The Relationship between Co‐rumination and Internalizing Problems: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis

Co‐rumination refers to the process of engaging in repeated discussion of personal problems in dyadic relationships. The current systematic review and meta‐analysis provided an evaluation of the relationship between co‐rumination and internalizing problems in children, adolescents and young adults,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical psychology and psychotherapy 2017-03, Vol.24 (2), p.512-527
Hauptverfasser: Spendelow, Jason S., Simonds, Laura M., Avery, Rachel E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 527
container_issue 2
container_start_page 512
container_title Clinical psychology and psychotherapy
container_volume 24
creator Spendelow, Jason S.
Simonds, Laura M.
Avery, Rachel E.
description Co‐rumination refers to the process of engaging in repeated discussion of personal problems in dyadic relationships. The current systematic review and meta‐analysis provided an evaluation of the relationship between co‐rumination and internalizing problems in children, adolescents and young adults, along with an investigation of potential moderator variables. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they quantitatively assessed the relationship between co‐rumination and depression, anxiety and/or internalizing problems using validated measures. An electronic search was conducted in PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, Medline, Scopus and the Cochrane Library database of systematic reviews for studies published since 2002. In addition, unpublished studies were located by contacting authors in the field and by online searches of dissertation databases. Thirty‐eight studies were deemed eligible for inclusion comprising a total of 12 829 community‐based participants. A random‐effects model was employed in the analysis, and effect sizes were obtained exclusively from cross‐sectional data. Small to moderate effect sizes were found across four outcomes representing internalizing problems (mean corrected correlation range 0.14 to 0.26), with no significant variability across these variables. Female participants were found to score significantly higher on measures of co‐rumination compared with males (d = −0.55). Moderator analyses revealed mixed findings. No significant effects were found for age, gender or publication status. A significant effect was found for co‐rumination questionnaire version used (p = 0.05), and a marginal effect found for co‐rumination partner (same‐sex best friend versus other confidants; p = 0.08). These findings indicate that co‐rumination may have a modest but significant association with internalizing problems. The implications of these findings and directions for further research are discussed. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Key Practitioner Message Co‐rumination has maladaptive (repetitive, unproductive discussion of problems) components, but also shows an association with friendship satisfaction. The current review found that co‐rumination has small‐moderate association with depression and anxiety. Practitioners should be aware of the way in which people discuss affective distress with others.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cpp.2023
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1891886351</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1826695835</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4163-ab88e2c9a6a3ec2aef50a6ae68ae81d8fcb019dd1bb1d296fd617822bf74f0723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkdtKw0AQhhdRbK2CTyABb7xJ3d00e_CuFA-FikXrddgkE7slJ7OJpV75CD6jT-KmrQqC4NUMzDcfw_wIHRPcJxjT86gs-xRTbwd1CZbSxYLL3bZnnutJ6XfQgTELjDHngu-jDuWU-JIPuiidzcG5h1TVusjNXJdOCPUSIHdGxcfbe9VkOl_PHJXHzjivocpVql91_uRMqyJMITMXztB5WJkaMktG1vaiYbnmb6FW1qLsyspoc4j2EpUaONrWHnq8upyNbtzJ3fV4NJy40YDYi1UoBNBIKqY8iKiCxMe2ByYUCBKLJAoxkXFMwpDEVLIkZoQLSsOEDxLMqddDZxtvWRXPDZg6yLSJIE1VDkVjAiIkEYJ5PvkHShmTvvB8i57-QhdF036jpQTzfUoY_xFGVWFMBUlQVjpT1SogOGjDCmxYQRuWRU-2wibMIP4Gv9KxgLsBljqF1Z-iYDSdroWfoxmgGA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1886552167</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Relationship between Co‐rumination and Internalizing Problems: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Spendelow, Jason S. ; Simonds, Laura M. ; Avery, Rachel E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Spendelow, Jason S. ; Simonds, Laura M. ; Avery, Rachel E.</creatorcontrib><description>Co‐rumination refers to the process of engaging in repeated discussion of personal problems in dyadic relationships. The current systematic review and meta‐analysis provided an evaluation of the relationship between co‐rumination and internalizing problems in children, adolescents and young adults, along with an investigation of potential moderator variables. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they quantitatively assessed the relationship between co‐rumination and depression, anxiety and/or internalizing problems using validated measures. An electronic search was conducted in PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, Medline, Scopus and the Cochrane Library database of systematic reviews for studies published since 2002. In addition, unpublished studies were located by contacting authors in the field and by online searches of dissertation databases. Thirty‐eight studies were deemed eligible for inclusion comprising a total of 12 829 community‐based participants. A random‐effects model was employed in the analysis, and effect sizes were obtained exclusively from cross‐sectional data. Small to moderate effect sizes were found across four outcomes representing internalizing problems (mean corrected correlation range 0.14 to 0.26), with no significant variability across these variables. Female participants were found to score significantly higher on measures of co‐rumination compared with males (d = −0.55). Moderator analyses revealed mixed findings. No significant effects were found for age, gender or publication status. A significant effect was found for co‐rumination questionnaire version used (p = 0.05), and a marginal effect found for co‐rumination partner (same‐sex best friend versus other confidants; p = 0.08). These findings indicate that co‐rumination may have a modest but significant association with internalizing problems. The implications of these findings and directions for further research are discussed. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd. Key Practitioner Message Co‐rumination has maladaptive (repetitive, unproductive discussion of problems) components, but also shows an association with friendship satisfaction. The current review found that co‐rumination has small‐moderate association with depression and anxiety. Practitioners should be aware of the way in which people discuss affective distress with others.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1063-3995</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0879</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cpp.2023</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27215974</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CPPSEO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley and Sons, Limited</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Anxiety ; Child ; Co‐rumination ; Depression ; Female ; Friends - psychology ; Humans ; Internal-External Control ; Interpersonal Relations ; Male ; Meta‐analysis ; Sex Factors ; Social Behavior ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Systematic review ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Clinical psychology and psychotherapy, 2017-03, Vol.24 (2), p.512-527</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4163-ab88e2c9a6a3ec2aef50a6ae68ae81d8fcb019dd1bb1d296fd617822bf74f0723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4163-ab88e2c9a6a3ec2aef50a6ae68ae81d8fcb019dd1bb1d296fd617822bf74f0723</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcpp.2023$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcpp.2023$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27215974$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spendelow, Jason S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simonds, Laura M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avery, Rachel E.</creatorcontrib><title>The Relationship between Co‐rumination and Internalizing Problems: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis</title><title>Clinical psychology and psychotherapy</title><addtitle>Clin Psychol Psychother</addtitle><description>Co‐rumination refers to the process of engaging in repeated discussion of personal problems in dyadic relationships. The current systematic review and meta‐analysis provided an evaluation of the relationship between co‐rumination and internalizing problems in children, adolescents and young adults, along with an investigation of potential moderator variables. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they quantitatively assessed the relationship between co‐rumination and depression, anxiety and/or internalizing problems using validated measures. An electronic search was conducted in PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, Medline, Scopus and the Cochrane Library database of systematic reviews for studies published since 2002. In addition, unpublished studies were located by contacting authors in the field and by online searches of dissertation databases. Thirty‐eight studies were deemed eligible for inclusion comprising a total of 12 829 community‐based participants. A random‐effects model was employed in the analysis, and effect sizes were obtained exclusively from cross‐sectional data. Small to moderate effect sizes were found across four outcomes representing internalizing problems (mean corrected correlation range 0.14 to 0.26), with no significant variability across these variables. Female participants were found to score significantly higher on measures of co‐rumination compared with males (d = −0.55). Moderator analyses revealed mixed findings. No significant effects were found for age, gender or publication status. A significant effect was found for co‐rumination questionnaire version used (p = 0.05), and a marginal effect found for co‐rumination partner (same‐sex best friend versus other confidants; p = 0.08). These findings indicate that co‐rumination may have a modest but significant association with internalizing problems. The implications of these findings and directions for further research are discussed. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd. Key Practitioner Message Co‐rumination has maladaptive (repetitive, unproductive discussion of problems) components, but also shows an association with friendship satisfaction. The current review found that co‐rumination has small‐moderate association with depression and anxiety. Practitioners should be aware of the way in which people discuss affective distress with others.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Co‐rumination</subject><subject>Depression</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Friends - psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal-External Control</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Meta‐analysis</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Social Behavior</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1063-3995</issn><issn>1099-0879</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkdtKw0AQhhdRbK2CTyABb7xJ3d00e_CuFA-FikXrddgkE7slJ7OJpV75CD6jT-KmrQqC4NUMzDcfw_wIHRPcJxjT86gs-xRTbwd1CZbSxYLL3bZnnutJ6XfQgTELjDHngu-jDuWU-JIPuiidzcG5h1TVusjNXJdOCPUSIHdGxcfbe9VkOl_PHJXHzjivocpVql91_uRMqyJMITMXztB5WJkaMktG1vaiYbnmb6FW1qLsyspoc4j2EpUaONrWHnq8upyNbtzJ3fV4NJy40YDYi1UoBNBIKqY8iKiCxMe2ByYUCBKLJAoxkXFMwpDEVLIkZoQLSsOEDxLMqddDZxtvWRXPDZg6yLSJIE1VDkVjAiIkEYJ5PvkHShmTvvB8i57-QhdF036jpQTzfUoY_xFGVWFMBUlQVjpT1SogOGjDCmxYQRuWRU-2wibMIP4Gv9KxgLsBljqF1Z-iYDSdroWfoxmgGA</recordid><startdate>201703</startdate><enddate>201703</enddate><creator>Spendelow, Jason S.</creator><creator>Simonds, Laura M.</creator><creator>Avery, Rachel E.</creator><general>John Wiley and Sons, Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201703</creationdate><title>The Relationship between Co‐rumination and Internalizing Problems: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis</title><author>Spendelow, Jason S. ; Simonds, Laura M. ; Avery, Rachel E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4163-ab88e2c9a6a3ec2aef50a6ae68ae81d8fcb019dd1bb1d296fd617822bf74f0723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Co‐rumination</topic><topic>Depression</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Friends - psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal-External Control</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Meta‐analysis</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Social Behavior</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spendelow, Jason S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simonds, Laura M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avery, Rachel E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical psychology and psychotherapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spendelow, Jason S.</au><au>Simonds, Laura M.</au><au>Avery, Rachel E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Relationship between Co‐rumination and Internalizing Problems: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis</atitle><jtitle>Clinical psychology and psychotherapy</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Psychol Psychother</addtitle><date>2017-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>512</spage><epage>527</epage><pages>512-527</pages><issn>1063-3995</issn><eissn>1099-0879</eissn><coden>CPPSEO</coden><abstract>Co‐rumination refers to the process of engaging in repeated discussion of personal problems in dyadic relationships. The current systematic review and meta‐analysis provided an evaluation of the relationship between co‐rumination and internalizing problems in children, adolescents and young adults, along with an investigation of potential moderator variables. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they quantitatively assessed the relationship between co‐rumination and depression, anxiety and/or internalizing problems using validated measures. An electronic search was conducted in PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, Medline, Scopus and the Cochrane Library database of systematic reviews for studies published since 2002. In addition, unpublished studies were located by contacting authors in the field and by online searches of dissertation databases. Thirty‐eight studies were deemed eligible for inclusion comprising a total of 12 829 community‐based participants. A random‐effects model was employed in the analysis, and effect sizes were obtained exclusively from cross‐sectional data. Small to moderate effect sizes were found across four outcomes representing internalizing problems (mean corrected correlation range 0.14 to 0.26), with no significant variability across these variables. Female participants were found to score significantly higher on measures of co‐rumination compared with males (d = −0.55). Moderator analyses revealed mixed findings. No significant effects were found for age, gender or publication status. A significant effect was found for co‐rumination questionnaire version used (p = 0.05), and a marginal effect found for co‐rumination partner (same‐sex best friend versus other confidants; p = 0.08). These findings indicate that co‐rumination may have a modest but significant association with internalizing problems. The implications of these findings and directions for further research are discussed. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd. Key Practitioner Message Co‐rumination has maladaptive (repetitive, unproductive discussion of problems) components, but also shows an association with friendship satisfaction. The current review found that co‐rumination has small‐moderate association with depression and anxiety. Practitioners should be aware of the way in which people discuss affective distress with others.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley and Sons, Limited</pub><pmid>27215974</pmid><doi>10.1002/cpp.2023</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1063-3995
ispartof Clinical psychology and psychotherapy, 2017-03, Vol.24 (2), p.512-527
issn 1063-3995
1099-0879
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1891886351
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Anxiety
Child
Co‐rumination
Depression
Female
Friends - psychology
Humans
Internal-External Control
Interpersonal Relations
Male
Meta‐analysis
Sex Factors
Social Behavior
Surveys and Questionnaires
Systematic review
Young Adult
title The Relationship between Co‐rumination and Internalizing Problems: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T03%3A26%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Relationship%20between%20Co%E2%80%90rumination%20and%20Internalizing%20Problems:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20psychology%20and%20psychotherapy&rft.au=Spendelow,%20Jason%20S.&rft.date=2017-03&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=512&rft.epage=527&rft.pages=512-527&rft.issn=1063-3995&rft.eissn=1099-0879&rft.coden=CPPSEO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cpp.2023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1826695835%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1886552167&rft_id=info:pmid/27215974&rfr_iscdi=true