DNA damage repair and survival outcomes in advanced gastric cancer patients treated with first‐line chemotherapy

The DNA damage response (DDR) network is exploited by cancer cells to withstand chemotherapy. Gastric cancer (GC) carries deregulation of the DDR and harbors genetic defects that fuel its activation. The ATM‐Chk2 and ATR‐Chk1‐Wee1 axes are deputed to initiate DNA repair. Overactivation of these path...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of cancer 2017-06, Vol.140 (11), p.2587-2595
Hauptverfasser: Ronchetti, Livia, Melucci, Elisa, De Nicola, Francesca, Goeman, Frauke, Casini, Beatrice, Sperati, Francesca, Pallocca, Matteo, Terrenato, Irene, Pizzuti, Laura, Vici, Patrizia, Sergi, Domenico, Di Lauro, Luigi, Amoreo, Carla Azzurra, Gallo, Enzo, Diodoro, Maria Grazia, Pescarmona, Edoardo, Vitale, Ilio, Barba, Maddalena, Buglioni, Simonetta, Mottolese, Marcella, Fanciulli, Maurizio, De Maria, Ruggero, Maugeri‐Saccà, Marcello
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2595
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2587
container_title International journal of cancer
container_volume 140
creator Ronchetti, Livia
Melucci, Elisa
De Nicola, Francesca
Goeman, Frauke
Casini, Beatrice
Sperati, Francesca
Pallocca, Matteo
Terrenato, Irene
Pizzuti, Laura
Vici, Patrizia
Sergi, Domenico
Di Lauro, Luigi
Amoreo, Carla Azzurra
Gallo, Enzo
Diodoro, Maria Grazia
Pescarmona, Edoardo
Vitale, Ilio
Barba, Maddalena
Buglioni, Simonetta
Mottolese, Marcella
Fanciulli, Maurizio
De Maria, Ruggero
Maugeri‐Saccà, Marcello
description The DNA damage response (DDR) network is exploited by cancer cells to withstand chemotherapy. Gastric cancer (GC) carries deregulation of the DDR and harbors genetic defects that fuel its activation. The ATM‐Chk2 and ATR‐Chk1‐Wee1 axes are deputed to initiate DNA repair. Overactivation of these pathways in cancer cells may represent an adaptive response for compensating genetic defects deregulating G1‐S transition (e.g., TP53) and ATM/ATR‐initiated DNA repair (e.g., ARID1A). We hypothesized that DDR‐linked biomarkers may predict clinical outcomes in GC patients treated with chemotherapy. Immunohistochemical assessment of DDR kinases (pATM, pChk2, pChk1 and pWee1) and DNA damage markers (γ‐H2AX and pRPA32) was performed in biological samples from 110 advanced GC patients treated with first‐line chemotherapy, either in phase II trials or in routine clinical practice. In 90 patients, this characterization was integrated with targeted ultra‐deep sequencing for evaluating the mutational status of TP53 and ARID1A. We recorded a positive association between the investigated biomarkers. The combination of two biomarkers (γ‐H2AXhigh/pATMhigh) was an adverse factor for both progression‐free survival (multivariate Cox: HR 2.23, 95%CI: 1.47–3.40) and overall survival (multivariate Cox: HR: 2.07, 95%CI: 1.20–3.58). The relationship between the γ‐H2AXhigh/pATMhigh model and progression‐free survival was consistent across the different TP53 backgrounds and was maintained in the ARID1A wild‐type setting. Conversely, this association was no longer observed in an ARID1A‐mutated subgroup. The γ‐H2AXhigh/pATMhigh model negatively impacted survival outcomes in GC patients treated with chemotherapy. The mutational status of ARID1A, but apparently not TP53 mutations, affects its predictive significance. What's new? Gastric cancer patients with activation of DNA damage repair mechanisms fare worse than those without, new results show. Cancer cells can take over DNA damage repair machinery to protect themselves from chemotherapy. These authors speculated that biomarkers related to DDR might predict clinical outcomes. To find out, they tested samples from 110 gastric cancer patients for the biomarkers and also for a couple of telltale genetic mutations. Patients with biomarkers indicating DDR activation had worse progression‐free survival than those without, but this relationship disappeared in the presence of a defective ARID1A gene, which hinders DDR initiation.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ijc.30668
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1891874554</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1891874554</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3878-565fd8cbed3179e58ea4cbf0d731b52e149ab27b9b590a71441798bb4cc3ca903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0btOHDEUBmArCgobkoIXiCylSTNgj-0Zu0RLIEQoaaAeHXvOsl7NLbZn0XY8As_Ik2BuKahs6_90dOSfkEPOjjhj5bHfuCPBqkp_IAvOTF2wkquPZJEzVtRcVPvkc4wbxjhXTH4i-6UuhSiNWpBw-ueEttDDDdKAE_hAYWhpnMPWb6Gj45zc2GOkfqDQbmFw2NIbiCl4R93TM9AJkschRZoCQsr5rU9ruvIhpoe7-84PSN0a-zGtMcC0-0L2VtBF_Pp6HpDrs59Xy1_F5d_zi-XJZeGErnWhKrVqtbPYCl4bVBpBOrtibS24VSVyacCWtTVWGQY1lzIzba10TjgwTByQHy9zpzD-mzGmpvfRYdfBgOMcG64N17VUSmb6_R3djHMY8nZZaVXJ0hie1bdXNdse22YKvoewa95-M4PjF3DrO9z9zzlrnmpqck3Nc03Nxe_l80U8Ar-ahjA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1885642991</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>DNA damage repair and survival outcomes in advanced gastric cancer patients treated with first‐line chemotherapy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Ronchetti, Livia ; Melucci, Elisa ; De Nicola, Francesca ; Goeman, Frauke ; Casini, Beatrice ; Sperati, Francesca ; Pallocca, Matteo ; Terrenato, Irene ; Pizzuti, Laura ; Vici, Patrizia ; Sergi, Domenico ; Di Lauro, Luigi ; Amoreo, Carla Azzurra ; Gallo, Enzo ; Diodoro, Maria Grazia ; Pescarmona, Edoardo ; Vitale, Ilio ; Barba, Maddalena ; Buglioni, Simonetta ; Mottolese, Marcella ; Fanciulli, Maurizio ; De Maria, Ruggero ; Maugeri‐Saccà, Marcello</creator><creatorcontrib>Ronchetti, Livia ; Melucci, Elisa ; De Nicola, Francesca ; Goeman, Frauke ; Casini, Beatrice ; Sperati, Francesca ; Pallocca, Matteo ; Terrenato, Irene ; Pizzuti, Laura ; Vici, Patrizia ; Sergi, Domenico ; Di Lauro, Luigi ; Amoreo, Carla Azzurra ; Gallo, Enzo ; Diodoro, Maria Grazia ; Pescarmona, Edoardo ; Vitale, Ilio ; Barba, Maddalena ; Buglioni, Simonetta ; Mottolese, Marcella ; Fanciulli, Maurizio ; De Maria, Ruggero ; Maugeri‐Saccà, Marcello</creatorcontrib><description>The DNA damage response (DDR) network is exploited by cancer cells to withstand chemotherapy. Gastric cancer (GC) carries deregulation of the DDR and harbors genetic defects that fuel its activation. The ATM‐Chk2 and ATR‐Chk1‐Wee1 axes are deputed to initiate DNA repair. Overactivation of these pathways in cancer cells may represent an adaptive response for compensating genetic defects deregulating G1‐S transition (e.g., TP53) and ATM/ATR‐initiated DNA repair (e.g., ARID1A). We hypothesized that DDR‐linked biomarkers may predict clinical outcomes in GC patients treated with chemotherapy. Immunohistochemical assessment of DDR kinases (pATM, pChk2, pChk1 and pWee1) and DNA damage markers (γ‐H2AX and pRPA32) was performed in biological samples from 110 advanced GC patients treated with first‐line chemotherapy, either in phase II trials or in routine clinical practice. In 90 patients, this characterization was integrated with targeted ultra‐deep sequencing for evaluating the mutational status of TP53 and ARID1A. We recorded a positive association between the investigated biomarkers. The combination of two biomarkers (γ‐H2AXhigh/pATMhigh) was an adverse factor for both progression‐free survival (multivariate Cox: HR 2.23, 95%CI: 1.47–3.40) and overall survival (multivariate Cox: HR: 2.07, 95%CI: 1.20–3.58). The relationship between the γ‐H2AXhigh/pATMhigh model and progression‐free survival was consistent across the different TP53 backgrounds and was maintained in the ARID1A wild‐type setting. Conversely, this association was no longer observed in an ARID1A‐mutated subgroup. The γ‐H2AXhigh/pATMhigh model negatively impacted survival outcomes in GC patients treated with chemotherapy. The mutational status of ARID1A, but apparently not TP53 mutations, affects its predictive significance. What's new? Gastric cancer patients with activation of DNA damage repair mechanisms fare worse than those without, new results show. Cancer cells can take over DNA damage repair machinery to protect themselves from chemotherapy. These authors speculated that biomarkers related to DDR might predict clinical outcomes. To find out, they tested samples from 110 gastric cancer patients for the biomarkers and also for a couple of telltale genetic mutations. Patients with biomarkers indicating DDR activation had worse progression‐free survival than those without, but this relationship disappeared in the presence of a defective ARID1A gene, which hinders DDR initiation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7136</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0215</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ijc.30668</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28233295</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use ; ARID1A ; Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins - metabolism ; Biomarkers ; Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism ; Cancer ; Cell Cycle Proteins ; Chemotherapy ; Clinical outcomes ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; Disease-Free Survival ; DNA ; DNA damage ; DNA Damage - drug effects ; DNA damage repair ; DNA repair ; DNA Repair - drug effects ; DNA-Binding Proteins - metabolism ; Female ; Gastric cancer ; Gastric Mucosa - metabolism ; Histones - metabolism ; Humans ; Male ; Medical research ; Middle Aged ; Mutation ; pATM ; Protein Kinases - metabolism ; Signal Transduction - drug effects ; Stomach - drug effects ; Stomach Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Stomach Neoplasms - genetics ; Stomach Neoplasms - metabolism ; TP53 ; γ‐H2AX</subject><ispartof>International journal of cancer, 2017-06, Vol.140 (11), p.2587-2595</ispartof><rights>2017 UICC</rights><rights>2017 UICC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3878-565fd8cbed3179e58ea4cbf0d731b52e149ab27b9b590a71441798bb4cc3ca903</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-2287-9581</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fijc.30668$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fijc.30668$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28233295$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ronchetti, Livia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melucci, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Nicola, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goeman, Frauke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casini, Beatrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sperati, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pallocca, Matteo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terrenato, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pizzuti, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vici, Patrizia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sergi, Domenico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Lauro, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amoreo, Carla Azzurra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallo, Enzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diodoro, Maria Grazia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pescarmona, Edoardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vitale, Ilio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barba, Maddalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buglioni, Simonetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mottolese, Marcella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fanciulli, Maurizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Maria, Ruggero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maugeri‐Saccà, Marcello</creatorcontrib><title>DNA damage repair and survival outcomes in advanced gastric cancer patients treated with first‐line chemotherapy</title><title>International journal of cancer</title><addtitle>Int J Cancer</addtitle><description>The DNA damage response (DDR) network is exploited by cancer cells to withstand chemotherapy. Gastric cancer (GC) carries deregulation of the DDR and harbors genetic defects that fuel its activation. The ATM‐Chk2 and ATR‐Chk1‐Wee1 axes are deputed to initiate DNA repair. Overactivation of these pathways in cancer cells may represent an adaptive response for compensating genetic defects deregulating G1‐S transition (e.g., TP53) and ATM/ATR‐initiated DNA repair (e.g., ARID1A). We hypothesized that DDR‐linked biomarkers may predict clinical outcomes in GC patients treated with chemotherapy. Immunohistochemical assessment of DDR kinases (pATM, pChk2, pChk1 and pWee1) and DNA damage markers (γ‐H2AX and pRPA32) was performed in biological samples from 110 advanced GC patients treated with first‐line chemotherapy, either in phase II trials or in routine clinical practice. In 90 patients, this characterization was integrated with targeted ultra‐deep sequencing for evaluating the mutational status of TP53 and ARID1A. We recorded a positive association between the investigated biomarkers. The combination of two biomarkers (γ‐H2AXhigh/pATMhigh) was an adverse factor for both progression‐free survival (multivariate Cox: HR 2.23, 95%CI: 1.47–3.40) and overall survival (multivariate Cox: HR: 2.07, 95%CI: 1.20–3.58). The relationship between the γ‐H2AXhigh/pATMhigh model and progression‐free survival was consistent across the different TP53 backgrounds and was maintained in the ARID1A wild‐type setting. Conversely, this association was no longer observed in an ARID1A‐mutated subgroup. The γ‐H2AXhigh/pATMhigh model negatively impacted survival outcomes in GC patients treated with chemotherapy. The mutational status of ARID1A, but apparently not TP53 mutations, affects its predictive significance. What's new? Gastric cancer patients with activation of DNA damage repair mechanisms fare worse than those without, new results show. Cancer cells can take over DNA damage repair machinery to protect themselves from chemotherapy. These authors speculated that biomarkers related to DDR might predict clinical outcomes. To find out, they tested samples from 110 gastric cancer patients for the biomarkers and also for a couple of telltale genetic mutations. Patients with biomarkers indicating DDR activation had worse progression‐free survival than those without, but this relationship disappeared in the presence of a defective ARID1A gene, which hinders DDR initiation.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>ARID1A</subject><subject>Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins - metabolism</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cell Cycle Proteins</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>Disease-Free Survival</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA damage</subject><subject>DNA Damage - drug effects</subject><subject>DNA damage repair</subject><subject>DNA repair</subject><subject>DNA Repair - drug effects</subject><subject>DNA-Binding Proteins - metabolism</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastric cancer</subject><subject>Gastric Mucosa - metabolism</subject><subject>Histones - metabolism</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>pATM</subject><subject>Protein Kinases - metabolism</subject><subject>Signal Transduction - drug effects</subject><subject>Stomach - drug effects</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - metabolism</subject><subject>TP53</subject><subject>γ‐H2AX</subject><issn>0020-7136</issn><issn>1097-0215</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0btOHDEUBmArCgobkoIXiCylSTNgj-0Zu0RLIEQoaaAeHXvOsl7NLbZn0XY8As_Ik2BuKahs6_90dOSfkEPOjjhj5bHfuCPBqkp_IAvOTF2wkquPZJEzVtRcVPvkc4wbxjhXTH4i-6UuhSiNWpBw-ueEttDDDdKAE_hAYWhpnMPWb6Gj45zc2GOkfqDQbmFw2NIbiCl4R93TM9AJkschRZoCQsr5rU9ruvIhpoe7-84PSN0a-zGtMcC0-0L2VtBF_Pp6HpDrs59Xy1_F5d_zi-XJZeGErnWhKrVqtbPYCl4bVBpBOrtibS24VSVyacCWtTVWGQY1lzIzba10TjgwTByQHy9zpzD-mzGmpvfRYdfBgOMcG64N17VUSmb6_R3djHMY8nZZaVXJ0hie1bdXNdse22YKvoewa95-M4PjF3DrO9z9zzlrnmpqck3Nc03Nxe_l80U8Ar-ahjA</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>Ronchetti, Livia</creator><creator>Melucci, Elisa</creator><creator>De Nicola, Francesca</creator><creator>Goeman, Frauke</creator><creator>Casini, Beatrice</creator><creator>Sperati, Francesca</creator><creator>Pallocca, Matteo</creator><creator>Terrenato, Irene</creator><creator>Pizzuti, Laura</creator><creator>Vici, Patrizia</creator><creator>Sergi, Domenico</creator><creator>Di Lauro, Luigi</creator><creator>Amoreo, Carla Azzurra</creator><creator>Gallo, Enzo</creator><creator>Diodoro, Maria Grazia</creator><creator>Pescarmona, Edoardo</creator><creator>Vitale, Ilio</creator><creator>Barba, Maddalena</creator><creator>Buglioni, Simonetta</creator><creator>Mottolese, Marcella</creator><creator>Fanciulli, Maurizio</creator><creator>De Maria, Ruggero</creator><creator>Maugeri‐Saccà, Marcello</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7TM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2287-9581</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>DNA damage repair and survival outcomes in advanced gastric cancer patients treated with first‐line chemotherapy</title><author>Ronchetti, Livia ; Melucci, Elisa ; De Nicola, Francesca ; Goeman, Frauke ; Casini, Beatrice ; Sperati, Francesca ; Pallocca, Matteo ; Terrenato, Irene ; Pizzuti, Laura ; Vici, Patrizia ; Sergi, Domenico ; Di Lauro, Luigi ; Amoreo, Carla Azzurra ; Gallo, Enzo ; Diodoro, Maria Grazia ; Pescarmona, Edoardo ; Vitale, Ilio ; Barba, Maddalena ; Buglioni, Simonetta ; Mottolese, Marcella ; Fanciulli, Maurizio ; De Maria, Ruggero ; Maugeri‐Saccà, Marcello</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3878-565fd8cbed3179e58ea4cbf0d731b52e149ab27b9b590a71441798bb4cc3ca903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>ARID1A</topic><topic>Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins - metabolism</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cell Cycle Proteins</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>Disease-Free Survival</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA damage</topic><topic>DNA Damage - drug effects</topic><topic>DNA damage repair</topic><topic>DNA repair</topic><topic>DNA Repair - drug effects</topic><topic>DNA-Binding Proteins - metabolism</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastric cancer</topic><topic>Gastric Mucosa - metabolism</topic><topic>Histones - metabolism</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>pATM</topic><topic>Protein Kinases - metabolism</topic><topic>Signal Transduction - drug effects</topic><topic>Stomach - drug effects</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - metabolism</topic><topic>TP53</topic><topic>γ‐H2AX</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ronchetti, Livia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melucci, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Nicola, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goeman, Frauke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casini, Beatrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sperati, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pallocca, Matteo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terrenato, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pizzuti, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vici, Patrizia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sergi, Domenico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Lauro, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amoreo, Carla Azzurra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallo, Enzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diodoro, Maria Grazia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pescarmona, Edoardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vitale, Ilio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barba, Maddalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buglioni, Simonetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mottolese, Marcella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fanciulli, Maurizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Maria, Ruggero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maugeri‐Saccà, Marcello</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International journal of cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ronchetti, Livia</au><au>Melucci, Elisa</au><au>De Nicola, Francesca</au><au>Goeman, Frauke</au><au>Casini, Beatrice</au><au>Sperati, Francesca</au><au>Pallocca, Matteo</au><au>Terrenato, Irene</au><au>Pizzuti, Laura</au><au>Vici, Patrizia</au><au>Sergi, Domenico</au><au>Di Lauro, Luigi</au><au>Amoreo, Carla Azzurra</au><au>Gallo, Enzo</au><au>Diodoro, Maria Grazia</au><au>Pescarmona, Edoardo</au><au>Vitale, Ilio</au><au>Barba, Maddalena</au><au>Buglioni, Simonetta</au><au>Mottolese, Marcella</au><au>Fanciulli, Maurizio</au><au>De Maria, Ruggero</au><au>Maugeri‐Saccà, Marcello</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>DNA damage repair and survival outcomes in advanced gastric cancer patients treated with first‐line chemotherapy</atitle><jtitle>International journal of cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Cancer</addtitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>140</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2587</spage><epage>2595</epage><pages>2587-2595</pages><issn>0020-7136</issn><eissn>1097-0215</eissn><abstract>The DNA damage response (DDR) network is exploited by cancer cells to withstand chemotherapy. Gastric cancer (GC) carries deregulation of the DDR and harbors genetic defects that fuel its activation. The ATM‐Chk2 and ATR‐Chk1‐Wee1 axes are deputed to initiate DNA repair. Overactivation of these pathways in cancer cells may represent an adaptive response for compensating genetic defects deregulating G1‐S transition (e.g., TP53) and ATM/ATR‐initiated DNA repair (e.g., ARID1A). We hypothesized that DDR‐linked biomarkers may predict clinical outcomes in GC patients treated with chemotherapy. Immunohistochemical assessment of DDR kinases (pATM, pChk2, pChk1 and pWee1) and DNA damage markers (γ‐H2AX and pRPA32) was performed in biological samples from 110 advanced GC patients treated with first‐line chemotherapy, either in phase II trials or in routine clinical practice. In 90 patients, this characterization was integrated with targeted ultra‐deep sequencing for evaluating the mutational status of TP53 and ARID1A. We recorded a positive association between the investigated biomarkers. The combination of two biomarkers (γ‐H2AXhigh/pATMhigh) was an adverse factor for both progression‐free survival (multivariate Cox: HR 2.23, 95%CI: 1.47–3.40) and overall survival (multivariate Cox: HR: 2.07, 95%CI: 1.20–3.58). The relationship between the γ‐H2AXhigh/pATMhigh model and progression‐free survival was consistent across the different TP53 backgrounds and was maintained in the ARID1A wild‐type setting. Conversely, this association was no longer observed in an ARID1A‐mutated subgroup. The γ‐H2AXhigh/pATMhigh model negatively impacted survival outcomes in GC patients treated with chemotherapy. The mutational status of ARID1A, but apparently not TP53 mutations, affects its predictive significance. What's new? Gastric cancer patients with activation of DNA damage repair mechanisms fare worse than those without, new results show. Cancer cells can take over DNA damage repair machinery to protect themselves from chemotherapy. These authors speculated that biomarkers related to DDR might predict clinical outcomes. To find out, they tested samples from 110 gastric cancer patients for the biomarkers and also for a couple of telltale genetic mutations. Patients with biomarkers indicating DDR activation had worse progression‐free survival than those without, but this relationship disappeared in the presence of a defective ARID1A gene, which hinders DDR initiation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28233295</pmid><doi>10.1002/ijc.30668</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2287-9581</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-7136
ispartof International journal of cancer, 2017-06, Vol.140 (11), p.2587-2595
issn 0020-7136
1097-0215
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1891874554
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Aged
Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use
ARID1A
Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins - metabolism
Biomarkers
Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism
Cancer
Cell Cycle Proteins
Chemotherapy
Clinical outcomes
Deoxyribonucleic acid
Disease-Free Survival
DNA
DNA damage
DNA Damage - drug effects
DNA damage repair
DNA repair
DNA Repair - drug effects
DNA-Binding Proteins - metabolism
Female
Gastric cancer
Gastric Mucosa - metabolism
Histones - metabolism
Humans
Male
Medical research
Middle Aged
Mutation
pATM
Protein Kinases - metabolism
Signal Transduction - drug effects
Stomach - drug effects
Stomach Neoplasms - drug therapy
Stomach Neoplasms - genetics
Stomach Neoplasms - metabolism
TP53
γ‐H2AX
title DNA damage repair and survival outcomes in advanced gastric cancer patients treated with first‐line chemotherapy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T15%3A18%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DNA%20damage%20repair%20and%20survival%20outcomes%20in%20advanced%20gastric%20cancer%20patients%20treated%20with%20first%E2%80%90line%20chemotherapy&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20cancer&rft.au=Ronchetti,%20Livia&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=140&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2587&rft.epage=2595&rft.pages=2587-2595&rft.issn=0020-7136&rft.eissn=1097-0215&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ijc.30668&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1891874554%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1885642991&rft_id=info:pmid/28233295&rfr_iscdi=true