Development of a valid and reliable test to assess trauma radiograph interpretation performance

Abstract Objectives The purpose of this investigation was to develop and examine the preliminary validity and reliability among radiographers of a test to assess trauma radiograph interpretation performance suitable for use among health professionals. Methods Stage 1 examined 14,159 consecutive appe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiography (London, England. 1995) England. 1995), 2017-05, Vol.23 (2), p.153-158
Hauptverfasser: Neep, M.J, Steffens, T, Riley, V, Eastgate, P, McPhail, S.M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 158
container_issue 2
container_start_page 153
container_title Radiography (London, England. 1995)
container_volume 23
creator Neep, M.J
Steffens, T
Riley, V
Eastgate, P
McPhail, S.M
description Abstract Objectives The purpose of this investigation was to develop and examine the preliminary validity and reliability among radiographers of a test to assess trauma radiograph interpretation performance suitable for use among health professionals. Methods Stage 1 examined 14,159 consecutive appendicular and axial examinations from a hospital emergency department over a 12 month period to quantify a typical anatomical region case-mix of trauma radiographs. A sample of radiographic cases representative of affected anatomical regions was then developed into the Image Interpretation Test (IIT). Stage 2 involved prospective investigations of the IIT's reliability (inter-rater, intra-rater, internal consistency) and validity (concurrent) among 41 radiographers. Results The IIT included 60 cases. The median (interquartile range) clinical experience of participants was 5 (2–10) years. Case scores were internally consistent (Cronbach's alpha = 0.90). Favourable inter-rater reliability (kappa > 0.70 for 58/60 cases, Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) > 0.99 for total score) and intra-rater reliability (kappa > 0.90 for 60/60 cases, ICC > 0.99 for total score) was observed. There was a positive association between radiographers' confidence in image interpretation and IIT score (coefficient = 1.52, r-squared = 0.60, p 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.radi.2017.01.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1886353627</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1078817417300056</els_id><sourcerecordid>1886353627</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-4d76b8da02742077c6641efc1318b335b67b76118bb17db314d0be87e83679b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2P1iAUhRujcT70D7gwLN20cqEFJjEmZkZHk0lcqGvCx63y2pYK9E3m30vzji5cuALCOQfuc5rmBdAOKIjXhy4ZHzpGQXYUOkr7R805DJy1THF4XPdUqlaB7M-ai5wPlFLWM_W0Oav3V3To1Xmjb_CIU1xnXAqJIzHkaKbgiVk8STgFYyckBXMhJRKTM-ZMSjLbbMj-ePyezPqDhKVgWhMWU0JcyIppjGk2i8NnzZPRTBmfP6yXzbcP779ef2zvPt9-un5317oeoLS9l8IqbyiTPaNSOiF6wNEBB2U5H6yQVgqoBwvSWw69pxaVRMWFvLKCXzavTrlrir-2-l89h-xwmsyCccsalBJ84ILJKmUnqUsx54SjXlOYTbrXQPUOVh_0PpvewWoKuoKtppcP-Zud0f-1_CFZBW9OAqxTHgMmnV3ASsCHhK5oH8P_89_-Y3dTWIIz00-8x3yIW1oqPw06M031l73avVmQvNY6CP4bmHSesw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1886353627</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development of a valid and reliable test to assess trauma radiograph interpretation performance</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Neep, M.J ; Steffens, T ; Riley, V ; Eastgate, P ; McPhail, S.M</creator><creatorcontrib>Neep, M.J ; Steffens, T ; Riley, V ; Eastgate, P ; McPhail, S.M</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives The purpose of this investigation was to develop and examine the preliminary validity and reliability among radiographers of a test to assess trauma radiograph interpretation performance suitable for use among health professionals. Methods Stage 1 examined 14,159 consecutive appendicular and axial examinations from a hospital emergency department over a 12 month period to quantify a typical anatomical region case-mix of trauma radiographs. A sample of radiographic cases representative of affected anatomical regions was then developed into the Image Interpretation Test (IIT). Stage 2 involved prospective investigations of the IIT's reliability (inter-rater, intra-rater, internal consistency) and validity (concurrent) among 41 radiographers. Results The IIT included 60 cases. The median (interquartile range) clinical experience of participants was 5 (2–10) years. Case scores were internally consistent (Cronbach's alpha = 0.90). Favourable inter-rater reliability (kappa &gt; 0.70 for 58/60 cases, Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) &gt; 0.99 for total score) and intra-rater reliability (kappa &gt; 0.90 for 60/60 cases, ICC &gt; 0.99 for total score) was observed. There was a positive association between radiographers' confidence in image interpretation and IIT score (coefficient = 1.52, r-squared = 0.60, p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions The IIT developed during this investigation included a selection of radiographic cases consistent with anatomical regions represented in an adult trauma case-mix. This study has also provided foundational preliminary evidence to support the reliability and validity of the IIT among radiographers. The findings suggest that it is possible to assess image interpretation performance of adult trauma radiographs with this test.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-8174</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2831</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2017.01.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28390548</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Image interpretation ; Radiology ; Reliability ; Trauma ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Radiography (London, England. 1995), 2017-05, Vol.23 (2), p.153-158</ispartof><rights>The College of Radiographers</rights><rights>2017 The College of Radiographers</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 The College of Radiographers. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-4d76b8da02742077c6641efc1318b335b67b76118bb17db314d0be87e83679b63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-4d76b8da02742077c6641efc1318b335b67b76118bb17db314d0be87e83679b63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2017.01.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28390548$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Neep, M.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steffens, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riley, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eastgate, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McPhail, S.M</creatorcontrib><title>Development of a valid and reliable test to assess trauma radiograph interpretation performance</title><title>Radiography (London, England. 1995)</title><addtitle>Radiography (Lond)</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives The purpose of this investigation was to develop and examine the preliminary validity and reliability among radiographers of a test to assess trauma radiograph interpretation performance suitable for use among health professionals. Methods Stage 1 examined 14,159 consecutive appendicular and axial examinations from a hospital emergency department over a 12 month period to quantify a typical anatomical region case-mix of trauma radiographs. A sample of radiographic cases representative of affected anatomical regions was then developed into the Image Interpretation Test (IIT). Stage 2 involved prospective investigations of the IIT's reliability (inter-rater, intra-rater, internal consistency) and validity (concurrent) among 41 radiographers. Results The IIT included 60 cases. The median (interquartile range) clinical experience of participants was 5 (2–10) years. Case scores were internally consistent (Cronbach's alpha = 0.90). Favourable inter-rater reliability (kappa &gt; 0.70 for 58/60 cases, Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) &gt; 0.99 for total score) and intra-rater reliability (kappa &gt; 0.90 for 60/60 cases, ICC &gt; 0.99 for total score) was observed. There was a positive association between radiographers' confidence in image interpretation and IIT score (coefficient = 1.52, r-squared = 0.60, p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions The IIT developed during this investigation included a selection of radiographic cases consistent with anatomical regions represented in an adult trauma case-mix. This study has also provided foundational preliminary evidence to support the reliability and validity of the IIT among radiographers. The findings suggest that it is possible to assess image interpretation performance of adult trauma radiographs with this test.</description><subject>Image interpretation</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1078-8174</issn><issn>1532-2831</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU2P1iAUhRujcT70D7gwLN20cqEFJjEmZkZHk0lcqGvCx63y2pYK9E3m30vzji5cuALCOQfuc5rmBdAOKIjXhy4ZHzpGQXYUOkr7R805DJy1THF4XPdUqlaB7M-ai5wPlFLWM_W0Oav3V3To1Xmjb_CIU1xnXAqJIzHkaKbgiVk8STgFYyckBXMhJRKTM-ZMSjLbbMj-ePyezPqDhKVgWhMWU0JcyIppjGk2i8NnzZPRTBmfP6yXzbcP779ef2zvPt9-un5317oeoLS9l8IqbyiTPaNSOiF6wNEBB2U5H6yQVgqoBwvSWw69pxaVRMWFvLKCXzavTrlrir-2-l89h-xwmsyCccsalBJ84ILJKmUnqUsx54SjXlOYTbrXQPUOVh_0PpvewWoKuoKtppcP-Zud0f-1_CFZBW9OAqxTHgMmnV3ASsCHhK5oH8P_89_-Y3dTWIIz00-8x3yIW1oqPw06M031l73avVmQvNY6CP4bmHSesw</recordid><startdate>20170501</startdate><enddate>20170501</enddate><creator>Neep, M.J</creator><creator>Steffens, T</creator><creator>Riley, V</creator><creator>Eastgate, P</creator><creator>McPhail, S.M</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170501</creationdate><title>Development of a valid and reliable test to assess trauma radiograph interpretation performance</title><author>Neep, M.J ; Steffens, T ; Riley, V ; Eastgate, P ; McPhail, S.M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-4d76b8da02742077c6641efc1318b335b67b76118bb17db314d0be87e83679b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Image interpretation</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Neep, M.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steffens, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riley, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eastgate, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McPhail, S.M</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Radiography (London, England. 1995)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Neep, M.J</au><au>Steffens, T</au><au>Riley, V</au><au>Eastgate, P</au><au>McPhail, S.M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development of a valid and reliable test to assess trauma radiograph interpretation performance</atitle><jtitle>Radiography (London, England. 1995)</jtitle><addtitle>Radiography (Lond)</addtitle><date>2017-05-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>153</spage><epage>158</epage><pages>153-158</pages><issn>1078-8174</issn><eissn>1532-2831</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objectives The purpose of this investigation was to develop and examine the preliminary validity and reliability among radiographers of a test to assess trauma radiograph interpretation performance suitable for use among health professionals. Methods Stage 1 examined 14,159 consecutive appendicular and axial examinations from a hospital emergency department over a 12 month period to quantify a typical anatomical region case-mix of trauma radiographs. A sample of radiographic cases representative of affected anatomical regions was then developed into the Image Interpretation Test (IIT). Stage 2 involved prospective investigations of the IIT's reliability (inter-rater, intra-rater, internal consistency) and validity (concurrent) among 41 radiographers. Results The IIT included 60 cases. The median (interquartile range) clinical experience of participants was 5 (2–10) years. Case scores were internally consistent (Cronbach's alpha = 0.90). Favourable inter-rater reliability (kappa &gt; 0.70 for 58/60 cases, Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) &gt; 0.99 for total score) and intra-rater reliability (kappa &gt; 0.90 for 60/60 cases, ICC &gt; 0.99 for total score) was observed. There was a positive association between radiographers' confidence in image interpretation and IIT score (coefficient = 1.52, r-squared = 0.60, p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions The IIT developed during this investigation included a selection of radiographic cases consistent with anatomical regions represented in an adult trauma case-mix. This study has also provided foundational preliminary evidence to support the reliability and validity of the IIT among radiographers. The findings suggest that it is possible to assess image interpretation performance of adult trauma radiographs with this test.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28390548</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.radi.2017.01.004</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1078-8174
ispartof Radiography (London, England. 1995), 2017-05, Vol.23 (2), p.153-158
issn 1078-8174
1532-2831
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1886353627
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Image interpretation
Radiology
Reliability
Trauma
Validity
title Development of a valid and reliable test to assess trauma radiograph interpretation performance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T16%3A51%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20of%20a%20valid%20and%20reliable%20test%20to%20assess%20trauma%20radiograph%20interpretation%20performance&rft.jtitle=Radiography%20(London,%20England.%201995)&rft.au=Neep,%20M.J&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=158&rft.pages=153-158&rft.issn=1078-8174&rft.eissn=1532-2831&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.radi.2017.01.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1886353627%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1886353627&rft_id=info:pmid/28390548&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1078817417300056&rfr_iscdi=true