Anterolateral ligament reconstruction with autologous grafting: A biomechanical study
Abstract Background To evaluate the reliability of the Iliotibial band compared to gracilis tendon as a graft to be used in anterolateral ligament reconstruction. Methods Gracilis tendon and a strip of Iliotibial band compared were harvested from 8 fresh human cadaveric knees. The gracilis tendon wa...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical biomechanics (Bristol) 2017-05, Vol.44, p.99-103 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 103 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 99 |
| container_title | Clinical biomechanics (Bristol) |
| container_volume | 44 |
| creator | Monaco, E Lanzetti, R.M Fabbri, M Redler, A De Carli, A Ferretti, A |
| description | Abstract Background To evaluate the reliability of the Iliotibial band compared to gracilis tendon as a graft to be used in anterolateral ligament reconstruction. Methods Gracilis tendon and a strip of Iliotibial band compared were harvested from 8 fresh human cadaveric knees. The gracilis tendon was prepared to obtain a graft of 10 cm in length (Group 1). Iliotibial band compared was prepared to obtain a graft of 10 cm in length and 0.5 cm in width from the middle portion (Group 2). All the specimens were fixed on a servo hydraulic tensile machine with dedicated cryo-clamp. The loading protocol, used to compare the previously published results of ultimate failure load and Stiffness of the anterolateral ligament (Group 3), included a cyclic preconditioning between 10 and 25 N at 0.1 Hz for 10 cycles and then a load to failure test at 20 mm/min. Findings Gracilis tendon showed higher Ultimante Failure Load and stiffness when compared to a strip of Iliotibial band. Gracilis tendon and a strip of Iliotibial band compared showed higher Ultimante Failure Load and stiffness when compared with native anterolateral ligament as reported by Kennedy. Interpretation Both grafts tested in the present studies are suitable for an anatomical anterolateral ligament reconstruction. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.03.013 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1885952339</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0268003317300815</els_id><sourcerecordid>1885952339</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-6ec013d14c9e47898ff5266446fc7f0b83ac3abf7d62a535c656b8a534df50753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxS1ERZeWr4DCjUvC2I5jhwPSasU_qRKHtmfLceytl8QutlO03x5HuyDEict4Dm_ePP8GoTcYGgy4e3do9OT84MJs9ENDAPMGaAOYPkMbLHhfY8Lxc7QB0okagNJL9DKlAwC0hPEX6JIIKlpG-Abdb302MUyqVDVVk9ur2fhcRaODTzkuOrvgq58uP1RqyWEK-7Ckah-Vzc7v31fb6pxDeaeLQ8rLeLxGF1ZNybw6v1fo_tPHu92X-ubb56-77U2tW0py3RldQo-41b1pueiFtYx0Xdt2VnMLg6BKUzVYPnZEMcp0x7pBlK4dLQPO6BV6e_J9jOHHYlKWs0vaTJPypsSUWAjWM0JpX6T9SapjSCkaKx-jm1U8SgxypSoP8i-qcqUqgcoSsMy-Pq9ZhtmMfyZ_YyyC3UlgymefnIkyaWe8NqMrILMcg_uvNR_-cVmVK9Xv5mjSISzRF5oSy0QkyNv1vOt1MacAAjP6C6-6pMQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1885952339</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Anterolateral ligament reconstruction with autologous grafting: A biomechanical study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Monaco, E ; Lanzetti, R.M ; Fabbri, M ; Redler, A ; De Carli, A ; Ferretti, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Monaco, E ; Lanzetti, R.M ; Fabbri, M ; Redler, A ; De Carli, A ; Ferretti, A</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background To evaluate the reliability of the Iliotibial band compared to gracilis tendon as a graft to be used in anterolateral ligament reconstruction. Methods Gracilis tendon and a strip of Iliotibial band compared were harvested from 8 fresh human cadaveric knees. The gracilis tendon was prepared to obtain a graft of 10 cm in length (Group 1). Iliotibial band compared was prepared to obtain a graft of 10 cm in length and 0.5 cm in width from the middle portion (Group 2). All the specimens were fixed on a servo hydraulic tensile machine with dedicated cryo-clamp. The loading protocol, used to compare the previously published results of ultimate failure load and Stiffness of the anterolateral ligament (Group 3), included a cyclic preconditioning between 10 and 25 N at 0.1 Hz for 10 cycles and then a load to failure test at 20 mm/min. Findings Gracilis tendon showed higher Ultimante Failure Load and stiffness when compared to a strip of Iliotibial band. Gracilis tendon and a strip of Iliotibial band compared showed higher Ultimante Failure Load and stiffness when compared with native anterolateral ligament as reported by Kennedy. Interpretation Both grafts tested in the present studies are suitable for an anatomical anterolateral ligament reconstruction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-0033</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1271</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.03.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28384527</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament - surgery ; Anterolateral ligament ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Biomechanics ; Female ; Gracilis tendon ; Humans ; Ileotibial band ; Ligaments, Articular - surgery ; Male ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures ; Reproducibility of Results ; Stress, Mechanical ; Tendons - transplantation ; Transplantation, Autologous</subject><ispartof>Clinical biomechanics (Bristol), 2017-05, Vol.44, p.99-103</ispartof><rights>2017</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-6ec013d14c9e47898ff5266446fc7f0b83ac3abf7d62a535c656b8a534df50753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-6ec013d14c9e47898ff5266446fc7f0b83ac3abf7d62a535c656b8a534df50753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.03.013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28384527$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Monaco, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanzetti, R.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabbri, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redler, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Carli, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferretti, A</creatorcontrib><title>Anterolateral ligament reconstruction with autologous grafting: A biomechanical study</title><title>Clinical biomechanics (Bristol)</title><addtitle>Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)</addtitle><description>Abstract Background To evaluate the reliability of the Iliotibial band compared to gracilis tendon as a graft to be used in anterolateral ligament reconstruction. Methods Gracilis tendon and a strip of Iliotibial band compared were harvested from 8 fresh human cadaveric knees. The gracilis tendon was prepared to obtain a graft of 10 cm in length (Group 1). Iliotibial band compared was prepared to obtain a graft of 10 cm in length and 0.5 cm in width from the middle portion (Group 2). All the specimens were fixed on a servo hydraulic tensile machine with dedicated cryo-clamp. The loading protocol, used to compare the previously published results of ultimate failure load and Stiffness of the anterolateral ligament (Group 3), included a cyclic preconditioning between 10 and 25 N at 0.1 Hz for 10 cycles and then a load to failure test at 20 mm/min. Findings Gracilis tendon showed higher Ultimante Failure Load and stiffness when compared to a strip of Iliotibial band. Gracilis tendon and a strip of Iliotibial band compared showed higher Ultimante Failure Load and stiffness when compared with native anterolateral ligament as reported by Kennedy. Interpretation Both grafts tested in the present studies are suitable for an anatomical anterolateral ligament reconstruction.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament - surgery</subject><subject>Anterolateral ligament</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gracilis tendon</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ileotibial band</subject><subject>Ligaments, Articular - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Tendons - transplantation</subject><subject>Transplantation, Autologous</subject><issn>0268-0033</issn><issn>1879-1271</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxS1ERZeWr4DCjUvC2I5jhwPSasU_qRKHtmfLceytl8QutlO03x5HuyDEict4Dm_ePP8GoTcYGgy4e3do9OT84MJs9ENDAPMGaAOYPkMbLHhfY8Lxc7QB0okagNJL9DKlAwC0hPEX6JIIKlpG-Abdb302MUyqVDVVk9ur2fhcRaODTzkuOrvgq58uP1RqyWEK-7Ckah-Vzc7v31fb6pxDeaeLQ8rLeLxGF1ZNybw6v1fo_tPHu92X-ubb56-77U2tW0py3RldQo-41b1pueiFtYx0Xdt2VnMLg6BKUzVYPnZEMcp0x7pBlK4dLQPO6BV6e_J9jOHHYlKWs0vaTJPypsSUWAjWM0JpX6T9SapjSCkaKx-jm1U8SgxypSoP8i-qcqUqgcoSsMy-Pq9ZhtmMfyZ_YyyC3UlgymefnIkyaWe8NqMrILMcg_uvNR_-cVmVK9Xv5mjSISzRF5oSy0QkyNv1vOt1MacAAjP6C6-6pMQ</recordid><startdate>20170501</startdate><enddate>20170501</enddate><creator>Monaco, E</creator><creator>Lanzetti, R.M</creator><creator>Fabbri, M</creator><creator>Redler, A</creator><creator>De Carli, A</creator><creator>Ferretti, A</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170501</creationdate><title>Anterolateral ligament reconstruction with autologous grafting: A biomechanical study</title><author>Monaco, E ; Lanzetti, R.M ; Fabbri, M ; Redler, A ; De Carli, A ; Ferretti, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-6ec013d14c9e47898ff5266446fc7f0b83ac3abf7d62a535c656b8a534df50753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament - surgery</topic><topic>Anterolateral ligament</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gracilis tendon</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ileotibial band</topic><topic>Ligaments, Articular - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Tendons - transplantation</topic><topic>Transplantation, Autologous</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Monaco, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanzetti, R.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabbri, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redler, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Carli, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferretti, A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical biomechanics (Bristol)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Monaco, E</au><au>Lanzetti, R.M</au><au>Fabbri, M</au><au>Redler, A</au><au>De Carli, A</au><au>Ferretti, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Anterolateral ligament reconstruction with autologous grafting: A biomechanical study</atitle><jtitle>Clinical biomechanics (Bristol)</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)</addtitle><date>2017-05-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>44</volume><spage>99</spage><epage>103</epage><pages>99-103</pages><issn>0268-0033</issn><eissn>1879-1271</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background To evaluate the reliability of the Iliotibial band compared to gracilis tendon as a graft to be used in anterolateral ligament reconstruction. Methods Gracilis tendon and a strip of Iliotibial band compared were harvested from 8 fresh human cadaveric knees. The gracilis tendon was prepared to obtain a graft of 10 cm in length (Group 1). Iliotibial band compared was prepared to obtain a graft of 10 cm in length and 0.5 cm in width from the middle portion (Group 2). All the specimens were fixed on a servo hydraulic tensile machine with dedicated cryo-clamp. The loading protocol, used to compare the previously published results of ultimate failure load and Stiffness of the anterolateral ligament (Group 3), included a cyclic preconditioning between 10 and 25 N at 0.1 Hz for 10 cycles and then a load to failure test at 20 mm/min. Findings Gracilis tendon showed higher Ultimante Failure Load and stiffness when compared to a strip of Iliotibial band. Gracilis tendon and a strip of Iliotibial band compared showed higher Ultimante Failure Load and stiffness when compared with native anterolateral ligament as reported by Kennedy. Interpretation Both grafts tested in the present studies are suitable for an anatomical anterolateral ligament reconstruction.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28384527</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.03.013</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0268-0033 |
| ispartof | Clinical biomechanics (Bristol), 2017-05, Vol.44, p.99-103 |
| issn | 0268-0033 1879-1271 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1885952339 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
| subjects | Aged Anterior Cruciate Ligament - surgery Anterolateral ligament Biomechanical Phenomena Biomechanics Female Gracilis tendon Humans Ileotibial band Ligaments, Articular - surgery Male Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reconstructive Surgical Procedures Reproducibility of Results Stress, Mechanical Tendons - transplantation Transplantation, Autologous |
| title | Anterolateral ligament reconstruction with autologous grafting: A biomechanical study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T22%3A43%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anterolateral%20ligament%20reconstruction%20with%20autologous%20grafting:%20A%20biomechanical%20study&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20biomechanics%20(Bristol)&rft.au=Monaco,%20E&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.volume=44&rft.spage=99&rft.epage=103&rft.pages=99-103&rft.issn=0268-0033&rft.eissn=1879-1271&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.03.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1885952339%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1885952339&rft_id=info:pmid/28384527&rft_els_id=S0268003317300815&rfr_iscdi=true |