Aspiration and dysphagia screening in acute stroke – the Gugging Swallowing Screen revisited

Background and purpose The Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS) is a tool to screen aspiration risk in acute stroke. We aimed to replicate its validity in a larger second cohort of patients with acute stroke, including the more severe with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥ 15. Metho...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of neurology 2017-04, Vol.24 (4), p.594-601
Hauptverfasser: Warnecke, T., Im, S., Kaiser, C., Hamacher, C., Oelenberg, S., Dziewas, R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 601
container_issue 4
container_start_page 594
container_title European journal of neurology
container_volume 24
creator Warnecke, T.
Im, S.
Kaiser, C.
Hamacher, C.
Oelenberg, S.
Dziewas, R.
description Background and purpose The Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS) is a tool to screen aspiration risk in acute stroke. We aimed to replicate its validity in a larger second cohort of patients with acute stroke, including the more severe with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥ 15. Methods In a prospective, double‐blind design, the GUSS was validated with the Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing scale. Patients were categorized into different stroke severities as assessed by the NIHSS, and the diagnostic properties were calculated separately for each subgroup. Results A total of 100 patients with acute stroke were evaluated consecutively at a mean 1.7 ± 2.2 days after stroke. With the GUSS cut‐off value of 14 points, the GUSS screened aspiration risk with a 96.5% sensitivity and 55.8% specificity (area under the curve, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.67–0.84), which corresponded well with the original publication. In the NIHSS < 5 group, the sensitivity and specificity levels were 71.4% and 88.8%, respectively. In the NIHSS ≥ 15 group, these levels changed to 100% and 20%, respectively. The high failure rate in completing the first part of the GUSS in the latter group was related to the low specificity. Diet recommendations following the GUSS were more conservative than those after Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing. In particular, the GUSS overestimated the need for nasogastric tube feeding. Conclusions This is the first time that a swallowing screening tool for patients with acute stroke has been revalidated in a larger population from another stroke center. The validity of a swallow screening test may vary according to different stroke severities.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ene.13251
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1888978739</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1888978739</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4521-8f337a689d9fe59baacc511408d602035a97a37d70800e75a709e06c5b439e0b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctOGzEUhq0KxCWw6AtUltiUxYRz7HjsWSKUppUiWNBuGTkzJ4lhMpPaM0TZ8Q68YZ-kzoUukCpxNv6l851Psn7GPiP0Mc4V1dRHKRR-Yic4SE2CUuJBzFJhohDwmJ2G8AgAQgs4YsfCSCEA0hP2cB2WztvWNTW3dcnLdVjO7cxZHgpPVLt6xl1cFV1LPLS-eSL-5-WVt3Pio2422-zvV7aqmtU2bo-4p2cXXEvlGTuc2irQ-f7tsV_fhj9vvifju9GPm-txUgyUwMRMpdQ2NVmZTUllE2uLQiEOwJQpCJDKZtpKXWowAKSV1ZARpIWaDGQME9ljX3fepW9-dxTafOFCQVVla2q6kKMxJtNGy-wDqM5SLWSaRvTiHfrYdL6OH9kIASUaZSJ1uaMK34TgaZovvVtYv84R8k0_eewn3_YT2S97YzdZUPmPfCskAlc7YOUqWv_flA9vhzvlX-XCmKY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1880131858</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Aspiration and dysphagia screening in acute stroke – the Gugging Swallowing Screen revisited</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Warnecke, T. ; Im, S. ; Kaiser, C. ; Hamacher, C. ; Oelenberg, S. ; Dziewas, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Warnecke, T. ; Im, S. ; Kaiser, C. ; Hamacher, C. ; Oelenberg, S. ; Dziewas, R.</creatorcontrib><description>Background and purpose The Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS) is a tool to screen aspiration risk in acute stroke. We aimed to replicate its validity in a larger second cohort of patients with acute stroke, including the more severe with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥ 15. Methods In a prospective, double‐blind design, the GUSS was validated with the Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing scale. Patients were categorized into different stroke severities as assessed by the NIHSS, and the diagnostic properties were calculated separately for each subgroup. Results A total of 100 patients with acute stroke were evaluated consecutively at a mean 1.7 ± 2.2 days after stroke. With the GUSS cut‐off value of 14 points, the GUSS screened aspiration risk with a 96.5% sensitivity and 55.8% specificity (area under the curve, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.67–0.84), which corresponded well with the original publication. In the NIHSS &lt; 5 group, the sensitivity and specificity levels were 71.4% and 88.8%, respectively. In the NIHSS ≥ 15 group, these levels changed to 100% and 20%, respectively. The high failure rate in completing the first part of the GUSS in the latter group was related to the low specificity. Diet recommendations following the GUSS were more conservative than those after Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing. In particular, the GUSS overestimated the need for nasogastric tube feeding. Conclusions This is the first time that a swallowing screening tool for patients with acute stroke has been revalidated in a larger population from another stroke center. The validity of a swallow screening test may vary according to different stroke severities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1351-5101</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-1331</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ene.13251</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28322006</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EJNEFL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; aspiration ; deglutition disorders ; Deglutition Disorders - diagnosis ; Deglutition Disorders - etiology ; diagnosis ; Double-Blind Method ; Endoscopy ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Mass Screening ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Stroke ; Stroke - complications ; Stroke - diagnosis ; United States</subject><ispartof>European journal of neurology, 2017-04, Vol.24 (4), p.594-601</ispartof><rights>2017 EAN</rights><rights>2017 EAN.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 European Academy of Neurology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4521-8f337a689d9fe59baacc511408d602035a97a37d70800e75a709e06c5b439e0b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4521-8f337a689d9fe59baacc511408d602035a97a37d70800e75a709e06c5b439e0b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8400-4911</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fene.13251$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fene.13251$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28322006$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Warnecke, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Im, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamacher, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oelenberg, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dziewas, R.</creatorcontrib><title>Aspiration and dysphagia screening in acute stroke – the Gugging Swallowing Screen revisited</title><title>European journal of neurology</title><addtitle>Eur J Neurol</addtitle><description>Background and purpose The Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS) is a tool to screen aspiration risk in acute stroke. We aimed to replicate its validity in a larger second cohort of patients with acute stroke, including the more severe with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥ 15. Methods In a prospective, double‐blind design, the GUSS was validated with the Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing scale. Patients were categorized into different stroke severities as assessed by the NIHSS, and the diagnostic properties were calculated separately for each subgroup. Results A total of 100 patients with acute stroke were evaluated consecutively at a mean 1.7 ± 2.2 days after stroke. With the GUSS cut‐off value of 14 points, the GUSS screened aspiration risk with a 96.5% sensitivity and 55.8% specificity (area under the curve, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.67–0.84), which corresponded well with the original publication. In the NIHSS &lt; 5 group, the sensitivity and specificity levels were 71.4% and 88.8%, respectively. In the NIHSS ≥ 15 group, these levels changed to 100% and 20%, respectively. The high failure rate in completing the first part of the GUSS in the latter group was related to the low specificity. Diet recommendations following the GUSS were more conservative than those after Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing. In particular, the GUSS overestimated the need for nasogastric tube feeding. Conclusions This is the first time that a swallowing screening tool for patients with acute stroke has been revalidated in a larger population from another stroke center. The validity of a swallow screening test may vary according to different stroke severities.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>aspiration</subject><subject>deglutition disorders</subject><subject>Deglutition Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Deglutition Disorders - etiology</subject><subject>diagnosis</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Stroke - complications</subject><subject>Stroke - diagnosis</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1351-5101</issn><issn>1468-1331</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctOGzEUhq0KxCWw6AtUltiUxYRz7HjsWSKUppUiWNBuGTkzJ4lhMpPaM0TZ8Q68YZ-kzoUukCpxNv6l851Psn7GPiP0Mc4V1dRHKRR-Yic4SE2CUuJBzFJhohDwmJ2G8AgAQgs4YsfCSCEA0hP2cB2WztvWNTW3dcnLdVjO7cxZHgpPVLt6xl1cFV1LPLS-eSL-5-WVt3Pio2422-zvV7aqmtU2bo-4p2cXXEvlGTuc2irQ-f7tsV_fhj9vvifju9GPm-txUgyUwMRMpdQ2NVmZTUllE2uLQiEOwJQpCJDKZtpKXWowAKSV1ZARpIWaDGQME9ljX3fepW9-dxTafOFCQVVla2q6kKMxJtNGy-wDqM5SLWSaRvTiHfrYdL6OH9kIASUaZSJ1uaMK34TgaZovvVtYv84R8k0_eewn3_YT2S97YzdZUPmPfCskAlc7YOUqWv_flA9vhzvlX-XCmKY</recordid><startdate>201704</startdate><enddate>201704</enddate><creator>Warnecke, T.</creator><creator>Im, S.</creator><creator>Kaiser, C.</creator><creator>Hamacher, C.</creator><creator>Oelenberg, S.</creator><creator>Dziewas, R.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8400-4911</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201704</creationdate><title>Aspiration and dysphagia screening in acute stroke – the Gugging Swallowing Screen revisited</title><author>Warnecke, T. ; Im, S. ; Kaiser, C. ; Hamacher, C. ; Oelenberg, S. ; Dziewas, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4521-8f337a689d9fe59baacc511408d602035a97a37d70800e75a709e06c5b439e0b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>aspiration</topic><topic>deglutition disorders</topic><topic>Deglutition Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Deglutition Disorders - etiology</topic><topic>diagnosis</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Stroke - complications</topic><topic>Stroke - diagnosis</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Warnecke, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Im, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamacher, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oelenberg, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dziewas, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Warnecke, T.</au><au>Im, S.</au><au>Kaiser, C.</au><au>Hamacher, C.</au><au>Oelenberg, S.</au><au>Dziewas, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Aspiration and dysphagia screening in acute stroke – the Gugging Swallowing Screen revisited</atitle><jtitle>European journal of neurology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Neurol</addtitle><date>2017-04</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>594</spage><epage>601</epage><pages>594-601</pages><issn>1351-5101</issn><eissn>1468-1331</eissn><coden>EJNEFL</coden><abstract>Background and purpose The Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS) is a tool to screen aspiration risk in acute stroke. We aimed to replicate its validity in a larger second cohort of patients with acute stroke, including the more severe with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥ 15. Methods In a prospective, double‐blind design, the GUSS was validated with the Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing scale. Patients were categorized into different stroke severities as assessed by the NIHSS, and the diagnostic properties were calculated separately for each subgroup. Results A total of 100 patients with acute stroke were evaluated consecutively at a mean 1.7 ± 2.2 days after stroke. With the GUSS cut‐off value of 14 points, the GUSS screened aspiration risk with a 96.5% sensitivity and 55.8% specificity (area under the curve, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.67–0.84), which corresponded well with the original publication. In the NIHSS &lt; 5 group, the sensitivity and specificity levels were 71.4% and 88.8%, respectively. In the NIHSS ≥ 15 group, these levels changed to 100% and 20%, respectively. The high failure rate in completing the first part of the GUSS in the latter group was related to the low specificity. Diet recommendations following the GUSS were more conservative than those after Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing. In particular, the GUSS overestimated the need for nasogastric tube feeding. Conclusions This is the first time that a swallowing screening tool for patients with acute stroke has been revalidated in a larger population from another stroke center. The validity of a swallow screening test may vary according to different stroke severities.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>28322006</pmid><doi>10.1111/ene.13251</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8400-4911</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1351-5101
ispartof European journal of neurology, 2017-04, Vol.24 (4), p.594-601
issn 1351-5101
1468-1331
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1888978739
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
aspiration
deglutition disorders
Deglutition Disorders - diagnosis
Deglutition Disorders - etiology
diagnosis
Double-Blind Method
Endoscopy
Female
Humans
Male
Mass Screening
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Stroke
Stroke - complications
Stroke - diagnosis
United States
title Aspiration and dysphagia screening in acute stroke – the Gugging Swallowing Screen revisited
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T14%3A55%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Aspiration%20and%20dysphagia%20screening%20in%20acute%20stroke%20%E2%80%93%20the%20Gugging%20Swallowing%20Screen%20revisited&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20neurology&rft.au=Warnecke,%20T.&rft.date=2017-04&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=594&rft.epage=601&rft.pages=594-601&rft.issn=1351-5101&rft.eissn=1468-1331&rft.coden=EJNEFL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ene.13251&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1888978739%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1880131858&rft_id=info:pmid/28322006&rfr_iscdi=true