Comparison of Mix Design Methods for Porous Asphalt Mixtures
AbstractPorous asphalt mixtures have been used for more than 60 years, but it was not until 1974 that the first formalized procedure was created by the Federal Highway Administration to design mixtures for open-graded friction courses (OGFC). Since that time, there have been several other mix design...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of materials in civil engineering 2012-11, Vol.24 (11), p.1359-1367 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1367 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1359 |
container_title | Journal of materials in civil engineering |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Putman, Bradley J Kline, Laura C |
description | AbstractPorous asphalt mixtures have been used for more than 60 years, but it was not until 1974 that the first formalized procedure was created by the Federal Highway Administration to design mixtures for open-graded friction courses (OGFC). Since that time, there have been several other mix design procedures developed and adapted, mainly for OGFCs on high-volume roadways. In the past decade, porous asphalt pavements have been gaining popularity as a storm water best management practice and utilize similar mixtures as those used for OGFCs. However, for any porous mixtures to perform as intended, they must be designed and constructed properly. Across the United States, there are currently more than 20 different methods used to design these mixtures. The objective of this research was to compare the different mix design procedures currently used in the United States. The results indicated that some of the procedures result in a range of design binder contents instead of a single value. This does not provide much guidance to inexperienced designers, which could result in pavement performance issues that could deter the future use of porous asphalt mixtures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000529 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1888967489</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1864557257</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-74b238131ac920a160c7c72a8f8b9afecd8c4d53fe2ba8a688867c5b50fa4dc93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMoOKf_oQiCXnQmTZMm4s2o8wNWFJzXIU0T19E1NWlB_70pG7sTPDcHDs857-EB4BLBGYIU3V7P3_PFTbGaIZ7imBCMZzAUSfgRmBxmx2ACGecxIhSdgjPvN4HBMIUTcJ_bbSdd7W0bWRMV9Xf0oH392UaF7te28pGxLnqzzg4-mvtuLZt-pPrBaX8OToxsvL7Y9yn4eFys8ud4-fr0ks-XsUwh6eMsLRPMEEZS8QRKRKHKVJZIZljJpdGqYiqtCDY6KSWTlDFGM0VKAo1MK8XxFFzv7nbOfg3a92Jbe6WbRrY6_CVQ2OA0S9l_UJoSkiUkC-jdDlXOeu-0EZ2rt9L9CATFaFeI0a4oVmI0KUaTYm83LF_tc6RXsjFOtqr2hwsJpYhwmASO7riAabGxg2uDqUPC3wG_VSWKfQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1864557257</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Mix Design Methods for Porous Asphalt Mixtures</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Putman, Bradley J ; Kline, Laura C</creator><creatorcontrib>Putman, Bradley J ; Kline, Laura C</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractPorous asphalt mixtures have been used for more than 60 years, but it was not until 1974 that the first formalized procedure was created by the Federal Highway Administration to design mixtures for open-graded friction courses (OGFC). Since that time, there have been several other mix design procedures developed and adapted, mainly for OGFCs on high-volume roadways. In the past decade, porous asphalt pavements have been gaining popularity as a storm water best management practice and utilize similar mixtures as those used for OGFCs. However, for any porous mixtures to perform as intended, they must be designed and constructed properly. Across the United States, there are currently more than 20 different methods used to design these mixtures. The objective of this research was to compare the different mix design procedures currently used in the United States. The results indicated that some of the procedures result in a range of design binder contents instead of a single value. This does not provide much guidance to inexperienced designers, which could result in pavement performance issues that could deter the future use of porous asphalt mixtures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-1561</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5533</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000529</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Asphalt ; Best Management Practice ; Binders ; Bitumen. Tars. Bituminous binders and bituminous concretes ; Buildings. Public works ; Design engineering ; Exact sciences and technology ; Friction ; Materials ; Pavements ; Roadways ; Stormwater ; Technical Papers</subject><ispartof>Journal of materials in civil engineering, 2012-11, Vol.24 (11), p.1359-1367</ispartof><rights>2012 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-74b238131ac920a160c7c72a8f8b9afecd8c4d53fe2ba8a688867c5b50fa4dc93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-74b238131ac920a160c7c72a8f8b9afecd8c4d53fe2ba8a688867c5b50fa4dc93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000529$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000529$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,76193,76201</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26615902$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Putman, Bradley J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kline, Laura C</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Mix Design Methods for Porous Asphalt Mixtures</title><title>Journal of materials in civil engineering</title><description>AbstractPorous asphalt mixtures have been used for more than 60 years, but it was not until 1974 that the first formalized procedure was created by the Federal Highway Administration to design mixtures for open-graded friction courses (OGFC). Since that time, there have been several other mix design procedures developed and adapted, mainly for OGFCs on high-volume roadways. In the past decade, porous asphalt pavements have been gaining popularity as a storm water best management practice and utilize similar mixtures as those used for OGFCs. However, for any porous mixtures to perform as intended, they must be designed and constructed properly. Across the United States, there are currently more than 20 different methods used to design these mixtures. The objective of this research was to compare the different mix design procedures currently used in the United States. The results indicated that some of the procedures result in a range of design binder contents instead of a single value. This does not provide much guidance to inexperienced designers, which could result in pavement performance issues that could deter the future use of porous asphalt mixtures.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Asphalt</subject><subject>Best Management Practice</subject><subject>Binders</subject><subject>Bitumen. Tars. Bituminous binders and bituminous concretes</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Design engineering</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Friction</subject><subject>Materials</subject><subject>Pavements</subject><subject>Roadways</subject><subject>Stormwater</subject><subject>Technical Papers</subject><issn>0899-1561</issn><issn>1943-5533</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMoOKf_oQiCXnQmTZMm4s2o8wNWFJzXIU0T19E1NWlB_70pG7sTPDcHDs857-EB4BLBGYIU3V7P3_PFTbGaIZ7imBCMZzAUSfgRmBxmx2ACGecxIhSdgjPvN4HBMIUTcJ_bbSdd7W0bWRMV9Xf0oH392UaF7te28pGxLnqzzg4-mvtuLZt-pPrBaX8OToxsvL7Y9yn4eFys8ud4-fr0ks-XsUwh6eMsLRPMEEZS8QRKRKHKVJZIZljJpdGqYiqtCDY6KSWTlDFGM0VKAo1MK8XxFFzv7nbOfg3a92Jbe6WbRrY6_CVQ2OA0S9l_UJoSkiUkC-jdDlXOeu-0EZ2rt9L9CATFaFeI0a4oVmI0KUaTYm83LF_tc6RXsjFOtqr2hwsJpYhwmASO7riAabGxg2uDqUPC3wG_VSWKfQ</recordid><startdate>20121101</startdate><enddate>20121101</enddate><creator>Putman, Bradley J</creator><creator>Kline, Laura C</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121101</creationdate><title>Comparison of Mix Design Methods for Porous Asphalt Mixtures</title><author>Putman, Bradley J ; Kline, Laura C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-74b238131ac920a160c7c72a8f8b9afecd8c4d53fe2ba8a688867c5b50fa4dc93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Asphalt</topic><topic>Best Management Practice</topic><topic>Binders</topic><topic>Bitumen. Tars. Bituminous binders and bituminous concretes</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Design engineering</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Friction</topic><topic>Materials</topic><topic>Pavements</topic><topic>Roadways</topic><topic>Stormwater</topic><topic>Technical Papers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Putman, Bradley J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kline, Laura C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of materials in civil engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Putman, Bradley J</au><au>Kline, Laura C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Mix Design Methods for Porous Asphalt Mixtures</atitle><jtitle>Journal of materials in civil engineering</jtitle><date>2012-11-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1359</spage><epage>1367</epage><pages>1359-1367</pages><issn>0899-1561</issn><eissn>1943-5533</eissn><abstract>AbstractPorous asphalt mixtures have been used for more than 60 years, but it was not until 1974 that the first formalized procedure was created by the Federal Highway Administration to design mixtures for open-graded friction courses (OGFC). Since that time, there have been several other mix design procedures developed and adapted, mainly for OGFCs on high-volume roadways. In the past decade, porous asphalt pavements have been gaining popularity as a storm water best management practice and utilize similar mixtures as those used for OGFCs. However, for any porous mixtures to perform as intended, they must be designed and constructed properly. Across the United States, there are currently more than 20 different methods used to design these mixtures. The objective of this research was to compare the different mix design procedures currently used in the United States. The results indicated that some of the procedures result in a range of design binder contents instead of a single value. This does not provide much guidance to inexperienced designers, which could result in pavement performance issues that could deter the future use of porous asphalt mixtures.</abstract><cop>Reston, VA</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000529</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0899-1561 |
ispartof | Journal of materials in civil engineering, 2012-11, Vol.24 (11), p.1359-1367 |
issn | 0899-1561 1943-5533 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1888967489 |
source | American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014 |
subjects | Applied sciences Asphalt Best Management Practice Binders Bitumen. Tars. Bituminous binders and bituminous concretes Buildings. Public works Design engineering Exact sciences and technology Friction Materials Pavements Roadways Stormwater Technical Papers |
title | Comparison of Mix Design Methods for Porous Asphalt Mixtures |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T03%3A37%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Mix%20Design%20Methods%20for%20Porous%20Asphalt%20Mixtures&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20materials%20in%20civil%20engineering&rft.au=Putman,%20Bradley%20J&rft.date=2012-11-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1359&rft.epage=1367&rft.pages=1359-1367&rft.issn=0899-1561&rft.eissn=1943-5533&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000529&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1864557257%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1864557257&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |