjects underwent LSG, LSG with duodenojejunal bypass (LSG/DJB), or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). The weight loss effects, safety of surgery, and metabolic profile changes were compared. Results Sixty-two subjects were classified into the SMO group (25%). The percent excess weight loss (%EWL) after LSG among the patients in the SMO group was not significantly different from that of patients who underwent other procedures. LSG was associated with a significantly lower success rate in terms of weight loss (%EWL ≥ 50%), in comparison to the weight loss at 1 year after LRYGB and at 2 years after LSG/DJB and LRYGB. Among the patients in the MO group, the %EWL and the rate of successful weight loss did not differ to a statistically significant extent. Conclusion This study demonstrated that in patients with SMO, LSG/DJB and LRYGB can achieve superior weight loss effects in comparison to LSG.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>28451928</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11695-017-2685-7</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-8923
ispartof Obesity surgery, 2017-10, Vol.27 (10), p.2537-2545
issn 0960-8923
1708-0428
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1893553850
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adult
Body Mass Index
Comparative studies
Female
Gastrectomy - adverse effects
Gastrectomy - methods
Gastric Bypass - adverse effects
Gastric Bypass - methods
Gastroplasty - adverse effects
Gastroplasty - methods
Humans
Laparoscopy
Laparoscopy - adverse effects
Laparoscopy - methods
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Metabolome
Middle Aged
Obesity
Obesity, Morbid - metabolism
Obesity, Morbid - surgery
Original Contributions
Retrospective Studies
Surgery
Surgical outcomes
Treatment Outcome
Weight control
Weight Loss
title A Comparison of the Bariatric Procedures that Are Performed in the Treatment of Super Morbid Obesity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T07%3A26%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparison%20of%20the%20Bariatric%20Procedures%20that%20Are%20Performed%20in%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Super%20Morbid%20Obesity&rft.jtitle=Obesity%20surgery&rft.au=Uno,%20Kohei&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2537&rft.epage=2545&rft.pages=2537-2545&rft.issn=0960-8923&rft.eissn=1708-0428&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11695-017-2685-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1940821864%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1940821864&rft_id=info:pmid/28451928&rfr_iscdi=true