Equitable or elitist? The social impact of the 2014 Tour de France Grand Départ
The Tour de France Grand Départ came to the UK in July 2014. It was heralded as a great success, drawing in an estimated 3.5 million visitors and generating over £128 million for the local economy, but there has been little research on assessing the geodemographics of who attended this event - did i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Area (London 1969) 2017-03, Vol.49 (1), p.60-68 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 68 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 60 |
container_title | Area (London 1969) |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Whittle, Matthew Lomax, Nik Heppenstall, Alison Brerton, Simon |
description | The Tour de France Grand Départ came to the UK in July 2014. It was heralded as a great success, drawing in an estimated 3.5 million visitors and generating over £128 million for the local economy, but there has been little research on assessing the geodemographics of who attended this event - did it reach out to all sections of society as hoped, or was it contained to the 'typical' cycling spectator? Using previously unpublished data, this research examines the demography of the crowd attending different sections of Le Grand Départ and explores whether the event was equitable, i.e. accessible to all sections of the population, or elitist, with a demographic bias in who attended. The results show that there was a bias towards a white, male, middle-aged spectators, which is particularly prominent for the least accessible stages. Ethnic minorities and people with a disability were particularly underrepresented for large parts of the route. Where there were interventions to improve access, the demographic profile of spectators was more in line with the national picture. Understanding who does, and who does not, attend these events has wider implications for the planning of, and longer-term socio-economic impacts of, these events and we recommend that further advanced planning would improve the equitability of future sporting events. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/area.12284 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1891439540</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44202355</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44202355</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4254-315539b4c498533bcb96396d43a7383053ac86983580f5b6e454fc9f4d2f926b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9KAzEQxoMoWKsX70LAiwir-TNJk5OU2lahoEg9h2yaxS3bbpvsIn0kn8MXM7XqwYM4l2GG3zfwzYfQKSVXNNW1Dd5eUcYU7KEOhZ7IoCfZPuoQQiAjSsMhOopxvh2lIB30OFy3ZWPzyuM6YF-VTRmbGzx98TjWrrQVLhcr6xpcF7hJS0Yo4GndBjzzeBTs0nk8Tm2Gb9_fVjY0x-igsFX0J1-9i55Hw-ngLps8jO8H_UnmgAnIOBWC6xwcaCU4z12uJddyBtz2uOJEcOuU1IoLRQqRSw8CCqcLmLFCM5nzLrrY3V2Fet362JhFGZ2vKrv0dRsNVZoC1wLIP1AFlOmekgk9_4XOk9dlMmKoZgSASwWJutxRLtQxBl-YVSgXNmwMJWabg9nmYD5zSDDdwa9l5Td_kKb_NOx_a852mnls6vCjAWCE8fS4D2G1j_0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1920443684</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Equitable or elitist? The social impact of the 2014 Tour de France Grand Départ</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Whittle, Matthew ; Lomax, Nik ; Heppenstall, Alison ; Brerton, Simon</creator><creatorcontrib>Whittle, Matthew ; Lomax, Nik ; Heppenstall, Alison ; Brerton, Simon</creatorcontrib><description>The Tour de France Grand Départ came to the UK in July 2014. It was heralded as a great success, drawing in an estimated 3.5 million visitors and generating over £128 million for the local economy, but there has been little research on assessing the geodemographics of who attended this event - did it reach out to all sections of society as hoped, or was it contained to the 'typical' cycling spectator? Using previously unpublished data, this research examines the demography of the crowd attending different sections of Le Grand Départ and explores whether the event was equitable, i.e. accessible to all sections of the population, or elitist, with a demographic bias in who attended. The results show that there was a bias towards a white, male, middle-aged spectators, which is particularly prominent for the least accessible stages. Ethnic minorities and people with a disability were particularly underrepresented for large parts of the route. Where there were interventions to improve access, the demographic profile of spectators was more in line with the national picture. Understanding who does, and who does not, attend these events has wider implications for the planning of, and longer-term socio-economic impacts of, these events and we recommend that further advanced planning would improve the equitability of future sporting events.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-0894</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-4762</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/area.12284</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: John Wiley & Sons Ltd</publisher><subject>Accessibility ; Bias ; Bicycle racing ; Bicycles ; Cultural centers ; Cycles ; cycling ; Demographics ; Demography ; Disability ; Economic impact ; Economics ; Elitism ; Equality ; Ethnic groups ; Geodemographics ; Leeds ; Local economy ; Males ; Middle age ; Minority & ethnic groups ; Minority groups ; Professional sports ; Regions ; Social impact ; Socioeconomic factors ; Spectators ; Sports marketing ; survey ; Tour de France ; tourism ; Tours ; United Kingdom ; Visitors</subject><ispartof>Area (London 1969), 2017-03, Vol.49 (1), p.60-68</ispartof><rights>2017 Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers)</rights><rights>2016 Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers)</rights><rights>Area © 2017 Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4254-315539b4c498533bcb96396d43a7383053ac86983580f5b6e454fc9f4d2f926b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4254-315539b4c498533bcb96396d43a7383053ac86983580f5b6e454fc9f4d2f926b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44202355$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44202355$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Whittle, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lomax, Nik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heppenstall, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brerton, Simon</creatorcontrib><title>Equitable or elitist? The social impact of the 2014 Tour de France Grand Départ</title><title>Area (London 1969)</title><description>The Tour de France Grand Départ came to the UK in July 2014. It was heralded as a great success, drawing in an estimated 3.5 million visitors and generating over £128 million for the local economy, but there has been little research on assessing the geodemographics of who attended this event - did it reach out to all sections of society as hoped, or was it contained to the 'typical' cycling spectator? Using previously unpublished data, this research examines the demography of the crowd attending different sections of Le Grand Départ and explores whether the event was equitable, i.e. accessible to all sections of the population, or elitist, with a demographic bias in who attended. The results show that there was a bias towards a white, male, middle-aged spectators, which is particularly prominent for the least accessible stages. Ethnic minorities and people with a disability were particularly underrepresented for large parts of the route. Where there were interventions to improve access, the demographic profile of spectators was more in line with the national picture. Understanding who does, and who does not, attend these events has wider implications for the planning of, and longer-term socio-economic impacts of, these events and we recommend that further advanced planning would improve the equitability of future sporting events.</description><subject>Accessibility</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Bicycle racing</subject><subject>Bicycles</subject><subject>Cultural centers</subject><subject>Cycles</subject><subject>cycling</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Elitism</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Ethnic groups</subject><subject>Geodemographics</subject><subject>Leeds</subject><subject>Local economy</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Middle age</subject><subject>Minority & ethnic groups</subject><subject>Minority groups</subject><subject>Professional sports</subject><subject>Regions</subject><subject>Social impact</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Spectators</subject><subject>Sports marketing</subject><subject>survey</subject><subject>Tour de France</subject><subject>tourism</subject><subject>Tours</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Visitors</subject><issn>0004-0894</issn><issn>1475-4762</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc9KAzEQxoMoWKsX70LAiwir-TNJk5OU2lahoEg9h2yaxS3bbpvsIn0kn8MXM7XqwYM4l2GG3zfwzYfQKSVXNNW1Dd5eUcYU7KEOhZ7IoCfZPuoQQiAjSsMhOopxvh2lIB30OFy3ZWPzyuM6YF-VTRmbGzx98TjWrrQVLhcr6xpcF7hJS0Yo4GndBjzzeBTs0nk8Tm2Gb9_fVjY0x-igsFX0J1-9i55Hw-ngLps8jO8H_UnmgAnIOBWC6xwcaCU4z12uJddyBtz2uOJEcOuU1IoLRQqRSw8CCqcLmLFCM5nzLrrY3V2Fet362JhFGZ2vKrv0dRsNVZoC1wLIP1AFlOmekgk9_4XOk9dlMmKoZgSASwWJutxRLtQxBl-YVSgXNmwMJWabg9nmYD5zSDDdwa9l5Td_kKb_NOx_a852mnls6vCjAWCE8fS4D2G1j_0</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Whittle, Matthew</creator><creator>Lomax, Nik</creator><creator>Heppenstall, Alison</creator><creator>Brerton, Simon</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>Equitable or elitist? The social impact of the 2014 Tour de France Grand Départ</title><author>Whittle, Matthew ; Lomax, Nik ; Heppenstall, Alison ; Brerton, Simon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4254-315539b4c498533bcb96396d43a7383053ac86983580f5b6e454fc9f4d2f926b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Accessibility</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Bicycle racing</topic><topic>Bicycles</topic><topic>Cultural centers</topic><topic>Cycles</topic><topic>cycling</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Elitism</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Ethnic groups</topic><topic>Geodemographics</topic><topic>Leeds</topic><topic>Local economy</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Middle age</topic><topic>Minority & ethnic groups</topic><topic>Minority groups</topic><topic>Professional sports</topic><topic>Regions</topic><topic>Social impact</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Spectators</topic><topic>Sports marketing</topic><topic>survey</topic><topic>Tour de France</topic><topic>tourism</topic><topic>Tours</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Visitors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Whittle, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lomax, Nik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heppenstall, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brerton, Simon</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Area (London 1969)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Whittle, Matthew</au><au>Lomax, Nik</au><au>Heppenstall, Alison</au><au>Brerton, Simon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Equitable or elitist? The social impact of the 2014 Tour de France Grand Départ</atitle><jtitle>Area (London 1969)</jtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>60</spage><epage>68</epage><pages>60-68</pages><issn>0004-0894</issn><eissn>1475-4762</eissn><abstract>The Tour de France Grand Départ came to the UK in July 2014. It was heralded as a great success, drawing in an estimated 3.5 million visitors and generating over £128 million for the local economy, but there has been little research on assessing the geodemographics of who attended this event - did it reach out to all sections of society as hoped, or was it contained to the 'typical' cycling spectator? Using previously unpublished data, this research examines the demography of the crowd attending different sections of Le Grand Départ and explores whether the event was equitable, i.e. accessible to all sections of the population, or elitist, with a demographic bias in who attended. The results show that there was a bias towards a white, male, middle-aged spectators, which is particularly prominent for the least accessible stages. Ethnic minorities and people with a disability were particularly underrepresented for large parts of the route. Where there were interventions to improve access, the demographic profile of spectators was more in line with the national picture. Understanding who does, and who does not, attend these events has wider implications for the planning of, and longer-term socio-economic impacts of, these events and we recommend that further advanced planning would improve the equitability of future sporting events.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/area.12284</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0004-0894 |
ispartof | Area (London 1969), 2017-03, Vol.49 (1), p.60-68 |
issn | 0004-0894 1475-4762 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1891439540 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Accessibility Bias Bicycle racing Bicycles Cultural centers Cycles cycling Demographics Demography Disability Economic impact Economics Elitism Equality Ethnic groups Geodemographics Leeds Local economy Males Middle age Minority & ethnic groups Minority groups Professional sports Regions Social impact Socioeconomic factors Spectators Sports marketing survey Tour de France tourism Tours United Kingdom Visitors |
title | Equitable or elitist? The social impact of the 2014 Tour de France Grand Départ |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T03%3A34%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Equitable%20or%20elitist?%20The%20social%20impact%20of%20the%202014%20Tour%20de%20France%20Grand%20D%C3%A9part&rft.jtitle=Area%20(London%201969)&rft.au=Whittle,%20Matthew&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=60&rft.epage=68&rft.pages=60-68&rft.issn=0004-0894&rft.eissn=1475-4762&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/area.12284&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44202355%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1920443684&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44202355&rfr_iscdi=true |