Aspiration and dysphagia screening in acute stroke – the Gugging Swallowing Screen revisited
Background and purpose The Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS) is a tool to screen aspiration risk in acute stroke. We aimed to replicate its validity in a larger second cohort of patients with acute stroke, including the more severe with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥ 15. Metho...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of neurology 2017-04, Vol.24 (4), p.594-601 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 601 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 594 |
container_title | European journal of neurology |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Warnecke, T. Im, S. Kaiser, C. Hamacher, C. Oelenberg, S. Dziewas, R. |
description | Background and purpose
The Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS) is a tool to screen aspiration risk in acute stroke. We aimed to replicate its validity in a larger second cohort of patients with acute stroke, including the more severe with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥ 15.
Methods
In a prospective, double‐blind design, the GUSS was validated with the Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing scale. Patients were categorized into different stroke severities as assessed by the NIHSS, and the diagnostic properties were calculated separately for each subgroup.
Results
A total of 100 patients with acute stroke were evaluated consecutively at a mean 1.7 ± 2.2 days after stroke. With the GUSS cut‐off value of 14 points, the GUSS screened aspiration risk with a 96.5% sensitivity and 55.8% specificity (area under the curve, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.67–0.84), which corresponded well with the original publication. In the NIHSS < 5 group, the sensitivity and specificity levels were 71.4% and 88.8%, respectively. In the NIHSS ≥ 15 group, these levels changed to 100% and 20%, respectively. The high failure rate in completing the first part of the GUSS in the latter group was related to the low specificity. Diet recommendations following the GUSS were more conservative than those after Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing. In particular, the GUSS overestimated the need for nasogastric tube feeding.
Conclusions
This is the first time that a swallowing screening tool for patients with acute stroke has been revalidated in a larger population from another stroke center. The validity of a swallow screening test may vary according to different stroke severities. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ene.13251 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1888978739</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1888978739</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4521-8f337a689d9fe59baacc511408d602035a97a37d70800e75a709e06c5b439e0b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctOGzEUhq0KxCWw6AtUltiUxYRz7HjsWSKUppUiWNBuGTkzJ4lhMpPaM0TZ8Q68YZ-kzoUukCpxNv6l851Psn7GPiP0Mc4V1dRHKRR-Yic4SE2CUuJBzFJhohDwmJ2G8AgAQgs4YsfCSCEA0hP2cB2WztvWNTW3dcnLdVjO7cxZHgpPVLt6xl1cFV1LPLS-eSL-5-WVt3Pio2422-zvV7aqmtU2bo-4p2cXXEvlGTuc2irQ-f7tsV_fhj9vvifju9GPm-txUgyUwMRMpdQ2NVmZTUllE2uLQiEOwJQpCJDKZtpKXWowAKSV1ZARpIWaDGQME9ljX3fepW9-dxTafOFCQVVla2q6kKMxJtNGy-wDqM5SLWSaRvTiHfrYdL6OH9kIASUaZSJ1uaMK34TgaZovvVtYv84R8k0_eewn3_YT2S97YzdZUPmPfCskAlc7YOUqWv_flA9vhzvlX-XCmKY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1880131858</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Aspiration and dysphagia screening in acute stroke – the Gugging Swallowing Screen revisited</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Warnecke, T. ; Im, S. ; Kaiser, C. ; Hamacher, C. ; Oelenberg, S. ; Dziewas, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Warnecke, T. ; Im, S. ; Kaiser, C. ; Hamacher, C. ; Oelenberg, S. ; Dziewas, R.</creatorcontrib><description>Background and purpose
The Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS) is a tool to screen aspiration risk in acute stroke. We aimed to replicate its validity in a larger second cohort of patients with acute stroke, including the more severe with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥ 15.
Methods
In a prospective, double‐blind design, the GUSS was validated with the Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing scale. Patients were categorized into different stroke severities as assessed by the NIHSS, and the diagnostic properties were calculated separately for each subgroup.
Results
A total of 100 patients with acute stroke were evaluated consecutively at a mean 1.7 ± 2.2 days after stroke. With the GUSS cut‐off value of 14 points, the GUSS screened aspiration risk with a 96.5% sensitivity and 55.8% specificity (area under the curve, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.67–0.84), which corresponded well with the original publication. In the NIHSS < 5 group, the sensitivity and specificity levels were 71.4% and 88.8%, respectively. In the NIHSS ≥ 15 group, these levels changed to 100% and 20%, respectively. The high failure rate in completing the first part of the GUSS in the latter group was related to the low specificity. Diet recommendations following the GUSS were more conservative than those after Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing. In particular, the GUSS overestimated the need for nasogastric tube feeding.
Conclusions
This is the first time that a swallowing screening tool for patients with acute stroke has been revalidated in a larger population from another stroke center. The validity of a swallow screening test may vary according to different stroke severities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1351-5101</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-1331</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ene.13251</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28322006</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EJNEFL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; aspiration ; deglutition disorders ; Deglutition Disorders - diagnosis ; Deglutition Disorders - etiology ; diagnosis ; Double-Blind Method ; Endoscopy ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Mass Screening ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Stroke ; Stroke - complications ; Stroke - diagnosis ; United States</subject><ispartof>European journal of neurology, 2017-04, Vol.24 (4), p.594-601</ispartof><rights>2017 EAN</rights><rights>2017 EAN.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 European Academy of Neurology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4521-8f337a689d9fe59baacc511408d602035a97a37d70800e75a709e06c5b439e0b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4521-8f337a689d9fe59baacc511408d602035a97a37d70800e75a709e06c5b439e0b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8400-4911</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fene.13251$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fene.13251$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28322006$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Warnecke, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Im, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamacher, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oelenberg, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dziewas, R.</creatorcontrib><title>Aspiration and dysphagia screening in acute stroke – the Gugging Swallowing Screen revisited</title><title>European journal of neurology</title><addtitle>Eur J Neurol</addtitle><description>Background and purpose
The Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS) is a tool to screen aspiration risk in acute stroke. We aimed to replicate its validity in a larger second cohort of patients with acute stroke, including the more severe with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥ 15.
Methods
In a prospective, double‐blind design, the GUSS was validated with the Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing scale. Patients were categorized into different stroke severities as assessed by the NIHSS, and the diagnostic properties were calculated separately for each subgroup.
Results
A total of 100 patients with acute stroke were evaluated consecutively at a mean 1.7 ± 2.2 days after stroke. With the GUSS cut‐off value of 14 points, the GUSS screened aspiration risk with a 96.5% sensitivity and 55.8% specificity (area under the curve, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.67–0.84), which corresponded well with the original publication. In the NIHSS < 5 group, the sensitivity and specificity levels were 71.4% and 88.8%, respectively. In the NIHSS ≥ 15 group, these levels changed to 100% and 20%, respectively. The high failure rate in completing the first part of the GUSS in the latter group was related to the low specificity. Diet recommendations following the GUSS were more conservative than those after Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing. In particular, the GUSS overestimated the need for nasogastric tube feeding.
Conclusions
This is the first time that a swallowing screening tool for patients with acute stroke has been revalidated in a larger population from another stroke center. The validity of a swallow screening test may vary according to different stroke severities.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>aspiration</subject><subject>deglutition disorders</subject><subject>Deglutition Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Deglutition Disorders - etiology</subject><subject>diagnosis</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Stroke - complications</subject><subject>Stroke - diagnosis</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1351-5101</issn><issn>1468-1331</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctOGzEUhq0KxCWw6AtUltiUxYRz7HjsWSKUppUiWNBuGTkzJ4lhMpPaM0TZ8Q68YZ-kzoUukCpxNv6l851Psn7GPiP0Mc4V1dRHKRR-Yic4SE2CUuJBzFJhohDwmJ2G8AgAQgs4YsfCSCEA0hP2cB2WztvWNTW3dcnLdVjO7cxZHgpPVLt6xl1cFV1LPLS-eSL-5-WVt3Pio2422-zvV7aqmtU2bo-4p2cXXEvlGTuc2irQ-f7tsV_fhj9vvifju9GPm-txUgyUwMRMpdQ2NVmZTUllE2uLQiEOwJQpCJDKZtpKXWowAKSV1ZARpIWaDGQME9ljX3fepW9-dxTafOFCQVVla2q6kKMxJtNGy-wDqM5SLWSaRvTiHfrYdL6OH9kIASUaZSJ1uaMK34TgaZovvVtYv84R8k0_eewn3_YT2S97YzdZUPmPfCskAlc7YOUqWv_flA9vhzvlX-XCmKY</recordid><startdate>201704</startdate><enddate>201704</enddate><creator>Warnecke, T.</creator><creator>Im, S.</creator><creator>Kaiser, C.</creator><creator>Hamacher, C.</creator><creator>Oelenberg, S.</creator><creator>Dziewas, R.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8400-4911</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201704</creationdate><title>Aspiration and dysphagia screening in acute stroke – the Gugging Swallowing Screen revisited</title><author>Warnecke, T. ; Im, S. ; Kaiser, C. ; Hamacher, C. ; Oelenberg, S. ; Dziewas, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4521-8f337a689d9fe59baacc511408d602035a97a37d70800e75a709e06c5b439e0b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>aspiration</topic><topic>deglutition disorders</topic><topic>Deglutition Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Deglutition Disorders - etiology</topic><topic>diagnosis</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Stroke - complications</topic><topic>Stroke - diagnosis</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Warnecke, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Im, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamacher, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oelenberg, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dziewas, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Warnecke, T.</au><au>Im, S.</au><au>Kaiser, C.</au><au>Hamacher, C.</au><au>Oelenberg, S.</au><au>Dziewas, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Aspiration and dysphagia screening in acute stroke – the Gugging Swallowing Screen revisited</atitle><jtitle>European journal of neurology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Neurol</addtitle><date>2017-04</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>594</spage><epage>601</epage><pages>594-601</pages><issn>1351-5101</issn><eissn>1468-1331</eissn><coden>EJNEFL</coden><abstract>Background and purpose
The Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS) is a tool to screen aspiration risk in acute stroke. We aimed to replicate its validity in a larger second cohort of patients with acute stroke, including the more severe with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥ 15.
Methods
In a prospective, double‐blind design, the GUSS was validated with the Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing scale. Patients were categorized into different stroke severities as assessed by the NIHSS, and the diagnostic properties were calculated separately for each subgroup.
Results
A total of 100 patients with acute stroke were evaluated consecutively at a mean 1.7 ± 2.2 days after stroke. With the GUSS cut‐off value of 14 points, the GUSS screened aspiration risk with a 96.5% sensitivity and 55.8% specificity (area under the curve, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.67–0.84), which corresponded well with the original publication. In the NIHSS < 5 group, the sensitivity and specificity levels were 71.4% and 88.8%, respectively. In the NIHSS ≥ 15 group, these levels changed to 100% and 20%, respectively. The high failure rate in completing the first part of the GUSS in the latter group was related to the low specificity. Diet recommendations following the GUSS were more conservative than those after Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing. In particular, the GUSS overestimated the need for nasogastric tube feeding.
Conclusions
This is the first time that a swallowing screening tool for patients with acute stroke has been revalidated in a larger population from another stroke center. The validity of a swallow screening test may vary according to different stroke severities.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>28322006</pmid><doi>10.1111/ene.13251</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8400-4911</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1351-5101 |
ispartof | European journal of neurology, 2017-04, Vol.24 (4), p.594-601 |
issn | 1351-5101 1468-1331 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1888978739 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over aspiration deglutition disorders Deglutition Disorders - diagnosis Deglutition Disorders - etiology diagnosis Double-Blind Method Endoscopy Female Humans Male Mass Screening Middle Aged Prospective Studies Sensitivity and Specificity Stroke Stroke - complications Stroke - diagnosis United States |
title | Aspiration and dysphagia screening in acute stroke – the Gugging Swallowing Screen revisited |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T14%3A55%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Aspiration%20and%20dysphagia%20screening%20in%20acute%20stroke%20%E2%80%93%20the%20Gugging%20Swallowing%20Screen%20revisited&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20neurology&rft.au=Warnecke,%20T.&rft.date=2017-04&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=594&rft.epage=601&rft.pages=594-601&rft.issn=1351-5101&rft.eissn=1468-1331&rft.coden=EJNEFL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ene.13251&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1888978739%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1880131858&rft_id=info:pmid/28322006&rfr_iscdi=true |