Patch testing with rubber series in Europe: a critical review and recommendation
Summary Background Rubber additives constitute an important group of contact allergens, particularly in certain occupations. Objectives To collect information regarding the current practice of using a ‘rubber series’ in Europe, and discuss this against the background of evidence concerning the preva...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Contact dermatitis 2017-04, Vol.76 (4), p.195-203 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 203 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 195 |
| container_title | Contact dermatitis |
| container_volume | 76 |
| creator | Warburton, Katharine L. Uter, Wolfgang Geier, Johannes Spiewak, Radoslaw Mahler, Vera Crépy, Marie‐Noëlle Schuttelaar, Marie Louise Bauer, Andrea Wilkinson, Mark |
| description | Summary
Background
Rubber additives constitute an important group of contact allergens, particularly in certain occupations.
Objectives
To collect information regarding the current practice of using a ‘rubber series’ in Europe, and discuss this against the background of evidence concerning the prevalence of allergy in order to derive a recommendation for a ‘European rubber series’.
Methods
The following were performed: (i) a survey targeting all members of the COST action ‘StanDerm’ consortium, (ii) analysis of rubber contact allergy data in the database of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies, and (iii) a literature review.
Results
Information from 13 countries was available, from one or several departments of dermatology, and occasionally occupational health. Apart from some substances tested only in single departments, a broad overlap regarding important allergens was evident, but considerable variation existed between departments.
Conclusions
An up‐to‐date ‘European rubber series’ is recommended, with the exclusion of substances only of historical concern. A ‘supplementary rubber series’ containing allergens of less proven importance, requiring further analysis, is recommended for departments specializing in occupational contact allergy. These should be continually updated as new evidence emerges. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/cod.12736 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1888980077</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4321095219</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p3126-66374895ea4d7fbff904ca62eb50b2d5c61a9f7bc394bb69e314033e038450e73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUlPwzAQhS0EomU58AeQJS5cAuN4icMNlbJISO0BzpHtTMBVNpyEin9PWpYDJ-YyT5pPTzPzCDlhcMHGunRNfsHihKsdMmUKIALJ1S6ZAgMZMZ3wCTnouhUAUyLW-2QSa-Axl_GULJemd6-0x6739Qtd-_6VhsFaDLTD4LGjvqbzITQtXlFDXfC9d6akAd89rqmp81G6pqqwzk3vm_qI7BWm7PD4ux-S59v50-w-elzcPcyuH6OWs1hFSvFE6FSiEXlS2KJIQTijYrQSbJxLp5hJi8Q6ngprVYqcCeAcgWshARN-SM6_fNvQvA3j-lnlO4dlaWpshi5jWutUAyT_QaVgoICLET37g66aIdTjIRtDgFSC4iN1-k0NtsI8a4OvTPjIft46ApdfwNqX-PE7Z5Bt8srGvLJtXtlscbMV_BO7S4Uq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1880095063</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patch testing with rubber series in Europe: a critical review and recommendation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Warburton, Katharine L. ; Uter, Wolfgang ; Geier, Johannes ; Spiewak, Radoslaw ; Mahler, Vera ; Crépy, Marie‐Noëlle ; Schuttelaar, Marie Louise ; Bauer, Andrea ; Wilkinson, Mark</creator><creatorcontrib>Warburton, Katharine L. ; Uter, Wolfgang ; Geier, Johannes ; Spiewak, Radoslaw ; Mahler, Vera ; Crépy, Marie‐Noëlle ; Schuttelaar, Marie Louise ; Bauer, Andrea ; Wilkinson, Mark</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
Background
Rubber additives constitute an important group of contact allergens, particularly in certain occupations.
Objectives
To collect information regarding the current practice of using a ‘rubber series’ in Europe, and discuss this against the background of evidence concerning the prevalence of allergy in order to derive a recommendation for a ‘European rubber series’.
Methods
The following were performed: (i) a survey targeting all members of the COST action ‘StanDerm’ consortium, (ii) analysis of rubber contact allergy data in the database of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies, and (iii) a literature review.
Results
Information from 13 countries was available, from one or several departments of dermatology, and occasionally occupational health. Apart from some substances tested only in single departments, a broad overlap regarding important allergens was evident, but considerable variation existed between departments.
Conclusions
An up‐to‐date ‘European rubber series’ is recommended, with the exclusion of substances only of historical concern. A ‘supplementary rubber series’ containing allergens of less proven importance, requiring further analysis, is recommended for departments specializing in occupational contact allergy. These should be continually updated as new evidence emerges.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0105-1873</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0536</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cod.12736</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28032352</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Allergies ; clinical epidemiology ; contact allergy ; Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - diagnosis ; Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - epidemiology ; Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - etiology ; Dermatitis, Occupational - diagnosis ; Dermatitis, Occupational - epidemiology ; Dermatitis, Occupational - etiology ; Female ; Humans ; Latex Hypersensitivity - diagnosis ; Latex Hypersensitivity - epidemiology ; Latex Hypersensitivity - etiology ; Male ; Occupations ; patch testing ; Patch Tests - methods ; Prevalence ; Rubber - adverse effects ; rubber additives ; standardization</subject><ispartof>Contact dermatitis, 2017-04, Vol.76 (4), p.195-203</ispartof><rights>2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-4498-3710</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcod.12736$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcod.12736$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28032352$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Warburton, Katharine L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uter, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geier, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiewak, Radoslaw</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahler, Vera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crépy, Marie‐Noëlle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuttelaar, Marie Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, Mark</creatorcontrib><title>Patch testing with rubber series in Europe: a critical review and recommendation</title><title>Contact dermatitis</title><addtitle>Contact Dermatitis</addtitle><description>Summary
Background
Rubber additives constitute an important group of contact allergens, particularly in certain occupations.
Objectives
To collect information regarding the current practice of using a ‘rubber series’ in Europe, and discuss this against the background of evidence concerning the prevalence of allergy in order to derive a recommendation for a ‘European rubber series’.
Methods
The following were performed: (i) a survey targeting all members of the COST action ‘StanDerm’ consortium, (ii) analysis of rubber contact allergy data in the database of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies, and (iii) a literature review.
Results
Information from 13 countries was available, from one or several departments of dermatology, and occasionally occupational health. Apart from some substances tested only in single departments, a broad overlap regarding important allergens was evident, but considerable variation existed between departments.
Conclusions
An up‐to‐date ‘European rubber series’ is recommended, with the exclusion of substances only of historical concern. A ‘supplementary rubber series’ containing allergens of less proven importance, requiring further analysis, is recommended for departments specializing in occupational contact allergy. These should be continually updated as new evidence emerges.</description><subject>Allergies</subject><subject>clinical epidemiology</subject><subject>contact allergy</subject><subject>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - diagnosis</subject><subject>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - epidemiology</subject><subject>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - etiology</subject><subject>Dermatitis, Occupational - diagnosis</subject><subject>Dermatitis, Occupational - epidemiology</subject><subject>Dermatitis, Occupational - etiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Latex Hypersensitivity - diagnosis</subject><subject>Latex Hypersensitivity - epidemiology</subject><subject>Latex Hypersensitivity - etiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Occupations</subject><subject>patch testing</subject><subject>Patch Tests - methods</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Rubber - adverse effects</subject><subject>rubber additives</subject><subject>standardization</subject><issn>0105-1873</issn><issn>1600-0536</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUlPwzAQhS0EomU58AeQJS5cAuN4icMNlbJISO0BzpHtTMBVNpyEin9PWpYDJ-YyT5pPTzPzCDlhcMHGunRNfsHihKsdMmUKIALJ1S6ZAgMZMZ3wCTnouhUAUyLW-2QSa-Axl_GULJemd6-0x6739Qtd-_6VhsFaDLTD4LGjvqbzITQtXlFDXfC9d6akAd89rqmp81G6pqqwzk3vm_qI7BWm7PD4ux-S59v50-w-elzcPcyuH6OWs1hFSvFE6FSiEXlS2KJIQTijYrQSbJxLp5hJi8Q6ngprVYqcCeAcgWshARN-SM6_fNvQvA3j-lnlO4dlaWpshi5jWutUAyT_QaVgoICLET37g66aIdTjIRtDgFSC4iN1-k0NtsI8a4OvTPjIft46ApdfwNqX-PE7Z5Bt8srGvLJtXtlscbMV_BO7S4Uq</recordid><startdate>201704</startdate><enddate>201704</enddate><creator>Warburton, Katharine L.</creator><creator>Uter, Wolfgang</creator><creator>Geier, Johannes</creator><creator>Spiewak, Radoslaw</creator><creator>Mahler, Vera</creator><creator>Crépy, Marie‐Noëlle</creator><creator>Schuttelaar, Marie Louise</creator><creator>Bauer, Andrea</creator><creator>Wilkinson, Mark</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4498-3710</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201704</creationdate><title>Patch testing with rubber series in Europe: a critical review and recommendation</title><author>Warburton, Katharine L. ; Uter, Wolfgang ; Geier, Johannes ; Spiewak, Radoslaw ; Mahler, Vera ; Crépy, Marie‐Noëlle ; Schuttelaar, Marie Louise ; Bauer, Andrea ; Wilkinson, Mark</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p3126-66374895ea4d7fbff904ca62eb50b2d5c61a9f7bc394bb69e314033e038450e73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Allergies</topic><topic>clinical epidemiology</topic><topic>contact allergy</topic><topic>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - diagnosis</topic><topic>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - epidemiology</topic><topic>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - etiology</topic><topic>Dermatitis, Occupational - diagnosis</topic><topic>Dermatitis, Occupational - epidemiology</topic><topic>Dermatitis, Occupational - etiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Latex Hypersensitivity - diagnosis</topic><topic>Latex Hypersensitivity - epidemiology</topic><topic>Latex Hypersensitivity - etiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Occupations</topic><topic>patch testing</topic><topic>Patch Tests - methods</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Rubber - adverse effects</topic><topic>rubber additives</topic><topic>standardization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Warburton, Katharine L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uter, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geier, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiewak, Radoslaw</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahler, Vera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crépy, Marie‐Noëlle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuttelaar, Marie Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, Mark</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Contact dermatitis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Warburton, Katharine L.</au><au>Uter, Wolfgang</au><au>Geier, Johannes</au><au>Spiewak, Radoslaw</au><au>Mahler, Vera</au><au>Crépy, Marie‐Noëlle</au><au>Schuttelaar, Marie Louise</au><au>Bauer, Andrea</au><au>Wilkinson, Mark</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patch testing with rubber series in Europe: a critical review and recommendation</atitle><jtitle>Contact dermatitis</jtitle><addtitle>Contact Dermatitis</addtitle><date>2017-04</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>195</spage><epage>203</epage><pages>195-203</pages><issn>0105-1873</issn><eissn>1600-0536</eissn><abstract>Summary
Background
Rubber additives constitute an important group of contact allergens, particularly in certain occupations.
Objectives
To collect information regarding the current practice of using a ‘rubber series’ in Europe, and discuss this against the background of evidence concerning the prevalence of allergy in order to derive a recommendation for a ‘European rubber series’.
Methods
The following were performed: (i) a survey targeting all members of the COST action ‘StanDerm’ consortium, (ii) analysis of rubber contact allergy data in the database of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies, and (iii) a literature review.
Results
Information from 13 countries was available, from one or several departments of dermatology, and occasionally occupational health. Apart from some substances tested only in single departments, a broad overlap regarding important allergens was evident, but considerable variation existed between departments.
Conclusions
An up‐to‐date ‘European rubber series’ is recommended, with the exclusion of substances only of historical concern. A ‘supplementary rubber series’ containing allergens of less proven importance, requiring further analysis, is recommended for departments specializing in occupational contact allergy. These should be continually updated as new evidence emerges.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>28032352</pmid><doi>10.1111/cod.12736</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4498-3710</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0105-1873 |
| ispartof | Contact dermatitis, 2017-04, Vol.76 (4), p.195-203 |
| issn | 0105-1873 1600-0536 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1888980077 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Allergies clinical epidemiology contact allergy Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - diagnosis Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - epidemiology Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - etiology Dermatitis, Occupational - diagnosis Dermatitis, Occupational - epidemiology Dermatitis, Occupational - etiology Female Humans Latex Hypersensitivity - diagnosis Latex Hypersensitivity - epidemiology Latex Hypersensitivity - etiology Male Occupations patch testing Patch Tests - methods Prevalence Rubber - adverse effects rubber additives standardization |
| title | Patch testing with rubber series in Europe: a critical review and recommendation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T08%3A11%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patch%20testing%20with%20rubber%20series%20in%20Europe:%20a%20critical%20review%20and%20recommendation&rft.jtitle=Contact%20dermatitis&rft.au=Warburton,%20Katharine%20L.&rft.date=2017-04&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=195&rft.epage=203&rft.pages=195-203&rft.issn=0105-1873&rft.eissn=1600-0536&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cod.12736&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4321095219%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1880095063&rft_id=info:pmid/28032352&rfr_iscdi=true |