Minimally Invasive Osteosynthesis with a Bridge Plate Versus a Functional Brace for Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Nonoperative treatment has historically been considered the standard for fractures of the shaft of the humerus. Minimally invasive bridge-plate osteosynthesis for isolated humeral shaft fractures has been proven to be a safe technique, with good and reproducible results. This study was designed to c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 2017-04, Vol.99 (7), p.583-592
Hauptverfasser: Matsunaga, Fabio Teruo, Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara, Matsumoto, Marcelo Hide, Netto, Nicola Archetti, Faloppa, Flavio, Belloti, Joao Carlos
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 592
container_issue 7
container_start_page 583
container_title Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume
container_volume 99
creator Matsunaga, Fabio Teruo
Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara
Matsumoto, Marcelo Hide
Netto, Nicola Archetti
Faloppa, Flavio
Belloti, Joao Carlos
description Nonoperative treatment has historically been considered the standard for fractures of the shaft of the humerus. Minimally invasive bridge-plate osteosynthesis for isolated humeral shaft fractures has been proven to be a safe technique, with good and reproducible results. This study was designed to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes between patients who had been treated with bridge plate osteosynthesis and those who had been managed nonoperatively with a functional brace. A prospective randomized trial was designed and included 110 patients allocated to 1 of 2 groups: surgery with a bridge plate or nonoperative treatment with a functional brace. The primary outcome was the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score at 6 months. The score on the Short Form-36 (SF-36) life-quality questionnaire, complications of treatment, Constant-Murley score for the shoulder, pain level, and radiographic results were assessed as secondary outcomes. Participants were assessed at 2 weeks; 1, 2, and 6 months; and 1 year after the interventions. The mean DASH score of the bridge plate group was statistically superior to that of the functional brace group (mean scores, 10.9 and 16.9, respectively; p = 0.046) only at 6 months. The bridge plate group also had a significantly more favorable nonunion rate (0% versus 15%) and less mean residual angular displacement seen on the anteroposterior radiograph (2.0° versus 10.5°) (both p < 0.05). No difference between the groups was detected with regard to the SF-36 score, pain level, Constant-Murley score, or angular displacement seen on the lateral radiograph. This trial demonstrates that, compared with functional bracing, surgical treatment with a bridge plate has a statistically significant advantage, of uncertain clinical benefit, with respect to self-reported outcome (DASH score) at 6 months, nonunion rate, and residual deformity in the coronal plane as seen on radiographs. Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
doi_str_mv 10.2106/JBJS.16.00628
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1884462107</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1884462107</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2096-5ada5f19dd660c5a237a1e1204d50fc444fddaeee939dd9e4d73f332b60776a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kc1u1DAURi0EokNhyRZ5ySbD9W8Sdu2Ioa2KimhhG7nxDTF44tZ2OhoegafGwxRWvjo6-hbHhLxmsOQM9LuL04vrJdNLAM2bJ2TBlFAVE41-ShYAnFWtUOqIvEjpBwBICfVzcsQbUaumZQvy-5Ob3MZ4v6Pn04NJ7gHpVcoY0m7KIyaX6NblkRp6Gp39jvSzNxnpN4xpToWu56nPLkzGF8H0SIcQ6dm8wVjI9WiGTNeF5zliek9P6Bcz2bBxv9DSVZhyDN6X8yY641-SZ4PxCV89vsfk6_rDzeqsurz6eL46uax6Dq2ulLFGDay1VmvoleGiNgwZB2kVDL2UcrDWIGIritOitLUYhOC3GupaGxDH5O1h9y6G-xlT7jYu9ei9mTDMqWNNI6UuceuiVge1jyGliEN3F0utuOsYdPv83T5_x3T3N3_x3zxOz7cbtP_tf72LIA_CNvhcGv708xZjN6LxeSwj5Yc0FxUHVoMEBdUeafEHUoyRbQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1884462107</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Minimally Invasive Osteosynthesis with a Bridge Plate Versus a Functional Brace for Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Matsunaga, Fabio Teruo ; Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara ; Matsumoto, Marcelo Hide ; Netto, Nicola Archetti ; Faloppa, Flavio ; Belloti, Joao Carlos</creator><creatorcontrib>Matsunaga, Fabio Teruo ; Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara ; Matsumoto, Marcelo Hide ; Netto, Nicola Archetti ; Faloppa, Flavio ; Belloti, Joao Carlos</creatorcontrib><description>Nonoperative treatment has historically been considered the standard for fractures of the shaft of the humerus. Minimally invasive bridge-plate osteosynthesis for isolated humeral shaft fractures has been proven to be a safe technique, with good and reproducible results. This study was designed to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes between patients who had been treated with bridge plate osteosynthesis and those who had been managed nonoperatively with a functional brace. A prospective randomized trial was designed and included 110 patients allocated to 1 of 2 groups: surgery with a bridge plate or nonoperative treatment with a functional brace. The primary outcome was the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score at 6 months. The score on the Short Form-36 (SF-36) life-quality questionnaire, complications of treatment, Constant-Murley score for the shoulder, pain level, and radiographic results were assessed as secondary outcomes. Participants were assessed at 2 weeks; 1, 2, and 6 months; and 1 year after the interventions. The mean DASH score of the bridge plate group was statistically superior to that of the functional brace group (mean scores, 10.9 and 16.9, respectively; p = 0.046) only at 6 months. The bridge plate group also had a significantly more favorable nonunion rate (0% versus 15%) and less mean residual angular displacement seen on the anteroposterior radiograph (2.0° versus 10.5°) (both p &lt; 0.05). No difference between the groups was detected with regard to the SF-36 score, pain level, Constant-Murley score, or angular displacement seen on the lateral radiograph. This trial demonstrates that, compared with functional bracing, surgical treatment with a bridge plate has a statistically significant advantage, of uncertain clinical benefit, with respect to self-reported outcome (DASH score) at 6 months, nonunion rate, and residual deformity in the coronal plane as seen on radiographs. Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1386</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00628</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28375891</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Bone Plates ; Braces ; Female ; Fracture Fixation - instrumentation ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation ; Humans ; Humeral Fractures - therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - instrumentation ; Musculoskeletal Pain - etiology ; Prospective Studies ; Time-to-Treatment ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2017-04, Vol.99 (7), p.583-592</ispartof><rights>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2096-5ada5f19dd660c5a237a1e1204d50fc444fddaeee939dd9e4d73f332b60776a03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28375891$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Matsunaga, Fabio Teruo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsumoto, Marcelo Hide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Netto, Nicola Archetti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faloppa, Flavio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belloti, Joao Carlos</creatorcontrib><title>Minimally Invasive Osteosynthesis with a Bridge Plate Versus a Functional Brace for Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><title>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</title><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><description>Nonoperative treatment has historically been considered the standard for fractures of the shaft of the humerus. Minimally invasive bridge-plate osteosynthesis for isolated humeral shaft fractures has been proven to be a safe technique, with good and reproducible results. This study was designed to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes between patients who had been treated with bridge plate osteosynthesis and those who had been managed nonoperatively with a functional brace. A prospective randomized trial was designed and included 110 patients allocated to 1 of 2 groups: surgery with a bridge plate or nonoperative treatment with a functional brace. The primary outcome was the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score at 6 months. The score on the Short Form-36 (SF-36) life-quality questionnaire, complications of treatment, Constant-Murley score for the shoulder, pain level, and radiographic results were assessed as secondary outcomes. Participants were assessed at 2 weeks; 1, 2, and 6 months; and 1 year after the interventions. The mean DASH score of the bridge plate group was statistically superior to that of the functional brace group (mean scores, 10.9 and 16.9, respectively; p = 0.046) only at 6 months. The bridge plate group also had a significantly more favorable nonunion rate (0% versus 15%) and less mean residual angular displacement seen on the anteroposterior radiograph (2.0° versus 10.5°) (both p &lt; 0.05). No difference between the groups was detected with regard to the SF-36 score, pain level, Constant-Murley score, or angular displacement seen on the lateral radiograph. This trial demonstrates that, compared with functional bracing, surgical treatment with a bridge plate has a statistically significant advantage, of uncertain clinical benefit, with respect to self-reported outcome (DASH score) at 6 months, nonunion rate, and residual deformity in the coronal plane as seen on radiographs. Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bone Plates</subject><subject>Braces</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Humeral Fractures - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - instrumentation</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal Pain - etiology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Time-to-Treatment</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0021-9355</issn><issn>1535-1386</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kc1u1DAURi0EokNhyRZ5ySbD9W8Sdu2Ioa2KimhhG7nxDTF44tZ2OhoegafGwxRWvjo6-hbHhLxmsOQM9LuL04vrJdNLAM2bJ2TBlFAVE41-ShYAnFWtUOqIvEjpBwBICfVzcsQbUaumZQvy-5Ob3MZ4v6Pn04NJ7gHpVcoY0m7KIyaX6NblkRp6Gp39jvSzNxnpN4xpToWu56nPLkzGF8H0SIcQ6dm8wVjI9WiGTNeF5zliek9P6Bcz2bBxv9DSVZhyDN6X8yY641-SZ4PxCV89vsfk6_rDzeqsurz6eL46uax6Dq2ulLFGDay1VmvoleGiNgwZB2kVDL2UcrDWIGIritOitLUYhOC3GupaGxDH5O1h9y6G-xlT7jYu9ei9mTDMqWNNI6UuceuiVge1jyGliEN3F0utuOsYdPv83T5_x3T3N3_x3zxOz7cbtP_tf72LIA_CNvhcGv708xZjN6LxeSwj5Yc0FxUHVoMEBdUeafEHUoyRbQ</recordid><startdate>20170405</startdate><enddate>20170405</enddate><creator>Matsunaga, Fabio Teruo</creator><creator>Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara</creator><creator>Matsumoto, Marcelo Hide</creator><creator>Netto, Nicola Archetti</creator><creator>Faloppa, Flavio</creator><creator>Belloti, Joao Carlos</creator><general>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170405</creationdate><title>Minimally Invasive Osteosynthesis with a Bridge Plate Versus a Functional Brace for Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><author>Matsunaga, Fabio Teruo ; Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara ; Matsumoto, Marcelo Hide ; Netto, Nicola Archetti ; Faloppa, Flavio ; Belloti, Joao Carlos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2096-5ada5f19dd660c5a237a1e1204d50fc444fddaeee939dd9e4d73f332b60776a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bone Plates</topic><topic>Braces</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Humeral Fractures - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - instrumentation</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal Pain - etiology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Time-to-Treatment</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Matsunaga, Fabio Teruo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsumoto, Marcelo Hide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Netto, Nicola Archetti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faloppa, Flavio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belloti, Joao Carlos</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Matsunaga, Fabio Teruo</au><au>Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara</au><au>Matsumoto, Marcelo Hide</au><au>Netto, Nicola Archetti</au><au>Faloppa, Flavio</au><au>Belloti, Joao Carlos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Minimally Invasive Osteosynthesis with a Bridge Plate Versus a Functional Brace for Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><date>2017-04-05</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>583</spage><epage>592</epage><pages>583-592</pages><issn>0021-9355</issn><eissn>1535-1386</eissn><abstract>Nonoperative treatment has historically been considered the standard for fractures of the shaft of the humerus. Minimally invasive bridge-plate osteosynthesis for isolated humeral shaft fractures has been proven to be a safe technique, with good and reproducible results. This study was designed to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes between patients who had been treated with bridge plate osteosynthesis and those who had been managed nonoperatively with a functional brace. A prospective randomized trial was designed and included 110 patients allocated to 1 of 2 groups: surgery with a bridge plate or nonoperative treatment with a functional brace. The primary outcome was the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score at 6 months. The score on the Short Form-36 (SF-36) life-quality questionnaire, complications of treatment, Constant-Murley score for the shoulder, pain level, and radiographic results were assessed as secondary outcomes. Participants were assessed at 2 weeks; 1, 2, and 6 months; and 1 year after the interventions. The mean DASH score of the bridge plate group was statistically superior to that of the functional brace group (mean scores, 10.9 and 16.9, respectively; p = 0.046) only at 6 months. The bridge plate group also had a significantly more favorable nonunion rate (0% versus 15%) and less mean residual angular displacement seen on the anteroposterior radiograph (2.0° versus 10.5°) (both p &lt; 0.05). No difference between the groups was detected with regard to the SF-36 score, pain level, Constant-Murley score, or angular displacement seen on the lateral radiograph. This trial demonstrates that, compared with functional bracing, surgical treatment with a bridge plate has a statistically significant advantage, of uncertain clinical benefit, with respect to self-reported outcome (DASH score) at 6 months, nonunion rate, and residual deformity in the coronal plane as seen on radiographs. Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</pub><pmid>28375891</pmid><doi>10.2106/JBJS.16.00628</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9355
ispartof Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2017-04, Vol.99 (7), p.583-592
issn 0021-9355
1535-1386
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1884462107
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Bone Plates
Braces
Female
Fracture Fixation - instrumentation
Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation
Humans
Humeral Fractures - therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - instrumentation
Musculoskeletal Pain - etiology
Prospective Studies
Time-to-Treatment
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
title Minimally Invasive Osteosynthesis with a Bridge Plate Versus a Functional Brace for Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T14%3A42%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Minimally%20Invasive%20Osteosynthesis%20with%20a%20Bridge%20Plate%20Versus%20a%20Functional%20Brace%20for%20Humeral%20Shaft%20Fractures:%20A%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20joint%20surgery.%20American%20volume&rft.au=Matsunaga,%20Fabio%20Teruo&rft.date=2017-04-05&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=583&rft.epage=592&rft.pages=583-592&rft.issn=0021-9355&rft.eissn=1535-1386&rft_id=info:doi/10.2106/JBJS.16.00628&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1884462107%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1884462107&rft_id=info:pmid/28375891&rfr_iscdi=true