Influence of the delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase (ALAD) polymorphism on biomarkers of lead exposure in Turkish storage battery manufacturing workers

Background The relationship between delta‐aminolevulinic acid dehydratase polymorphism (ALAD) and biomarkers of exposure was investigated in Turkish lead workers in this study. Methods Seventy two male lead battery manufacturing workers were selected for the study. Blood lead (BPb) and urinary lead...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of industrial medicine 2003-02, Vol.43 (2), p.165-171
Hauptverfasser: Süzen, H. Sinan, Duydu, Yalçın, Aydın, Ahmet, Işımer, Aşkın, Vural, Nevin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The relationship between delta‐aminolevulinic acid dehydratase polymorphism (ALAD) and biomarkers of exposure was investigated in Turkish lead workers in this study. Methods Seventy two male lead battery manufacturing workers were selected for the study. Blood lead (BPb) and urinary lead (UPb) concentrations were determined by atomic absorption spectrometry. Erythrocyte ALAD activity and urinary 5‐aminolevulinic acid (UALA) were measured spectrophotometrically. The polymerase chain reaction‐restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR‐RFLP) technique was used to determine the genotype of the ALAD gene. Results In total, 51 workers (70.8%) had the ALAD 1‐1 genotype, whereas 21 workers (29.2%) had the ALAD 1‐2 genotype. No significant relationships were found between the two genotypes and BPb, UPb, and ALAD activity. ALAD1 homozygotes showed significantly higher levels of UALA in comparison with those ALAD2 carriers. Conclusions ALAD 1‐1 individuals might be an increased risk compared to ALAD2 carriers to disturbance in heme biosynthetic pathway in high lead exposure. Am. J. Ind. Med. 43: 165–171, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
ISSN:0271-3586
1097-0274
DOI:10.1002/ajim.10158