Equitable or elitist? The social impact of the 2014 Tour de France Grand Départ

The Tour de France Grand Départ came to the UK in July 2014. It was heralded as a great success, drawing in an estimated 3.5 million visitors and generating over £128 million for the local economy, but there has been little research on assessing the geodemographics of who attended this event - did i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Area (London 1969) 2017-03, Vol.49 (1), p.60-68
Hauptverfasser: Whittle, Matthew, Lomax, Nik, Heppenstall, Alison, Brerton, Simon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 68
container_issue 1
container_start_page 60
container_title Area (London 1969)
container_volume 49
creator Whittle, Matthew
Lomax, Nik
Heppenstall, Alison
Brerton, Simon
description The Tour de France Grand Départ came to the UK in July 2014. It was heralded as a great success, drawing in an estimated 3.5 million visitors and generating over £128 million for the local economy, but there has been little research on assessing the geodemographics of who attended this event - did it reach out to all sections of society as hoped, or was it contained to the 'typical' cycling spectator? Using previously unpublished data, this research examines the demography of the crowd attending different sections of Le Grand Départ and explores whether the event was equitable, i.e. accessible to all sections of the population, or elitist, with a demographic bias in who attended. The results show that there was a bias towards a white, male, middle-aged spectators, which is particularly prominent for the least accessible stages. Ethnic minorities and people with a disability were particularly underrepresented for large parts of the route. Where there were interventions to improve access, the demographic profile of spectators was more in line with the national picture. Understanding who does, and who does not, attend these events has wider implications for the planning of, and longer-term socio-economic impacts of, these events and we recommend that further advanced planning would improve the equitability of future sporting events.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/area.12284
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1891439540</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44202355</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44202355</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4254-315539b4c498533bcb96396d43a7383053ac86983580f5b6e454fc9f4d2f926b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9KAzEQxoMoWKsX70LAiwir-TNJk5OU2lahoEg9h2yaxS3bbpvsIn0kn8MXM7XqwYM4l2GG3zfwzYfQKSVXNNW1Dd5eUcYU7KEOhZ7IoCfZPuoQQiAjSsMhOopxvh2lIB30OFy3ZWPzyuM6YF-VTRmbGzx98TjWrrQVLhcr6xpcF7hJS0Yo4GndBjzzeBTs0nk8Tm2Gb9_fVjY0x-igsFX0J1-9i55Hw-ngLps8jO8H_UnmgAnIOBWC6xwcaCU4z12uJddyBtz2uOJEcOuU1IoLRQqRSw8CCqcLmLFCM5nzLrrY3V2Fet362JhFGZ2vKrv0dRsNVZoC1wLIP1AFlOmekgk9_4XOk9dlMmKoZgSASwWJutxRLtQxBl-YVSgXNmwMJWabg9nmYD5zSDDdwa9l5Td_kKb_NOx_a852mnls6vCjAWCE8fS4D2G1j_0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1920443684</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Equitable or elitist? The social impact of the 2014 Tour de France Grand Départ</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Whittle, Matthew ; Lomax, Nik ; Heppenstall, Alison ; Brerton, Simon</creator><creatorcontrib>Whittle, Matthew ; Lomax, Nik ; Heppenstall, Alison ; Brerton, Simon</creatorcontrib><description>The Tour de France Grand Départ came to the UK in July 2014. It was heralded as a great success, drawing in an estimated 3.5 million visitors and generating over £128 million for the local economy, but there has been little research on assessing the geodemographics of who attended this event - did it reach out to all sections of society as hoped, or was it contained to the 'typical' cycling spectator? Using previously unpublished data, this research examines the demography of the crowd attending different sections of Le Grand Départ and explores whether the event was equitable, i.e. accessible to all sections of the population, or elitist, with a demographic bias in who attended. The results show that there was a bias towards a white, male, middle-aged spectators, which is particularly prominent for the least accessible stages. Ethnic minorities and people with a disability were particularly underrepresented for large parts of the route. Where there were interventions to improve access, the demographic profile of spectators was more in line with the national picture. Understanding who does, and who does not, attend these events has wider implications for the planning of, and longer-term socio-economic impacts of, these events and we recommend that further advanced planning would improve the equitability of future sporting events.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-0894</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-4762</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/area.12284</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</publisher><subject>Accessibility ; Bias ; Bicycle racing ; Bicycles ; Cultural centers ; Cycles ; cycling ; Demographics ; Demography ; Disability ; Economic impact ; Economics ; Elitism ; Equality ; Ethnic groups ; Geodemographics ; Leeds ; Local economy ; Males ; Middle age ; Minority &amp; ethnic groups ; Minority groups ; Professional sports ; Regions ; Social impact ; Socioeconomic factors ; Spectators ; Sports marketing ; survey ; Tour de France ; tourism ; Tours ; United Kingdom ; Visitors</subject><ispartof>Area (London 1969), 2017-03, Vol.49 (1), p.60-68</ispartof><rights>2017 Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers)</rights><rights>2016 Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers)</rights><rights>Area © 2017 Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4254-315539b4c498533bcb96396d43a7383053ac86983580f5b6e454fc9f4d2f926b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4254-315539b4c498533bcb96396d43a7383053ac86983580f5b6e454fc9f4d2f926b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44202355$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44202355$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Whittle, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lomax, Nik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heppenstall, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brerton, Simon</creatorcontrib><title>Equitable or elitist? The social impact of the 2014 Tour de France Grand Départ</title><title>Area (London 1969)</title><description>The Tour de France Grand Départ came to the UK in July 2014. It was heralded as a great success, drawing in an estimated 3.5 million visitors and generating over £128 million for the local economy, but there has been little research on assessing the geodemographics of who attended this event - did it reach out to all sections of society as hoped, or was it contained to the 'typical' cycling spectator? Using previously unpublished data, this research examines the demography of the crowd attending different sections of Le Grand Départ and explores whether the event was equitable, i.e. accessible to all sections of the population, or elitist, with a demographic bias in who attended. The results show that there was a bias towards a white, male, middle-aged spectators, which is particularly prominent for the least accessible stages. Ethnic minorities and people with a disability were particularly underrepresented for large parts of the route. Where there were interventions to improve access, the demographic profile of spectators was more in line with the national picture. Understanding who does, and who does not, attend these events has wider implications for the planning of, and longer-term socio-economic impacts of, these events and we recommend that further advanced planning would improve the equitability of future sporting events.</description><subject>Accessibility</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Bicycle racing</subject><subject>Bicycles</subject><subject>Cultural centers</subject><subject>Cycles</subject><subject>cycling</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Elitism</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Ethnic groups</subject><subject>Geodemographics</subject><subject>Leeds</subject><subject>Local economy</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Middle age</subject><subject>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</subject><subject>Minority groups</subject><subject>Professional sports</subject><subject>Regions</subject><subject>Social impact</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Spectators</subject><subject>Sports marketing</subject><subject>survey</subject><subject>Tour de France</subject><subject>tourism</subject><subject>Tours</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Visitors</subject><issn>0004-0894</issn><issn>1475-4762</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc9KAzEQxoMoWKsX70LAiwir-TNJk5OU2lahoEg9h2yaxS3bbpvsIn0kn8MXM7XqwYM4l2GG3zfwzYfQKSVXNNW1Dd5eUcYU7KEOhZ7IoCfZPuoQQiAjSsMhOopxvh2lIB30OFy3ZWPzyuM6YF-VTRmbGzx98TjWrrQVLhcr6xpcF7hJS0Yo4GndBjzzeBTs0nk8Tm2Gb9_fVjY0x-igsFX0J1-9i55Hw-ngLps8jO8H_UnmgAnIOBWC6xwcaCU4z12uJddyBtz2uOJEcOuU1IoLRQqRSw8CCqcLmLFCM5nzLrrY3V2Fet362JhFGZ2vKrv0dRsNVZoC1wLIP1AFlOmekgk9_4XOk9dlMmKoZgSASwWJutxRLtQxBl-YVSgXNmwMJWabg9nmYD5zSDDdwa9l5Td_kKb_NOx_a852mnls6vCjAWCE8fS4D2G1j_0</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Whittle, Matthew</creator><creator>Lomax, Nik</creator><creator>Heppenstall, Alison</creator><creator>Brerton, Simon</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>Equitable or elitist? The social impact of the 2014 Tour de France Grand Départ</title><author>Whittle, Matthew ; Lomax, Nik ; Heppenstall, Alison ; Brerton, Simon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4254-315539b4c498533bcb96396d43a7383053ac86983580f5b6e454fc9f4d2f926b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Accessibility</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Bicycle racing</topic><topic>Bicycles</topic><topic>Cultural centers</topic><topic>Cycles</topic><topic>cycling</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Elitism</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Ethnic groups</topic><topic>Geodemographics</topic><topic>Leeds</topic><topic>Local economy</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Middle age</topic><topic>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</topic><topic>Minority groups</topic><topic>Professional sports</topic><topic>Regions</topic><topic>Social impact</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Spectators</topic><topic>Sports marketing</topic><topic>survey</topic><topic>Tour de France</topic><topic>tourism</topic><topic>Tours</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Visitors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Whittle, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lomax, Nik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heppenstall, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brerton, Simon</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Area (London 1969)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Whittle, Matthew</au><au>Lomax, Nik</au><au>Heppenstall, Alison</au><au>Brerton, Simon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Equitable or elitist? The social impact of the 2014 Tour de France Grand Départ</atitle><jtitle>Area (London 1969)</jtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>60</spage><epage>68</epage><pages>60-68</pages><issn>0004-0894</issn><eissn>1475-4762</eissn><abstract>The Tour de France Grand Départ came to the UK in July 2014. It was heralded as a great success, drawing in an estimated 3.5 million visitors and generating over £128 million for the local economy, but there has been little research on assessing the geodemographics of who attended this event - did it reach out to all sections of society as hoped, or was it contained to the 'typical' cycling spectator? Using previously unpublished data, this research examines the demography of the crowd attending different sections of Le Grand Départ and explores whether the event was equitable, i.e. accessible to all sections of the population, or elitist, with a demographic bias in who attended. The results show that there was a bias towards a white, male, middle-aged spectators, which is particularly prominent for the least accessible stages. Ethnic minorities and people with a disability were particularly underrepresented for large parts of the route. Where there were interventions to improve access, the demographic profile of spectators was more in line with the national picture. Understanding who does, and who does not, attend these events has wider implications for the planning of, and longer-term socio-economic impacts of, these events and we recommend that further advanced planning would improve the equitability of future sporting events.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/area.12284</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-0894
ispartof Area (London 1969), 2017-03, Vol.49 (1), p.60-68
issn 0004-0894
1475-4762
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1891439540
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Accessibility
Bias
Bicycle racing
Bicycles
Cultural centers
Cycles
cycling
Demographics
Demography
Disability
Economic impact
Economics
Elitism
Equality
Ethnic groups
Geodemographics
Leeds
Local economy
Males
Middle age
Minority & ethnic groups
Minority groups
Professional sports
Regions
Social impact
Socioeconomic factors
Spectators
Sports marketing
survey
Tour de France
tourism
Tours
United Kingdom
Visitors
title Equitable or elitist? The social impact of the 2014 Tour de France Grand Départ
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T03%3A34%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Equitable%20or%20elitist?%20The%20social%20impact%20of%20the%202014%20Tour%20de%20France%20Grand%20D%C3%A9part&rft.jtitle=Area%20(London%201969)&rft.au=Whittle,%20Matthew&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=60&rft.epage=68&rft.pages=60-68&rft.issn=0004-0894&rft.eissn=1475-4762&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/area.12284&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44202355%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1920443684&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44202355&rfr_iscdi=true