A survey on abnormal uterine bleeding among radiographers with frequent MRI exposure using intrauterine contraceptive devices

Purpose Based on a previous case report of menometrorrhagia (prolonged/excessive uterine bleeding, occurring at irregular and/or frequent intervals) in MRI workers with intrauterine devices (IUDs), it was evaluated whether this association could be confirmed. Methods A survey was performed among 381...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Magnetic resonance in medicine 2018-02, Vol.79 (2), p.1083-1089
Hauptverfasser: Huss, A., Schaap, K., Kromhout, H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1089
container_issue 2
container_start_page 1083
container_title Magnetic resonance in medicine
container_volume 79
creator Huss, A.
Schaap, K.
Kromhout, H.
description Purpose Based on a previous case report of menometrorrhagia (prolonged/excessive uterine bleeding, occurring at irregular and/or frequent intervals) in MRI workers with intrauterine devices (IUDs), it was evaluated whether this association could be confirmed. Methods A survey was performed among 381 female radiographers registered with their national association. Logistic regression was used to analyze associations of abnormal uterine bleeding with the frequency of working with MRI scanners, presence near the scanner/in the scanner room during image acquisition, and with scanner strength or type. Results A total of 68 women reported using IUDs, and 72 reported abnormal uterine bleeding. Compared with unexposed women not using IUDs, the odds ratio in women with IUDs working with MRI scanners was 2.09 (95% confidence interval 0.83–3.66). Associations were stronger if women working with MRI reported being present during image acquisition (odds ratio 3.43, 95% CI 1.26–9.34). Associations with scanner strength or type were not consistent. Conclusions Radiographers using IUDs who are occupationally exposed to stray fields from MRI scanners report abnormal uterine bleeding more often than their co‐workers without an IUD, or nonexposed co‐workers with an IUD. In particular, radiographers present inside the scanner room during image acquisition showed an increased risk. Magn Reson Med 79:1083–1089, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/mrm.26707
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1892334280</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1983892594</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-325f3c7c15fc0f34996e3d29135c567dc82d4946f7ebbefea7c42a66883c54203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1P3DAQhq2qqGyhh_6BylIv9BDWX4ntI0LQIrFCWsHZcpwJGCVxaicLe-C_19uFHipxmdFIzzwazYvQV0pOKSFs2cf-lFWSyA9oQUvGClZq8REtiBSk4FSLQ_Q5pUdCiNZSfEKHTAkhFGUL9HKG0xw3sMVhwLYeQuxth-cJoh8A1x1A44d7bPuQa7SND_fRjg8QE37y0wNuI_yeYZjwan2F4XkM2QZ4TrslP0zRvqlc2E0OxslvADew8Q7SMTpobZfgy2s_QneXF7fnv4rrm59X52fXheNKyYKzsuVOOlq2jrRcaF0Bb5imvHRlJRunWCO0qFoJdQ0tWOkEs1WlFHelYIQfoZO9d4whn5sm0_vkoOvsAGFOhirNOBdM7dDv_6GPYY5Dvs5QrXgG828z9WNPuRhSitCaMfrexq2hxOwyMTkT8zeTzH57Nc51D80_8i2EDCz3wJPvYPu-yazWq73yD7fYl80</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1983892594</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A survey on abnormal uterine bleeding among radiographers with frequent MRI exposure using intrauterine contraceptive devices</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><creator>Huss, A. ; Schaap, K. ; Kromhout, H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Huss, A. ; Schaap, K. ; Kromhout, H.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Based on a previous case report of menometrorrhagia (prolonged/excessive uterine bleeding, occurring at irregular and/or frequent intervals) in MRI workers with intrauterine devices (IUDs), it was evaluated whether this association could be confirmed. Methods A survey was performed among 381 female radiographers registered with their national association. Logistic regression was used to analyze associations of abnormal uterine bleeding with the frequency of working with MRI scanners, presence near the scanner/in the scanner room during image acquisition, and with scanner strength or type. Results A total of 68 women reported using IUDs, and 72 reported abnormal uterine bleeding. Compared with unexposed women not using IUDs, the odds ratio in women with IUDs working with MRI scanners was 2.09 (95% confidence interval 0.83–3.66). Associations were stronger if women working with MRI reported being present during image acquisition (odds ratio 3.43, 95% CI 1.26–9.34). Associations with scanner strength or type were not consistent. Conclusions Radiographers using IUDs who are occupationally exposed to stray fields from MRI scanners report abnormal uterine bleeding more often than their co‐workers without an IUD, or nonexposed co‐workers with an IUD. In particular, radiographers present inside the scanner room during image acquisition showed an increased risk. Magn Reson Med 79:1083–1089, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0740-3194</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2594</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26707</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28444812</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>abnormal uterine bleeding ; Adult ; Bleeding ; Confidence intervals ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Health Personnel - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Hemorrhage ; Humans ; Hysterectomy ; Image acquisition ; intrauterine device ; Intrauterine devices ; Intrauterine Devices - statistics &amp; numerical data ; IUD ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - adverse effects ; menorrhagia ; metrorrhagia ; Middle Aged ; MRI exposure ; Occupational exposure ; Occupational Exposure - analysis ; Occupational Exposure - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Regression analysis ; Scanners ; Statistical analysis ; Uterine Hemorrhage - epidemiology ; Uterus ; Workers</subject><ispartof>Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2018-02, Vol.79 (2), p.1083-1089</ispartof><rights>2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine</rights><rights>2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.</rights><rights>2018 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-325f3c7c15fc0f34996e3d29135c567dc82d4946f7ebbefea7c42a66883c54203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-325f3c7c15fc0f34996e3d29135c567dc82d4946f7ebbefea7c42a66883c54203</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fmrm.26707$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fmrm.26707$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28444812$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huss, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaap, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kromhout, H.</creatorcontrib><title>A survey on abnormal uterine bleeding among radiographers with frequent MRI exposure using intrauterine contraceptive devices</title><title>Magnetic resonance in medicine</title><addtitle>Magn Reson Med</addtitle><description>Purpose Based on a previous case report of menometrorrhagia (prolonged/excessive uterine bleeding, occurring at irregular and/or frequent intervals) in MRI workers with intrauterine devices (IUDs), it was evaluated whether this association could be confirmed. Methods A survey was performed among 381 female radiographers registered with their national association. Logistic regression was used to analyze associations of abnormal uterine bleeding with the frequency of working with MRI scanners, presence near the scanner/in the scanner room during image acquisition, and with scanner strength or type. Results A total of 68 women reported using IUDs, and 72 reported abnormal uterine bleeding. Compared with unexposed women not using IUDs, the odds ratio in women with IUDs working with MRI scanners was 2.09 (95% confidence interval 0.83–3.66). Associations were stronger if women working with MRI reported being present during image acquisition (odds ratio 3.43, 95% CI 1.26–9.34). Associations with scanner strength or type were not consistent. Conclusions Radiographers using IUDs who are occupationally exposed to stray fields from MRI scanners report abnormal uterine bleeding more often than their co‐workers without an IUD, or nonexposed co‐workers with an IUD. In particular, radiographers present inside the scanner room during image acquisition showed an increased risk. Magn Reson Med 79:1083–1089, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.</description><subject>abnormal uterine bleeding</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bleeding</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Personnel - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Hemorrhage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysterectomy</subject><subject>Image acquisition</subject><subject>intrauterine device</subject><subject>Intrauterine devices</subject><subject>Intrauterine Devices - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>IUD</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - adverse effects</subject><subject>menorrhagia</subject><subject>metrorrhagia</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>MRI exposure</subject><subject>Occupational exposure</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - analysis</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Scanners</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Uterine Hemorrhage - epidemiology</subject><subject>Uterus</subject><subject>Workers</subject><issn>0740-3194</issn><issn>1522-2594</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1P3DAQhq2qqGyhh_6BylIv9BDWX4ntI0LQIrFCWsHZcpwJGCVxaicLe-C_19uFHipxmdFIzzwazYvQV0pOKSFs2cf-lFWSyA9oQUvGClZq8REtiBSk4FSLQ_Q5pUdCiNZSfEKHTAkhFGUL9HKG0xw3sMVhwLYeQuxth-cJoh8A1x1A44d7bPuQa7SND_fRjg8QE37y0wNuI_yeYZjwan2F4XkM2QZ4TrslP0zRvqlc2E0OxslvADew8Q7SMTpobZfgy2s_QneXF7fnv4rrm59X52fXheNKyYKzsuVOOlq2jrRcaF0Bb5imvHRlJRunWCO0qFoJdQ0tWOkEs1WlFHelYIQfoZO9d4whn5sm0_vkoOvsAGFOhirNOBdM7dDv_6GPYY5Dvs5QrXgG828z9WNPuRhSitCaMfrexq2hxOwyMTkT8zeTzH57Nc51D80_8i2EDCz3wJPvYPu-yazWq73yD7fYl80</recordid><startdate>201802</startdate><enddate>201802</enddate><creator>Huss, A.</creator><creator>Schaap, K.</creator><creator>Kromhout, H.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201802</creationdate><title>A survey on abnormal uterine bleeding among radiographers with frequent MRI exposure using intrauterine contraceptive devices</title><author>Huss, A. ; Schaap, K. ; Kromhout, H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-325f3c7c15fc0f34996e3d29135c567dc82d4946f7ebbefea7c42a66883c54203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>abnormal uterine bleeding</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bleeding</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Personnel - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Hemorrhage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysterectomy</topic><topic>Image acquisition</topic><topic>intrauterine device</topic><topic>Intrauterine devices</topic><topic>Intrauterine Devices - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>IUD</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - adverse effects</topic><topic>menorrhagia</topic><topic>metrorrhagia</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>MRI exposure</topic><topic>Occupational exposure</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - analysis</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Scanners</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Uterine Hemorrhage - epidemiology</topic><topic>Uterus</topic><topic>Workers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huss, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaap, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kromhout, H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huss, A.</au><au>Schaap, K.</au><au>Kromhout, H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A survey on abnormal uterine bleeding among radiographers with frequent MRI exposure using intrauterine contraceptive devices</atitle><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Magn Reson Med</addtitle><date>2018-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1083</spage><epage>1089</epage><pages>1083-1089</pages><issn>0740-3194</issn><eissn>1522-2594</eissn><abstract>Purpose Based on a previous case report of menometrorrhagia (prolonged/excessive uterine bleeding, occurring at irregular and/or frequent intervals) in MRI workers with intrauterine devices (IUDs), it was evaluated whether this association could be confirmed. Methods A survey was performed among 381 female radiographers registered with their national association. Logistic regression was used to analyze associations of abnormal uterine bleeding with the frequency of working with MRI scanners, presence near the scanner/in the scanner room during image acquisition, and with scanner strength or type. Results A total of 68 women reported using IUDs, and 72 reported abnormal uterine bleeding. Compared with unexposed women not using IUDs, the odds ratio in women with IUDs working with MRI scanners was 2.09 (95% confidence interval 0.83–3.66). Associations were stronger if women working with MRI reported being present during image acquisition (odds ratio 3.43, 95% CI 1.26–9.34). Associations with scanner strength or type were not consistent. Conclusions Radiographers using IUDs who are occupationally exposed to stray fields from MRI scanners report abnormal uterine bleeding more often than their co‐workers without an IUD, or nonexposed co‐workers with an IUD. In particular, radiographers present inside the scanner room during image acquisition showed an increased risk. Magn Reson Med 79:1083–1089, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28444812</pmid><doi>10.1002/mrm.26707</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0740-3194
ispartof Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2018-02, Vol.79 (2), p.1083-1089
issn 0740-3194
1522-2594
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1892334280
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals; Wiley Free Content
subjects abnormal uterine bleeding
Adult
Bleeding
Confidence intervals
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Health Personnel - statistics & numerical data
Hemorrhage
Humans
Hysterectomy
Image acquisition
intrauterine device
Intrauterine devices
Intrauterine Devices - statistics & numerical data
IUD
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - adverse effects
menorrhagia
metrorrhagia
Middle Aged
MRI exposure
Occupational exposure
Occupational Exposure - analysis
Occupational Exposure - statistics & numerical data
Regression analysis
Scanners
Statistical analysis
Uterine Hemorrhage - epidemiology
Uterus
Workers
title A survey on abnormal uterine bleeding among radiographers with frequent MRI exposure using intrauterine contraceptive devices
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T12%3A27%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20survey%20on%20abnormal%20uterine%20bleeding%20among%20radiographers%20with%20frequent%20MRI%20exposure%20using%20intrauterine%20contraceptive%20devices&rft.jtitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Huss,%20A.&rft.date=2018-02&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1083&rft.epage=1089&rft.pages=1083-1089&rft.issn=0740-3194&rft.eissn=1522-2594&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mrm.26707&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1983892594%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1983892594&rft_id=info:pmid/28444812&rfr_iscdi=true