Watching diagnoses develop: Eye movements reveal symptom processing during diagnostic reasoning
Finding a probable explanation for observed symptoms is a highly complex task that draws on information retrieval from memory. Recent research suggests that observed symptoms are interpreted in a way that maximizes coherence for a single likely explanation. This becomes particularly clear if symptom...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychonomic bulletin & review 2017-10, Vol.24 (5), p.1398-1412 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1412 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1398 |
container_title | Psychonomic bulletin & review |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Scholz, Agnes Krems, Josef F. Jahn, Georg |
description | Finding a probable explanation for observed symptoms is a highly complex task that draws on information retrieval from memory. Recent research suggests that observed symptoms are interpreted in a way that maximizes coherence for a single likely explanation. This becomes particularly clear if symptom sequences support more than one explanation. However, there are no existing process data available that allow coherence maximization to be traced in ambiguous diagnostic situations, where critical information has to be retrieved from memory. In this experiment, we applied memory indexing, an eye-tracking method that affords rich time-course information concerning memory-based cognitive processing during higher order thinking, to reveal symptom processing and the preferred interpretation of symptom sequences. Participants first learned information about causes and symptoms presented in spatial frames. Gaze allocation to emptied spatial frames during symptom processing and during the diagnostic response reflected the subjective status of hypotheses held in memory and the preferred interpretation of ambiguous symptoms. Memory indexing traced how the diagnostic decision developed and revealed instances of hypothesis change and biases in symptom processing. Memory indexing thus provided direct online evidence for coherence maximization in processing ambiguous information. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3758/s13423-017-1294-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1892334694</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1953816699</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-f04d6e2c518c801debf6c0ef9d7be521f6802c1f9305bf2a77dd3fd47010e8163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1rFTEUhoMotlZ_gBsZcONmNCdfk7iTUm2h4EZxGeYmJ3XKzGTMmSncf99cb5UiuMrh8LxvDg9jr4G_l522HwikErLl0LUgnGrtE3YKWkKrpeBP68yNa5206oS9ILrlnGvjzHN2IqxSykh1yvyPfg0_h_mmiUN_M2dCaiLe4ZiXj83FHpsp3-GE80pNqet-bGg_LWuemqXkgES_o1t51LAOobI95bkuX7JnqR8JXz28Z-z754tv55ft9dcvV-efrtugQK9t4ioaFEGDDZZDxF0ygWNysduhFpCM5SJAcpLrXRJ918UoU1QdB44WjDxj74699axfG9Lqp4ECjmM_Y97Ig3VCSmWcqujbf9DbvJW5XufBaVnbjHOVgiMVSiYqmPxShqkvew_cH-z7o31f7fuDfW9r5s1D87abMP5N_NFdAXEEaDkYw_Lo6_-23gOVtpDx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1953816699</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Watching diagnoses develop: Eye movements reveal symptom processing during diagnostic reasoning</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Scholz, Agnes ; Krems, Josef F. ; Jahn, Georg</creator><creatorcontrib>Scholz, Agnes ; Krems, Josef F. ; Jahn, Georg</creatorcontrib><description>Finding a probable explanation for observed symptoms is a highly complex task that draws on information retrieval from memory. Recent research suggests that observed symptoms are interpreted in a way that maximizes coherence for a single likely explanation. This becomes particularly clear if symptom sequences support more than one explanation. However, there are no existing process data available that allow coherence maximization to be traced in ambiguous diagnostic situations, where critical information has to be retrieved from memory. In this experiment, we applied memory indexing, an eye-tracking method that affords rich time-course information concerning memory-based cognitive processing during higher order thinking, to reveal symptom processing and the preferred interpretation of symptom sequences. Participants first learned information about causes and symptoms presented in spatial frames. Gaze allocation to emptied spatial frames during symptom processing and during the diagnostic response reflected the subjective status of hypotheses held in memory and the preferred interpretation of ambiguous symptoms. Memory indexing traced how the diagnostic decision developed and revealed instances of hypothesis change and biases in symptom processing. Memory indexing thus provided direct online evidence for coherence maximization in processing ambiguous information.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-9384</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5320</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/s13423-017-1294-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28444634</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cognitive Psychology ; Data processing ; Decision making ; Eye movements ; Eye Movements - physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; Information processing ; Male ; Memory ; Memory - physiology ; Psychology ; Social psychology ; Thinking - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2017-10, Vol.24 (5), p.1398-1412</ispartof><rights>Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2017</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science & Business Media Oct 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-f04d6e2c518c801debf6c0ef9d7be521f6802c1f9305bf2a77dd3fd47010e8163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-f04d6e2c518c801debf6c0ef9d7be521f6802c1f9305bf2a77dd3fd47010e8163</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/s13423-017-1294-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.3758/s13423-017-1294-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28444634$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scholz, Agnes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krems, Josef F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jahn, Georg</creatorcontrib><title>Watching diagnoses develop: Eye movements reveal symptom processing during diagnostic reasoning</title><title>Psychonomic bulletin & review</title><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><description>Finding a probable explanation for observed symptoms is a highly complex task that draws on information retrieval from memory. Recent research suggests that observed symptoms are interpreted in a way that maximizes coherence for a single likely explanation. This becomes particularly clear if symptom sequences support more than one explanation. However, there are no existing process data available that allow coherence maximization to be traced in ambiguous diagnostic situations, where critical information has to be retrieved from memory. In this experiment, we applied memory indexing, an eye-tracking method that affords rich time-course information concerning memory-based cognitive processing during higher order thinking, to reveal symptom processing and the preferred interpretation of symptom sequences. Participants first learned information about causes and symptoms presented in spatial frames. Gaze allocation to emptied spatial frames during symptom processing and during the diagnostic response reflected the subjective status of hypotheses held in memory and the preferred interpretation of ambiguous symptoms. Memory indexing traced how the diagnostic decision developed and revealed instances of hypothesis change and biases in symptom processing. Memory indexing thus provided direct online evidence for coherence maximization in processing ambiguous information.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Eye movements</subject><subject>Eye Movements - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory - physiology</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Thinking - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1069-9384</issn><issn>1531-5320</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1rFTEUhoMotlZ_gBsZcONmNCdfk7iTUm2h4EZxGeYmJ3XKzGTMmSncf99cb5UiuMrh8LxvDg9jr4G_l522HwikErLl0LUgnGrtE3YKWkKrpeBP68yNa5206oS9ILrlnGvjzHN2IqxSykh1yvyPfg0_h_mmiUN_M2dCaiLe4ZiXj83FHpsp3-GE80pNqet-bGg_LWuemqXkgES_o1t51LAOobI95bkuX7JnqR8JXz28Z-z754tv55ft9dcvV-efrtugQK9t4ioaFEGDDZZDxF0ygWNysduhFpCM5SJAcpLrXRJ918UoU1QdB44WjDxj74699axfG9Lqp4ECjmM_Y97Ig3VCSmWcqujbf9DbvJW5XufBaVnbjHOVgiMVSiYqmPxShqkvew_cH-z7o31f7fuDfW9r5s1D87abMP5N_NFdAXEEaDkYw_Lo6_-23gOVtpDx</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>Scholz, Agnes</creator><creator>Krems, Josef F.</creator><creator>Jahn, Georg</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>Watching diagnoses develop: Eye movements reveal symptom processing during diagnostic reasoning</title><author>Scholz, Agnes ; Krems, Josef F. ; Jahn, Georg</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-f04d6e2c518c801debf6c0ef9d7be521f6802c1f9305bf2a77dd3fd47010e8163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Eye movements</topic><topic>Eye Movements - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory - physiology</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Thinking - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scholz, Agnes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krems, Josef F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jahn, Georg</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychonomic bulletin & review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scholz, Agnes</au><au>Krems, Josef F.</au><au>Jahn, Georg</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Watching diagnoses develop: Eye movements reveal symptom processing during diagnostic reasoning</atitle><jtitle>Psychonomic bulletin & review</jtitle><stitle>Psychon Bull Rev</stitle><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1398</spage><epage>1412</epage><pages>1398-1412</pages><issn>1069-9384</issn><eissn>1531-5320</eissn><abstract>Finding a probable explanation for observed symptoms is a highly complex task that draws on information retrieval from memory. Recent research suggests that observed symptoms are interpreted in a way that maximizes coherence for a single likely explanation. This becomes particularly clear if symptom sequences support more than one explanation. However, there are no existing process data available that allow coherence maximization to be traced in ambiguous diagnostic situations, where critical information has to be retrieved from memory. In this experiment, we applied memory indexing, an eye-tracking method that affords rich time-course information concerning memory-based cognitive processing during higher order thinking, to reveal symptom processing and the preferred interpretation of symptom sequences. Participants first learned information about causes and symptoms presented in spatial frames. Gaze allocation to emptied spatial frames during symptom processing and during the diagnostic response reflected the subjective status of hypotheses held in memory and the preferred interpretation of ambiguous symptoms. Memory indexing traced how the diagnostic decision developed and revealed instances of hypothesis change and biases in symptom processing. Memory indexing thus provided direct online evidence for coherence maximization in processing ambiguous information.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>28444634</pmid><doi>10.3758/s13423-017-1294-8</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1069-9384 |
ispartof | Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2017-10, Vol.24 (5), p.1398-1412 |
issn | 1069-9384 1531-5320 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1892334694 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adult Behavioral Science and Psychology Cognition & reasoning Cognitive Psychology Data processing Decision making Eye movements Eye Movements - physiology Female Humans Hypotheses Information processing Male Memory Memory - physiology Psychology Social psychology Thinking - physiology Young Adult |
title | Watching diagnoses develop: Eye movements reveal symptom processing during diagnostic reasoning |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T23%3A09%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Watching%20diagnoses%20develop:%20Eye%20movements%20reveal%20symptom%20processing%20during%20diagnostic%20reasoning&rft.jtitle=Psychonomic%20bulletin%20&%20review&rft.au=Scholz,%20Agnes&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1398&rft.epage=1412&rft.pages=1398-1412&rft.issn=1069-9384&rft.eissn=1531-5320&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/s13423-017-1294-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1953816699%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1953816699&rft_id=info:pmid/28444634&rfr_iscdi=true |