A survey on abnormal uterine bleeding among radiographers with frequent MRI exposure using intrauterine contraceptive devices
Purpose Based on a previous case report of menometrorrhagia (prolonged/excessive uterine bleeding, occurring at irregular and/or frequent intervals) in MRI workers with intrauterine devices (IUDs), it was evaluated whether this association could be confirmed. Methods A survey was performed among 381...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Magnetic resonance in medicine 2018-02, Vol.79 (2), p.1083-1089 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1089 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 1083 |
container_title | Magnetic resonance in medicine |
container_volume | 79 |
creator | Huss, A. Schaap, K. Kromhout, H. |
description | Purpose
Based on a previous case report of menometrorrhagia (prolonged/excessive uterine bleeding, occurring at irregular and/or frequent intervals) in MRI workers with intrauterine devices (IUDs), it was evaluated whether this association could be confirmed.
Methods
A survey was performed among 381 female radiographers registered with their national association. Logistic regression was used to analyze associations of abnormal uterine bleeding with the frequency of working with MRI scanners, presence near the scanner/in the scanner room during image acquisition, and with scanner strength or type.
Results
A total of 68 women reported using IUDs, and 72 reported abnormal uterine bleeding. Compared with unexposed women not using IUDs, the odds ratio in women with IUDs working with MRI scanners was 2.09 (95% confidence interval 0.83–3.66). Associations were stronger if women working with MRI reported being present during image acquisition (odds ratio 3.43, 95% CI 1.26–9.34). Associations with scanner strength or type were not consistent.
Conclusions
Radiographers using IUDs who are occupationally exposed to stray fields from MRI scanners report abnormal uterine bleeding more often than their co‐workers without an IUD, or nonexposed co‐workers with an IUD. In particular, radiographers present inside the scanner room during image acquisition showed an increased risk. Magn Reson Med 79:1083–1089, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/mrm.26707 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1892334280</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1983892594</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-325f3c7c15fc0f34996e3d29135c567dc82d4946f7ebbefea7c42a66883c54203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1P3DAQhq2qqGyhh_6BylIv9BDWX4ntI0LQIrFCWsHZcpwJGCVxaicLe-C_19uFHipxmdFIzzwazYvQV0pOKSFs2cf-lFWSyA9oQUvGClZq8REtiBSk4FSLQ_Q5pUdCiNZSfEKHTAkhFGUL9HKG0xw3sMVhwLYeQuxth-cJoh8A1x1A44d7bPuQa7SND_fRjg8QE37y0wNuI_yeYZjwan2F4XkM2QZ4TrslP0zRvqlc2E0OxslvADew8Q7SMTpobZfgy2s_QneXF7fnv4rrm59X52fXheNKyYKzsuVOOlq2jrRcaF0Bb5imvHRlJRunWCO0qFoJdQ0tWOkEs1WlFHelYIQfoZO9d4whn5sm0_vkoOvsAGFOhirNOBdM7dDv_6GPYY5Dvs5QrXgG828z9WNPuRhSitCaMfrexq2hxOwyMTkT8zeTzH57Nc51D80_8i2EDCz3wJPvYPu-yazWq73yD7fYl80</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1983892594</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A survey on abnormal uterine bleeding among radiographers with frequent MRI exposure using intrauterine contraceptive devices</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><creator>Huss, A. ; Schaap, K. ; Kromhout, H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Huss, A. ; Schaap, K. ; Kromhout, H.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Based on a previous case report of menometrorrhagia (prolonged/excessive uterine bleeding, occurring at irregular and/or frequent intervals) in MRI workers with intrauterine devices (IUDs), it was evaluated whether this association could be confirmed.
Methods
A survey was performed among 381 female radiographers registered with their national association. Logistic regression was used to analyze associations of abnormal uterine bleeding with the frequency of working with MRI scanners, presence near the scanner/in the scanner room during image acquisition, and with scanner strength or type.
Results
A total of 68 women reported using IUDs, and 72 reported abnormal uterine bleeding. Compared with unexposed women not using IUDs, the odds ratio in women with IUDs working with MRI scanners was 2.09 (95% confidence interval 0.83–3.66). Associations were stronger if women working with MRI reported being present during image acquisition (odds ratio 3.43, 95% CI 1.26–9.34). Associations with scanner strength or type were not consistent.
Conclusions
Radiographers using IUDs who are occupationally exposed to stray fields from MRI scanners report abnormal uterine bleeding more often than their co‐workers without an IUD, or nonexposed co‐workers with an IUD. In particular, radiographers present inside the scanner room during image acquisition showed an increased risk. Magn Reson Med 79:1083–1089, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0740-3194</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2594</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26707</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28444812</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>abnormal uterine bleeding ; Adult ; Bleeding ; Confidence intervals ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Health Personnel - statistics & numerical data ; Hemorrhage ; Humans ; Hysterectomy ; Image acquisition ; intrauterine device ; Intrauterine devices ; Intrauterine Devices - statistics & numerical data ; IUD ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - adverse effects ; menorrhagia ; metrorrhagia ; Middle Aged ; MRI exposure ; Occupational exposure ; Occupational Exposure - analysis ; Occupational Exposure - statistics & numerical data ; Regression analysis ; Scanners ; Statistical analysis ; Uterine Hemorrhage - epidemiology ; Uterus ; Workers</subject><ispartof>Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2018-02, Vol.79 (2), p.1083-1089</ispartof><rights>2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine</rights><rights>2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.</rights><rights>2018 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-325f3c7c15fc0f34996e3d29135c567dc82d4946f7ebbefea7c42a66883c54203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-325f3c7c15fc0f34996e3d29135c567dc82d4946f7ebbefea7c42a66883c54203</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fmrm.26707$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fmrm.26707$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28444812$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huss, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaap, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kromhout, H.</creatorcontrib><title>A survey on abnormal uterine bleeding among radiographers with frequent MRI exposure using intrauterine contraceptive devices</title><title>Magnetic resonance in medicine</title><addtitle>Magn Reson Med</addtitle><description>Purpose
Based on a previous case report of menometrorrhagia (prolonged/excessive uterine bleeding, occurring at irregular and/or frequent intervals) in MRI workers with intrauterine devices (IUDs), it was evaluated whether this association could be confirmed.
Methods
A survey was performed among 381 female radiographers registered with their national association. Logistic regression was used to analyze associations of abnormal uterine bleeding with the frequency of working with MRI scanners, presence near the scanner/in the scanner room during image acquisition, and with scanner strength or type.
Results
A total of 68 women reported using IUDs, and 72 reported abnormal uterine bleeding. Compared with unexposed women not using IUDs, the odds ratio in women with IUDs working with MRI scanners was 2.09 (95% confidence interval 0.83–3.66). Associations were stronger if women working with MRI reported being present during image acquisition (odds ratio 3.43, 95% CI 1.26–9.34). Associations with scanner strength or type were not consistent.
Conclusions
Radiographers using IUDs who are occupationally exposed to stray fields from MRI scanners report abnormal uterine bleeding more often than their co‐workers without an IUD, or nonexposed co‐workers with an IUD. In particular, radiographers present inside the scanner room during image acquisition showed an increased risk. Magn Reson Med 79:1083–1089, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.</description><subject>abnormal uterine bleeding</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bleeding</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Personnel - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Hemorrhage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysterectomy</subject><subject>Image acquisition</subject><subject>intrauterine device</subject><subject>Intrauterine devices</subject><subject>Intrauterine Devices - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>IUD</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - adverse effects</subject><subject>menorrhagia</subject><subject>metrorrhagia</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>MRI exposure</subject><subject>Occupational exposure</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - analysis</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Scanners</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Uterine Hemorrhage - epidemiology</subject><subject>Uterus</subject><subject>Workers</subject><issn>0740-3194</issn><issn>1522-2594</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1P3DAQhq2qqGyhh_6BylIv9BDWX4ntI0LQIrFCWsHZcpwJGCVxaicLe-C_19uFHipxmdFIzzwazYvQV0pOKSFs2cf-lFWSyA9oQUvGClZq8REtiBSk4FSLQ_Q5pUdCiNZSfEKHTAkhFGUL9HKG0xw3sMVhwLYeQuxth-cJoh8A1x1A44d7bPuQa7SND_fRjg8QE37y0wNuI_yeYZjwan2F4XkM2QZ4TrslP0zRvqlc2E0OxslvADew8Q7SMTpobZfgy2s_QneXF7fnv4rrm59X52fXheNKyYKzsuVOOlq2jrRcaF0Bb5imvHRlJRunWCO0qFoJdQ0tWOkEs1WlFHelYIQfoZO9d4whn5sm0_vkoOvsAGFOhirNOBdM7dDv_6GPYY5Dvs5QrXgG828z9WNPuRhSitCaMfrexq2hxOwyMTkT8zeTzH57Nc51D80_8i2EDCz3wJPvYPu-yazWq73yD7fYl80</recordid><startdate>201802</startdate><enddate>201802</enddate><creator>Huss, A.</creator><creator>Schaap, K.</creator><creator>Kromhout, H.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201802</creationdate><title>A survey on abnormal uterine bleeding among radiographers with frequent MRI exposure using intrauterine contraceptive devices</title><author>Huss, A. ; Schaap, K. ; Kromhout, H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-325f3c7c15fc0f34996e3d29135c567dc82d4946f7ebbefea7c42a66883c54203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>abnormal uterine bleeding</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bleeding</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Personnel - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Hemorrhage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysterectomy</topic><topic>Image acquisition</topic><topic>intrauterine device</topic><topic>Intrauterine devices</topic><topic>Intrauterine Devices - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>IUD</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - adverse effects</topic><topic>menorrhagia</topic><topic>metrorrhagia</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>MRI exposure</topic><topic>Occupational exposure</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - analysis</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Scanners</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Uterine Hemorrhage - epidemiology</topic><topic>Uterus</topic><topic>Workers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huss, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaap, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kromhout, H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huss, A.</au><au>Schaap, K.</au><au>Kromhout, H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A survey on abnormal uterine bleeding among radiographers with frequent MRI exposure using intrauterine contraceptive devices</atitle><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Magn Reson Med</addtitle><date>2018-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1083</spage><epage>1089</epage><pages>1083-1089</pages><issn>0740-3194</issn><eissn>1522-2594</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Based on a previous case report of menometrorrhagia (prolonged/excessive uterine bleeding, occurring at irregular and/or frequent intervals) in MRI workers with intrauterine devices (IUDs), it was evaluated whether this association could be confirmed.
Methods
A survey was performed among 381 female radiographers registered with their national association. Logistic regression was used to analyze associations of abnormal uterine bleeding with the frequency of working with MRI scanners, presence near the scanner/in the scanner room during image acquisition, and with scanner strength or type.
Results
A total of 68 women reported using IUDs, and 72 reported abnormal uterine bleeding. Compared with unexposed women not using IUDs, the odds ratio in women with IUDs working with MRI scanners was 2.09 (95% confidence interval 0.83–3.66). Associations were stronger if women working with MRI reported being present during image acquisition (odds ratio 3.43, 95% CI 1.26–9.34). Associations with scanner strength or type were not consistent.
Conclusions
Radiographers using IUDs who are occupationally exposed to stray fields from MRI scanners report abnormal uterine bleeding more often than their co‐workers without an IUD, or nonexposed co‐workers with an IUD. In particular, radiographers present inside the scanner room during image acquisition showed an increased risk. Magn Reson Med 79:1083–1089, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28444812</pmid><doi>10.1002/mrm.26707</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0740-3194 |
ispartof | Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2018-02, Vol.79 (2), p.1083-1089 |
issn | 0740-3194 1522-2594 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1892334280 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals; Wiley Free Content |
subjects | abnormal uterine bleeding Adult Bleeding Confidence intervals Cross-Sectional Studies Female Health Personnel - statistics & numerical data Hemorrhage Humans Hysterectomy Image acquisition intrauterine device Intrauterine devices Intrauterine Devices - statistics & numerical data IUD Magnetic resonance imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging - adverse effects menorrhagia metrorrhagia Middle Aged MRI exposure Occupational exposure Occupational Exposure - analysis Occupational Exposure - statistics & numerical data Regression analysis Scanners Statistical analysis Uterine Hemorrhage - epidemiology Uterus Workers |
title | A survey on abnormal uterine bleeding among radiographers with frequent MRI exposure using intrauterine contraceptive devices |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T12%3A27%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20survey%20on%20abnormal%20uterine%20bleeding%20among%20radiographers%20with%20frequent%20MRI%20exposure%20using%20intrauterine%20contraceptive%20devices&rft.jtitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Huss,%20A.&rft.date=2018-02&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1083&rft.epage=1089&rft.pages=1083-1089&rft.issn=0740-3194&rft.eissn=1522-2594&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mrm.26707&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1983892594%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1983892594&rft_id=info:pmid/28444812&rfr_iscdi=true |