Habitat preferences of red-listed fungi and bryophytes in woodland key habitats in southern Sweden - analyses of data from a national survey
The aim of this study was to identify habitat preferences of red-listedepiphytic and epixylic bryophyte, lichenized and non-lichenized fungi speciesinwoodland key habitats (WKHS) (areas less than 10 ha, where foreststructures indicate occurrence of red-listed species) in southern Sweden. Therelative...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biodiversity and conservation 2002-08, Vol.11 (8), p.1479-1503 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1503 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1479 |
container_title | Biodiversity and conservation |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Berg, A Gaerdenfors, U Hallingbaeck, T Noren, M |
description | The aim of this study was to identify habitat preferences of red-listedepiphytic and epixylic bryophyte, lichenized and non-lichenized fungi speciesinwoodland key habitats (WKHS) (areas less than 10 ha, where foreststructures indicate occurrence of red-listed species) in southern Sweden. Therelative importance of different groups of environmental factors was assessedwith partial canonical correspondence analysis techniques and across-validationapproach using data from 7196 selected WKHs. Different woody substrates (oldtrees, logs and snags) made up the most important variable group for occurrenceof red-listed species (30% unique explainable variation). Species associatedwith Fagus sylvatica and Picea abieshabitats, but also species associated with Quercus spp.andPopulus tremula habitats showed distinct habitatpreferences. The second most important variable group (16% unique explainablevariation) was geographical location. A west-east gradient was identified, andspecies concentrated to Baltic islands in the east were separated from otherspecies. This gradient, and an identified south-north gradient, probablyreflect differences in temperatures and rainfall between different regions.Among the remaining variable groups, historical land-use, ground conditions andforest stand composition were of similar importance (5-7% uniqueexplainable variation). Traditional management regimes resulting in semi-openforest habitats (leaf harvesting, forest grazing and selective cutting) wereassociated with the occurrence of many species, probably due to differences inmicroclimate between sites of different openness. Furthermore, a groundmoisturegradient extending from species associated with dry sites (mainly lichenizedfungi) to species associated with wet sites (mainly bryophytes), and a nutrientgradient from species associated with nutrient-poor sites to species occurringat nutrient-rich sites, were identified. Thus, conservation measures are neededin a broad spectrum of habitats with different substrates. Also sites withsimilar substrates, but situated in different regions (and climates), or withdifferent ground moisture and nutrient conditions are needed to cover the fullspectrum of habitat conditions suitable for different red-listed bryophytes andfungi.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1023/A:1016271823892 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18902872</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2142495771</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-f9d9b3f6d66582c95d3c2d60af91c968b44a5dd67d1b2c50524a4251e9d1a8e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkDFPwzAQhS0EEqUws1oMbAbbie2YraqAIiExAHPlxGeaksbFdqjyH_jRGMrEdNK9757uPYTOGb1ilBfXsxtGmeSKVbyoND9AEyYUJ1oxeogmVEtKCsbEMTqJcU0pVUKyCfpamLpNJuFtAAcB-gYi9g4HsKRrYwKL3dC_tdj0Ftdh9NvVmDLS9njnve1-1u8w4tXe5leIfkgrCD1-3oGFHpN8bLox7p2tSQa74DfY4N6k1mcNxyF8wniKjpzpIpz9zSl6vbt9mS_I49P9w3z2SBouVCJOW10XTlopRcUbLWzRcCupcZo1WlZ1WRphrVSW1bwRVPDSlFww0JaZCmQxRZd7323wHwPEtNy0sYEupwE_xCWrNOWV4hm8-Aeu_RDyw3GpRC5a5UaLb2vSdDQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>751827311</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Habitat preferences of red-listed fungi and bryophytes in woodland key habitats in southern Sweden - analyses of data from a national survey</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Berg, A ; Gaerdenfors, U ; Hallingbaeck, T ; Noren, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Berg, A ; Gaerdenfors, U ; Hallingbaeck, T ; Noren, M</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to identify habitat preferences of red-listedepiphytic and epixylic bryophyte, lichenized and non-lichenized fungi speciesinwoodland key habitats (WKHS) (areas less than 10 ha, where foreststructures indicate occurrence of red-listed species) in southern Sweden. Therelative importance of different groups of environmental factors was assessedwith partial canonical correspondence analysis techniques and across-validationapproach using data from 7196 selected WKHs. Different woody substrates (oldtrees, logs and snags) made up the most important variable group for occurrenceof red-listed species (30% unique explainable variation). Species associatedwith Fagus sylvatica and Picea abieshabitats, but also species associated with Quercus spp.andPopulus tremula habitats showed distinct habitatpreferences. The second most important variable group (16% unique explainablevariation) was geographical location. A west-east gradient was identified, andspecies concentrated to Baltic islands in the east were separated from otherspecies. This gradient, and an identified south-north gradient, probablyreflect differences in temperatures and rainfall between different regions.Among the remaining variable groups, historical land-use, ground conditions andforest stand composition were of similar importance (5-7% uniqueexplainable variation). Traditional management regimes resulting in semi-openforest habitats (leaf harvesting, forest grazing and selective cutting) wereassociated with the occurrence of many species, probably due to differences inmicroclimate between sites of different openness. Furthermore, a groundmoisturegradient extending from species associated with dry sites (mainly lichenizedfungi) to species associated with wet sites (mainly bryophytes), and a nutrientgradient from species associated with nutrient-poor sites to species occurringat nutrient-rich sites, were identified. Thus, conservation measures are neededin a broad spectrum of habitats with different substrates. Also sites withsimilar substrates, but situated in different regions (and climates), or withdifferent ground moisture and nutrient conditions are needed to cover the fullspectrum of habitat conditions suitable for different red-listed bryophytes andfungi.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-3115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9710</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1016271823892</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Aquatic plants ; Environmental factors ; Habitat preferences ; Habitats ; Land use ; Nutrients ; Woodlands</subject><ispartof>Biodiversity and conservation, 2002-08, Vol.11 (8), p.1479-1503</ispartof><rights>Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-f9d9b3f6d66582c95d3c2d60af91c968b44a5dd67d1b2c50524a4251e9d1a8e63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berg, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaerdenfors, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hallingbaeck, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noren, M</creatorcontrib><title>Habitat preferences of red-listed fungi and bryophytes in woodland key habitats in southern Sweden - analyses of data from a national survey</title><title>Biodiversity and conservation</title><description>The aim of this study was to identify habitat preferences of red-listedepiphytic and epixylic bryophyte, lichenized and non-lichenized fungi speciesinwoodland key habitats (WKHS) (areas less than 10 ha, where foreststructures indicate occurrence of red-listed species) in southern Sweden. Therelative importance of different groups of environmental factors was assessedwith partial canonical correspondence analysis techniques and across-validationapproach using data from 7196 selected WKHs. Different woody substrates (oldtrees, logs and snags) made up the most important variable group for occurrenceof red-listed species (30% unique explainable variation). Species associatedwith Fagus sylvatica and Picea abieshabitats, but also species associated with Quercus spp.andPopulus tremula habitats showed distinct habitatpreferences. The second most important variable group (16% unique explainablevariation) was geographical location. A west-east gradient was identified, andspecies concentrated to Baltic islands in the east were separated from otherspecies. This gradient, and an identified south-north gradient, probablyreflect differences in temperatures and rainfall between different regions.Among the remaining variable groups, historical land-use, ground conditions andforest stand composition were of similar importance (5-7% uniqueexplainable variation). Traditional management regimes resulting in semi-openforest habitats (leaf harvesting, forest grazing and selective cutting) wereassociated with the occurrence of many species, probably due to differences inmicroclimate between sites of different openness. Furthermore, a groundmoisturegradient extending from species associated with dry sites (mainly lichenizedfungi) to species associated with wet sites (mainly bryophytes), and a nutrientgradient from species associated with nutrient-poor sites to species occurringat nutrient-rich sites, were identified. Thus, conservation measures are neededin a broad spectrum of habitats with different substrates. Also sites withsimilar substrates, but situated in different regions (and climates), or withdifferent ground moisture and nutrient conditions are needed to cover the fullspectrum of habitat conditions suitable for different red-listed bryophytes andfungi.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>Habitat preferences</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Woodlands</subject><issn>0960-3115</issn><issn>1572-9710</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkDFPwzAQhS0EEqUws1oMbAbbie2YraqAIiExAHPlxGeaksbFdqjyH_jRGMrEdNK9757uPYTOGb1ilBfXsxtGmeSKVbyoND9AEyYUJ1oxeogmVEtKCsbEMTqJcU0pVUKyCfpamLpNJuFtAAcB-gYi9g4HsKRrYwKL3dC_tdj0Ftdh9NvVmDLS9njnve1-1u8w4tXe5leIfkgrCD1-3oGFHpN8bLox7p2tSQa74DfY4N6k1mcNxyF8wniKjpzpIpz9zSl6vbt9mS_I49P9w3z2SBouVCJOW10XTlopRcUbLWzRcCupcZo1WlZ1WRphrVSW1bwRVPDSlFww0JaZCmQxRZd7323wHwPEtNy0sYEupwE_xCWrNOWV4hm8-Aeu_RDyw3GpRC5a5UaLb2vSdDQ</recordid><startdate>20020801</startdate><enddate>20020801</enddate><creator>Berg, A</creator><creator>Gaerdenfors, U</creator><creator>Hallingbaeck, T</creator><creator>Noren, M</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>M7N</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020801</creationdate><title>Habitat preferences of red-listed fungi and bryophytes in woodland key habitats in southern Sweden - analyses of data from a national survey</title><author>Berg, A ; Gaerdenfors, U ; Hallingbaeck, T ; Noren, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-f9d9b3f6d66582c95d3c2d60af91c968b44a5dd67d1b2c50524a4251e9d1a8e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>Habitat preferences</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Woodlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berg, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaerdenfors, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hallingbaeck, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noren, M</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><jtitle>Biodiversity and conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berg, A</au><au>Gaerdenfors, U</au><au>Hallingbaeck, T</au><au>Noren, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Habitat preferences of red-listed fungi and bryophytes in woodland key habitats in southern Sweden - analyses of data from a national survey</atitle><jtitle>Biodiversity and conservation</jtitle><date>2002-08-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1479</spage><epage>1503</epage><pages>1479-1503</pages><issn>0960-3115</issn><eissn>1572-9710</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to identify habitat preferences of red-listedepiphytic and epixylic bryophyte, lichenized and non-lichenized fungi speciesinwoodland key habitats (WKHS) (areas less than 10 ha, where foreststructures indicate occurrence of red-listed species) in southern Sweden. Therelative importance of different groups of environmental factors was assessedwith partial canonical correspondence analysis techniques and across-validationapproach using data from 7196 selected WKHs. Different woody substrates (oldtrees, logs and snags) made up the most important variable group for occurrenceof red-listed species (30% unique explainable variation). Species associatedwith Fagus sylvatica and Picea abieshabitats, but also species associated with Quercus spp.andPopulus tremula habitats showed distinct habitatpreferences. The second most important variable group (16% unique explainablevariation) was geographical location. A west-east gradient was identified, andspecies concentrated to Baltic islands in the east were separated from otherspecies. This gradient, and an identified south-north gradient, probablyreflect differences in temperatures and rainfall between different regions.Among the remaining variable groups, historical land-use, ground conditions andforest stand composition were of similar importance (5-7% uniqueexplainable variation). Traditional management regimes resulting in semi-openforest habitats (leaf harvesting, forest grazing and selective cutting) wereassociated with the occurrence of many species, probably due to differences inmicroclimate between sites of different openness. Furthermore, a groundmoisturegradient extending from species associated with dry sites (mainly lichenizedfungi) to species associated with wet sites (mainly bryophytes), and a nutrientgradient from species associated with nutrient-poor sites to species occurringat nutrient-rich sites, were identified. Thus, conservation measures are neededin a broad spectrum of habitats with different substrates. Also sites withsimilar substrates, but situated in different regions (and climates), or withdifferent ground moisture and nutrient conditions are needed to cover the fullspectrum of habitat conditions suitable for different red-listed bryophytes andfungi.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1023/A:1016271823892</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-3115 |
ispartof | Biodiversity and conservation, 2002-08, Vol.11 (8), p.1479-1503 |
issn | 0960-3115 1572-9710 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18902872 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Aquatic plants Environmental factors Habitat preferences Habitats Land use Nutrients Woodlands |
title | Habitat preferences of red-listed fungi and bryophytes in woodland key habitats in southern Sweden - analyses of data from a national survey |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T05%3A21%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Habitat%20preferences%20of%20red-listed%20fungi%20and%20bryophytes%20in%20woodland%20key%20habitats%20in%20southern%20Sweden%20-%20analyses%20of%20data%20from%20a%20national%20survey&rft.jtitle=Biodiversity%20and%20conservation&rft.au=Berg,%20A&rft.date=2002-08-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1479&rft.epage=1503&rft.pages=1479-1503&rft.issn=0960-3115&rft.eissn=1572-9710&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1016271823892&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2142495771%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=751827311&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |