Is Obligate Siblicidal Aggression Food Sensitive?

In avian species whose chicks show facultative siblicide, attacks increase with food deprivation. In species that show obligate siblicide, this causal relationship is not expected, but no test has been made. When we composed artificial pairs of young brown boobies, Sula leucogaster (an obligately si...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behavioral ecology and sociobiology 2003-10, Vol.54 (6), p.547-554
Hauptverfasser: Osorno, José Luis, Drummond, Hugh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 554
container_issue 6
container_start_page 547
container_title Behavioral ecology and sociobiology
container_volume 54
creator Osorno, José Luis
Drummond, Hugh
description In avian species whose chicks show facultative siblicide, attacks increase with food deprivation. In species that show obligate siblicide, this causal relationship is not expected, but no test has been made. When we composed artificial pairs of young brown boobies, Sula leucogaster (an obligately siblicidal species), and supplied variable amounts of food to the older nestlings in each pair, food ingestion was related to the most intense form of attack, pushes, which can cause death by expelling the broodmate from the nest. The less food an older nestling ingested, the more time it spent active and the greater its rate and absolute frequency of pushes, and the more often it expelled its nestmate. Hence, deficient food provision to older nestlings could precipitate siblicidal expulsion of broodmates. Younger nestmates were aggressive too, and the more they were pushed and expelled, the more they pecked. Aggression of senior brown-booby broodmates may be flexible and food sensitive in order to optimize the timing of siblicide or to make siblicide weakly facultative.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00265-003-0667-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18875831</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25063303</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25063303</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-f6fdfa59b54126050904bb4902def0e744b65b6cdd327e5a39391e088e6b41183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkMFKAzEQhoMoWKsP4EFYBL1FJ5kku3sSKVYLhR6q55DdzZaU7aYmW8G3N6VFwdMMzPcPPx8h1wweGED-GAG4khQAKSiVUzwhIyaQU8gVPyUjQAFUCoHn5CLGNQAoVhQjwmYxW1SdW5nBZkuXtto1psueV6tgY3S-z6beN9nS9tEN7ss-XZKz1nTRXh3nmHxMX94nb3S-eJ1Nnue0RokDbVXbtEaWlRSMK5BQgqgqUQJvbAs2F6JSslJ10yDPrTRYYsksFIVVlWCswDG5P_zdBv-5s3HQGxdr23Wmt34XdaqfywJZAm__gWu_C33qphUTHIClQmPCDlAdfIzBtnob3MaEb81A7w3qg0GdDOq9QY0pc3d8bGJtujaYvnbxLyiZKlDwxN0cuHUcfPi9cwkKERB_AGZqd10</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614200135</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is Obligate Siblicidal Aggression Food Sensitive?</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Osorno, José Luis ; Drummond, Hugh</creator><creatorcontrib>Osorno, José Luis ; Drummond, Hugh</creatorcontrib><description>In avian species whose chicks show facultative siblicide, attacks increase with food deprivation. In species that show obligate siblicide, this causal relationship is not expected, but no test has been made. When we composed artificial pairs of young brown boobies, Sula leucogaster (an obligately siblicidal species), and supplied variable amounts of food to the older nestlings in each pair, food ingestion was related to the most intense form of attack, pushes, which can cause death by expelling the broodmate from the nest. The less food an older nestling ingested, the more time it spent active and the greater its rate and absolute frequency of pushes, and the more often it expelled its nestmate. Hence, deficient food provision to older nestlings could precipitate siblicidal expulsion of broodmates. Younger nestmates were aggressive too, and the more they were pushed and expelled, the more they pecked. Aggression of senior brown-booby broodmates may be flexible and food sensitive in order to optimize the timing of siblicide or to make siblicide weakly facultative.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-5443</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0762</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00265-003-0667-3</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BESOD6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Animal aggression ; Animal ethology ; Aves ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birds ; Chicks ; Evolution ; Expulsion ; Food ; Food deprivation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human aggression ; Ingestion ; Pecking order ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Siblings ; Vertebrata</subject><ispartof>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2003-10, Vol.54 (6), p.547-554</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2003 Springer-Verlag</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-f6fdfa59b54126050904bb4902def0e744b65b6cdd327e5a39391e088e6b41183</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25063303$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25063303$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27915,27916,58008,58241</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15168342$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Osorno, José Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drummond, Hugh</creatorcontrib><title>Is Obligate Siblicidal Aggression Food Sensitive?</title><title>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</title><description>In avian species whose chicks show facultative siblicide, attacks increase with food deprivation. In species that show obligate siblicide, this causal relationship is not expected, but no test has been made. When we composed artificial pairs of young brown boobies, Sula leucogaster (an obligately siblicidal species), and supplied variable amounts of food to the older nestlings in each pair, food ingestion was related to the most intense form of attack, pushes, which can cause death by expelling the broodmate from the nest. The less food an older nestling ingested, the more time it spent active and the greater its rate and absolute frequency of pushes, and the more often it expelled its nestmate. Hence, deficient food provision to older nestlings could precipitate siblicidal expulsion of broodmates. Younger nestmates were aggressive too, and the more they were pushed and expelled, the more they pecked. Aggression of senior brown-booby broodmates may be flexible and food sensitive in order to optimize the timing of siblicide or to make siblicide weakly facultative.</description><subject>Animal aggression</subject><subject>Animal ethology</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Chicks</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Expulsion</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food deprivation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human aggression</subject><subject>Ingestion</subject><subject>Pecking order</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Siblings</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><issn>0340-5443</issn><issn>1432-0762</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkMFKAzEQhoMoWKsP4EFYBL1FJ5kku3sSKVYLhR6q55DdzZaU7aYmW8G3N6VFwdMMzPcPPx8h1wweGED-GAG4khQAKSiVUzwhIyaQU8gVPyUjQAFUCoHn5CLGNQAoVhQjwmYxW1SdW5nBZkuXtto1psueV6tgY3S-z6beN9nS9tEN7ss-XZKz1nTRXh3nmHxMX94nb3S-eJ1Nnue0RokDbVXbtEaWlRSMK5BQgqgqUQJvbAs2F6JSslJ10yDPrTRYYsksFIVVlWCswDG5P_zdBv-5s3HQGxdr23Wmt34XdaqfywJZAm__gWu_C33qphUTHIClQmPCDlAdfIzBtnob3MaEb81A7w3qg0GdDOq9QY0pc3d8bGJtujaYvnbxLyiZKlDwxN0cuHUcfPi9cwkKERB_AGZqd10</recordid><startdate>20031001</startdate><enddate>20031001</enddate><creator>Osorno, José Luis</creator><creator>Drummond, Hugh</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031001</creationdate><title>Is Obligate Siblicidal Aggression Food Sensitive?</title><author>Osorno, José Luis ; Drummond, Hugh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-f6fdfa59b54126050904bb4902def0e744b65b6cdd327e5a39391e088e6b41183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Animal aggression</topic><topic>Animal ethology</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Chicks</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Expulsion</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food deprivation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human aggression</topic><topic>Ingestion</topic><topic>Pecking order</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Siblings</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Osorno, José Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drummond, Hugh</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Osorno, José Luis</au><au>Drummond, Hugh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is Obligate Siblicidal Aggression Food Sensitive?</atitle><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle><date>2003-10-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>547</spage><epage>554</epage><pages>547-554</pages><issn>0340-5443</issn><eissn>1432-0762</eissn><coden>BESOD6</coden><abstract>In avian species whose chicks show facultative siblicide, attacks increase with food deprivation. In species that show obligate siblicide, this causal relationship is not expected, but no test has been made. When we composed artificial pairs of young brown boobies, Sula leucogaster (an obligately siblicidal species), and supplied variable amounts of food to the older nestlings in each pair, food ingestion was related to the most intense form of attack, pushes, which can cause death by expelling the broodmate from the nest. The less food an older nestling ingested, the more time it spent active and the greater its rate and absolute frequency of pushes, and the more often it expelled its nestmate. Hence, deficient food provision to older nestlings could precipitate siblicidal expulsion of broodmates. Younger nestmates were aggressive too, and the more they were pushed and expelled, the more they pecked. Aggression of senior brown-booby broodmates may be flexible and food sensitive in order to optimize the timing of siblicide or to make siblicide weakly facultative.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s00265-003-0667-3</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0340-5443
ispartof Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2003-10, Vol.54 (6), p.547-554
issn 0340-5443
1432-0762
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18875831
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Animal aggression
Animal ethology
Aves
Biological and medical sciences
Birds
Chicks
Evolution
Expulsion
Food
Food deprivation
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human aggression
Ingestion
Pecking order
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Siblings
Vertebrata
title Is Obligate Siblicidal Aggression Food Sensitive?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T00%3A46%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20Obligate%20Siblicidal%20Aggression%20Food%20Sensitive?&rft.jtitle=Behavioral%20ecology%20and%20sociobiology&rft.au=Osorno,%20Jos%C3%A9%20Luis&rft.date=2003-10-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=547&rft.epage=554&rft.pages=547-554&rft.issn=0340-5443&rft.eissn=1432-0762&rft.coden=BESOD6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00265-003-0667-3&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25063303%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614200135&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=25063303&rfr_iscdi=true