Beyond study participants: a framework for engaging patients in the selection or development of clinical outcome assessments for evaluating the benefits of treatment in medical product development

Background Patients are participating more actively in health care decision-making with regard to their health, as well as in the broader realm of assessing the value of medical products and influencing decisions about their registration and reimbursement. There is an increasing trend to include pat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Quality of life research 2018-01, Vol.27 (1), p.5-16
Hauptverfasser: Wilson, Hilary, Dashiell-Aje, Ebony, Anatchkova, Milena, Coyne, Karin, Hareendran, Asha, Leidy, Nancy Kline, McHorney, Colleen A., Wyrwich, Kathy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 16
container_issue 1
container_start_page 5
container_title Quality of life research
container_volume 27
creator Wilson, Hilary
Dashiell-Aje, Ebony
Anatchkova, Milena
Coyne, Karin
Hareendran, Asha
Leidy, Nancy Kline
McHorney, Colleen A.
Wyrwich, Kathy
description Background Patients are participating more actively in health care decision-making with regard to their health, as well as in the broader realm of assessing the value of medical products and influencing decisions about their registration and reimbursement. There is an increasing trend to include patients' perspectives throughout the stages of medical product development by broadening the traditional study-participant role to that of an active partner throughout the process. Including patients in the selection and development of clinical outcome assessments (COAs) to evaluate the benefit of treatment is particularly important. Still, despite widespread enthusiasm, there is substantial uncertainty regarding how and when to engage patients in this process. Purpose This manuscript proposes a methodological framework for engaging patients at varying levels in the selection and development of COAs for medical product development. Framework The framework builds on the Food and Drug Administration's roadmap for patient-focused COA. Methods for engaging patients across each stage in this roadmap are summarized by levels of engagement. Opportunities and examples of patient engagement (PE) in the selection and/or development of COAs are summarized, together with best practices and practical considerations. Conclusion This paper offers a framework for understanding, planning, and implementing methods to advance PE in the selection and/or development of COAs for evaluating the benefit of medical products. The intent is to further this important discussion and enhance the process and outcome of PE in this context.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11136-017-1577-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1891088017</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44856068</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44856068</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-b5cc421932716fcf104030f06fd03c676c8f3c0f7c68dd56bb46ea8cd12105e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAURiMEotPCA7AAWWLDJnBtJ47NDir-pEpsYB05zvXgIbEH22k178eD4ZmUqmLBypZ8vnOv_FXVMwqvKUD3JlFKuaiBdjVtu64WD6pNufCaiUY9rDagBKsVb_hZdZ7SDgCkAva4OmOyYS0A21S_3-Mh-JGkvIwHstcxO-P22uf0lmhio57xJsSfxIZI0G_11vltwbLDghDnSf6BJOGEJrvgSaFGvMYp7OcCkGCJmZx3Rk8kLNmEGYlOCVOaT_mT9VpPSxEW79E1oEfrylvJ5og6n0Rl0IzjybOPYVxMvj_nSfXI6inh09vzovr-8cO3y8_11ddPXy7fXdWGqybXQ2tMw6jirKPCGkuhAQ4WhB2BG9EJIy03YDsj5Di2YhgagVqakTIKLQp-Ub1avWWHXwum3M8uGZwm7TEsqadSUZCy9FHQl_-gu7BEX7brqVJMlmlSFYqulIkhpYi230c363joKfTHivu14r4o-2PF_XGJF7fmZSh_cpf422kB2Aqk8uS3GO-N_o_1-RrapRzinbRpZCtASP4H-dfADA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1992867689</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Beyond study participants: a framework for engaging patients in the selection or development of clinical outcome assessments for evaluating the benefits of treatment in medical product development</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Wilson, Hilary ; Dashiell-Aje, Ebony ; Anatchkova, Milena ; Coyne, Karin ; Hareendran, Asha ; Leidy, Nancy Kline ; McHorney, Colleen A. ; Wyrwich, Kathy</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Hilary ; Dashiell-Aje, Ebony ; Anatchkova, Milena ; Coyne, Karin ; Hareendran, Asha ; Leidy, Nancy Kline ; McHorney, Colleen A. ; Wyrwich, Kathy</creatorcontrib><description>Background Patients are participating more actively in health care decision-making with regard to their health, as well as in the broader realm of assessing the value of medical products and influencing decisions about their registration and reimbursement. There is an increasing trend to include patients' perspectives throughout the stages of medical product development by broadening the traditional study-participant role to that of an active partner throughout the process. Including patients in the selection and development of clinical outcome assessments (COAs) to evaluate the benefit of treatment is particularly important. Still, despite widespread enthusiasm, there is substantial uncertainty regarding how and when to engage patients in this process. Purpose This manuscript proposes a methodological framework for engaging patients at varying levels in the selection and development of COAs for medical product development. Framework The framework builds on the Food and Drug Administration's roadmap for patient-focused COA. Methods for engaging patients across each stage in this roadmap are summarized by levels of engagement. Opportunities and examples of patient engagement (PE) in the selection and/or development of COAs are summarized, together with best practices and practical considerations. Conclusion This paper offers a framework for understanding, planning, and implementing methods to advance PE in the selection and/or development of COAs for evaluating the benefit of medical products. The intent is to further this important discussion and enhance the process and outcome of PE in this context.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-9343</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2649</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11136-017-1577-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28425002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer</publisher><subject>Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Patient assessment ; Patients ; Product development ; Public Health ; Quality of Life Research ; Sociology ; SPECIAL SECTION: MEASURING WHAT MATTERS ; Special Section: Measuring What Matters (by invitation only)</subject><ispartof>Quality of life research, 2018-01, Vol.27 (1), p.5-16</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017</rights><rights>Quality of Life Research is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-b5cc421932716fcf104030f06fd03c676c8f3c0f7c68dd56bb46ea8cd12105e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-b5cc421932716fcf104030f06fd03c676c8f3c0f7c68dd56bb46ea8cd12105e63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1102-6869</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44856068$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44856068$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28425002$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Hilary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dashiell-Aje, Ebony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anatchkova, Milena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coyne, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hareendran, Asha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leidy, Nancy Kline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McHorney, Colleen A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wyrwich, Kathy</creatorcontrib><title>Beyond study participants: a framework for engaging patients in the selection or development of clinical outcome assessments for evaluating the benefits of treatment in medical product development</title><title>Quality of life research</title><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><description>Background Patients are participating more actively in health care decision-making with regard to their health, as well as in the broader realm of assessing the value of medical products and influencing decisions about their registration and reimbursement. There is an increasing trend to include patients' perspectives throughout the stages of medical product development by broadening the traditional study-participant role to that of an active partner throughout the process. Including patients in the selection and development of clinical outcome assessments (COAs) to evaluate the benefit of treatment is particularly important. Still, despite widespread enthusiasm, there is substantial uncertainty regarding how and when to engage patients in this process. Purpose This manuscript proposes a methodological framework for engaging patients at varying levels in the selection and development of COAs for medical product development. Framework The framework builds on the Food and Drug Administration's roadmap for patient-focused COA. Methods for engaging patients across each stage in this roadmap are summarized by levels of engagement. Opportunities and examples of patient engagement (PE) in the selection and/or development of COAs are summarized, together with best practices and practical considerations. Conclusion This paper offers a framework for understanding, planning, and implementing methods to advance PE in the selection and/or development of COAs for evaluating the benefit of medical products. The intent is to further this important discussion and enhance the process and outcome of PE in this context.</description><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Patient assessment</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Product development</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>SPECIAL SECTION: MEASURING WHAT MATTERS</subject><subject>Special Section: Measuring What Matters (by invitation only)</subject><issn>0962-9343</issn><issn>1573-2649</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAURiMEotPCA7AAWWLDJnBtJ47NDir-pEpsYB05zvXgIbEH22k178eD4ZmUqmLBypZ8vnOv_FXVMwqvKUD3JlFKuaiBdjVtu64WD6pNufCaiUY9rDagBKsVb_hZdZ7SDgCkAva4OmOyYS0A21S_3-Mh-JGkvIwHstcxO-P22uf0lmhio57xJsSfxIZI0G_11vltwbLDghDnSf6BJOGEJrvgSaFGvMYp7OcCkGCJmZx3Rk8kLNmEGYlOCVOaT_mT9VpPSxEW79E1oEfrylvJ5og6n0Rl0IzjybOPYVxMvj_nSfXI6inh09vzovr-8cO3y8_11ddPXy7fXdWGqybXQ2tMw6jirKPCGkuhAQ4WhB2BG9EJIy03YDsj5Di2YhgagVqakTIKLQp-Ub1avWWHXwum3M8uGZwm7TEsqadSUZCy9FHQl_-gu7BEX7brqVJMlmlSFYqulIkhpYi230c363joKfTHivu14r4o-2PF_XGJF7fmZSh_cpf422kB2Aqk8uS3GO-N_o_1-RrapRzinbRpZCtASP4H-dfADA</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Wilson, Hilary</creator><creator>Dashiell-Aje, Ebony</creator><creator>Anatchkova, Milena</creator><creator>Coyne, Karin</creator><creator>Hareendran, Asha</creator><creator>Leidy, Nancy Kline</creator><creator>McHorney, Colleen A.</creator><creator>Wyrwich, Kathy</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1102-6869</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Beyond study participants: a framework for engaging patients in the selection or development of clinical outcome assessments for evaluating the benefits of treatment in medical product development</title><author>Wilson, Hilary ; Dashiell-Aje, Ebony ; Anatchkova, Milena ; Coyne, Karin ; Hareendran, Asha ; Leidy, Nancy Kline ; McHorney, Colleen A. ; Wyrwich, Kathy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-b5cc421932716fcf104030f06fd03c676c8f3c0f7c68dd56bb46ea8cd12105e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Patient assessment</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Product development</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>SPECIAL SECTION: MEASURING WHAT MATTERS</topic><topic>Special Section: Measuring What Matters (by invitation only)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Hilary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dashiell-Aje, Ebony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anatchkova, Milena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coyne, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hareendran, Asha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leidy, Nancy Kline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McHorney, Colleen A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wyrwich, Kathy</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Quality of life research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilson, Hilary</au><au>Dashiell-Aje, Ebony</au><au>Anatchkova, Milena</au><au>Coyne, Karin</au><au>Hareendran, Asha</au><au>Leidy, Nancy Kline</au><au>McHorney, Colleen A.</au><au>Wyrwich, Kathy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Beyond study participants: a framework for engaging patients in the selection or development of clinical outcome assessments for evaluating the benefits of treatment in medical product development</atitle><jtitle>Quality of life research</jtitle><stitle>Qual Life Res</stitle><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>5</spage><epage>16</epage><pages>5-16</pages><issn>0962-9343</issn><eissn>1573-2649</eissn><abstract>Background Patients are participating more actively in health care decision-making with regard to their health, as well as in the broader realm of assessing the value of medical products and influencing decisions about their registration and reimbursement. There is an increasing trend to include patients' perspectives throughout the stages of medical product development by broadening the traditional study-participant role to that of an active partner throughout the process. Including patients in the selection and development of clinical outcome assessments (COAs) to evaluate the benefit of treatment is particularly important. Still, despite widespread enthusiasm, there is substantial uncertainty regarding how and when to engage patients in this process. Purpose This manuscript proposes a methodological framework for engaging patients at varying levels in the selection and development of COAs for medical product development. Framework The framework builds on the Food and Drug Administration's roadmap for patient-focused COA. Methods for engaging patients across each stage in this roadmap are summarized by levels of engagement. Opportunities and examples of patient engagement (PE) in the selection and/or development of COAs are summarized, together with best practices and practical considerations. Conclusion This paper offers a framework for understanding, planning, and implementing methods to advance PE in the selection and/or development of COAs for evaluating the benefit of medical products. The intent is to further this important discussion and enhance the process and outcome of PE in this context.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>28425002</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11136-017-1577-6</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1102-6869</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-9343
ispartof Quality of life research, 2018-01, Vol.27 (1), p.5-16
issn 0962-9343
1573-2649
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1891088017
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Patient assessment
Patients
Product development
Public Health
Quality of Life Research
Sociology
SPECIAL SECTION: MEASURING WHAT MATTERS
Special Section: Measuring What Matters (by invitation only)
title Beyond study participants: a framework for engaging patients in the selection or development of clinical outcome assessments for evaluating the benefits of treatment in medical product development
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T22%3A38%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Beyond%20study%20participants:%20a%20framework%20for%20engaging%20patients%20in%20the%20selection%20or%20development%20of%20clinical%20outcome%20assessments%20for%20evaluating%20the%20benefits%20of%20treatment%20in%20medical%20product%20development&rft.jtitle=Quality%20of%20life%20research&rft.au=Wilson,%20Hilary&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=5&rft.epage=16&rft.pages=5-16&rft.issn=0962-9343&rft.eissn=1573-2649&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11136-017-1577-6&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44856068%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1992867689&rft_id=info:pmid/28425002&rft_jstor_id=44856068&rfr_iscdi=true