Integrating an automated activity monitor into an artificial insemination program and the associated risk factors affecting reproductive performance of dairy cows

The aim of this study was to compare 2 reproductive programs for the management of first postpartum artificial insemination (AI) based on activity monitors and timed AI, as well as to determine the effect of health-related factors on detection and expression of estrus. Lactating Holstein cows (n = 9...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of dairy science 2017-06, Vol.100 (6), p.5005-5018
Hauptverfasser: Burnett, Tracy A., Madureira, Augusto M.L., Silper, Bruna F., Fernandes, A.C.C., Cerri, Ronaldo L.A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 5018
container_issue 6
container_start_page 5005
container_title Journal of dairy science
container_volume 100
creator Burnett, Tracy A.
Madureira, Augusto M.L.
Silper, Bruna F.
Fernandes, A.C.C.
Cerri, Ronaldo L.A.
description The aim of this study was to compare 2 reproductive programs for the management of first postpartum artificial insemination (AI) based on activity monitors and timed AI, as well as to determine the effect of health-related factors on detection and expression of estrus. Lactating Holstein cows (n = 918) from 2 commercial farms were enrolled. Estrous cycles of all cows were presynchronized with 2 injections of PGF2α administered 2 wk apart. Treatments were (1) first insemination performed by timed AI (TAI) and (2) first insemination based upon the detection of estrus by activity monitors (ACT; Heatime, SCR Engineering, Netanya, Israel) after the presynchronization, whereas cows not inseminated by the detection of estrus were enrolled in the Ovsynch protocol. Body condition score (BCS; scale 1 to 5), hock score (scale: 1 to 4), gait score (scale: 1 to 4), and corpus luteum presence detected by ovarian ultrasonography were recorded twice during the presynchronization. On the ACT treatment, 50.5% of cows were inseminated based on detected estrus, whereas 83.2% of the cows on the TAI treatment were inseminated appropriately after the timed AI protocol. Pregnancy per AI did not differ by treatment (30.8 vs. 33.5% for ACT and TAI, respectively). Success of pregnancy was affected by parity, cyclicity, BCS, milk production, and a tendency for leg health. In addition, treatment × cyclicity and treatment × parity interactions were found to affect pregnancy success, where anovulatory cows and older cows had compromised pregnancy outcomes on the ACT treatment but not on the TAI treatment. Factors affecting pregnancy outcomes varied among farms. Hazard of pregnancy by 300 DIM was affected by farm, parity, BCS, a treatment × cyclicity interaction, and a tendency for an interaction between leg health and farm. Detection of estrus was affected by farm, parity, cyclicity, and leg health, but not BCS or milk production. Expression of estrus was compromised in anovular and older cows, and by the timing of the estrus event, but not by gait score, BCS, or milk production. Increased duration of estrus, but not intensity of estrus, improved pregnancy per AI. In conclusion, using an automated activity monitor for the detection of estrus within a Presynch-Ovsynch program resulted in similar pregnancy per AI and days open compared with a reproduction program that was strictly based on timed AI for first postpartum AI. In contrast, notable variations in reproductive outcomes were dete
doi_str_mv 10.3168/jds.2016-12246
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1891454795</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022030217303284</els_id><sourcerecordid>1891454795</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-fca98e99326a85fb48807edc3c40a147148b4bb31a1ef11bb57122812d17d13d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFvVCEUhYnR2LG6dWlYunlTLvDm8ZamsdqkSTe6Jjy4VOo8GIHXZv6Ov7TMTOvOFYF859zLOYR8BLYWsFEX966sOYNNB5zLzSuygp73nYBRvSYrxjjvmGD8jLwr5b5dgbP-LTnjSgo59GxF_l7HinfZ1BDvqInULDXNpqKjxtbwEOqezimGmjINsaYjkmvwwQazbU8F5xCbOkW6y6kZzQ1xtP5CakpJjTp45VB-U98cUy7UeI_2OC9j07jlMAjpDrNPeTbRIk2eOhPyntr0WN6TN95sC354Ps_Jz6uvPy6_dze3364vv9x0VihZO2_NqHAcBd8Y1ftJKsUGdFZYyQzIAaSa5DQJMIAeYJr6oWWmgDsYHAgnzsnnk29b6s-Cpeo5FIvbrYmYlqJBjSB7OYx9Q9cn1OZUSkavdznMJu81MH3oRbde9KEXfeylCT49ey_TjO4f_lJEA9QJwPbDh4BZFxuwZeFCbmlpl8L_vJ8Av7ygaQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1891454795</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integrating an automated activity monitor into an artificial insemination program and the associated risk factors affecting reproductive performance of dairy cows</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Burnett, Tracy A. ; Madureira, Augusto M.L. ; Silper, Bruna F. ; Fernandes, A.C.C. ; Cerri, Ronaldo L.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Burnett, Tracy A. ; Madureira, Augusto M.L. ; Silper, Bruna F. ; Fernandes, A.C.C. ; Cerri, Ronaldo L.A.</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to compare 2 reproductive programs for the management of first postpartum artificial insemination (AI) based on activity monitors and timed AI, as well as to determine the effect of health-related factors on detection and expression of estrus. Lactating Holstein cows (n = 918) from 2 commercial farms were enrolled. Estrous cycles of all cows were presynchronized with 2 injections of PGF2α administered 2 wk apart. Treatments were (1) first insemination performed by timed AI (TAI) and (2) first insemination based upon the detection of estrus by activity monitors (ACT; Heatime, SCR Engineering, Netanya, Israel) after the presynchronization, whereas cows not inseminated by the detection of estrus were enrolled in the Ovsynch protocol. Body condition score (BCS; scale 1 to 5), hock score (scale: 1 to 4), gait score (scale: 1 to 4), and corpus luteum presence detected by ovarian ultrasonography were recorded twice during the presynchronization. On the ACT treatment, 50.5% of cows were inseminated based on detected estrus, whereas 83.2% of the cows on the TAI treatment were inseminated appropriately after the timed AI protocol. Pregnancy per AI did not differ by treatment (30.8 vs. 33.5% for ACT and TAI, respectively). Success of pregnancy was affected by parity, cyclicity, BCS, milk production, and a tendency for leg health. In addition, treatment × cyclicity and treatment × parity interactions were found to affect pregnancy success, where anovulatory cows and older cows had compromised pregnancy outcomes on the ACT treatment but not on the TAI treatment. Factors affecting pregnancy outcomes varied among farms. Hazard of pregnancy by 300 DIM was affected by farm, parity, BCS, a treatment × cyclicity interaction, and a tendency for an interaction between leg health and farm. Detection of estrus was affected by farm, parity, cyclicity, and leg health, but not BCS or milk production. Expression of estrus was compromised in anovular and older cows, and by the timing of the estrus event, but not by gait score, BCS, or milk production. Increased duration of estrus, but not intensity of estrus, improved pregnancy per AI. In conclusion, using an automated activity monitor for the detection of estrus within a Presynch-Ovsynch program resulted in similar pregnancy per AI and days open compared with a reproduction program that was strictly based on timed AI for first postpartum AI. In contrast, notable variations in reproductive outcomes were detected between farms, suggesting that the use of automated activity monitors is prone to individual farm management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0302</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3198</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3168/jds.2016-12246</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28434750</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; automated activity monitor ; Cattle ; Corpus Luteum - physiology ; dairy cow ; Dinoprost - administration &amp; dosage ; Estrus Detection - methods ; Estrus Synchronization - methods ; Female ; health ; Insemination, Artificial - veterinary ; Lactation ; Parity ; Pregnancy ; Progesterone ; Reproduction - physiology ; Risk Factors ; timed artificial insemination</subject><ispartof>Journal of dairy science, 2017-06, Vol.100 (6), p.5005-5018</ispartof><rights>2017 American Dairy Science Association</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-fca98e99326a85fb48807edc3c40a147148b4bb31a1ef11bb57122812d17d13d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-fca98e99326a85fb48807edc3c40a147148b4bb31a1ef11bb57122812d17d13d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030217303284$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28434750$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burnett, Tracy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madureira, Augusto M.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silper, Bruna F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, A.C.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerri, Ronaldo L.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Integrating an automated activity monitor into an artificial insemination program and the associated risk factors affecting reproductive performance of dairy cows</title><title>Journal of dairy science</title><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to compare 2 reproductive programs for the management of first postpartum artificial insemination (AI) based on activity monitors and timed AI, as well as to determine the effect of health-related factors on detection and expression of estrus. Lactating Holstein cows (n = 918) from 2 commercial farms were enrolled. Estrous cycles of all cows were presynchronized with 2 injections of PGF2α administered 2 wk apart. Treatments were (1) first insemination performed by timed AI (TAI) and (2) first insemination based upon the detection of estrus by activity monitors (ACT; Heatime, SCR Engineering, Netanya, Israel) after the presynchronization, whereas cows not inseminated by the detection of estrus were enrolled in the Ovsynch protocol. Body condition score (BCS; scale 1 to 5), hock score (scale: 1 to 4), gait score (scale: 1 to 4), and corpus luteum presence detected by ovarian ultrasonography were recorded twice during the presynchronization. On the ACT treatment, 50.5% of cows were inseminated based on detected estrus, whereas 83.2% of the cows on the TAI treatment were inseminated appropriately after the timed AI protocol. Pregnancy per AI did not differ by treatment (30.8 vs. 33.5% for ACT and TAI, respectively). Success of pregnancy was affected by parity, cyclicity, BCS, milk production, and a tendency for leg health. In addition, treatment × cyclicity and treatment × parity interactions were found to affect pregnancy success, where anovulatory cows and older cows had compromised pregnancy outcomes on the ACT treatment but not on the TAI treatment. Factors affecting pregnancy outcomes varied among farms. Hazard of pregnancy by 300 DIM was affected by farm, parity, BCS, a treatment × cyclicity interaction, and a tendency for an interaction between leg health and farm. Detection of estrus was affected by farm, parity, cyclicity, and leg health, but not BCS or milk production. Expression of estrus was compromised in anovular and older cows, and by the timing of the estrus event, but not by gait score, BCS, or milk production. Increased duration of estrus, but not intensity of estrus, improved pregnancy per AI. In conclusion, using an automated activity monitor for the detection of estrus within a Presynch-Ovsynch program resulted in similar pregnancy per AI and days open compared with a reproduction program that was strictly based on timed AI for first postpartum AI. In contrast, notable variations in reproductive outcomes were detected between farms, suggesting that the use of automated activity monitors is prone to individual farm management.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>automated activity monitor</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Corpus Luteum - physiology</subject><subject>dairy cow</subject><subject>Dinoprost - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Estrus Detection - methods</subject><subject>Estrus Synchronization - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>health</subject><subject>Insemination, Artificial - veterinary</subject><subject>Lactation</subject><subject>Parity</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Progesterone</subject><subject>Reproduction - physiology</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>timed artificial insemination</subject><issn>0022-0302</issn><issn>1525-3198</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUFvVCEUhYnR2LG6dWlYunlTLvDm8ZamsdqkSTe6Jjy4VOo8GIHXZv6Ov7TMTOvOFYF859zLOYR8BLYWsFEX966sOYNNB5zLzSuygp73nYBRvSYrxjjvmGD8jLwr5b5dgbP-LTnjSgo59GxF_l7HinfZ1BDvqInULDXNpqKjxtbwEOqezimGmjINsaYjkmvwwQazbU8F5xCbOkW6y6kZzQ1xtP5CakpJjTp45VB-U98cUy7UeI_2OC9j07jlMAjpDrNPeTbRIk2eOhPyntr0WN6TN95sC354Ps_Jz6uvPy6_dze3364vv9x0VihZO2_NqHAcBd8Y1ftJKsUGdFZYyQzIAaSa5DQJMIAeYJr6oWWmgDsYHAgnzsnnk29b6s-Cpeo5FIvbrYmYlqJBjSB7OYx9Q9cn1OZUSkavdznMJu81MH3oRbde9KEXfeylCT49ey_TjO4f_lJEA9QJwPbDh4BZFxuwZeFCbmlpl8L_vJ8Av7ygaQ</recordid><startdate>201706</startdate><enddate>201706</enddate><creator>Burnett, Tracy A.</creator><creator>Madureira, Augusto M.L.</creator><creator>Silper, Bruna F.</creator><creator>Fernandes, A.C.C.</creator><creator>Cerri, Ronaldo L.A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201706</creationdate><title>Integrating an automated activity monitor into an artificial insemination program and the associated risk factors affecting reproductive performance of dairy cows</title><author>Burnett, Tracy A. ; Madureira, Augusto M.L. ; Silper, Bruna F. ; Fernandes, A.C.C. ; Cerri, Ronaldo L.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-fca98e99326a85fb48807edc3c40a147148b4bb31a1ef11bb57122812d17d13d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>automated activity monitor</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Corpus Luteum - physiology</topic><topic>dairy cow</topic><topic>Dinoprost - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Estrus Detection - methods</topic><topic>Estrus Synchronization - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>health</topic><topic>Insemination, Artificial - veterinary</topic><topic>Lactation</topic><topic>Parity</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Progesterone</topic><topic>Reproduction - physiology</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>timed artificial insemination</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burnett, Tracy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madureira, Augusto M.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silper, Bruna F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, A.C.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerri, Ronaldo L.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burnett, Tracy A.</au><au>Madureira, Augusto M.L.</au><au>Silper, Bruna F.</au><au>Fernandes, A.C.C.</au><au>Cerri, Ronaldo L.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Integrating an automated activity monitor into an artificial insemination program and the associated risk factors affecting reproductive performance of dairy cows</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><date>2017-06</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>5005</spage><epage>5018</epage><pages>5005-5018</pages><issn>0022-0302</issn><eissn>1525-3198</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to compare 2 reproductive programs for the management of first postpartum artificial insemination (AI) based on activity monitors and timed AI, as well as to determine the effect of health-related factors on detection and expression of estrus. Lactating Holstein cows (n = 918) from 2 commercial farms were enrolled. Estrous cycles of all cows were presynchronized with 2 injections of PGF2α administered 2 wk apart. Treatments were (1) first insemination performed by timed AI (TAI) and (2) first insemination based upon the detection of estrus by activity monitors (ACT; Heatime, SCR Engineering, Netanya, Israel) after the presynchronization, whereas cows not inseminated by the detection of estrus were enrolled in the Ovsynch protocol. Body condition score (BCS; scale 1 to 5), hock score (scale: 1 to 4), gait score (scale: 1 to 4), and corpus luteum presence detected by ovarian ultrasonography were recorded twice during the presynchronization. On the ACT treatment, 50.5% of cows were inseminated based on detected estrus, whereas 83.2% of the cows on the TAI treatment were inseminated appropriately after the timed AI protocol. Pregnancy per AI did not differ by treatment (30.8 vs. 33.5% for ACT and TAI, respectively). Success of pregnancy was affected by parity, cyclicity, BCS, milk production, and a tendency for leg health. In addition, treatment × cyclicity and treatment × parity interactions were found to affect pregnancy success, where anovulatory cows and older cows had compromised pregnancy outcomes on the ACT treatment but not on the TAI treatment. Factors affecting pregnancy outcomes varied among farms. Hazard of pregnancy by 300 DIM was affected by farm, parity, BCS, a treatment × cyclicity interaction, and a tendency for an interaction between leg health and farm. Detection of estrus was affected by farm, parity, cyclicity, and leg health, but not BCS or milk production. Expression of estrus was compromised in anovular and older cows, and by the timing of the estrus event, but not by gait score, BCS, or milk production. Increased duration of estrus, but not intensity of estrus, improved pregnancy per AI. In conclusion, using an automated activity monitor for the detection of estrus within a Presynch-Ovsynch program resulted in similar pregnancy per AI and days open compared with a reproduction program that was strictly based on timed AI for first postpartum AI. In contrast, notable variations in reproductive outcomes were detected between farms, suggesting that the use of automated activity monitors is prone to individual farm management.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28434750</pmid><doi>10.3168/jds.2016-12246</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0302
ispartof Journal of dairy science, 2017-06, Vol.100 (6), p.5005-5018
issn 0022-0302
1525-3198
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1891454795
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Animals
automated activity monitor
Cattle
Corpus Luteum - physiology
dairy cow
Dinoprost - administration & dosage
Estrus Detection - methods
Estrus Synchronization - methods
Female
health
Insemination, Artificial - veterinary
Lactation
Parity
Pregnancy
Progesterone
Reproduction - physiology
Risk Factors
timed artificial insemination
title Integrating an automated activity monitor into an artificial insemination program and the associated risk factors affecting reproductive performance of dairy cows
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T01%3A06%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integrating%20an%20automated%20activity%20monitor%20into%20an%20artificial%20insemination%20program%20and%20the%20associated%20risk%20factors%20affecting%20reproductive%20performance%20of%20dairy%20cows&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dairy%20science&rft.au=Burnett,%20Tracy%20A.&rft.date=2017-06&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=5005&rft.epage=5018&rft.pages=5005-5018&rft.issn=0022-0302&rft.eissn=1525-3198&rft_id=info:doi/10.3168/jds.2016-12246&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1891454795%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1891454795&rft_id=info:pmid/28434750&rft_els_id=S0022030217303284&rfr_iscdi=true