Minimally Invasive Osteosynthesis with a Bridge Plate Versus a Functional Brace for Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Nonoperative treatment has historically been considered the standard for fractures of the shaft of the humerus. Minimally invasive bridge-plate osteosynthesis for isolated humeral shaft fractures has been proven to be a safe technique, with good and reproducible results. This study was designed to c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 2017-04, Vol.99 (7), p.583-592 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 592 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 583 |
container_title | Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume |
container_volume | 99 |
creator | Matsunaga, Fabio Teruo Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara Matsumoto, Marcelo Hide Netto, Nicola Archetti Faloppa, Flavio Belloti, Joao Carlos |
description | Nonoperative treatment has historically been considered the standard for fractures of the shaft of the humerus. Minimally invasive bridge-plate osteosynthesis for isolated humeral shaft fractures has been proven to be a safe technique, with good and reproducible results. This study was designed to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes between patients who had been treated with bridge plate osteosynthesis and those who had been managed nonoperatively with a functional brace.
A prospective randomized trial was designed and included 110 patients allocated to 1 of 2 groups: surgery with a bridge plate or nonoperative treatment with a functional brace. The primary outcome was the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score at 6 months. The score on the Short Form-36 (SF-36) life-quality questionnaire, complications of treatment, Constant-Murley score for the shoulder, pain level, and radiographic results were assessed as secondary outcomes. Participants were assessed at 2 weeks; 1, 2, and 6 months; and 1 year after the interventions.
The mean DASH score of the bridge plate group was statistically superior to that of the functional brace group (mean scores, 10.9 and 16.9, respectively; p = 0.046) only at 6 months. The bridge plate group also had a significantly more favorable nonunion rate (0% versus 15%) and less mean residual angular displacement seen on the anteroposterior radiograph (2.0° versus 10.5°) (both p < 0.05). No difference between the groups was detected with regard to the SF-36 score, pain level, Constant-Murley score, or angular displacement seen on the lateral radiograph.
This trial demonstrates that, compared with functional bracing, surgical treatment with a bridge plate has a statistically significant advantage, of uncertain clinical benefit, with respect to self-reported outcome (DASH score) at 6 months, nonunion rate, and residual deformity in the coronal plane as seen on radiographs.
Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2106/JBJS.16.00628 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1884462107</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1884462107</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2096-5ada5f19dd660c5a237a1e1204d50fc444fddaeee939dd9e4d73f332b60776a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kc1u1DAURi0EokNhyRZ5ySbD9W8Sdu2Ioa2KimhhG7nxDTF44tZ2OhoegafGwxRWvjo6-hbHhLxmsOQM9LuL04vrJdNLAM2bJ2TBlFAVE41-ShYAnFWtUOqIvEjpBwBICfVzcsQbUaumZQvy-5Ob3MZ4v6Pn04NJ7gHpVcoY0m7KIyaX6NblkRp6Gp39jvSzNxnpN4xpToWu56nPLkzGF8H0SIcQ6dm8wVjI9WiGTNeF5zliek9P6Bcz2bBxv9DSVZhyDN6X8yY641-SZ4PxCV89vsfk6_rDzeqsurz6eL46uax6Dq2ulLFGDay1VmvoleGiNgwZB2kVDL2UcrDWIGIritOitLUYhOC3GupaGxDH5O1h9y6G-xlT7jYu9ei9mTDMqWNNI6UuceuiVge1jyGliEN3F0utuOsYdPv83T5_x3T3N3_x3zxOz7cbtP_tf72LIA_CNvhcGv708xZjN6LxeSwj5Yc0FxUHVoMEBdUeafEHUoyRbQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1884462107</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Minimally Invasive Osteosynthesis with a Bridge Plate Versus a Functional Brace for Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Matsunaga, Fabio Teruo ; Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara ; Matsumoto, Marcelo Hide ; Netto, Nicola Archetti ; Faloppa, Flavio ; Belloti, Joao Carlos</creator><creatorcontrib>Matsunaga, Fabio Teruo ; Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara ; Matsumoto, Marcelo Hide ; Netto, Nicola Archetti ; Faloppa, Flavio ; Belloti, Joao Carlos</creatorcontrib><description>Nonoperative treatment has historically been considered the standard for fractures of the shaft of the humerus. Minimally invasive bridge-plate osteosynthesis for isolated humeral shaft fractures has been proven to be a safe technique, with good and reproducible results. This study was designed to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes between patients who had been treated with bridge plate osteosynthesis and those who had been managed nonoperatively with a functional brace.
A prospective randomized trial was designed and included 110 patients allocated to 1 of 2 groups: surgery with a bridge plate or nonoperative treatment with a functional brace. The primary outcome was the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score at 6 months. The score on the Short Form-36 (SF-36) life-quality questionnaire, complications of treatment, Constant-Murley score for the shoulder, pain level, and radiographic results were assessed as secondary outcomes. Participants were assessed at 2 weeks; 1, 2, and 6 months; and 1 year after the interventions.
The mean DASH score of the bridge plate group was statistically superior to that of the functional brace group (mean scores, 10.9 and 16.9, respectively; p = 0.046) only at 6 months. The bridge plate group also had a significantly more favorable nonunion rate (0% versus 15%) and less mean residual angular displacement seen on the anteroposterior radiograph (2.0° versus 10.5°) (both p < 0.05). No difference between the groups was detected with regard to the SF-36 score, pain level, Constant-Murley score, or angular displacement seen on the lateral radiograph.
This trial demonstrates that, compared with functional bracing, surgical treatment with a bridge plate has a statistically significant advantage, of uncertain clinical benefit, with respect to self-reported outcome (DASH score) at 6 months, nonunion rate, and residual deformity in the coronal plane as seen on radiographs.
Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1386</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00628</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28375891</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Bone Plates ; Braces ; Female ; Fracture Fixation - instrumentation ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation ; Humans ; Humeral Fractures - therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - instrumentation ; Musculoskeletal Pain - etiology ; Prospective Studies ; Time-to-Treatment ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2017-04, Vol.99 (7), p.583-592</ispartof><rights>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2096-5ada5f19dd660c5a237a1e1204d50fc444fddaeee939dd9e4d73f332b60776a03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28375891$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Matsunaga, Fabio Teruo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsumoto, Marcelo Hide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Netto, Nicola Archetti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faloppa, Flavio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belloti, Joao Carlos</creatorcontrib><title>Minimally Invasive Osteosynthesis with a Bridge Plate Versus a Functional Brace for Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><title>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</title><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><description>Nonoperative treatment has historically been considered the standard for fractures of the shaft of the humerus. Minimally invasive bridge-plate osteosynthesis for isolated humeral shaft fractures has been proven to be a safe technique, with good and reproducible results. This study was designed to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes between patients who had been treated with bridge plate osteosynthesis and those who had been managed nonoperatively with a functional brace.
A prospective randomized trial was designed and included 110 patients allocated to 1 of 2 groups: surgery with a bridge plate or nonoperative treatment with a functional brace. The primary outcome was the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score at 6 months. The score on the Short Form-36 (SF-36) life-quality questionnaire, complications of treatment, Constant-Murley score for the shoulder, pain level, and radiographic results were assessed as secondary outcomes. Participants were assessed at 2 weeks; 1, 2, and 6 months; and 1 year after the interventions.
The mean DASH score of the bridge plate group was statistically superior to that of the functional brace group (mean scores, 10.9 and 16.9, respectively; p = 0.046) only at 6 months. The bridge plate group also had a significantly more favorable nonunion rate (0% versus 15%) and less mean residual angular displacement seen on the anteroposterior radiograph (2.0° versus 10.5°) (both p < 0.05). No difference between the groups was detected with regard to the SF-36 score, pain level, Constant-Murley score, or angular displacement seen on the lateral radiograph.
This trial demonstrates that, compared with functional bracing, surgical treatment with a bridge plate has a statistically significant advantage, of uncertain clinical benefit, with respect to self-reported outcome (DASH score) at 6 months, nonunion rate, and residual deformity in the coronal plane as seen on radiographs.
Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bone Plates</subject><subject>Braces</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Humeral Fractures - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - instrumentation</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal Pain - etiology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Time-to-Treatment</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0021-9355</issn><issn>1535-1386</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kc1u1DAURi0EokNhyRZ5ySbD9W8Sdu2Ioa2KimhhG7nxDTF44tZ2OhoegafGwxRWvjo6-hbHhLxmsOQM9LuL04vrJdNLAM2bJ2TBlFAVE41-ShYAnFWtUOqIvEjpBwBICfVzcsQbUaumZQvy-5Ob3MZ4v6Pn04NJ7gHpVcoY0m7KIyaX6NblkRp6Gp39jvSzNxnpN4xpToWu56nPLkzGF8H0SIcQ6dm8wVjI9WiGTNeF5zliek9P6Bcz2bBxv9DSVZhyDN6X8yY641-SZ4PxCV89vsfk6_rDzeqsurz6eL46uax6Dq2ulLFGDay1VmvoleGiNgwZB2kVDL2UcrDWIGIritOitLUYhOC3GupaGxDH5O1h9y6G-xlT7jYu9ei9mTDMqWNNI6UuceuiVge1jyGliEN3F0utuOsYdPv83T5_x3T3N3_x3zxOz7cbtP_tf72LIA_CNvhcGv708xZjN6LxeSwj5Yc0FxUHVoMEBdUeafEHUoyRbQ</recordid><startdate>20170405</startdate><enddate>20170405</enddate><creator>Matsunaga, Fabio Teruo</creator><creator>Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara</creator><creator>Matsumoto, Marcelo Hide</creator><creator>Netto, Nicola Archetti</creator><creator>Faloppa, Flavio</creator><creator>Belloti, Joao Carlos</creator><general>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170405</creationdate><title>Minimally Invasive Osteosynthesis with a Bridge Plate Versus a Functional Brace for Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><author>Matsunaga, Fabio Teruo ; Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara ; Matsumoto, Marcelo Hide ; Netto, Nicola Archetti ; Faloppa, Flavio ; Belloti, Joao Carlos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2096-5ada5f19dd660c5a237a1e1204d50fc444fddaeee939dd9e4d73f332b60776a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bone Plates</topic><topic>Braces</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Humeral Fractures - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - instrumentation</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal Pain - etiology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Time-to-Treatment</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Matsunaga, Fabio Teruo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsumoto, Marcelo Hide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Netto, Nicola Archetti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faloppa, Flavio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belloti, Joao Carlos</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Matsunaga, Fabio Teruo</au><au>Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara</au><au>Matsumoto, Marcelo Hide</au><au>Netto, Nicola Archetti</au><au>Faloppa, Flavio</au><au>Belloti, Joao Carlos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Minimally Invasive Osteosynthesis with a Bridge Plate Versus a Functional Brace for Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><date>2017-04-05</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>583</spage><epage>592</epage><pages>583-592</pages><issn>0021-9355</issn><eissn>1535-1386</eissn><abstract>Nonoperative treatment has historically been considered the standard for fractures of the shaft of the humerus. Minimally invasive bridge-plate osteosynthesis for isolated humeral shaft fractures has been proven to be a safe technique, with good and reproducible results. This study was designed to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes between patients who had been treated with bridge plate osteosynthesis and those who had been managed nonoperatively with a functional brace.
A prospective randomized trial was designed and included 110 patients allocated to 1 of 2 groups: surgery with a bridge plate or nonoperative treatment with a functional brace. The primary outcome was the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score at 6 months. The score on the Short Form-36 (SF-36) life-quality questionnaire, complications of treatment, Constant-Murley score for the shoulder, pain level, and radiographic results were assessed as secondary outcomes. Participants were assessed at 2 weeks; 1, 2, and 6 months; and 1 year after the interventions.
The mean DASH score of the bridge plate group was statistically superior to that of the functional brace group (mean scores, 10.9 and 16.9, respectively; p = 0.046) only at 6 months. The bridge plate group also had a significantly more favorable nonunion rate (0% versus 15%) and less mean residual angular displacement seen on the anteroposterior radiograph (2.0° versus 10.5°) (both p < 0.05). No difference between the groups was detected with regard to the SF-36 score, pain level, Constant-Murley score, or angular displacement seen on the lateral radiograph.
This trial demonstrates that, compared with functional bracing, surgical treatment with a bridge plate has a statistically significant advantage, of uncertain clinical benefit, with respect to self-reported outcome (DASH score) at 6 months, nonunion rate, and residual deformity in the coronal plane as seen on radiographs.
Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</pub><pmid>28375891</pmid><doi>10.2106/JBJS.16.00628</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9355 |
ispartof | Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2017-04, Vol.99 (7), p.583-592 |
issn | 0021-9355 1535-1386 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1884462107 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Bone Plates Braces Female Fracture Fixation - instrumentation Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation Humans Humeral Fractures - therapy Male Middle Aged Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - instrumentation Musculoskeletal Pain - etiology Prospective Studies Time-to-Treatment Treatment Outcome Young Adult |
title | Minimally Invasive Osteosynthesis with a Bridge Plate Versus a Functional Brace for Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T14%3A42%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Minimally%20Invasive%20Osteosynthesis%20with%20a%20Bridge%20Plate%20Versus%20a%20Functional%20Brace%20for%20Humeral%20Shaft%20Fractures:%20A%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20joint%20surgery.%20American%20volume&rft.au=Matsunaga,%20Fabio%20Teruo&rft.date=2017-04-05&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=583&rft.epage=592&rft.pages=583-592&rft.issn=0021-9355&rft.eissn=1535-1386&rft_id=info:doi/10.2106/JBJS.16.00628&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1884462107%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1884462107&rft_id=info:pmid/28375891&rfr_iscdi=true |