The Effect of Polymerization Methods and Fiber Types on the Mechanical Behavior of Fiber‐Reinforced Resin‐Based Composites

Purpose Glass fibers were introduced to increase the fracture resistance of resin‐based composites restorations; however, the poor polymerization between fibers and resin‐based composite were sometimes noted and can cause debonding and failure. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of prosthodontics 2017-04, Vol.26 (3), p.230-237
Hauptverfasser: Huang, Nan‐Chieh, Bottino, Marco C., Levon, John A., Chu, Tien‐Min G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 237
container_issue 3
container_start_page 230
container_title Journal of prosthodontics
container_volume 26
creator Huang, Nan‐Chieh
Bottino, Marco C.
Levon, John A.
Chu, Tien‐Min G.
description Purpose Glass fibers were introduced to increase the fracture resistance of resin‐based composites restorations; however, the poor polymerization between fibers and resin‐based composite were sometimes noted and can cause debonding and failure. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of different polymerization methods as well as fiber types on the mechanical behavior of fiber‐reinforced resin‐based composites. Materials and Methods Seventy‐five specimens were fabricated and divided into one control group and four experimental groups (n = 15), according to the type of glass fiber (strip or mesh) and polymerization methods (one‐ or two‐step). A 0.2‐mm‐thick fiber layer was fabricated with different polymerization methods, on top of which a 1.8 mm resin‐based composite layer was added to make a bar‐shape specimen, followed by a final polymerization. Specimens were tested for flexural strength and flexural modulus. The failure modes of specimens were observed by scanning electron microscopy. Results The fiber types showed significant effect on the flexural strength of test specimens (F = 469.48, p < 0.05), but the polymerization methods had no significant effect (F = 0.05, p = 0.82). The interaction between these two variables was not significant (F = 1.73, p = 0.19). In addition, both fiber type (F = 9.71, p < 0.05) and polymerization method (F = 12.17, p < 0.05) affected the flexural modulus of test specimens; however, the interaction between these two variables was not significant (F = 0.40, p = 0.53). Conclusions The strip fibers showed better mechanical behavior than mesh fibers and were suggested for resin‐based composites restorations reinforcement; however, different polymerization methods did not have a significant effect on the strength and failure mode of fiber‐reinforced resin‐based composites.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jopr.12587
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1891884121</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1891884121</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4267-68b5453d6b34833c5a2b805b5ed21609c9b0c5f2278172fc3907eced55b0dee13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0c1O3DAUBWALFRVKu-EBKkvdoEoBXztOnCWM-GkFAo2mErvIcW40HiVxsDOg6aLiEfqMfRI8DGXRBWo2ju3Px7IOIfvADiF-Rws3-EPgUuVbZBek4IlKi9t38Z_JIilSuN0hH0JYMAYgFbwnO1zxXGRK7ZJfsznS06ZBM1LX0BvXrjr09qcerevpFY5zVweq-5qe2Qo9na0GDDRujfHcFZq57q3RLT3Bub63zq9DnuWfx99TtH3jvMGaTjHYPi6d6BBnE9cNLtgRw0ey3eg24KeXcY_8ODudTS6Sy-vzb5Pjy8SkPMuTTFUylaLOKpEqIYzUvFJMVhJrDhkrTFExIxvOcwU5b4woWI7xXikrViOC2CMHm9zBu7slhrHsbDDYtrpHtwwlqAKUSoH_D1WFUHnKWaRf_qELt_R9fMhaqSzLIeVRfd0o410IHpty8LbTflUCK9cFlusCy-cCI_78ErmsOqxf6d_GIoANeLAtrt6IKr9f30w3oU9gZKeJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1888667142</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effect of Polymerization Methods and Fiber Types on the Mechanical Behavior of Fiber‐Reinforced Resin‐Based Composites</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Huang, Nan‐Chieh ; Bottino, Marco C. ; Levon, John A. ; Chu, Tien‐Min G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Huang, Nan‐Chieh ; Bottino, Marco C. ; Levon, John A. ; Chu, Tien‐Min G.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Glass fibers were introduced to increase the fracture resistance of resin‐based composites restorations; however, the poor polymerization between fibers and resin‐based composite were sometimes noted and can cause debonding and failure. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of different polymerization methods as well as fiber types on the mechanical behavior of fiber‐reinforced resin‐based composites. Materials and Methods Seventy‐five specimens were fabricated and divided into one control group and four experimental groups (n = 15), according to the type of glass fiber (strip or mesh) and polymerization methods (one‐ or two‐step). A 0.2‐mm‐thick fiber layer was fabricated with different polymerization methods, on top of which a 1.8 mm resin‐based composite layer was added to make a bar‐shape specimen, followed by a final polymerization. Specimens were tested for flexural strength and flexural modulus. The failure modes of specimens were observed by scanning electron microscopy. Results The fiber types showed significant effect on the flexural strength of test specimens (F = 469.48, p &lt; 0.05), but the polymerization methods had no significant effect (F = 0.05, p = 0.82). The interaction between these two variables was not significant (F = 1.73, p = 0.19). In addition, both fiber type (F = 9.71, p &lt; 0.05) and polymerization method (F = 12.17, p &lt; 0.05) affected the flexural modulus of test specimens; however, the interaction between these two variables was not significant (F = 0.40, p = 0.53). Conclusions The strip fibers showed better mechanical behavior than mesh fibers and were suggested for resin‐based composites restorations reinforcement; however, different polymerization methods did not have a significant effect on the strength and failure mode of fiber‐reinforced resin‐based composites.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-941X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-849X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12587</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28273688</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Composite Resins - chemistry ; Dental Materials - chemistry ; Dental Stress Analysis ; Dentistry ; Elastic Modulus ; fiber‐reinforced composites ; Flexural strength ; Glass - chemistry ; glass fibers ; In Vitro Techniques ; Materials Testing ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; Polymerization ; Stress, Mechanical ; Surface Properties</subject><ispartof>Journal of prosthodontics, 2017-04, Vol.26 (3), p.230-237</ispartof><rights>2017 by the American College of Prosthodontists</rights><rights>2017 by the American College of Prosthodontists.</rights><rights>2017 American College of Prosthodontists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4267-68b5453d6b34833c5a2b805b5ed21609c9b0c5f2278172fc3907eced55b0dee13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4267-68b5453d6b34833c5a2b805b5ed21609c9b0c5f2278172fc3907eced55b0dee13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjopr.12587$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjopr.12587$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28273688$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huang, Nan‐Chieh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bottino, Marco C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levon, John A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Tien‐Min G.</creatorcontrib><title>The Effect of Polymerization Methods and Fiber Types on the Mechanical Behavior of Fiber‐Reinforced Resin‐Based Composites</title><title>Journal of prosthodontics</title><addtitle>J Prosthodont</addtitle><description>Purpose Glass fibers were introduced to increase the fracture resistance of resin‐based composites restorations; however, the poor polymerization between fibers and resin‐based composite were sometimes noted and can cause debonding and failure. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of different polymerization methods as well as fiber types on the mechanical behavior of fiber‐reinforced resin‐based composites. Materials and Methods Seventy‐five specimens were fabricated and divided into one control group and four experimental groups (n = 15), according to the type of glass fiber (strip or mesh) and polymerization methods (one‐ or two‐step). A 0.2‐mm‐thick fiber layer was fabricated with different polymerization methods, on top of which a 1.8 mm resin‐based composite layer was added to make a bar‐shape specimen, followed by a final polymerization. Specimens were tested for flexural strength and flexural modulus. The failure modes of specimens were observed by scanning electron microscopy. Results The fiber types showed significant effect on the flexural strength of test specimens (F = 469.48, p &lt; 0.05), but the polymerization methods had no significant effect (F = 0.05, p = 0.82). The interaction between these two variables was not significant (F = 1.73, p = 0.19). In addition, both fiber type (F = 9.71, p &lt; 0.05) and polymerization method (F = 12.17, p &lt; 0.05) affected the flexural modulus of test specimens; however, the interaction between these two variables was not significant (F = 0.40, p = 0.53). Conclusions The strip fibers showed better mechanical behavior than mesh fibers and were suggested for resin‐based composites restorations reinforcement; however, different polymerization methods did not have a significant effect on the strength and failure mode of fiber‐reinforced resin‐based composites.</description><subject>Composite Resins - chemistry</subject><subject>Dental Materials - chemistry</subject><subject>Dental Stress Analysis</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Elastic Modulus</subject><subject>fiber‐reinforced composites</subject><subject>Flexural strength</subject><subject>Glass - chemistry</subject><subject>glass fibers</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</subject><subject>Polymerization</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><issn>1059-941X</issn><issn>1532-849X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0c1O3DAUBWALFRVKu-EBKkvdoEoBXztOnCWM-GkFAo2mErvIcW40HiVxsDOg6aLiEfqMfRI8DGXRBWo2ju3Px7IOIfvADiF-Rws3-EPgUuVbZBek4IlKi9t38Z_JIilSuN0hH0JYMAYgFbwnO1zxXGRK7ZJfsznS06ZBM1LX0BvXrjr09qcerevpFY5zVweq-5qe2Qo9na0GDDRujfHcFZq57q3RLT3Bub63zq9DnuWfx99TtH3jvMGaTjHYPi6d6BBnE9cNLtgRw0ey3eg24KeXcY_8ODudTS6Sy-vzb5Pjy8SkPMuTTFUylaLOKpEqIYzUvFJMVhJrDhkrTFExIxvOcwU5b4woWI7xXikrViOC2CMHm9zBu7slhrHsbDDYtrpHtwwlqAKUSoH_D1WFUHnKWaRf_qELt_R9fMhaqSzLIeVRfd0o410IHpty8LbTflUCK9cFlusCy-cCI_78ErmsOqxf6d_GIoANeLAtrt6IKr9f30w3oU9gZKeJ</recordid><startdate>201704</startdate><enddate>201704</enddate><creator>Huang, Nan‐Chieh</creator><creator>Bottino, Marco C.</creator><creator>Levon, John A.</creator><creator>Chu, Tien‐Min G.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201704</creationdate><title>The Effect of Polymerization Methods and Fiber Types on the Mechanical Behavior of Fiber‐Reinforced Resin‐Based Composites</title><author>Huang, Nan‐Chieh ; Bottino, Marco C. ; Levon, John A. ; Chu, Tien‐Min G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4267-68b5453d6b34833c5a2b805b5ed21609c9b0c5f2278172fc3907eced55b0dee13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Composite Resins - chemistry</topic><topic>Dental Materials - chemistry</topic><topic>Dental Stress Analysis</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Elastic Modulus</topic><topic>fiber‐reinforced composites</topic><topic>Flexural strength</topic><topic>Glass - chemistry</topic><topic>glass fibers</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</topic><topic>Polymerization</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huang, Nan‐Chieh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bottino, Marco C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levon, John A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Tien‐Min G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of prosthodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huang, Nan‐Chieh</au><au>Bottino, Marco C.</au><au>Levon, John A.</au><au>Chu, Tien‐Min G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effect of Polymerization Methods and Fiber Types on the Mechanical Behavior of Fiber‐Reinforced Resin‐Based Composites</atitle><jtitle>Journal of prosthodontics</jtitle><addtitle>J Prosthodont</addtitle><date>2017-04</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>230</spage><epage>237</epage><pages>230-237</pages><issn>1059-941X</issn><eissn>1532-849X</eissn><abstract>Purpose Glass fibers were introduced to increase the fracture resistance of resin‐based composites restorations; however, the poor polymerization between fibers and resin‐based composite were sometimes noted and can cause debonding and failure. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of different polymerization methods as well as fiber types on the mechanical behavior of fiber‐reinforced resin‐based composites. Materials and Methods Seventy‐five specimens were fabricated and divided into one control group and four experimental groups (n = 15), according to the type of glass fiber (strip or mesh) and polymerization methods (one‐ or two‐step). A 0.2‐mm‐thick fiber layer was fabricated with different polymerization methods, on top of which a 1.8 mm resin‐based composite layer was added to make a bar‐shape specimen, followed by a final polymerization. Specimens were tested for flexural strength and flexural modulus. The failure modes of specimens were observed by scanning electron microscopy. Results The fiber types showed significant effect on the flexural strength of test specimens (F = 469.48, p &lt; 0.05), but the polymerization methods had no significant effect (F = 0.05, p = 0.82). The interaction between these two variables was not significant (F = 1.73, p = 0.19). In addition, both fiber type (F = 9.71, p &lt; 0.05) and polymerization method (F = 12.17, p &lt; 0.05) affected the flexural modulus of test specimens; however, the interaction between these two variables was not significant (F = 0.40, p = 0.53). Conclusions The strip fibers showed better mechanical behavior than mesh fibers and were suggested for resin‐based composites restorations reinforcement; however, different polymerization methods did not have a significant effect on the strength and failure mode of fiber‐reinforced resin‐based composites.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28273688</pmid><doi>10.1111/jopr.12587</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1059-941X
ispartof Journal of prosthodontics, 2017-04, Vol.26 (3), p.230-237
issn 1059-941X
1532-849X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1891884121
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Composite Resins - chemistry
Dental Materials - chemistry
Dental Stress Analysis
Dentistry
Elastic Modulus
fiber‐reinforced composites
Flexural strength
Glass - chemistry
glass fibers
In Vitro Techniques
Materials Testing
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
Polymerization
Stress, Mechanical
Surface Properties
title The Effect of Polymerization Methods and Fiber Types on the Mechanical Behavior of Fiber‐Reinforced Resin‐Based Composites
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T05%3A50%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effect%20of%20Polymerization%20Methods%20and%20Fiber%20Types%20on%20the%20Mechanical%20Behavior%20of%20Fiber%E2%80%90Reinforced%20Resin%E2%80%90Based%20Composites&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20prosthodontics&rft.au=Huang,%20Nan%E2%80%90Chieh&rft.date=2017-04&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=230&rft.epage=237&rft.pages=230-237&rft.issn=1059-941X&rft.eissn=1532-849X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jopr.12587&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1891884121%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1888667142&rft_id=info:pmid/28273688&rfr_iscdi=true