Comparison of Mix Design Methods for Porous Asphalt Mixtures

AbstractPorous asphalt mixtures have been used for more than 60 years, but it was not until 1974 that the first formalized procedure was created by the Federal Highway Administration to design mixtures for open-graded friction courses (OGFC). Since that time, there have been several other mix design...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of materials in civil engineering 2012-11, Vol.24 (11), p.1359-1367
Hauptverfasser: Putman, Bradley J, Kline, Laura C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1367
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1359
container_title Journal of materials in civil engineering
container_volume 24
creator Putman, Bradley J
Kline, Laura C
description AbstractPorous asphalt mixtures have been used for more than 60 years, but it was not until 1974 that the first formalized procedure was created by the Federal Highway Administration to design mixtures for open-graded friction courses (OGFC). Since that time, there have been several other mix design procedures developed and adapted, mainly for OGFCs on high-volume roadways. In the past decade, porous asphalt pavements have been gaining popularity as a storm water best management practice and utilize similar mixtures as those used for OGFCs. However, for any porous mixtures to perform as intended, they must be designed and constructed properly. Across the United States, there are currently more than 20 different methods used to design these mixtures. The objective of this research was to compare the different mix design procedures currently used in the United States. The results indicated that some of the procedures result in a range of design binder contents instead of a single value. This does not provide much guidance to inexperienced designers, which could result in pavement performance issues that could deter the future use of porous asphalt mixtures.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000529
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1888967489</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1864557257</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-74b238131ac920a160c7c72a8f8b9afecd8c4d53fe2ba8a688867c5b50fa4dc93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMoOKf_oQiCXnQmTZMm4s2o8wNWFJzXIU0T19E1NWlB_70pG7sTPDcHDs857-EB4BLBGYIU3V7P3_PFTbGaIZ7imBCMZzAUSfgRmBxmx2ACGecxIhSdgjPvN4HBMIUTcJ_bbSdd7W0bWRMV9Xf0oH392UaF7te28pGxLnqzzg4-mvtuLZt-pPrBaX8OToxsvL7Y9yn4eFys8ud4-fr0ks-XsUwh6eMsLRPMEEZS8QRKRKHKVJZIZljJpdGqYiqtCDY6KSWTlDFGM0VKAo1MK8XxFFzv7nbOfg3a92Jbe6WbRrY6_CVQ2OA0S9l_UJoSkiUkC-jdDlXOeu-0EZ2rt9L9CATFaFeI0a4oVmI0KUaTYm83LF_tc6RXsjFOtqr2hwsJpYhwmASO7riAabGxg2uDqUPC3wG_VSWKfQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1864557257</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Mix Design Methods for Porous Asphalt Mixtures</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Putman, Bradley J ; Kline, Laura C</creator><creatorcontrib>Putman, Bradley J ; Kline, Laura C</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractPorous asphalt mixtures have been used for more than 60 years, but it was not until 1974 that the first formalized procedure was created by the Federal Highway Administration to design mixtures for open-graded friction courses (OGFC). Since that time, there have been several other mix design procedures developed and adapted, mainly for OGFCs on high-volume roadways. In the past decade, porous asphalt pavements have been gaining popularity as a storm water best management practice and utilize similar mixtures as those used for OGFCs. However, for any porous mixtures to perform as intended, they must be designed and constructed properly. Across the United States, there are currently more than 20 different methods used to design these mixtures. The objective of this research was to compare the different mix design procedures currently used in the United States. The results indicated that some of the procedures result in a range of design binder contents instead of a single value. This does not provide much guidance to inexperienced designers, which could result in pavement performance issues that could deter the future use of porous asphalt mixtures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-1561</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5533</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000529</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Asphalt ; Best Management Practice ; Binders ; Bitumen. Tars. Bituminous binders and bituminous concretes ; Buildings. Public works ; Design engineering ; Exact sciences and technology ; Friction ; Materials ; Pavements ; Roadways ; Stormwater ; Technical Papers</subject><ispartof>Journal of materials in civil engineering, 2012-11, Vol.24 (11), p.1359-1367</ispartof><rights>2012 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-74b238131ac920a160c7c72a8f8b9afecd8c4d53fe2ba8a688867c5b50fa4dc93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-74b238131ac920a160c7c72a8f8b9afecd8c4d53fe2ba8a688867c5b50fa4dc93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000529$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000529$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,76193,76201</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26615902$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Putman, Bradley J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kline, Laura C</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Mix Design Methods for Porous Asphalt Mixtures</title><title>Journal of materials in civil engineering</title><description>AbstractPorous asphalt mixtures have been used for more than 60 years, but it was not until 1974 that the first formalized procedure was created by the Federal Highway Administration to design mixtures for open-graded friction courses (OGFC). Since that time, there have been several other mix design procedures developed and adapted, mainly for OGFCs on high-volume roadways. In the past decade, porous asphalt pavements have been gaining popularity as a storm water best management practice and utilize similar mixtures as those used for OGFCs. However, for any porous mixtures to perform as intended, they must be designed and constructed properly. Across the United States, there are currently more than 20 different methods used to design these mixtures. The objective of this research was to compare the different mix design procedures currently used in the United States. The results indicated that some of the procedures result in a range of design binder contents instead of a single value. This does not provide much guidance to inexperienced designers, which could result in pavement performance issues that could deter the future use of porous asphalt mixtures.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Asphalt</subject><subject>Best Management Practice</subject><subject>Binders</subject><subject>Bitumen. Tars. Bituminous binders and bituminous concretes</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Design engineering</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Friction</subject><subject>Materials</subject><subject>Pavements</subject><subject>Roadways</subject><subject>Stormwater</subject><subject>Technical Papers</subject><issn>0899-1561</issn><issn>1943-5533</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMoOKf_oQiCXnQmTZMm4s2o8wNWFJzXIU0T19E1NWlB_70pG7sTPDcHDs857-EB4BLBGYIU3V7P3_PFTbGaIZ7imBCMZzAUSfgRmBxmx2ACGecxIhSdgjPvN4HBMIUTcJ_bbSdd7W0bWRMV9Xf0oH392UaF7te28pGxLnqzzg4-mvtuLZt-pPrBaX8OToxsvL7Y9yn4eFys8ud4-fr0ks-XsUwh6eMsLRPMEEZS8QRKRKHKVJZIZljJpdGqYiqtCDY6KSWTlDFGM0VKAo1MK8XxFFzv7nbOfg3a92Jbe6WbRrY6_CVQ2OA0S9l_UJoSkiUkC-jdDlXOeu-0EZ2rt9L9CATFaFeI0a4oVmI0KUaTYm83LF_tc6RXsjFOtqr2hwsJpYhwmASO7riAabGxg2uDqUPC3wG_VSWKfQ</recordid><startdate>20121101</startdate><enddate>20121101</enddate><creator>Putman, Bradley J</creator><creator>Kline, Laura C</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121101</creationdate><title>Comparison of Mix Design Methods for Porous Asphalt Mixtures</title><author>Putman, Bradley J ; Kline, Laura C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-74b238131ac920a160c7c72a8f8b9afecd8c4d53fe2ba8a688867c5b50fa4dc93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Asphalt</topic><topic>Best Management Practice</topic><topic>Binders</topic><topic>Bitumen. Tars. Bituminous binders and bituminous concretes</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Design engineering</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Friction</topic><topic>Materials</topic><topic>Pavements</topic><topic>Roadways</topic><topic>Stormwater</topic><topic>Technical Papers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Putman, Bradley J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kline, Laura C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of materials in civil engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Putman, Bradley J</au><au>Kline, Laura C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Mix Design Methods for Porous Asphalt Mixtures</atitle><jtitle>Journal of materials in civil engineering</jtitle><date>2012-11-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1359</spage><epage>1367</epage><pages>1359-1367</pages><issn>0899-1561</issn><eissn>1943-5533</eissn><abstract>AbstractPorous asphalt mixtures have been used for more than 60 years, but it was not until 1974 that the first formalized procedure was created by the Federal Highway Administration to design mixtures for open-graded friction courses (OGFC). Since that time, there have been several other mix design procedures developed and adapted, mainly for OGFCs on high-volume roadways. In the past decade, porous asphalt pavements have been gaining popularity as a storm water best management practice and utilize similar mixtures as those used for OGFCs. However, for any porous mixtures to perform as intended, they must be designed and constructed properly. Across the United States, there are currently more than 20 different methods used to design these mixtures. The objective of this research was to compare the different mix design procedures currently used in the United States. The results indicated that some of the procedures result in a range of design binder contents instead of a single value. This does not provide much guidance to inexperienced designers, which could result in pavement performance issues that could deter the future use of porous asphalt mixtures.</abstract><cop>Reston, VA</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000529</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0899-1561
ispartof Journal of materials in civil engineering, 2012-11, Vol.24 (11), p.1359-1367
issn 0899-1561
1943-5533
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1888967489
source American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014
subjects Applied sciences
Asphalt
Best Management Practice
Binders
Bitumen. Tars. Bituminous binders and bituminous concretes
Buildings. Public works
Design engineering
Exact sciences and technology
Friction
Materials
Pavements
Roadways
Stormwater
Technical Papers
title Comparison of Mix Design Methods for Porous Asphalt Mixtures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T03%3A37%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Mix%20Design%20Methods%20for%20Porous%20Asphalt%20Mixtures&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20materials%20in%20civil%20engineering&rft.au=Putman,%20Bradley%20J&rft.date=2012-11-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1359&rft.epage=1367&rft.pages=1359-1367&rft.issn=0899-1561&rft.eissn=1943-5533&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000529&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1864557257%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1864557257&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true