Influence of maintenance care in periodontally susceptible and non‐susceptible subjects following implant therapy
Objectives To compare the periodontal and peri‐implant conditions of periodontally susceptible and periodontally healthy subjects under maintenance care for a period of at least 3 years. Material and methods Sixty periodontally susceptible patients (PSP) and 56 periodontally non‐susceptible subjects...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical oral implants research 2017-04, Vol.28 (4), p.491-494 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 494 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 491 |
| container_title | Clinical oral implants research |
| container_volume | 28 |
| creator | Tan, Wah Ching Ong, Marianne M. A. Lang, Niklaus P. |
| description | Objectives
To compare the periodontal and peri‐implant conditions of periodontally susceptible and periodontally healthy subjects under maintenance care for a period of at least 3 years.
Material and methods
Sixty periodontally susceptible patients (PSP) and 56 periodontally non‐susceptible subjects (PHS) were treated with dental implants in the National Dental Centre Singapore (NDCS) and were maintained in a regular supportive periodontal care program for a mean of 6 years. Full mouth bleeding on probing (BoP), full mouth probing pocket depths (PPD), implant loss, and absence of crestal bone loss were recorded at the time of prosthesis delivery and following a mean follow‐up of 6 years 2 months.
Results
Although there were significant differences in the BoP and the percentage of subjects with tooth probing pocket depth ≥5 mm between PSP and PHS at the time of implant prosthesis installation (T0), there were no significant differences between the two subject groups in the various parameters assessed at the follow‐up visit (T1) (total number of teeth, percentage of subjects with implant probing pocket depth ≥5 mm, percentage of subjects with implant probing pocket depth ≥ 6 mm, absence of crestal bone loss, implant loss).
Conclusion
Owing to a rigid regular SPT program, implants placed in PSP perform equally well when compared to implants installed in PHS over a mean period of 6‐year follow‐up. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/clr.12824 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1891869736</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1826672106</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3864-e8911f0a5a7a9a76f4b7ddca3a788503053fe77d25bf42d6bcba77945a34c53b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0U1rHCEcBnAJLcnm5dAvEIRc2sMkvow6HsOStoGFQmnP4jjaujg60RnC3vIR-hn7Sep201IKhXoR5cfjXx4AXmF0jeu6MSFfY9KR9gisMEeoQQzhF2CFJGKNwByfgNNStgghLjt5DE4Il5K0VK5AuY8uLDYaC5ODo_ZxtlHvj0ZnC32Ek80-DSnOOoQdLEsxdpp9HyzUcYAxxe9P3_68LUu_tWYu0KUQ0qOPX6Afp6DjDOevNutpdw5eOh2KvXjez8Dnt3ef1u-bzYd39-vbTWNox9vGdhJjhzTTQkstuGt7MQxGUy26jiGKGHVWiIGw3rVk4L3ptRCyZZq2htGenoHXh9wpp4fFllmNvs4Z6iw2LUXh-kDHpaD8PyjhXBCM9vTqL7pNS471IwpLglpOqGBVvTkok1Mp2To1ZT_qvFMYqX1pqpamfpZW7eVz4tKPdvgtf7VUwc0BPPpgd_9OUuvNx0PkD6ZrozY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1920462375</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of maintenance care in periodontally susceptible and non‐susceptible subjects following implant therapy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Tan, Wah Ching ; Ong, Marianne M. A. ; Lang, Niklaus P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tan, Wah Ching ; Ong, Marianne M. A. ; Lang, Niklaus P.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
To compare the periodontal and peri‐implant conditions of periodontally susceptible and periodontally healthy subjects under maintenance care for a period of at least 3 years.
Material and methods
Sixty periodontally susceptible patients (PSP) and 56 periodontally non‐susceptible subjects (PHS) were treated with dental implants in the National Dental Centre Singapore (NDCS) and were maintained in a regular supportive periodontal care program for a mean of 6 years. Full mouth bleeding on probing (BoP), full mouth probing pocket depths (PPD), implant loss, and absence of crestal bone loss were recorded at the time of prosthesis delivery and following a mean follow‐up of 6 years 2 months.
Results
Although there were significant differences in the BoP and the percentage of subjects with tooth probing pocket depth ≥5 mm between PSP and PHS at the time of implant prosthesis installation (T0), there were no significant differences between the two subject groups in the various parameters assessed at the follow‐up visit (T1) (total number of teeth, percentage of subjects with implant probing pocket depth ≥5 mm, percentage of subjects with implant probing pocket depth ≥ 6 mm, absence of crestal bone loss, implant loss).
Conclusion
Owing to a rigid regular SPT program, implants placed in PSP perform equally well when compared to implants installed in PHS over a mean period of 6‐year follow‐up.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0905-7161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/clr.12824</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26992439</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Alveolar Ridge Augmentation ; Bleeding ; Bone loss ; compliance ; Dental Caries Susceptibility ; Dental Implantation ; Dental implants ; Dental materials ; Dental prosthetics ; Dental restorative materials ; Dentistry ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; implant dentistry ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Oral Hygiene ; periodontally healthy subjects ; periodontally susceptible patients ; Periodontics ; Periodontitis - prevention & control ; Postoperative Complications - prevention & control ; Prostheses ; residual probing depth ; Surgical implants ; Teeth ; Transplants & implants</subject><ispartof>Clinical oral implants research, 2017-04, Vol.28 (4), p.491-494</ispartof><rights>2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3864-e8911f0a5a7a9a76f4b7ddca3a788503053fe77d25bf42d6bcba77945a34c53b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3864-e8911f0a5a7a9a76f4b7ddca3a788503053fe77d25bf42d6bcba77945a34c53b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fclr.12824$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fclr.12824$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26992439$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tan, Wah Ching</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ong, Marianne M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lang, Niklaus P.</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of maintenance care in periodontally susceptible and non‐susceptible subjects following implant therapy</title><title>Clinical oral implants research</title><addtitle>Clin Oral Implants Res</addtitle><description>Objectives
To compare the periodontal and peri‐implant conditions of periodontally susceptible and periodontally healthy subjects under maintenance care for a period of at least 3 years.
Material and methods
Sixty periodontally susceptible patients (PSP) and 56 periodontally non‐susceptible subjects (PHS) were treated with dental implants in the National Dental Centre Singapore (NDCS) and were maintained in a regular supportive periodontal care program for a mean of 6 years. Full mouth bleeding on probing (BoP), full mouth probing pocket depths (PPD), implant loss, and absence of crestal bone loss were recorded at the time of prosthesis delivery and following a mean follow‐up of 6 years 2 months.
Results
Although there were significant differences in the BoP and the percentage of subjects with tooth probing pocket depth ≥5 mm between PSP and PHS at the time of implant prosthesis installation (T0), there were no significant differences between the two subject groups in the various parameters assessed at the follow‐up visit (T1) (total number of teeth, percentage of subjects with implant probing pocket depth ≥5 mm, percentage of subjects with implant probing pocket depth ≥ 6 mm, absence of crestal bone loss, implant loss).
Conclusion
Owing to a rigid regular SPT program, implants placed in PSP perform equally well when compared to implants installed in PHS over a mean period of 6‐year follow‐up.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation</subject><subject>Bleeding</subject><subject>Bone loss</subject><subject>compliance</subject><subject>Dental Caries Susceptibility</subject><subject>Dental Implantation</subject><subject>Dental implants</subject><subject>Dental materials</subject><subject>Dental prosthetics</subject><subject>Dental restorative materials</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>implant dentistry</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Oral Hygiene</subject><subject>periodontally healthy subjects</subject><subject>periodontally susceptible patients</subject><subject>Periodontics</subject><subject>Periodontitis - prevention & control</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - prevention & control</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>residual probing depth</subject><subject>Surgical implants</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><issn>0905-7161</issn><issn>1600-0501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0U1rHCEcBnAJLcnm5dAvEIRc2sMkvow6HsOStoGFQmnP4jjaujg60RnC3vIR-hn7Sep201IKhXoR5cfjXx4AXmF0jeu6MSFfY9KR9gisMEeoQQzhF2CFJGKNwByfgNNStgghLjt5DE4Il5K0VK5AuY8uLDYaC5ODo_ZxtlHvj0ZnC32Ek80-DSnOOoQdLEsxdpp9HyzUcYAxxe9P3_68LUu_tWYu0KUQ0qOPX6Afp6DjDOevNutpdw5eOh2KvXjez8Dnt3ef1u-bzYd39-vbTWNox9vGdhJjhzTTQkstuGt7MQxGUy26jiGKGHVWiIGw3rVk4L3ptRCyZZq2htGenoHXh9wpp4fFllmNvs4Z6iw2LUXh-kDHpaD8PyjhXBCM9vTqL7pNS471IwpLglpOqGBVvTkok1Mp2To1ZT_qvFMYqX1pqpamfpZW7eVz4tKPdvgtf7VUwc0BPPpgd_9OUuvNx0PkD6ZrozY</recordid><startdate>201704</startdate><enddate>201704</enddate><creator>Tan, Wah Ching</creator><creator>Ong, Marianne M. A.</creator><creator>Lang, Niklaus P.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201704</creationdate><title>Influence of maintenance care in periodontally susceptible and non‐susceptible subjects following implant therapy</title><author>Tan, Wah Ching ; Ong, Marianne M. A. ; Lang, Niklaus P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3864-e8911f0a5a7a9a76f4b7ddca3a788503053fe77d25bf42d6bcba77945a34c53b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation</topic><topic>Bleeding</topic><topic>Bone loss</topic><topic>compliance</topic><topic>Dental Caries Susceptibility</topic><topic>Dental Implantation</topic><topic>Dental implants</topic><topic>Dental materials</topic><topic>Dental prosthetics</topic><topic>Dental restorative materials</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>implant dentistry</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Oral Hygiene</topic><topic>periodontally healthy subjects</topic><topic>periodontally susceptible patients</topic><topic>Periodontics</topic><topic>Periodontitis - prevention & control</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - prevention & control</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>residual probing depth</topic><topic>Surgical implants</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tan, Wah Ching</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ong, Marianne M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lang, Niklaus P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tan, Wah Ching</au><au>Ong, Marianne M. A.</au><au>Lang, Niklaus P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of maintenance care in periodontally susceptible and non‐susceptible subjects following implant therapy</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Implants Res</addtitle><date>2017-04</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>491</spage><epage>494</epage><pages>491-494</pages><issn>0905-7161</issn><eissn>1600-0501</eissn><abstract>Objectives
To compare the periodontal and peri‐implant conditions of periodontally susceptible and periodontally healthy subjects under maintenance care for a period of at least 3 years.
Material and methods
Sixty periodontally susceptible patients (PSP) and 56 periodontally non‐susceptible subjects (PHS) were treated with dental implants in the National Dental Centre Singapore (NDCS) and were maintained in a regular supportive periodontal care program for a mean of 6 years. Full mouth bleeding on probing (BoP), full mouth probing pocket depths (PPD), implant loss, and absence of crestal bone loss were recorded at the time of prosthesis delivery and following a mean follow‐up of 6 years 2 months.
Results
Although there were significant differences in the BoP and the percentage of subjects with tooth probing pocket depth ≥5 mm between PSP and PHS at the time of implant prosthesis installation (T0), there were no significant differences between the two subject groups in the various parameters assessed at the follow‐up visit (T1) (total number of teeth, percentage of subjects with implant probing pocket depth ≥5 mm, percentage of subjects with implant probing pocket depth ≥ 6 mm, absence of crestal bone loss, implant loss).
Conclusion
Owing to a rigid regular SPT program, implants placed in PSP perform equally well when compared to implants installed in PHS over a mean period of 6‐year follow‐up.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>26992439</pmid><doi>10.1111/clr.12824</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0905-7161 |
| ispartof | Clinical oral implants research, 2017-04, Vol.28 (4), p.491-494 |
| issn | 0905-7161 1600-0501 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1891869736 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
| subjects | Adult Aged Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Bleeding Bone loss compliance Dental Caries Susceptibility Dental Implantation Dental implants Dental materials Dental prosthetics Dental restorative materials Dentistry Female Follow-Up Studies Humans implant dentistry Male Middle Aged Oral Hygiene periodontally healthy subjects periodontally susceptible patients Periodontics Periodontitis - prevention & control Postoperative Complications - prevention & control Prostheses residual probing depth Surgical implants Teeth Transplants & implants |
| title | Influence of maintenance care in periodontally susceptible and non‐susceptible subjects following implant therapy |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T16%3A43%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20maintenance%20care%20in%20periodontally%20susceptible%20and%20non%E2%80%90susceptible%20subjects%20following%20implant%20therapy&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oral%20implants%20research&rft.au=Tan,%20Wah%20Ching&rft.date=2017-04&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=491&rft.epage=494&rft.pages=491-494&rft.issn=0905-7161&rft.eissn=1600-0501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/clr.12824&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1826672106%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1920462375&rft_id=info:pmid/26992439&rfr_iscdi=true |