Social institutions, mobility and social justice: the results of a study

This article contributes to the debate on social justice in Russian society. Currently this debate revolves around the role of Russian culture, which is often claimed to preserve the traditions of egalitarian distribution. The findings from an all-Russia survey cast doubt on this assumption, reveali...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Mir Rossii 2015-01, Vol.24 (4), p.7-28
1. Verfasser: Chernysh, Mikhail
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 28
container_issue 4
container_start_page 7
container_title Mir Rossii
container_volume 24
creator Chernysh, Mikhail
description This article contributes to the debate on social justice in Russian society. Currently this debate revolves around the role of Russian culture, which is often claimed to preserve the traditions of egalitarian distribution. The findings from an all-Russia survey cast doubt on this assumption, revealing a plurality of interpretations of social justice - from the concept of justice as direct action to the concept of justice as a procedure based on law. The proportion of Russians who share egalitarian values is small. The majority of the population perceives the principle of justice as the strict implementation thereof by authorities, the population, employers and employees. Vignettes were used in order to gauge the reactions of Russians to situations where different interpretations of justice may be encountered. The findings reveal that the key problem is the gap between the macro and micro perceptions of justice. General macro principles rarely agree with practices taking place on a micro level. At this micro level interactions often resemble the rules of private ad hoc contracts, in which more resourceful groups preserve certain privileges. [web URL: https://mirros.hse.ru/en/2015-24-4/159741784.html] Reprinted by permission of the chief editor of the journal Mir Rossii
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1891439623</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1891439623</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_18914396233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVyjEKwjAUANAMChbtHf7oYCExWlJXUbrr4FZimmJKmmj_z9DbK-gFnN7yZiwTSoiCS3VbsByx55yLsqz2SmSsvkTjtAcXkBwlcjHgBoZ4d97RBDq0gN_Rp88w9gD0sDBaTJ4QYgcakFI7rdi80x5t_nPJ1ufT9VgXzzG-kkVqBofGeq-DjQkboSqxk1W5lfKP-gYh50B6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1891439623</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social institutions, mobility and social justice: the results of a study</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Chernysh, Mikhail</creator><creatorcontrib>Chernysh, Mikhail</creatorcontrib><description>This article contributes to the debate on social justice in Russian society. Currently this debate revolves around the role of Russian culture, which is often claimed to preserve the traditions of egalitarian distribution. The findings from an all-Russia survey cast doubt on this assumption, revealing a plurality of interpretations of social justice - from the concept of justice as direct action to the concept of justice as a procedure based on law. The proportion of Russians who share egalitarian values is small. The majority of the population perceives the principle of justice as the strict implementation thereof by authorities, the population, employers and employees. Vignettes were used in order to gauge the reactions of Russians to situations where different interpretations of justice may be encountered. The findings reveal that the key problem is the gap between the macro and micro perceptions of justice. General macro principles rarely agree with practices taking place on a micro level. At this micro level interactions often resemble the rules of private ad hoc contracts, in which more resourceful groups preserve certain privileges. [web URL: https://mirros.hse.ru/en/2015-24-4/159741784.html] Reprinted by permission of the chief editor of the journal Mir Rossii</description><identifier>ISSN: 1811-038X</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Attitude surveys ; Bureaucracy ; Culture ; Rule of law ; Russian Federation ; Social justice ; State-society relations</subject><ispartof>Mir Rossii, 2015-01, Vol.24 (4), p.7-28</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chernysh, Mikhail</creatorcontrib><title>Social institutions, mobility and social justice: the results of a study</title><title>Mir Rossii</title><description>This article contributes to the debate on social justice in Russian society. Currently this debate revolves around the role of Russian culture, which is often claimed to preserve the traditions of egalitarian distribution. The findings from an all-Russia survey cast doubt on this assumption, revealing a plurality of interpretations of social justice - from the concept of justice as direct action to the concept of justice as a procedure based on law. The proportion of Russians who share egalitarian values is small. The majority of the population perceives the principle of justice as the strict implementation thereof by authorities, the population, employers and employees. Vignettes were used in order to gauge the reactions of Russians to situations where different interpretations of justice may be encountered. The findings reveal that the key problem is the gap between the macro and micro perceptions of justice. General macro principles rarely agree with practices taking place on a micro level. At this micro level interactions often resemble the rules of private ad hoc contracts, in which more resourceful groups preserve certain privileges. [web URL: https://mirros.hse.ru/en/2015-24-4/159741784.html] Reprinted by permission of the chief editor of the journal Mir Rossii</description><subject>Attitude surveys</subject><subject>Bureaucracy</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Rule of law</subject><subject>Russian Federation</subject><subject>Social justice</subject><subject>State-society relations</subject><issn>1811-038X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVyjEKwjAUANAMChbtHf7oYCExWlJXUbrr4FZimmJKmmj_z9DbK-gFnN7yZiwTSoiCS3VbsByx55yLsqz2SmSsvkTjtAcXkBwlcjHgBoZ4d97RBDq0gN_Rp88w9gD0sDBaTJ4QYgcakFI7rdi80x5t_nPJ1ufT9VgXzzG-kkVqBofGeq-DjQkboSqxk1W5lfKP-gYh50B6</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Chernysh, Mikhail</creator><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>Social institutions, mobility and social justice: the results of a study</title><author>Chernysh, Mikhail</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_18914396233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Attitude surveys</topic><topic>Bureaucracy</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Rule of law</topic><topic>Russian Federation</topic><topic>Social justice</topic><topic>State-society relations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chernysh, Mikhail</creatorcontrib><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Mir Rossii</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chernysh, Mikhail</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social institutions, mobility and social justice: the results of a study</atitle><jtitle>Mir Rossii</jtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>7</spage><epage>28</epage><pages>7-28</pages><issn>1811-038X</issn><abstract>This article contributes to the debate on social justice in Russian society. Currently this debate revolves around the role of Russian culture, which is often claimed to preserve the traditions of egalitarian distribution. The findings from an all-Russia survey cast doubt on this assumption, revealing a plurality of interpretations of social justice - from the concept of justice as direct action to the concept of justice as a procedure based on law. The proportion of Russians who share egalitarian values is small. The majority of the population perceives the principle of justice as the strict implementation thereof by authorities, the population, employers and employees. Vignettes were used in order to gauge the reactions of Russians to situations where different interpretations of justice may be encountered. The findings reveal that the key problem is the gap between the macro and micro perceptions of justice. General macro principles rarely agree with practices taking place on a micro level. At this micro level interactions often resemble the rules of private ad hoc contracts, in which more resourceful groups preserve certain privileges. [web URL: https://mirros.hse.ru/en/2015-24-4/159741784.html] Reprinted by permission of the chief editor of the journal Mir Rossii</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1811-038X
ispartof Mir Rossii, 2015-01, Vol.24 (4), p.7-28
issn 1811-038X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1891439623
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Attitude surveys
Bureaucracy
Culture
Rule of law
Russian Federation
Social justice
State-society relations
title Social institutions, mobility and social justice: the results of a study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T19%3A21%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20institutions,%20mobility%20and%20social%20justice:%20the%20results%20of%20a%20study&rft.jtitle=Mir%20Rossii&rft.au=Chernysh,%20Mikhail&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=7&rft.epage=28&rft.pages=7-28&rft.issn=1811-038X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1891439623%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1891439623&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true