The effect of follicular wave on fertility characteristics in beef cattle
The objectives of this experiment were to determine the effects of follicular wave (first or second) on diameter of the dominant follicle, concentrations of progesterone and estradiol and the hepatic enzymes that inactivate them, thickness of the endometrium, and pregnancy rates to AI. Beef heifers...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of animal science 2017-02, Vol.95 (2), p.866-874 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 874 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 866 |
container_title | Journal of animal science |
container_volume | 95 |
creator | Muth-Spurlock, A M Dix, J A Coleson, M P T Hart, C G Lemley, C O Schulmeister, T M Lamb, G C Larson, J E |
description | The objectives of this experiment were to determine the effects of follicular wave (first or second) on diameter of the dominant follicle, concentrations of progesterone and estradiol and the hepatic enzymes that inactivate them, thickness of the endometrium, and pregnancy rates to AI. Beef heifers ( = 101) and cows ( = 106) were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatments: insemination to the first follicular wave (FFW) or insemination to the second follicular wave (SFW). Estrous cycles of females were synchronized to ensure appropriate timing for the treatments. The MIXED procedure of SAS was used for analysis. A similar proportion of females in each treatment responded to presynchronization; however, females in the FFW group ovulated in response to the first injection of GnRH of the CO-Synch protocol more frequently. Only females ( = 94) that properly responded to ovulation synchronization were included in further analyses. Cows in the FFW group tended ( 0.06) to have larger ovulatory follicles 36 h post-PGF of the CO-Synch protocol compared to cows in the SFW group (14.22 ± 0.42 and 11.83 ± 0.49, respectively), whereas heifers were similar between treatment groups. Three d prior to AI, circulating concentrations of progesterone were lesser ( 0.01) in females in the FFW (3.63 ± 0.80 ng/mL) than in the SFW (7.12 ± 0.83 ng/mL), whereas concentrations of estradiol tended ( 0.08) to be greater in those in the FFW (82.72 ± 6.48 pg/mL) than in the SFW (65.55 ± 6.74 pg/mL). Concentrations of cytochrome P450 1A in the liver were lesser ( 0.01) in females in the FFW than those in the SFW (0.68 ± 0.08 vs. 0.96 ± 0.06, respectively). Endometrial thicknesses were similar between treatments but were thicker ( < 0.0001) in cows (9.73 ± 0.24 mm) than heifers (7.22 ± 0.26 mm). When considering all females or only those that were properly presynchronized, pregnancy rates were similar between treatments. However, when evaluating females that ovulated to the assigned follicular wave, there was a treatment by parity interaction ( = 0.04) with heifers in the FFW having a lesser pregnancy rate (25.9%) than heifers in the SFW (72.0%) while cows in both treatment groups were intermediate (45.4% in FFW and 50.0% in SFW). The differences in concentrations of steroids between treatment groups may affect fertility of heifers; however, additional research is necessary. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2527/jas.2016.0898 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1884882981</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1884882981</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p141t-e692c6de8051ad1ed82f8ba8ed1bd723fc54a674b105f0bf927c8a9dc5fbed573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j01LAzEURYMgtlaXbiVLN1OTzGTyZilFa6Hgpq6HfLzQlLRTk4zSf2_Bujqbw7lcQh44mwsp1PNO57lgvJ0z6OCKTLkUsqp5W0_Ibc47xriQnbwhEwE1MKnUlKw2W6ToPdpCB0_9EGOwY9SJ_uhvpMOBekwlxFBO1G510rZgCrkEm2k4UIPoqdWlRLwj117HjPcXzsjn2-tm8V6tP5arxcu6OvKGlwrbTtjW4Xmfa8fRgfBgNKDjxilReysb3arGcCY9M74TyoLunJXeoJOqnpGnv-4xDV8j5tLvQ7YYoz7gMOaeAzQAogN-Vh8v6mj26PpjCnudTv3__foX6N1bZg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1884882981</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of follicular wave on fertility characteristics in beef cattle</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Muth-Spurlock, A M ; Dix, J A ; Coleson, M P T ; Hart, C G ; Lemley, C O ; Schulmeister, T M ; Lamb, G C ; Larson, J E</creator><creatorcontrib>Muth-Spurlock, A M ; Dix, J A ; Coleson, M P T ; Hart, C G ; Lemley, C O ; Schulmeister, T M ; Lamb, G C ; Larson, J E</creatorcontrib><description>The objectives of this experiment were to determine the effects of follicular wave (first or second) on diameter of the dominant follicle, concentrations of progesterone and estradiol and the hepatic enzymes that inactivate them, thickness of the endometrium, and pregnancy rates to AI. Beef heifers ( = 101) and cows ( = 106) were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatments: insemination to the first follicular wave (FFW) or insemination to the second follicular wave (SFW). Estrous cycles of females were synchronized to ensure appropriate timing for the treatments. The MIXED procedure of SAS was used for analysis. A similar proportion of females in each treatment responded to presynchronization; however, females in the FFW group ovulated in response to the first injection of GnRH of the CO-Synch protocol more frequently. Only females ( = 94) that properly responded to ovulation synchronization were included in further analyses. Cows in the FFW group tended ( 0.06) to have larger ovulatory follicles 36 h post-PGF of the CO-Synch protocol compared to cows in the SFW group (14.22 ± 0.42 and 11.83 ± 0.49, respectively), whereas heifers were similar between treatment groups. Three d prior to AI, circulating concentrations of progesterone were lesser ( 0.01) in females in the FFW (3.63 ± 0.80 ng/mL) than in the SFW (7.12 ± 0.83 ng/mL), whereas concentrations of estradiol tended ( 0.08) to be greater in those in the FFW (82.72 ± 6.48 pg/mL) than in the SFW (65.55 ± 6.74 pg/mL). Concentrations of cytochrome P450 1A in the liver were lesser ( 0.01) in females in the FFW than those in the SFW (0.68 ± 0.08 vs. 0.96 ± 0.06, respectively). Endometrial thicknesses were similar between treatments but were thicker ( < 0.0001) in cows (9.73 ± 0.24 mm) than heifers (7.22 ± 0.26 mm). When considering all females or only those that were properly presynchronized, pregnancy rates were similar between treatments. However, when evaluating females that ovulated to the assigned follicular wave, there was a treatment by parity interaction ( = 0.04) with heifers in the FFW having a lesser pregnancy rate (25.9%) than heifers in the SFW (72.0%) while cows in both treatment groups were intermediate (45.4% in FFW and 50.0% in SFW). The differences in concentrations of steroids between treatment groups may affect fertility of heifers; however, additional research is necessary.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/jas.2016.0898</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28380577</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cattle - physiology ; Endometrium ; Estradiol - pharmacology ; Estrous Cycle - drug effects ; Estrus Synchronization - methods ; Female ; Fertility - drug effects ; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - pharmacology ; Insemination, Artificial - veterinary ; Ovarian Follicle - drug effects ; Ovarian Follicle - physiology ; Ovulation - drug effects ; Ovulation - physiology ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Rate ; Progesterone - pharmacology</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2017-02, Vol.95 (2), p.866-874</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27906,27907</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28380577$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Muth-Spurlock, A M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dix, J A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleson, M P T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, C G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemley, C O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulmeister, T M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamb, G C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, J E</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of follicular wave on fertility characteristics in beef cattle</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><description>The objectives of this experiment were to determine the effects of follicular wave (first or second) on diameter of the dominant follicle, concentrations of progesterone and estradiol and the hepatic enzymes that inactivate them, thickness of the endometrium, and pregnancy rates to AI. Beef heifers ( = 101) and cows ( = 106) were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatments: insemination to the first follicular wave (FFW) or insemination to the second follicular wave (SFW). Estrous cycles of females were synchronized to ensure appropriate timing for the treatments. The MIXED procedure of SAS was used for analysis. A similar proportion of females in each treatment responded to presynchronization; however, females in the FFW group ovulated in response to the first injection of GnRH of the CO-Synch protocol more frequently. Only females ( = 94) that properly responded to ovulation synchronization were included in further analyses. Cows in the FFW group tended ( 0.06) to have larger ovulatory follicles 36 h post-PGF of the CO-Synch protocol compared to cows in the SFW group (14.22 ± 0.42 and 11.83 ± 0.49, respectively), whereas heifers were similar between treatment groups. Three d prior to AI, circulating concentrations of progesterone were lesser ( 0.01) in females in the FFW (3.63 ± 0.80 ng/mL) than in the SFW (7.12 ± 0.83 ng/mL), whereas concentrations of estradiol tended ( 0.08) to be greater in those in the FFW (82.72 ± 6.48 pg/mL) than in the SFW (65.55 ± 6.74 pg/mL). Concentrations of cytochrome P450 1A in the liver were lesser ( 0.01) in females in the FFW than those in the SFW (0.68 ± 0.08 vs. 0.96 ± 0.06, respectively). Endometrial thicknesses were similar between treatments but were thicker ( < 0.0001) in cows (9.73 ± 0.24 mm) than heifers (7.22 ± 0.26 mm). When considering all females or only those that were properly presynchronized, pregnancy rates were similar between treatments. However, when evaluating females that ovulated to the assigned follicular wave, there was a treatment by parity interaction ( = 0.04) with heifers in the FFW having a lesser pregnancy rate (25.9%) than heifers in the SFW (72.0%) while cows in both treatment groups were intermediate (45.4% in FFW and 50.0% in SFW). The differences in concentrations of steroids between treatment groups may affect fertility of heifers; however, additional research is necessary.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cattle - physiology</subject><subject>Endometrium</subject><subject>Estradiol - pharmacology</subject><subject>Estrous Cycle - drug effects</subject><subject>Estrus Synchronization - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertility - drug effects</subject><subject>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - pharmacology</subject><subject>Insemination, Artificial - veterinary</subject><subject>Ovarian Follicle - drug effects</subject><subject>Ovarian Follicle - physiology</subject><subject>Ovulation - drug effects</subject><subject>Ovulation - physiology</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Rate</subject><subject>Progesterone - pharmacology</subject><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j01LAzEURYMgtlaXbiVLN1OTzGTyZilFa6Hgpq6HfLzQlLRTk4zSf2_Bujqbw7lcQh44mwsp1PNO57lgvJ0z6OCKTLkUsqp5W0_Ibc47xriQnbwhEwE1MKnUlKw2W6ToPdpCB0_9EGOwY9SJ_uhvpMOBekwlxFBO1G510rZgCrkEm2k4UIPoqdWlRLwj117HjPcXzsjn2-tm8V6tP5arxcu6OvKGlwrbTtjW4Xmfa8fRgfBgNKDjxilReysb3arGcCY9M74TyoLunJXeoJOqnpGnv-4xDV8j5tLvQ7YYoz7gMOaeAzQAogN-Vh8v6mj26PpjCnudTv3__foX6N1bZg</recordid><startdate>201702</startdate><enddate>201702</enddate><creator>Muth-Spurlock, A M</creator><creator>Dix, J A</creator><creator>Coleson, M P T</creator><creator>Hart, C G</creator><creator>Lemley, C O</creator><creator>Schulmeister, T M</creator><creator>Lamb, G C</creator><creator>Larson, J E</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201702</creationdate><title>The effect of follicular wave on fertility characteristics in beef cattle</title><author>Muth-Spurlock, A M ; Dix, J A ; Coleson, M P T ; Hart, C G ; Lemley, C O ; Schulmeister, T M ; Lamb, G C ; Larson, J E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p141t-e692c6de8051ad1ed82f8ba8ed1bd723fc54a674b105f0bf927c8a9dc5fbed573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cattle - physiology</topic><topic>Endometrium</topic><topic>Estradiol - pharmacology</topic><topic>Estrous Cycle - drug effects</topic><topic>Estrus Synchronization - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertility - drug effects</topic><topic>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - pharmacology</topic><topic>Insemination, Artificial - veterinary</topic><topic>Ovarian Follicle - drug effects</topic><topic>Ovarian Follicle - physiology</topic><topic>Ovulation - drug effects</topic><topic>Ovulation - physiology</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Rate</topic><topic>Progesterone - pharmacology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Muth-Spurlock, A M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dix, J A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleson, M P T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, C G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemley, C O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulmeister, T M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamb, G C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, J E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Muth-Spurlock, A M</au><au>Dix, J A</au><au>Coleson, M P T</au><au>Hart, C G</au><au>Lemley, C O</au><au>Schulmeister, T M</au><au>Lamb, G C</au><au>Larson, J E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of follicular wave on fertility characteristics in beef cattle</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><date>2017-02</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>866</spage><epage>874</epage><pages>866-874</pages><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>The objectives of this experiment were to determine the effects of follicular wave (first or second) on diameter of the dominant follicle, concentrations of progesterone and estradiol and the hepatic enzymes that inactivate them, thickness of the endometrium, and pregnancy rates to AI. Beef heifers ( = 101) and cows ( = 106) were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatments: insemination to the first follicular wave (FFW) or insemination to the second follicular wave (SFW). Estrous cycles of females were synchronized to ensure appropriate timing for the treatments. The MIXED procedure of SAS was used for analysis. A similar proportion of females in each treatment responded to presynchronization; however, females in the FFW group ovulated in response to the first injection of GnRH of the CO-Synch protocol more frequently. Only females ( = 94) that properly responded to ovulation synchronization were included in further analyses. Cows in the FFW group tended ( 0.06) to have larger ovulatory follicles 36 h post-PGF of the CO-Synch protocol compared to cows in the SFW group (14.22 ± 0.42 and 11.83 ± 0.49, respectively), whereas heifers were similar between treatment groups. Three d prior to AI, circulating concentrations of progesterone were lesser ( 0.01) in females in the FFW (3.63 ± 0.80 ng/mL) than in the SFW (7.12 ± 0.83 ng/mL), whereas concentrations of estradiol tended ( 0.08) to be greater in those in the FFW (82.72 ± 6.48 pg/mL) than in the SFW (65.55 ± 6.74 pg/mL). Concentrations of cytochrome P450 1A in the liver were lesser ( 0.01) in females in the FFW than those in the SFW (0.68 ± 0.08 vs. 0.96 ± 0.06, respectively). Endometrial thicknesses were similar between treatments but were thicker ( < 0.0001) in cows (9.73 ± 0.24 mm) than heifers (7.22 ± 0.26 mm). When considering all females or only those that were properly presynchronized, pregnancy rates were similar between treatments. However, when evaluating females that ovulated to the assigned follicular wave, there was a treatment by parity interaction ( = 0.04) with heifers in the FFW having a lesser pregnancy rate (25.9%) than heifers in the SFW (72.0%) while cows in both treatment groups were intermediate (45.4% in FFW and 50.0% in SFW). The differences in concentrations of steroids between treatment groups may affect fertility of heifers; however, additional research is necessary.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>28380577</pmid><doi>10.2527/jas.2016.0898</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1525-3163 |
ispartof | Journal of animal science, 2017-02, Vol.95 (2), p.866-874 |
issn | 1525-3163 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1884882981 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Animals Cattle - physiology Endometrium Estradiol - pharmacology Estrous Cycle - drug effects Estrus Synchronization - methods Female Fertility - drug effects Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - pharmacology Insemination, Artificial - veterinary Ovarian Follicle - drug effects Ovarian Follicle - physiology Ovulation - drug effects Ovulation - physiology Pregnancy Pregnancy Rate Progesterone - pharmacology |
title | The effect of follicular wave on fertility characteristics in beef cattle |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T11%3A09%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20follicular%20wave%20on%20fertility%20characteristics%20in%20beef%20cattle&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Muth-Spurlock,%20A%20M&rft.date=2017-02&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=866&rft.epage=874&rft.pages=866-874&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/jas.2016.0898&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1884882981%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1884882981&rft_id=info:pmid/28380577&rfr_iscdi=true |