Social support and protection from depression: systematic review of current findings in Western countries
Numerous studies report an association between social support and protection from depression, but no systematic review or meta-analysis exists on this topic. To review systematically the characteristics of social support (types and source) associated with protection from depression across life perio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of psychiatry 2016-10, Vol.209 (4), p.284-293 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 293 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 284 |
container_title | British journal of psychiatry |
container_volume | 209 |
creator | Gariépy, Geneviève Honkaniemi, Helena Quesnel-Vallée, Amélie |
description | Numerous studies report an association between social support and protection from depression, but no systematic review or meta-analysis exists on this topic.
To review systematically the characteristics of social support (types and source) associated with protection from depression across life periods (childhood and adolescence; adulthood; older age) and by study design (cross-sectional v cohort studies).
A systematic literature search conducted in February 2015 yielded 100 eligible studies. Study quality was assessed using a critical appraisal checklist, followed by meta-analyses.
Sources of support varied across life periods, with parental support being most important among children and adolescents, whereas adults and older adults relied more on spouses, followed by family and then friends. Significant heterogeneity in social support measurement was noted. Effects were weaker in both magnitude and significance in cohort studies.
Knowledge gaps remain due to social support measurement heterogeneity and to evidence of reverse causality bias. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1192/bjp.bp.115.169094 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1891873424</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1192_bjp_bp_115_169094</cupid><sourcerecordid>2315607247</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-8b0174d768ccba1a665d797f5e801dec958c1bed16f6b5f9f19ff36753e8f3623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU2LFDEQhoMo7rj6A7xIwIuXHlP57PYmi1-w4EHFY-hOKkuG6aRNul323xuZUUEQPFUVPPXWx0vIU2B7gIG_nA7LflparvagBzbIe2QH0vAOpFb3yY4xZjrgil2QR7UeWikkNw_JBTdSKqHUjsRP2cXxSOu2LLmsdEyeLiWv6NaYEw0lz9TjUrDWVr-i9a6uOI9rdLTg94i3NAfqtlIwrTTE5GO6qTQm-hUbWBJ1eUtriVgfkwdhPFZ8co6X5MvbN5-v3nfXH999uHp93TkFau36iYGR3ujeuWmEUWvlzWCCwp6BRzeo3sGEHnTQkwpDgCEEoY0S2LfIxSV5cdJtZ3zb2hZ2jtXh8TgmzFu10A_Qm_YI-R8o10ZwzkVDn_-FHvJWUjvEcgFKM8OlaRScKFdyrQWDXUqcx3JngdmfltlmmZ2Wlit7sqz1PDsrb9OM_nfHL48aIM6i4zyV6G_wz-x_y_4Agfmkww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2315607247</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social support and protection from depression: systematic review of current findings in Western countries</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Gariépy, Geneviève ; Honkaniemi, Helena ; Quesnel-Vallée, Amélie</creator><creatorcontrib>Gariépy, Geneviève ; Honkaniemi, Helena ; Quesnel-Vallée, Amélie</creatorcontrib><description>Numerous studies report an association between social support and protection from depression, but no systematic review or meta-analysis exists on this topic.
To review systematically the characteristics of social support (types and source) associated with protection from depression across life periods (childhood and adolescence; adulthood; older age) and by study design (cross-sectional v cohort studies).
A systematic literature search conducted in February 2015 yielded 100 eligible studies. Study quality was assessed using a critical appraisal checklist, followed by meta-analyses.
Sources of support varied across life periods, with parental support being most important among children and adolescents, whereas adults and older adults relied more on spouses, followed by family and then friends. Significant heterogeneity in social support measurement was noted. Effects were weaker in both magnitude and significance in cohort studies.
Knowledge gaps remain due to social support measurement heterogeneity and to evidence of reverse causality bias.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1250</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-1465</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.115.169094</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27445355</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adolescents ; Adult ; Adults ; Aged ; Aging ; Bias ; Causality ; Child ; Childhood ; Children ; Cohort analysis ; Depression ; Depressive Disorder ; Family support ; Friendship ; Humans ; Life course ; Longitudinal studies ; Measurement ; Mental depression ; Mental health ; Meta-analysis ; Middle Aged ; Older people ; Population ; Protective Factors ; Psychiatry ; Review Articles ; Reviews ; Social interactions ; Social research ; Social Support ; Spouses ; Systematic review ; Teenagers ; Women ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>British journal of psychiatry, 2016-10, Vol.209 (4), p.284-293</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2016</rights><rights>The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2016.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-8b0174d768ccba1a665d797f5e801dec958c1bed16f6b5f9f19ff36753e8f3623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-8b0174d768ccba1a665d797f5e801dec958c1bed16f6b5f9f19ff36753e8f3623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007125000245121/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,12825,27901,27902,30976,55603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27445355$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gariépy, Geneviève</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honkaniemi, Helena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quesnel-Vallée, Amélie</creatorcontrib><title>Social support and protection from depression: systematic review of current findings in Western countries</title><title>British journal of psychiatry</title><addtitle>Br J Psychiatry</addtitle><description>Numerous studies report an association between social support and protection from depression, but no systematic review or meta-analysis exists on this topic.
To review systematically the characteristics of social support (types and source) associated with protection from depression across life periods (childhood and adolescence; adulthood; older age) and by study design (cross-sectional v cohort studies).
A systematic literature search conducted in February 2015 yielded 100 eligible studies. Study quality was assessed using a critical appraisal checklist, followed by meta-analyses.
Sources of support varied across life periods, with parental support being most important among children and adolescents, whereas adults and older adults relied more on spouses, followed by family and then friends. Significant heterogeneity in social support measurement was noted. Effects were weaker in both magnitude and significance in cohort studies.
Knowledge gaps remain due to social support measurement heterogeneity and to evidence of reverse causality bias.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Causality</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Childhood</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Depression</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder</subject><subject>Family support</subject><subject>Friendship</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life course</subject><subject>Longitudinal studies</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Protective Factors</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Review Articles</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Social interactions</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Social Support</subject><subject>Spouses</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0007-1250</issn><issn>1472-1465</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU2LFDEQhoMo7rj6A7xIwIuXHlP57PYmi1-w4EHFY-hOKkuG6aRNul323xuZUUEQPFUVPPXWx0vIU2B7gIG_nA7LflparvagBzbIe2QH0vAOpFb3yY4xZjrgil2QR7UeWikkNw_JBTdSKqHUjsRP2cXxSOu2LLmsdEyeLiWv6NaYEw0lz9TjUrDWVr-i9a6uOI9rdLTg94i3NAfqtlIwrTTE5GO6qTQm-hUbWBJ1eUtriVgfkwdhPFZ8co6X5MvbN5-v3nfXH999uHp93TkFau36iYGR3ujeuWmEUWvlzWCCwp6BRzeo3sGEHnTQkwpDgCEEoY0S2LfIxSV5cdJtZ3zb2hZ2jtXh8TgmzFu10A_Qm_YI-R8o10ZwzkVDn_-FHvJWUjvEcgFKM8OlaRScKFdyrQWDXUqcx3JngdmfltlmmZ2Wlit7sqz1PDsrb9OM_nfHL48aIM6i4zyV6G_wz-x_y_4Agfmkww</recordid><startdate>201610</startdate><enddate>201610</enddate><creator>Gariépy, Geneviève</creator><creator>Honkaniemi, Helena</creator><creator>Quesnel-Vallée, Amélie</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201610</creationdate><title>Social support and protection from depression: systematic review of current findings in Western countries</title><author>Gariépy, Geneviève ; Honkaniemi, Helena ; Quesnel-Vallée, Amélie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-8b0174d768ccba1a665d797f5e801dec958c1bed16f6b5f9f19ff36753e8f3623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Causality</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Childhood</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Depression</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder</topic><topic>Family support</topic><topic>Friendship</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life course</topic><topic>Longitudinal studies</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Protective Factors</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Review Articles</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Social interactions</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Social Support</topic><topic>Spouses</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gariépy, Geneviève</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honkaniemi, Helena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quesnel-Vallée, Amélie</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gariépy, Geneviève</au><au>Honkaniemi, Helena</au><au>Quesnel-Vallée, Amélie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social support and protection from depression: systematic review of current findings in Western countries</atitle><jtitle>British journal of psychiatry</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Psychiatry</addtitle><date>2016-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>209</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>284</spage><epage>293</epage><pages>284-293</pages><issn>0007-1250</issn><eissn>1472-1465</eissn><abstract>Numerous studies report an association between social support and protection from depression, but no systematic review or meta-analysis exists on this topic.
To review systematically the characteristics of social support (types and source) associated with protection from depression across life periods (childhood and adolescence; adulthood; older age) and by study design (cross-sectional v cohort studies).
A systematic literature search conducted in February 2015 yielded 100 eligible studies. Study quality was assessed using a critical appraisal checklist, followed by meta-analyses.
Sources of support varied across life periods, with parental support being most important among children and adolescents, whereas adults and older adults relied more on spouses, followed by family and then friends. Significant heterogeneity in social support measurement was noted. Effects were weaker in both magnitude and significance in cohort studies.
Knowledge gaps remain due to social support measurement heterogeneity and to evidence of reverse causality bias.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>27445355</pmid><doi>10.1192/bjp.bp.115.169094</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1250 |
ispartof | British journal of psychiatry, 2016-10, Vol.209 (4), p.284-293 |
issn | 0007-1250 1472-1465 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1891873424 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Adolescent Adolescents Adult Adults Aged Aging Bias Causality Child Childhood Children Cohort analysis Depression Depressive Disorder Family support Friendship Humans Life course Longitudinal studies Measurement Mental depression Mental health Meta-analysis Middle Aged Older people Population Protective Factors Psychiatry Review Articles Reviews Social interactions Social research Social Support Spouses Systematic review Teenagers Women Young Adult |
title | Social support and protection from depression: systematic review of current findings in Western countries |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T06%3A00%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20support%20and%20protection%20from%20depression:%20systematic%20review%20of%20current%20findings%20in%20Western%20countries&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20psychiatry&rft.au=Gari%C3%A9py,%20Genevi%C3%A8ve&rft.date=2016-10&rft.volume=209&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=284&rft.epage=293&rft.pages=284-293&rft.issn=0007-1250&rft.eissn=1472-1465&rft_id=info:doi/10.1192/bjp.bp.115.169094&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2315607247%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2315607247&rft_id=info:pmid/27445355&rft_cupid=10_1192_bjp_bp_115_169094&rfr_iscdi=true |