Temporal dynamics in epipelic, pelagic and epiphytic algal production in a clear and a turbid shallow lake
SUMMARY 1. Pelagic and epipelic microalgal production were measured over a year in a pre‐defined area (depth 0.5 m) in each of two lakes, one turbid and one with clear water. Further estimates of epiphytic production within reed stands were obtained by measuring production of periphyton developed on...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Freshwater biology 2003-03, Vol.48 (3), p.418-431 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 431 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 418 |
container_title | Freshwater biology |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Liboriussen, Lone Jeppesen, Erik |
description | SUMMARY 1. Pelagic and epipelic microalgal production were measured over a year in a pre‐defined area (depth 0.5 m) in each of two lakes, one turbid and one with clear water. Further estimates of epiphytic production within reed stands were obtained by measuring production of periphyton developed on artificial substrata.
2. Total annual production of phytoplankton and epipelon was 34% greater in the turbid lake (190 g C m−2 year−1) than in the clearwater lake (141 g C m−2 year−1). However, the ratio of total production to mean water column TP concentration was two fold greater in the clearwater lake.
3. Phytoplankton accounted for the majority of the annual production (96%) in the turbid lake, while epipelic microalgal production dominated (77%) in the clear lake. The relative contribution of epipelic algae varied over the year, however, and in the turbid lake was higher in winter (11–25%), when the water was relatively clear, than during summer (0.7–1.7%), when the water was more turbid. In the clearwater lake, the relative contribution of epipelon was high both in winter, when the water was most clear, and in mid‐summer, when phytoplankton production was constrained either by nutrients or grazing.
4. Compared with pelagic and epipelic primary production, epiphytic production within a reed stand was low and did not vary significantly between the lakes.
5. The study supports the theory of a competitive and compensatory trade‐off between primary producers in lakes with contrasting nutrient concentrations, resulting in relatively small differences in overall production between clear and turbid lakes when integrating over the season and over different habitats. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01018.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18905519</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>323731491</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5348-30b3a119638775b39912b3cf3e72f41dd33b246ea37f8dd4890ce3818d4c35a23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhiMEEkvhHSwkOJHU9thxcuAAFW2RKhCiqFIv1sRxWqfeZLETdfftcXarVuLU09jj7xuN9WcZYbRgVJTHfcGglDkXXBWcUigoo6wqti-y1ePDy2xFE5tLqujr7E2MPaW0koqvsv7SrjdjQE_a3YBrZyJxA7Ebt7HemU8kFbxxhuDQ7ru3u2m5-ZtkbMLYzmZy47A4SIy3GPYkkmkOjWtJvEXvx3vi8c6-zV516KN991CPsj-n3y5PzvOLn2ffT75c5EaCqHKgDSBjdQmVUrKBuma8AdOBVbwTrG0BGi5Ki6C6qm1FVVNjoWJVKwxI5HCUfTzMTfv9nW2c9NpFY73HwY5z1CwZUrL6GSBNO0iWwPf_gf04hyF9QnNgomRSqQRVB8iEMcZgO70Jbo1hpxnVS1S610sieklEL1HpfVR6m9QPD_MxGvRdwMG4-OQLKaBUNHGfD9y983b37Pn69Orrckp-fvBdnOz20cdwp0sFSuqrH2f617Xk51Be69_wD9PotLw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>231461577</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Temporal dynamics in epipelic, pelagic and epiphytic algal production in a clear and a turbid shallow lake</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Liboriussen, Lone ; Jeppesen, Erik</creator><creatorcontrib>Liboriussen, Lone ; Jeppesen, Erik</creatorcontrib><description>SUMMARY 1. Pelagic and epipelic microalgal production were measured over a year in a pre‐defined area (depth 0.5 m) in each of two lakes, one turbid and one with clear water. Further estimates of epiphytic production within reed stands were obtained by measuring production of periphyton developed on artificial substrata.
2. Total annual production of phytoplankton and epipelon was 34% greater in the turbid lake (190 g C m−2 year−1) than in the clearwater lake (141 g C m−2 year−1). However, the ratio of total production to mean water column TP concentration was two fold greater in the clearwater lake.
3. Phytoplankton accounted for the majority of the annual production (96%) in the turbid lake, while epipelic microalgal production dominated (77%) in the clear lake. The relative contribution of epipelic algae varied over the year, however, and in the turbid lake was higher in winter (11–25%), when the water was relatively clear, than during summer (0.7–1.7%), when the water was more turbid. In the clearwater lake, the relative contribution of epipelon was high both in winter, when the water was most clear, and in mid‐summer, when phytoplankton production was constrained either by nutrients or grazing.
4. Compared with pelagic and epipelic primary production, epiphytic production within a reed stand was low and did not vary significantly between the lakes.
5. The study supports the theory of a competitive and compensatory trade‐off between primary producers in lakes with contrasting nutrient concentrations, resulting in relatively small differences in overall production between clear and turbid lakes when integrating over the season and over different habitats.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-5070</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2427</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01018.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FWBLAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; benthic-pelagic links ; Biological and medical sciences ; eutrophication ; Fresh water ecosystems ; Freshwater ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; P-I parameters ; periphyton ; primary productivity ; Sea water ecosystems ; Synecology</subject><ispartof>Freshwater biology, 2003-03, Vol.48 (3), p.418-431</ispartof><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Science Ltd. Mar 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5348-30b3a119638775b39912b3cf3e72f41dd33b246ea37f8dd4890ce3818d4c35a23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5348-30b3a119638775b39912b3cf3e72f41dd33b246ea37f8dd4890ce3818d4c35a23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2427.2003.01018.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2427.2003.01018.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27907,27908,45557,45558</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14543670$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liboriussen, Lone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeppesen, Erik</creatorcontrib><title>Temporal dynamics in epipelic, pelagic and epiphytic algal production in a clear and a turbid shallow lake</title><title>Freshwater biology</title><description>SUMMARY 1. Pelagic and epipelic microalgal production were measured over a year in a pre‐defined area (depth 0.5 m) in each of two lakes, one turbid and one with clear water. Further estimates of epiphytic production within reed stands were obtained by measuring production of periphyton developed on artificial substrata.
2. Total annual production of phytoplankton and epipelon was 34% greater in the turbid lake (190 g C m−2 year−1) than in the clearwater lake (141 g C m−2 year−1). However, the ratio of total production to mean water column TP concentration was two fold greater in the clearwater lake.
3. Phytoplankton accounted for the majority of the annual production (96%) in the turbid lake, while epipelic microalgal production dominated (77%) in the clear lake. The relative contribution of epipelic algae varied over the year, however, and in the turbid lake was higher in winter (11–25%), when the water was relatively clear, than during summer (0.7–1.7%), when the water was more turbid. In the clearwater lake, the relative contribution of epipelon was high both in winter, when the water was most clear, and in mid‐summer, when phytoplankton production was constrained either by nutrients or grazing.
4. Compared with pelagic and epipelic primary production, epiphytic production within a reed stand was low and did not vary significantly between the lakes.
5. The study supports the theory of a competitive and compensatory trade‐off between primary producers in lakes with contrasting nutrient concentrations, resulting in relatively small differences in overall production between clear and turbid lakes when integrating over the season and over different habitats.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>benthic-pelagic links</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>eutrophication</subject><subject>Fresh water ecosystems</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>P-I parameters</subject><subject>periphyton</subject><subject>primary productivity</subject><subject>Sea water ecosystems</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><issn>0046-5070</issn><issn>1365-2427</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhiMEEkvhHSwkOJHU9thxcuAAFW2RKhCiqFIv1sRxWqfeZLETdfftcXarVuLU09jj7xuN9WcZYbRgVJTHfcGglDkXXBWcUigoo6wqti-y1ePDy2xFE5tLqujr7E2MPaW0koqvsv7SrjdjQE_a3YBrZyJxA7Ebt7HemU8kFbxxhuDQ7ru3u2m5-ZtkbMLYzmZy47A4SIy3GPYkkmkOjWtJvEXvx3vi8c6-zV516KN991CPsj-n3y5PzvOLn2ffT75c5EaCqHKgDSBjdQmVUrKBuma8AdOBVbwTrG0BGi5Ki6C6qm1FVVNjoWJVKwxI5HCUfTzMTfv9nW2c9NpFY73HwY5z1CwZUrL6GSBNO0iWwPf_gf04hyF9QnNgomRSqQRVB8iEMcZgO70Jbo1hpxnVS1S610sieklEL1HpfVR6m9QPD_MxGvRdwMG4-OQLKaBUNHGfD9y983b37Pn69Orrckp-fvBdnOz20cdwp0sFSuqrH2f617Xk51Be69_wD9PotLw</recordid><startdate>200303</startdate><enddate>200303</enddate><creator>Liboriussen, Lone</creator><creator>Jeppesen, Erik</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Science</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200303</creationdate><title>Temporal dynamics in epipelic, pelagic and epiphytic algal production in a clear and a turbid shallow lake</title><author>Liboriussen, Lone ; Jeppesen, Erik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5348-30b3a119638775b39912b3cf3e72f41dd33b246ea37f8dd4890ce3818d4c35a23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>benthic-pelagic links</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>eutrophication</topic><topic>Fresh water ecosystems</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>P-I parameters</topic><topic>periphyton</topic><topic>primary productivity</topic><topic>Sea water ecosystems</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liboriussen, Lone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeppesen, Erik</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><jtitle>Freshwater biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liboriussen, Lone</au><au>Jeppesen, Erik</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Temporal dynamics in epipelic, pelagic and epiphytic algal production in a clear and a turbid shallow lake</atitle><jtitle>Freshwater biology</jtitle><date>2003-03</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>418</spage><epage>431</epage><pages>418-431</pages><issn>0046-5070</issn><eissn>1365-2427</eissn><coden>FWBLAB</coden><abstract>SUMMARY 1. Pelagic and epipelic microalgal production were measured over a year in a pre‐defined area (depth 0.5 m) in each of two lakes, one turbid and one with clear water. Further estimates of epiphytic production within reed stands were obtained by measuring production of periphyton developed on artificial substrata.
2. Total annual production of phytoplankton and epipelon was 34% greater in the turbid lake (190 g C m−2 year−1) than in the clearwater lake (141 g C m−2 year−1). However, the ratio of total production to mean water column TP concentration was two fold greater in the clearwater lake.
3. Phytoplankton accounted for the majority of the annual production (96%) in the turbid lake, while epipelic microalgal production dominated (77%) in the clear lake. The relative contribution of epipelic algae varied over the year, however, and in the turbid lake was higher in winter (11–25%), when the water was relatively clear, than during summer (0.7–1.7%), when the water was more turbid. In the clearwater lake, the relative contribution of epipelon was high both in winter, when the water was most clear, and in mid‐summer, when phytoplankton production was constrained either by nutrients or grazing.
4. Compared with pelagic and epipelic primary production, epiphytic production within a reed stand was low and did not vary significantly between the lakes.
5. The study supports the theory of a competitive and compensatory trade‐off between primary producers in lakes with contrasting nutrient concentrations, resulting in relatively small differences in overall production between clear and turbid lakes when integrating over the season and over different habitats.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><doi>10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01018.x</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0046-5070 |
ispartof | Freshwater biology, 2003-03, Vol.48 (3), p.418-431 |
issn | 0046-5070 1365-2427 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18905519 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology benthic-pelagic links Biological and medical sciences eutrophication Fresh water ecosystems Freshwater Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology P-I parameters periphyton primary productivity Sea water ecosystems Synecology |
title | Temporal dynamics in epipelic, pelagic and epiphytic algal production in a clear and a turbid shallow lake |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T11%3A03%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Temporal%20dynamics%20in%20epipelic,%20pelagic%20and%20epiphytic%20algal%20production%20in%20a%20clear%20and%20a%20turbid%20shallow%20lake&rft.jtitle=Freshwater%20biology&rft.au=Liboriussen,%20Lone&rft.date=2003-03&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=418&rft.epage=431&rft.pages=418-431&rft.issn=0046-5070&rft.eissn=1365-2427&rft.coden=FWBLAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01018.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E323731491%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=231461577&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |