Clinical Trials Series — Large Pharma

To the Editor: We believe that the model of pharmaceutical clinical trials that is described by Rosenblatt (Jan. 5 issue) 1 needs rethinking. 2 , 3 Pivotal studies are unnecessarily complex, and the avoidance of composite end points would improve clarity and reduce costs. Choosing the appropriate ta...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New England journal of medicine 2017-04, Vol.376 (14), p.e28-e28
Hauptverfasser: Schellens, Jan H.M, Bernards, René, Winter, John H, Rosenblatt, Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e28
container_issue 14
container_start_page e28
container_title The New England journal of medicine
container_volume 376
creator Schellens, Jan H.M
Bernards, René
Winter, John H
Rosenblatt, Michael
description To the Editor: We believe that the model of pharmaceutical clinical trials that is described by Rosenblatt (Jan. 5 issue) 1 needs rethinking. 2 , 3 Pivotal studies are unnecessarily complex, and the avoidance of composite end points would improve clarity and reduce costs. Choosing the appropriate target population can make a difference. For example, in the case of the rotavirus vaccine RotaTeq, a vaccine for a disease that is self-limiting in high-income countries but potentially fatal in low-income countries, the trial might have been carried out in fewer patients at a lower cost and a higher benefit–risk ratio in low-income countries than . . .
doi_str_mv 10.1056/NEJMc1701621
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1884886654</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4321512603</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-f80cff505752c8d549a557c373c32350f48213be70ed91b74eb756513dd841093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0btOwzAUBmALgWgpbMwoEkgwELDj-4iiclO5SJQ5chwHUsVJsZuBjYfgCXkSXFoQQgz14sGffp3jH4BdBE8QpOz0dnh9oxGHiCVoDfQRxTgmBLJ10IcwETHhEvfAlvcTGA4ichP0EoG55JL0wWFaV02lVR2NXaVqHz0YVxkffby9RyPlnkx0_6ycVdtgowzPZmd5D8Dj-XCcXsaju4ur9GwUa0LQLC4F1GVJIeU00aKgRCpKucYca5xgCksiEoRzw6EpJMo5MTmnjCJcFIIgKPEAHC1yp6596YyfZbby2tS1akzb-QwJQYRgjJJVKRZ0RUqYmA-w_4dO2s41YecvJTkP_xzU8UJp13rvTJlNXWWVe80QzOa1ZL9rCXxvGdrl1hQ_-LuHAA4WwFqfNWZi_8_5BFAkjho</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1884977621</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical Trials Series — Large Pharma</title><source>New England Journal of Medicine Current</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Schellens, Jan H.M ; Bernards, René ; Winter, John H ; Rosenblatt, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Schellens, Jan H.M ; Bernards, René ; Winter, John H ; Rosenblatt, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>To the Editor: We believe that the model of pharmaceutical clinical trials that is described by Rosenblatt (Jan. 5 issue) 1 needs rethinking. 2 , 3 Pivotal studies are unnecessarily complex, and the avoidance of composite end points would improve clarity and reduce costs. Choosing the appropriate target population can make a difference. For example, in the case of the rotavirus vaccine RotaTeq, a vaccine for a disease that is self-limiting in high-income countries but potentially fatal in low-income countries, the trial might have been carried out in fewer patients at a lower cost and a higher benefit–risk ratio in low-income countries than . . .</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-4793</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc1701621</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28379794</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Massachusetts Medical Society</publisher><subject>Clinical trials ; Low income groups ; Rotavirus ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>The New England journal of medicine, 2017-04, Vol.376 (14), p.e28-e28</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Massachusetts Medical Society Apr 6, 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-f80cff505752c8d549a557c373c32350f48213be70ed91b74eb756513dd841093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMc1701621$$EPDF$$P50$$Gmms$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1884977621?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2759,2760,26103,27924,27925,52382,54064,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28379794$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schellens, Jan H.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernards, René</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winter, John H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenblatt, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical Trials Series — Large Pharma</title><title>The New England journal of medicine</title><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><description>To the Editor: We believe that the model of pharmaceutical clinical trials that is described by Rosenblatt (Jan. 5 issue) 1 needs rethinking. 2 , 3 Pivotal studies are unnecessarily complex, and the avoidance of composite end points would improve clarity and reduce costs. Choosing the appropriate target population can make a difference. For example, in the case of the rotavirus vaccine RotaTeq, a vaccine for a disease that is self-limiting in high-income countries but potentially fatal in low-income countries, the trial might have been carried out in fewer patients at a lower cost and a higher benefit–risk ratio in low-income countries than . . .</description><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Rotavirus</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>0028-4793</issn><issn>1533-4406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0btOwzAUBmALgWgpbMwoEkgwELDj-4iiclO5SJQ5chwHUsVJsZuBjYfgCXkSXFoQQgz14sGffp3jH4BdBE8QpOz0dnh9oxGHiCVoDfQRxTgmBLJ10IcwETHhEvfAlvcTGA4ichP0EoG55JL0wWFaV02lVR2NXaVqHz0YVxkffby9RyPlnkx0_6ycVdtgowzPZmd5D8Dj-XCcXsaju4ur9GwUa0LQLC4F1GVJIeU00aKgRCpKucYca5xgCksiEoRzw6EpJMo5MTmnjCJcFIIgKPEAHC1yp6596YyfZbby2tS1akzb-QwJQYRgjJJVKRZ0RUqYmA-w_4dO2s41YecvJTkP_xzU8UJp13rvTJlNXWWVe80QzOa1ZL9rCXxvGdrl1hQ_-LuHAA4WwFqfNWZi_8_5BFAkjho</recordid><startdate>20170406</startdate><enddate>20170406</enddate><creator>Schellens, Jan H.M</creator><creator>Bernards, René</creator><creator>Winter, John H</creator><creator>Rosenblatt, Michael</creator><general>Massachusetts Medical Society</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K0Y</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170406</creationdate><title>Clinical Trials Series — Large Pharma</title><author>Schellens, Jan H.M ; Bernards, René ; Winter, John H ; Rosenblatt, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-f80cff505752c8d549a557c373c32350f48213be70ed91b74eb756513dd841093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Rotavirus</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schellens, Jan H.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernards, René</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winter, John H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenblatt, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>New England Journal of Medicine</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Journals (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schellens, Jan H.M</au><au>Bernards, René</au><au>Winter, John H</au><au>Rosenblatt, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical Trials Series — Large Pharma</atitle><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><date>2017-04-06</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>376</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>e28</spage><epage>e28</epage><pages>e28-e28</pages><issn>0028-4793</issn><eissn>1533-4406</eissn><abstract>To the Editor: We believe that the model of pharmaceutical clinical trials that is described by Rosenblatt (Jan. 5 issue) 1 needs rethinking. 2 , 3 Pivotal studies are unnecessarily complex, and the avoidance of composite end points would improve clarity and reduce costs. Choosing the appropriate target population can make a difference. For example, in the case of the rotavirus vaccine RotaTeq, a vaccine for a disease that is self-limiting in high-income countries but potentially fatal in low-income countries, the trial might have been carried out in fewer patients at a lower cost and a higher benefit–risk ratio in low-income countries than . . .</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Massachusetts Medical Society</pub><pmid>28379794</pmid><doi>10.1056/NEJMc1701621</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-4793
ispartof The New England journal of medicine, 2017-04, Vol.376 (14), p.e28-e28
issn 0028-4793
1533-4406
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1884886654
source New England Journal of Medicine Current; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Clinical trials
Low income groups
Rotavirus
Vaccines
title Clinical Trials Series — Large Pharma
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T17%3A55%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20Trials%20Series%20%E2%80%94%20Large%20Pharma&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20England%20journal%20of%20medicine&rft.au=Schellens,%20Jan%20H.M&rft.date=2017-04-06&rft.volume=376&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=e28&rft.epage=e28&rft.pages=e28-e28&rft.issn=0028-4793&rft.eissn=1533-4406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1056/NEJMc1701621&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4321512603%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1884977621&rft_id=info:pmid/28379794&rfr_iscdi=true