Watching diagnoses develop: Eye movements reveal symptom processing during diagnostic reasoning

Finding a probable explanation for observed symptoms is a highly complex task that draws on information retrieval from memory. Recent research suggests that observed symptoms are interpreted in a way that maximizes coherence for a single likely explanation. This becomes particularly clear if symptom...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychonomic bulletin & review 2017-10, Vol.24 (5), p.1398-1412
Hauptverfasser: Scholz, Agnes, Krems, Josef F., Jahn, Georg
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1412
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1398
container_title Psychonomic bulletin & review
container_volume 24
creator Scholz, Agnes
Krems, Josef F.
Jahn, Georg
description Finding a probable explanation for observed symptoms is a highly complex task that draws on information retrieval from memory. Recent research suggests that observed symptoms are interpreted in a way that maximizes coherence for a single likely explanation. This becomes particularly clear if symptom sequences support more than one explanation. However, there are no existing process data available that allow coherence maximization to be traced in ambiguous diagnostic situations, where critical information has to be retrieved from memory. In this experiment, we applied memory indexing, an eye-tracking method that affords rich time-course information concerning memory-based cognitive processing during higher order thinking, to reveal symptom processing and the preferred interpretation of symptom sequences. Participants first learned information about causes and symptoms presented in spatial frames. Gaze allocation to emptied spatial frames during symptom processing and during the diagnostic response reflected the subjective status of hypotheses held in memory and the preferred interpretation of ambiguous symptoms. Memory indexing traced how the diagnostic decision developed and revealed instances of hypothesis change and biases in symptom processing. Memory indexing thus provided direct online evidence for coherence maximization in processing ambiguous information.
doi_str_mv 10.3758/s13423-017-1294-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1892334694</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1953816699</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-f04d6e2c518c801debf6c0ef9d7be521f6802c1f9305bf2a77dd3fd47010e8163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1rFTEUhoMotlZ_gBsZcONmNCdfk7iTUm2h4EZxGeYmJ3XKzGTMmSncf99cb5UiuMrh8LxvDg9jr4G_l522HwikErLl0LUgnGrtE3YKWkKrpeBP68yNa5206oS9ILrlnGvjzHN2IqxSykh1yvyPfg0_h_mmiUN_M2dCaiLe4ZiXj83FHpsp3-GE80pNqet-bGg_LWuemqXkgES_o1t51LAOobI95bkuX7JnqR8JXz28Z-z754tv55ft9dcvV-efrtugQK9t4ioaFEGDDZZDxF0ygWNysduhFpCM5SJAcpLrXRJ918UoU1QdB44WjDxj74699axfG9Lqp4ECjmM_Y97Ig3VCSmWcqujbf9DbvJW5XufBaVnbjHOVgiMVSiYqmPxShqkvew_cH-z7o31f7fuDfW9r5s1D87abMP5N_NFdAXEEaDkYw_Lo6_-23gOVtpDx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1953816699</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Watching diagnoses develop: Eye movements reveal symptom processing during diagnostic reasoning</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Scholz, Agnes ; Krems, Josef F. ; Jahn, Georg</creator><creatorcontrib>Scholz, Agnes ; Krems, Josef F. ; Jahn, Georg</creatorcontrib><description>Finding a probable explanation for observed symptoms is a highly complex task that draws on information retrieval from memory. Recent research suggests that observed symptoms are interpreted in a way that maximizes coherence for a single likely explanation. This becomes particularly clear if symptom sequences support more than one explanation. However, there are no existing process data available that allow coherence maximization to be traced in ambiguous diagnostic situations, where critical information has to be retrieved from memory. In this experiment, we applied memory indexing, an eye-tracking method that affords rich time-course information concerning memory-based cognitive processing during higher order thinking, to reveal symptom processing and the preferred interpretation of symptom sequences. Participants first learned information about causes and symptoms presented in spatial frames. Gaze allocation to emptied spatial frames during symptom processing and during the diagnostic response reflected the subjective status of hypotheses held in memory and the preferred interpretation of ambiguous symptoms. Memory indexing traced how the diagnostic decision developed and revealed instances of hypothesis change and biases in symptom processing. Memory indexing thus provided direct online evidence for coherence maximization in processing ambiguous information.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-9384</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5320</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/s13423-017-1294-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28444634</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cognitive Psychology ; Data processing ; Decision making ; Eye movements ; Eye Movements - physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; Information processing ; Male ; Memory ; Memory - physiology ; Psychology ; Social psychology ; Thinking - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review, 2017-10, Vol.24 (5), p.1398-1412</ispartof><rights>Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2017</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science &amp; Business Media Oct 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-f04d6e2c518c801debf6c0ef9d7be521f6802c1f9305bf2a77dd3fd47010e8163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-f04d6e2c518c801debf6c0ef9d7be521f6802c1f9305bf2a77dd3fd47010e8163</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/s13423-017-1294-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.3758/s13423-017-1294-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28444634$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scholz, Agnes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krems, Josef F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jahn, Georg</creatorcontrib><title>Watching diagnoses develop: Eye movements reveal symptom processing during diagnostic reasoning</title><title>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review</title><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><description>Finding a probable explanation for observed symptoms is a highly complex task that draws on information retrieval from memory. Recent research suggests that observed symptoms are interpreted in a way that maximizes coherence for a single likely explanation. This becomes particularly clear if symptom sequences support more than one explanation. However, there are no existing process data available that allow coherence maximization to be traced in ambiguous diagnostic situations, where critical information has to be retrieved from memory. In this experiment, we applied memory indexing, an eye-tracking method that affords rich time-course information concerning memory-based cognitive processing during higher order thinking, to reveal symptom processing and the preferred interpretation of symptom sequences. Participants first learned information about causes and symptoms presented in spatial frames. Gaze allocation to emptied spatial frames during symptom processing and during the diagnostic response reflected the subjective status of hypotheses held in memory and the preferred interpretation of ambiguous symptoms. Memory indexing traced how the diagnostic decision developed and revealed instances of hypothesis change and biases in symptom processing. Memory indexing thus provided direct online evidence for coherence maximization in processing ambiguous information.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Eye movements</subject><subject>Eye Movements - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory - physiology</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Thinking - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1069-9384</issn><issn>1531-5320</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1rFTEUhoMotlZ_gBsZcONmNCdfk7iTUm2h4EZxGeYmJ3XKzGTMmSncf99cb5UiuMrh8LxvDg9jr4G_l522HwikErLl0LUgnGrtE3YKWkKrpeBP68yNa5206oS9ILrlnGvjzHN2IqxSykh1yvyPfg0_h_mmiUN_M2dCaiLe4ZiXj83FHpsp3-GE80pNqet-bGg_LWuemqXkgES_o1t51LAOobI95bkuX7JnqR8JXz28Z-z754tv55ft9dcvV-efrtugQK9t4ioaFEGDDZZDxF0ygWNysduhFpCM5SJAcpLrXRJ918UoU1QdB44WjDxj74699axfG9Lqp4ECjmM_Y97Ig3VCSmWcqujbf9DbvJW5XufBaVnbjHOVgiMVSiYqmPxShqkvew_cH-z7o31f7fuDfW9r5s1D87abMP5N_NFdAXEEaDkYw_Lo6_-23gOVtpDx</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>Scholz, Agnes</creator><creator>Krems, Josef F.</creator><creator>Jahn, Georg</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>Watching diagnoses develop: Eye movements reveal symptom processing during diagnostic reasoning</title><author>Scholz, Agnes ; Krems, Josef F. ; Jahn, Georg</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-f04d6e2c518c801debf6c0ef9d7be521f6802c1f9305bf2a77dd3fd47010e8163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Eye movements</topic><topic>Eye Movements - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory - physiology</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Thinking - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scholz, Agnes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krems, Josef F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jahn, Georg</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scholz, Agnes</au><au>Krems, Josef F.</au><au>Jahn, Georg</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Watching diagnoses develop: Eye movements reveal symptom processing during diagnostic reasoning</atitle><jtitle>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review</jtitle><stitle>Psychon Bull Rev</stitle><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1398</spage><epage>1412</epage><pages>1398-1412</pages><issn>1069-9384</issn><eissn>1531-5320</eissn><abstract>Finding a probable explanation for observed symptoms is a highly complex task that draws on information retrieval from memory. Recent research suggests that observed symptoms are interpreted in a way that maximizes coherence for a single likely explanation. This becomes particularly clear if symptom sequences support more than one explanation. However, there are no existing process data available that allow coherence maximization to be traced in ambiguous diagnostic situations, where critical information has to be retrieved from memory. In this experiment, we applied memory indexing, an eye-tracking method that affords rich time-course information concerning memory-based cognitive processing during higher order thinking, to reveal symptom processing and the preferred interpretation of symptom sequences. Participants first learned information about causes and symptoms presented in spatial frames. Gaze allocation to emptied spatial frames during symptom processing and during the diagnostic response reflected the subjective status of hypotheses held in memory and the preferred interpretation of ambiguous symptoms. Memory indexing traced how the diagnostic decision developed and revealed instances of hypothesis change and biases in symptom processing. Memory indexing thus provided direct online evidence for coherence maximization in processing ambiguous information.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>28444634</pmid><doi>10.3758/s13423-017-1294-8</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1069-9384
ispartof Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2017-10, Vol.24 (5), p.1398-1412
issn 1069-9384
1531-5320
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1892334694
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adult
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Cognition & reasoning
Cognitive Psychology
Data processing
Decision making
Eye movements
Eye Movements - physiology
Female
Humans
Hypotheses
Information processing
Male
Memory
Memory - physiology
Psychology
Social psychology
Thinking - physiology
Young Adult
title Watching diagnoses develop: Eye movements reveal symptom processing during diagnostic reasoning
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T23%3A09%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Watching%20diagnoses%20develop:%20Eye%20movements%20reveal%20symptom%20processing%20during%20diagnostic%20reasoning&rft.jtitle=Psychonomic%20bulletin%20&%20review&rft.au=Scholz,%20Agnes&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1398&rft.epage=1412&rft.pages=1398-1412&rft.issn=1069-9384&rft.eissn=1531-5320&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/s13423-017-1294-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1953816699%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1953816699&rft_id=info:pmid/28444634&rfr_iscdi=true