The Effect of Polymerization Methods and Fiber Types on the Mechanical Behavior of Fiber‐Reinforced Resin‐Based Composites
Purpose Glass fibers were introduced to increase the fracture resistance of resin‐based composites restorations; however, the poor polymerization between fibers and resin‐based composite were sometimes noted and can cause debonding and failure. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of prosthodontics 2017-04, Vol.26 (3), p.230-237 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 237 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 230 |
container_title | Journal of prosthodontics |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Huang, Nan‐Chieh Bottino, Marco C. Levon, John A. Chu, Tien‐Min G. |
description | Purpose
Glass fibers were introduced to increase the fracture resistance of resin‐based composites restorations; however, the poor polymerization between fibers and resin‐based composite were sometimes noted and can cause debonding and failure. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of different polymerization methods as well as fiber types on the mechanical behavior of fiber‐reinforced resin‐based composites.
Materials and Methods
Seventy‐five specimens were fabricated and divided into one control group and four experimental groups (n = 15), according to the type of glass fiber (strip or mesh) and polymerization methods (one‐ or two‐step). A 0.2‐mm‐thick fiber layer was fabricated with different polymerization methods, on top of which a 1.8 mm resin‐based composite layer was added to make a bar‐shape specimen, followed by a final polymerization. Specimens were tested for flexural strength and flexural modulus. The failure modes of specimens were observed by scanning electron microscopy.
Results
The fiber types showed significant effect on the flexural strength of test specimens (F = 469.48, p < 0.05), but the polymerization methods had no significant effect (F = 0.05, p = 0.82). The interaction between these two variables was not significant (F = 1.73, p = 0.19). In addition, both fiber type (F = 9.71, p < 0.05) and polymerization method (F = 12.17, p < 0.05) affected the flexural modulus of test specimens; however, the interaction between these two variables was not significant (F = 0.40, p = 0.53).
Conclusions
The strip fibers showed better mechanical behavior than mesh fibers and were suggested for resin‐based composites restorations reinforcement; however, different polymerization methods did not have a significant effect on the strength and failure mode of fiber‐reinforced resin‐based composites. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jopr.12587 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1891884121</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1891884121</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4267-68b5453d6b34833c5a2b805b5ed21609c9b0c5f2278172fc3907eced55b0dee13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0c1O3DAUBWALFRVKu-EBKkvdoEoBXztOnCWM-GkFAo2mErvIcW40HiVxsDOg6aLiEfqMfRI8DGXRBWo2ju3Px7IOIfvADiF-Rws3-EPgUuVbZBek4IlKi9t38Z_JIilSuN0hH0JYMAYgFbwnO1zxXGRK7ZJfsznS06ZBM1LX0BvXrjr09qcerevpFY5zVweq-5qe2Qo9na0GDDRujfHcFZq57q3RLT3Bub63zq9DnuWfx99TtH3jvMGaTjHYPi6d6BBnE9cNLtgRw0ey3eg24KeXcY_8ODudTS6Sy-vzb5Pjy8SkPMuTTFUylaLOKpEqIYzUvFJMVhJrDhkrTFExIxvOcwU5b4woWI7xXikrViOC2CMHm9zBu7slhrHsbDDYtrpHtwwlqAKUSoH_D1WFUHnKWaRf_qELt_R9fMhaqSzLIeVRfd0o410IHpty8LbTflUCK9cFlusCy-cCI_78ErmsOqxf6d_GIoANeLAtrt6IKr9f30w3oU9gZKeJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1888667142</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effect of Polymerization Methods and Fiber Types on the Mechanical Behavior of Fiber‐Reinforced Resin‐Based Composites</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Huang, Nan‐Chieh ; Bottino, Marco C. ; Levon, John A. ; Chu, Tien‐Min G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Huang, Nan‐Chieh ; Bottino, Marco C. ; Levon, John A. ; Chu, Tien‐Min G.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Glass fibers were introduced to increase the fracture resistance of resin‐based composites restorations; however, the poor polymerization between fibers and resin‐based composite were sometimes noted and can cause debonding and failure. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of different polymerization methods as well as fiber types on the mechanical behavior of fiber‐reinforced resin‐based composites.
Materials and Methods
Seventy‐five specimens were fabricated and divided into one control group and four experimental groups (n = 15), according to the type of glass fiber (strip or mesh) and polymerization methods (one‐ or two‐step). A 0.2‐mm‐thick fiber layer was fabricated with different polymerization methods, on top of which a 1.8 mm resin‐based composite layer was added to make a bar‐shape specimen, followed by a final polymerization. Specimens were tested for flexural strength and flexural modulus. The failure modes of specimens were observed by scanning electron microscopy.
Results
The fiber types showed significant effect on the flexural strength of test specimens (F = 469.48, p < 0.05), but the polymerization methods had no significant effect (F = 0.05, p = 0.82). The interaction between these two variables was not significant (F = 1.73, p = 0.19). In addition, both fiber type (F = 9.71, p < 0.05) and polymerization method (F = 12.17, p < 0.05) affected the flexural modulus of test specimens; however, the interaction between these two variables was not significant (F = 0.40, p = 0.53).
Conclusions
The strip fibers showed better mechanical behavior than mesh fibers and were suggested for resin‐based composites restorations reinforcement; however, different polymerization methods did not have a significant effect on the strength and failure mode of fiber‐reinforced resin‐based composites.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-941X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-849X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12587</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28273688</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Composite Resins - chemistry ; Dental Materials - chemistry ; Dental Stress Analysis ; Dentistry ; Elastic Modulus ; fiber‐reinforced composites ; Flexural strength ; Glass - chemistry ; glass fibers ; In Vitro Techniques ; Materials Testing ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; Polymerization ; Stress, Mechanical ; Surface Properties</subject><ispartof>Journal of prosthodontics, 2017-04, Vol.26 (3), p.230-237</ispartof><rights>2017 by the American College of Prosthodontists</rights><rights>2017 by the American College of Prosthodontists.</rights><rights>2017 American College of Prosthodontists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4267-68b5453d6b34833c5a2b805b5ed21609c9b0c5f2278172fc3907eced55b0dee13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4267-68b5453d6b34833c5a2b805b5ed21609c9b0c5f2278172fc3907eced55b0dee13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjopr.12587$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjopr.12587$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28273688$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huang, Nan‐Chieh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bottino, Marco C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levon, John A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Tien‐Min G.</creatorcontrib><title>The Effect of Polymerization Methods and Fiber Types on the Mechanical Behavior of Fiber‐Reinforced Resin‐Based Composites</title><title>Journal of prosthodontics</title><addtitle>J Prosthodont</addtitle><description>Purpose
Glass fibers were introduced to increase the fracture resistance of resin‐based composites restorations; however, the poor polymerization between fibers and resin‐based composite were sometimes noted and can cause debonding and failure. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of different polymerization methods as well as fiber types on the mechanical behavior of fiber‐reinforced resin‐based composites.
Materials and Methods
Seventy‐five specimens were fabricated and divided into one control group and four experimental groups (n = 15), according to the type of glass fiber (strip or mesh) and polymerization methods (one‐ or two‐step). A 0.2‐mm‐thick fiber layer was fabricated with different polymerization methods, on top of which a 1.8 mm resin‐based composite layer was added to make a bar‐shape specimen, followed by a final polymerization. Specimens were tested for flexural strength and flexural modulus. The failure modes of specimens were observed by scanning electron microscopy.
Results
The fiber types showed significant effect on the flexural strength of test specimens (F = 469.48, p < 0.05), but the polymerization methods had no significant effect (F = 0.05, p = 0.82). The interaction between these two variables was not significant (F = 1.73, p = 0.19). In addition, both fiber type (F = 9.71, p < 0.05) and polymerization method (F = 12.17, p < 0.05) affected the flexural modulus of test specimens; however, the interaction between these two variables was not significant (F = 0.40, p = 0.53).
Conclusions
The strip fibers showed better mechanical behavior than mesh fibers and were suggested for resin‐based composites restorations reinforcement; however, different polymerization methods did not have a significant effect on the strength and failure mode of fiber‐reinforced resin‐based composites.</description><subject>Composite Resins - chemistry</subject><subject>Dental Materials - chemistry</subject><subject>Dental Stress Analysis</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Elastic Modulus</subject><subject>fiber‐reinforced composites</subject><subject>Flexural strength</subject><subject>Glass - chemistry</subject><subject>glass fibers</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</subject><subject>Polymerization</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><issn>1059-941X</issn><issn>1532-849X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0c1O3DAUBWALFRVKu-EBKkvdoEoBXztOnCWM-GkFAo2mErvIcW40HiVxsDOg6aLiEfqMfRI8DGXRBWo2ju3Px7IOIfvADiF-Rws3-EPgUuVbZBek4IlKi9t38Z_JIilSuN0hH0JYMAYgFbwnO1zxXGRK7ZJfsznS06ZBM1LX0BvXrjr09qcerevpFY5zVweq-5qe2Qo9na0GDDRujfHcFZq57q3RLT3Bub63zq9DnuWfx99TtH3jvMGaTjHYPi6d6BBnE9cNLtgRw0ey3eg24KeXcY_8ODudTS6Sy-vzb5Pjy8SkPMuTTFUylaLOKpEqIYzUvFJMVhJrDhkrTFExIxvOcwU5b4woWI7xXikrViOC2CMHm9zBu7slhrHsbDDYtrpHtwwlqAKUSoH_D1WFUHnKWaRf_qELt_R9fMhaqSzLIeVRfd0o410IHpty8LbTflUCK9cFlusCy-cCI_78ErmsOqxf6d_GIoANeLAtrt6IKr9f30w3oU9gZKeJ</recordid><startdate>201704</startdate><enddate>201704</enddate><creator>Huang, Nan‐Chieh</creator><creator>Bottino, Marco C.</creator><creator>Levon, John A.</creator><creator>Chu, Tien‐Min G.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201704</creationdate><title>The Effect of Polymerization Methods and Fiber Types on the Mechanical Behavior of Fiber‐Reinforced Resin‐Based Composites</title><author>Huang, Nan‐Chieh ; Bottino, Marco C. ; Levon, John A. ; Chu, Tien‐Min G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4267-68b5453d6b34833c5a2b805b5ed21609c9b0c5f2278172fc3907eced55b0dee13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Composite Resins - chemistry</topic><topic>Dental Materials - chemistry</topic><topic>Dental Stress Analysis</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Elastic Modulus</topic><topic>fiber‐reinforced composites</topic><topic>Flexural strength</topic><topic>Glass - chemistry</topic><topic>glass fibers</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</topic><topic>Polymerization</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huang, Nan‐Chieh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bottino, Marco C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levon, John A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Tien‐Min G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of prosthodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huang, Nan‐Chieh</au><au>Bottino, Marco C.</au><au>Levon, John A.</au><au>Chu, Tien‐Min G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effect of Polymerization Methods and Fiber Types on the Mechanical Behavior of Fiber‐Reinforced Resin‐Based Composites</atitle><jtitle>Journal of prosthodontics</jtitle><addtitle>J Prosthodont</addtitle><date>2017-04</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>230</spage><epage>237</epage><pages>230-237</pages><issn>1059-941X</issn><eissn>1532-849X</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Glass fibers were introduced to increase the fracture resistance of resin‐based composites restorations; however, the poor polymerization between fibers and resin‐based composite were sometimes noted and can cause debonding and failure. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of different polymerization methods as well as fiber types on the mechanical behavior of fiber‐reinforced resin‐based composites.
Materials and Methods
Seventy‐five specimens were fabricated and divided into one control group and four experimental groups (n = 15), according to the type of glass fiber (strip or mesh) and polymerization methods (one‐ or two‐step). A 0.2‐mm‐thick fiber layer was fabricated with different polymerization methods, on top of which a 1.8 mm resin‐based composite layer was added to make a bar‐shape specimen, followed by a final polymerization. Specimens were tested for flexural strength and flexural modulus. The failure modes of specimens were observed by scanning electron microscopy.
Results
The fiber types showed significant effect on the flexural strength of test specimens (F = 469.48, p < 0.05), but the polymerization methods had no significant effect (F = 0.05, p = 0.82). The interaction between these two variables was not significant (F = 1.73, p = 0.19). In addition, both fiber type (F = 9.71, p < 0.05) and polymerization method (F = 12.17, p < 0.05) affected the flexural modulus of test specimens; however, the interaction between these two variables was not significant (F = 0.40, p = 0.53).
Conclusions
The strip fibers showed better mechanical behavior than mesh fibers and were suggested for resin‐based composites restorations reinforcement; however, different polymerization methods did not have a significant effect on the strength and failure mode of fiber‐reinforced resin‐based composites.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28273688</pmid><doi>10.1111/jopr.12587</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1059-941X |
ispartof | Journal of prosthodontics, 2017-04, Vol.26 (3), p.230-237 |
issn | 1059-941X 1532-849X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1891884121 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE |
subjects | Composite Resins - chemistry Dental Materials - chemistry Dental Stress Analysis Dentistry Elastic Modulus fiber‐reinforced composites Flexural strength Glass - chemistry glass fibers In Vitro Techniques Materials Testing Microscopy, Electron, Scanning Polymerization Stress, Mechanical Surface Properties |
title | The Effect of Polymerization Methods and Fiber Types on the Mechanical Behavior of Fiber‐Reinforced Resin‐Based Composites |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T05%3A50%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effect%20of%20Polymerization%20Methods%20and%20Fiber%20Types%20on%20the%20Mechanical%20Behavior%20of%20Fiber%E2%80%90Reinforced%20Resin%E2%80%90Based%20Composites&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20prosthodontics&rft.au=Huang,%20Nan%E2%80%90Chieh&rft.date=2017-04&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=230&rft.epage=237&rft.pages=230-237&rft.issn=1059-941X&rft.eissn=1532-849X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jopr.12587&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1891884121%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1888667142&rft_id=info:pmid/28273688&rfr_iscdi=true |