Computer Modeling of Diabetes and Its Complications: A Report on the Fifth Mount Hood Challenge Meeting

Abstract Objectives The Mount Hood Challenge meetings provide a forum for computer modelers of diabetes to discuss and compare models, to assess predictions against data from clinical trials and other studies, and to identify key future developments in the field. This article reports the proceedings...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Value in health 2013-06, Vol.16 (4), p.670-685
1. Verfasser: Palmer, Andrew J., BmedSci, MBBS
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 685
container_issue 4
container_start_page 670
container_title Value in health
container_volume 16
creator Palmer, Andrew J., BmedSci, MBBS
description Abstract Objectives The Mount Hood Challenge meetings provide a forum for computer modelers of diabetes to discuss and compare models, to assess predictions against data from clinical trials and other studies, and to identify key future developments in the field. This article reports the proceedings of the Fifth Mount Hood Challenge in 2010. Methods Eight modeling groups participated. Each group was given four modeling challenges to perform (in type 2 diabetes): to simulate a trial of a lipid-lowering intervention (The Atorvastatin Study for Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease Endpoints in Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus [ASPEN]), to simulate a trial of a blood glucose–lowering intervention (Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation [ADVANCE]), to simulate a trial of a blood pressure–lowering intervention (Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes [ACCORD]), and (optional) to simulate a second trial of blood glucose–lowering therapy (ACCORD). Model outcomes for each challenge were compared with the published findings of the respective trials. Results The results of the models varied from each other and, in some cases, from the published trial data in important ways. In general, the models performed well in terms of predicting the relative benefit of interventions, but performed less well in terms of quantifying the absolute risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methodological challenges were highlighted including matching trial end-point definitions, the importance of assumptions concerning the progression of risk factors over time, and accurately matching the patient characteristics from each trial. Conclusions The Fifth Mount Hood Challenge allowed modelers, through systematic comparison and validation exercises, to identify important differences between models, address key methodological challenges, and discuss avenues of research to improve future diabetes models.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jval.2013.01.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1888958543</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1098301513000120</els_id><sourcerecordid>1541987121</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c617t-7823069dfd47db4542ae4f8ded4d44e7d8ab274483796010ed09a08bab7318853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks1u1DAUhSMEoqXwAiyQN0hsEq5_EjsIIVUDpZVaIfGztpz4ZsZDJh5sp1LfHocZQGJBV_biu0f2_U5RPKdQUaDN6221vTVjxYDyCmgFwB4Up7RmohSS84f5Dq0qOdD6pHgS4xYAGs7qx8UJ47JtOLDTYr3yu_2cMJAbb3F005r4gbx3psOEkZjJkqsUyUKNrjfJ-Sm-IefkM-59SMRPJG2QXLghbXLCPCVy6b0lq40ZR5zWSG4QU059WjwazBjx2fE8K75dfPi6uiyvP328Wp1fl31DZSqlYhya1g5WSNuJWjCDYlAWrbBCoLTKdEwKoZYPAAW00BpQnekkp0rV_Kx4dcjdB_9jxpj0zsUex9FM6OeoM6TaWtWC34_WgrZKUkbvR7lkINsaWEbZAe2DjzHgoPfB7Uy40xT0ok1v9aJNL9o0UA2_hl4c8-duh_bPyG9PGXh5BEzszTgEM_Uu_uVkDcBblbm3Bw7zjm8dBh17h1OP1gXsk7be_f8d7_4Z73MlsvfxO95h3Po5TNmepjoyDfrLUrClX5TnblEG_Cfhgcgg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1372079502</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Computer Modeling of Diabetes and Its Complications: A Report on the Fifth Mount Hood Challenge Meeting</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Palmer, Andrew J., BmedSci, MBBS</creator><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Andrew J., BmedSci, MBBS ; The Mount Hood 5 Modeling Group ; Mount Hood 5 Modeling Group</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives The Mount Hood Challenge meetings provide a forum for computer modelers of diabetes to discuss and compare models, to assess predictions against data from clinical trials and other studies, and to identify key future developments in the field. This article reports the proceedings of the Fifth Mount Hood Challenge in 2010. Methods Eight modeling groups participated. Each group was given four modeling challenges to perform (in type 2 diabetes): to simulate a trial of a lipid-lowering intervention (The Atorvastatin Study for Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease Endpoints in Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus [ASPEN]), to simulate a trial of a blood glucose–lowering intervention (Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation [ADVANCE]), to simulate a trial of a blood pressure–lowering intervention (Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes [ACCORD]), and (optional) to simulate a second trial of blood glucose–lowering therapy (ACCORD). Model outcomes for each challenge were compared with the published findings of the respective trials. Results The results of the models varied from each other and, in some cases, from the published trial data in important ways. In general, the models performed well in terms of predicting the relative benefit of interventions, but performed less well in terms of quantifying the absolute risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methodological challenges were highlighted including matching trial end-point definitions, the importance of assumptions concerning the progression of risk factors over time, and accurately matching the patient characteristics from each trial. Conclusions The Fifth Mount Hood Challenge allowed modelers, through systematic comparison and validation exercises, to identify important differences between models, address key methodological challenges, and discuss avenues of research to improve future diabetes models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-3015</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4733</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.01.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23796302</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Blood ; Blood Glucose - drug effects ; Blood Pressure - drug effects ; Cardiovascular Diseases - etiology ; Cardiovascular Diseases - prevention &amp; control ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Computer Simulation ; Computers ; cost-effectiveness analysis ; Diabetes ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - complications ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - drug therapy ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - physiopathology ; Endpoint Determination ; General aspects ; health economics ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Matching ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous ; modeling ; Planification. Prevention (methods). Intervention. Evaluation ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Risk ; Type 2 diabetes mellitus ; Validation</subject><ispartof>Value in health, 2013-06, Vol.16 (4), p.670-685</ispartof><rights>International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR)</rights><rights>2013 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR)</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c617t-7823069dfd47db4542ae4f8ded4d44e7d8ab274483796010ed09a08bab7318853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c617t-7823069dfd47db4542ae4f8ded4d44e7d8ab274483796010ed09a08bab7318853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098301513000120$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,3537,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,30977,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27500398$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23796302$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Andrew J., BmedSci, MBBS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The Mount Hood 5 Modeling Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mount Hood 5 Modeling Group</creatorcontrib><title>Computer Modeling of Diabetes and Its Complications: A Report on the Fifth Mount Hood Challenge Meeting</title><title>Value in health</title><addtitle>Value Health</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives The Mount Hood Challenge meetings provide a forum for computer modelers of diabetes to discuss and compare models, to assess predictions against data from clinical trials and other studies, and to identify key future developments in the field. This article reports the proceedings of the Fifth Mount Hood Challenge in 2010. Methods Eight modeling groups participated. Each group was given four modeling challenges to perform (in type 2 diabetes): to simulate a trial of a lipid-lowering intervention (The Atorvastatin Study for Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease Endpoints in Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus [ASPEN]), to simulate a trial of a blood glucose–lowering intervention (Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation [ADVANCE]), to simulate a trial of a blood pressure–lowering intervention (Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes [ACCORD]), and (optional) to simulate a second trial of blood glucose–lowering therapy (ACCORD). Model outcomes for each challenge were compared with the published findings of the respective trials. Results The results of the models varied from each other and, in some cases, from the published trial data in important ways. In general, the models performed well in terms of predicting the relative benefit of interventions, but performed less well in terms of quantifying the absolute risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methodological challenges were highlighted including matching trial end-point definitions, the importance of assumptions concerning the progression of risk factors over time, and accurately matching the patient characteristics from each trial. Conclusions The Fifth Mount Hood Challenge allowed modelers, through systematic comparison and validation exercises, to identify important differences between models, address key methodological challenges, and discuss avenues of research to improve future diabetes models.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Blood Glucose - drug effects</subject><subject>Blood Pressure - drug effects</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Diseases - etiology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Diseases - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Computers</subject><subject>cost-effectiveness analysis</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - complications</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - drug therapy</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - physiopathology</subject><subject>Endpoint Determination</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>health economics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Matching</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>modeling</subject><subject>Planification. Prevention (methods). Intervention. Evaluation</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Type 2 diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Validation</subject><issn>1098-3015</issn><issn>1524-4733</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks1u1DAUhSMEoqXwAiyQN0hsEq5_EjsIIVUDpZVaIfGztpz4ZsZDJh5sp1LfHocZQGJBV_biu0f2_U5RPKdQUaDN6221vTVjxYDyCmgFwB4Up7RmohSS84f5Dq0qOdD6pHgS4xYAGs7qx8UJ47JtOLDTYr3yu_2cMJAbb3F005r4gbx3psOEkZjJkqsUyUKNrjfJ-Sm-IefkM-59SMRPJG2QXLghbXLCPCVy6b0lq40ZR5zWSG4QU059WjwazBjx2fE8K75dfPi6uiyvP328Wp1fl31DZSqlYhya1g5WSNuJWjCDYlAWrbBCoLTKdEwKoZYPAAW00BpQnekkp0rV_Kx4dcjdB_9jxpj0zsUex9FM6OeoM6TaWtWC34_WgrZKUkbvR7lkINsaWEbZAe2DjzHgoPfB7Uy40xT0ok1v9aJNL9o0UA2_hl4c8-duh_bPyG9PGXh5BEzszTgEM_Uu_uVkDcBblbm3Bw7zjm8dBh17h1OP1gXsk7be_f8d7_4Z73MlsvfxO95h3Po5TNmepjoyDfrLUrClX5TnblEG_Cfhgcgg</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Palmer, Andrew J., BmedSci, MBBS</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Computer Modeling of Diabetes and Its Complications: A Report on the Fifth Mount Hood Challenge Meeting</title><author>Palmer, Andrew J., BmedSci, MBBS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c617t-7823069dfd47db4542ae4f8ded4d44e7d8ab274483796010ed09a08bab7318853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Blood Glucose - drug effects</topic><topic>Blood Pressure - drug effects</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Diseases - etiology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Diseases - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Computers</topic><topic>cost-effectiveness analysis</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - complications</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - drug therapy</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - physiopathology</topic><topic>Endpoint Determination</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>health economics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Matching</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>modeling</topic><topic>Planification. Prevention (methods). Intervention. Evaluation</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Type 2 diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Validation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Andrew J., BmedSci, MBBS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The Mount Hood 5 Modeling Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mount Hood 5 Modeling Group</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Value in health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Palmer, Andrew J., BmedSci, MBBS</au><aucorp>The Mount Hood 5 Modeling Group</aucorp><aucorp>Mount Hood 5 Modeling Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Computer Modeling of Diabetes and Its Complications: A Report on the Fifth Mount Hood Challenge Meeting</atitle><jtitle>Value in health</jtitle><addtitle>Value Health</addtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>670</spage><epage>685</epage><pages>670-685</pages><issn>1098-3015</issn><eissn>1524-4733</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objectives The Mount Hood Challenge meetings provide a forum for computer modelers of diabetes to discuss and compare models, to assess predictions against data from clinical trials and other studies, and to identify key future developments in the field. This article reports the proceedings of the Fifth Mount Hood Challenge in 2010. Methods Eight modeling groups participated. Each group was given four modeling challenges to perform (in type 2 diabetes): to simulate a trial of a lipid-lowering intervention (The Atorvastatin Study for Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease Endpoints in Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus [ASPEN]), to simulate a trial of a blood glucose–lowering intervention (Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation [ADVANCE]), to simulate a trial of a blood pressure–lowering intervention (Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes [ACCORD]), and (optional) to simulate a second trial of blood glucose–lowering therapy (ACCORD). Model outcomes for each challenge were compared with the published findings of the respective trials. Results The results of the models varied from each other and, in some cases, from the published trial data in important ways. In general, the models performed well in terms of predicting the relative benefit of interventions, but performed less well in terms of quantifying the absolute risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methodological challenges were highlighted including matching trial end-point definitions, the importance of assumptions concerning the progression of risk factors over time, and accurately matching the patient characteristics from each trial. Conclusions The Fifth Mount Hood Challenge allowed modelers, through systematic comparison and validation exercises, to identify important differences between models, address key methodological challenges, and discuss avenues of research to improve future diabetes models.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>23796302</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jval.2013.01.002</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1098-3015
ispartof Value in health, 2013-06, Vol.16 (4), p.670-685
issn 1098-3015
1524-4733
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1888958543
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Blood
Blood Glucose - drug effects
Blood Pressure - drug effects
Cardiovascular Diseases - etiology
Cardiovascular Diseases - prevention & control
Clinical Trials as Topic
Computer Simulation
Computers
cost-effectiveness analysis
Diabetes
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - complications
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - drug therapy
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - physiopathology
Endpoint Determination
General aspects
health economics
Humans
Internal Medicine
Matching
Medical sciences
Miscellaneous
modeling
Planification. Prevention (methods). Intervention. Evaluation
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Risk
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Validation
title Computer Modeling of Diabetes and Its Complications: A Report on the Fifth Mount Hood Challenge Meeting
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T05%3A58%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computer%20Modeling%20of%20Diabetes%20and%20Its%20Complications:%20A%20Report%20on%20the%20Fifth%20Mount%20Hood%20Challenge%20Meeting&rft.jtitle=Value%20in%20health&rft.au=Palmer,%20Andrew%20J.,%20BmedSci,%20MBBS&rft.aucorp=The%20Mount%20Hood%205%20Modeling%20Group&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=670&rft.epage=685&rft.pages=670-685&rft.issn=1098-3015&rft.eissn=1524-4733&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jval.2013.01.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1541987121%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1372079502&rft_id=info:pmid/23796302&rft_els_id=S1098301513000120&rfr_iscdi=true