Politics and Administration
This article develops a theory of the administration and effectiveness of government programs. In the model, a bureaucrat chooses a mechanism for assigning a good to clients with uncertain qualifications. The mechanism applies a costly means test to verify the client's eligibility. A politician...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of political science 2017-04, Vol.61 (2), p.305-319 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 319 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 305 |
container_title | American journal of political science |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Ting, Michael M. |
description | This article develops a theory of the administration and effectiveness of government programs. In the model, a bureaucrat chooses a mechanism for assigning a good to clients with uncertain qualifications. The mechanism applies a costly means test to verify the client's eligibility. A politician exercises oversight by limiting the bureaucrat's testing resources and the number of clients to be served. The model predicts the incidence of common administrative pathologies, including inefficient and politicized distribution of resources, inflexibility, program errors, and backlogs. When the politician favors marginally qualified clients, per capita spending is low and error rates are high. When the politician favors highly qualified clients, per capita spending is higher and error rates are lower. In the latter case, the bureaucrat may also use discriminatory testing, which allows the politician to target favored clients. Such targeted programs increase budgets and reduce backlogs, but they also increase error rates. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ajps.12273 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1891444237</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26384733</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26384733</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4543-4cad591d85a4378eceeb34eb177793ea44a8dcb21b19b0794e26aa4abd456c803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90M9LwzAUB_AgCs7pxasIAy8idOYlL01yHMOfDByo55CmGWR07Uw6ZP-9nVUPHpZLCPl8H48vIedAx9CdW7tcpzEwJvkBGYBAmglN5SEZUKpZJpTgx-QkpSXt3qj5gFzMmyq0waWRrcvRpFyFOqQ22jY09Sk5Wtgq-bOfe0je7-_epo_Z7OXhaTqZZQ4F8gydLYWGUgmLXCrvvC84-gKklJp7i2hV6QoGBeiCSo2e5daiLUoUuVOUD8l1P3cdm4-NT61ZheR8VdnaN5tkQGlARMZlR6_-0WWziXW3nWGY51JIyNk-BUpxRikD6NRNr1xsUop-YdYxrGzcGqBm16bZtWm-2-ww9PgzVH67R5rJ8_z1N3PZZ5apbeJfhuVcYffNvwAE332s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1883200211</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Politics and Administration</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Ting, Michael M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ting, Michael M.</creatorcontrib><description>This article develops a theory of the administration and effectiveness of government programs. In the model, a bureaucrat chooses a mechanism for assigning a good to clients with uncertain qualifications. The mechanism applies a costly means test to verify the client's eligibility. A politician exercises oversight by limiting the bureaucrat's testing resources and the number of clients to be served. The model predicts the incidence of common administrative pathologies, including inefficient and politicized distribution of resources, inflexibility, program errors, and backlogs. When the politician favors marginally qualified clients, per capita spending is low and error rates are high. When the politician favors highly qualified clients, per capita spending is higher and error rates are lower. In the latter case, the bureaucrat may also use discriminatory testing, which allows the politician to target favored clients. Such targeted programs increase budgets and reduce backlogs, but they also increase error rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0092-5853</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-5907</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12273</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJPLB4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Backlog ; Budgets ; Bureaucracy ; Bureaucrats ; Clients ; Effectiveness ; Errors ; Expenditures ; Management ; Oversight ; Per capita ; Political behavior ; Political science ; Politicians ; Politics ; Public services ; Qualifications</subject><ispartof>American journal of political science, 2017-04, Vol.61 (2), p.305-319</ispartof><rights>2017 Midwest Political Science Association</rights><rights>2016, Midwest Political Science Association</rights><rights>2017 by the Midwest Political Science Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4543-4cad591d85a4378eceeb34eb177793ea44a8dcb21b19b0794e26aa4abd456c803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4543-4cad591d85a4378eceeb34eb177793ea44a8dcb21b19b0794e26aa4abd456c803</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26384733$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26384733$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ting, Michael M.</creatorcontrib><title>Politics and Administration</title><title>American journal of political science</title><description>This article develops a theory of the administration and effectiveness of government programs. In the model, a bureaucrat chooses a mechanism for assigning a good to clients with uncertain qualifications. The mechanism applies a costly means test to verify the client's eligibility. A politician exercises oversight by limiting the bureaucrat's testing resources and the number of clients to be served. The model predicts the incidence of common administrative pathologies, including inefficient and politicized distribution of resources, inflexibility, program errors, and backlogs. When the politician favors marginally qualified clients, per capita spending is low and error rates are high. When the politician favors highly qualified clients, per capita spending is higher and error rates are lower. In the latter case, the bureaucrat may also use discriminatory testing, which allows the politician to target favored clients. Such targeted programs increase budgets and reduce backlogs, but they also increase error rates.</description><subject>Backlog</subject><subject>Budgets</subject><subject>Bureaucracy</subject><subject>Bureaucrats</subject><subject>Clients</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Oversight</subject><subject>Per capita</subject><subject>Political behavior</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Politicians</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Public services</subject><subject>Qualifications</subject><issn>0092-5853</issn><issn>1540-5907</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp90M9LwzAUB_AgCs7pxasIAy8idOYlL01yHMOfDByo55CmGWR07Uw6ZP-9nVUPHpZLCPl8H48vIedAx9CdW7tcpzEwJvkBGYBAmglN5SEZUKpZJpTgx-QkpSXt3qj5gFzMmyq0waWRrcvRpFyFOqQ22jY09Sk5Wtgq-bOfe0je7-_epo_Z7OXhaTqZZQ4F8gydLYWGUgmLXCrvvC84-gKklJp7i2hV6QoGBeiCSo2e5daiLUoUuVOUD8l1P3cdm4-NT61ZheR8VdnaN5tkQGlARMZlR6_-0WWziXW3nWGY51JIyNk-BUpxRikD6NRNr1xsUop-YdYxrGzcGqBm16bZtWm-2-ww9PgzVH67R5rJ8_z1N3PZZ5apbeJfhuVcYffNvwAE332s</recordid><startdate>201704</startdate><enddate>201704</enddate><creator>Ting, Michael M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201704</creationdate><title>Politics and Administration</title><author>Ting, Michael M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4543-4cad591d85a4378eceeb34eb177793ea44a8dcb21b19b0794e26aa4abd456c803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Backlog</topic><topic>Budgets</topic><topic>Bureaucracy</topic><topic>Bureaucrats</topic><topic>Clients</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Oversight</topic><topic>Per capita</topic><topic>Political behavior</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Politicians</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Public services</topic><topic>Qualifications</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ting, Michael M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>American journal of political science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ting, Michael M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Politics and Administration</atitle><jtitle>American journal of political science</jtitle><date>2017-04</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>305</spage><epage>319</epage><pages>305-319</pages><issn>0092-5853</issn><eissn>1540-5907</eissn><coden>AJPLB4</coden><abstract>This article develops a theory of the administration and effectiveness of government programs. In the model, a bureaucrat chooses a mechanism for assigning a good to clients with uncertain qualifications. The mechanism applies a costly means test to verify the client's eligibility. A politician exercises oversight by limiting the bureaucrat's testing resources and the number of clients to be served. The model predicts the incidence of common administrative pathologies, including inefficient and politicized distribution of resources, inflexibility, program errors, and backlogs. When the politician favors marginally qualified clients, per capita spending is low and error rates are high. When the politician favors highly qualified clients, per capita spending is higher and error rates are lower. In the latter case, the bureaucrat may also use discriminatory testing, which allows the politician to target favored clients. Such targeted programs increase budgets and reduce backlogs, but they also increase error rates.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/ajps.12273</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0092-5853 |
ispartof | American journal of political science, 2017-04, Vol.61 (2), p.305-319 |
issn | 0092-5853 1540-5907 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1891444237 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Access via Wiley Online Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Backlog Budgets Bureaucracy Bureaucrats Clients Effectiveness Errors Expenditures Management Oversight Per capita Political behavior Political science Politicians Politics Public services Qualifications |
title | Politics and Administration |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T18%3A26%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Politics%20and%20Administration&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20political%20science&rft.au=Ting,%20Michael%20M.&rft.date=2017-04&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=305&rft.epage=319&rft.pages=305-319&rft.issn=0092-5853&rft.eissn=1540-5907&rft.coden=AJPLB4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ajps.12273&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26384733%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1883200211&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26384733&rfr_iscdi=true |