The Reliability of Brood Patches in Assessing Reproductive Status in the Marbled Murrelet: Words of Caution

The assumption that brood patches identify incubating birds is a pervasive one in avian literature, and as a result, brood patches are often used to infer breeding status. Although the developmental stages of the brood patch with specific reproductive stages in passerines have been described, this i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Waterbirds (De Leon Springs, Fla.) Fla.), 2003-03, Vol.26 (1), p.108-118
Hauptverfasser: McFarlane Tranquilla, Laura A, Bradley, Russell W, Lank, David B, Williams, Tony D, Lougheed, Lynn W, Cooke, Fred
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 118
container_issue 1
container_start_page 108
container_title Waterbirds (De Leon Springs, Fla.)
container_volume 26
creator McFarlane Tranquilla, Laura A
Bradley, Russell W
Lank, David B
Williams, Tony D
Lougheed, Lynn W
Cooke, Fred
description The assumption that brood patches identify incubating birds is a pervasive one in avian literature, and as a result, brood patches are often used to infer breeding status. Although the developmental stages of the brood patch with specific reproductive stages in passerines have been described, this information for seabirds is not often reported. Thus, for birds whose breeding activities are not easily observed, it is difficult to confirm (1) that it is valid to assume that a bird which has some stage of brood patch is a nester or putative nester, and (2) whether specific stages of brood patch development reflect specific stages of the breeding cycle. We tested the utility of brood patch scores to infer breeding status in a non-colonial seabird, the Marbled Murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus), a species always captured away from the nest site. We confirmed the breeding status of murrelets with brood patches, and assessed the specific stages of brood patch development to the timing of egg-production (using a physiological analysis) and the onset of incubation (using radio telemetry). Murrelets with brood patches were not always nesters or putative nesters (58% of birds with brood patches were producing eggs, and 56% of radio-tagged birds with brood patches began incubation), and brood patch score did not predict which birds were more likely to become egg-producers or incubators. Specific brood patch stages did not always correlate with specific breeding stages (e.g., the brood patch of egg-producers ranged from absent to fully-developed). Birds with fully developed brood patches took from 3-30 days to start incubation. Brood patch development accurately depicted the average population incubation time, but we caution against using brood patches to predict the timing of an individual breeding attempt, and suggest that when possible, researchers should try to confirm breeding activities using other methods.
doi_str_mv 10.1675/1524-4695(2003)026[0108:TROBPI]2.0.CO;2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18841885</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1522474</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1522474</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b401t-9e03d8b98e875401e949b01e3ef6c6fb1b9ea3ffb8a35204611d53ffa30394453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkM1O3DAURiPUSlDKG7DwqmoXmfFvJqYriAYYCTQIBrFAlWUnN8U0xIPtIPH2OE0r9iysa_t-99g6WTYneEaKhZgTQXnOCym-U4zZD0yLe0xwebS5Xp9crX7RGZ5V6590J9sjkpW5YBJ_Svv_U7vZlxAeMaaULuhe9mfzAOgaOquN7Wx8Ra5FJ965Bl3pWD9AQLZHxyFACLb_nZJb75qhjvYF0E3UcfgbiAlyqb3poEGXg_fQQTxCd843YQRWeojW9V-zz63uAhz8q_vZ7elyU53nF-uzVXV8kRuOScwlYNaURpZQLkS6AcmlSYVBW9RFa4iRoFnbmlIzQTEvCGlEOmuGmeRcsP3s28RNf30eIET1ZEMNXad7cENQpCx5WmPwbArW3oXgoVVbb5-0f1UEq1G2GrWpUZsaZaskW42y1SRbUYVVtVY0kQ4n0mOIzr9jBKV8wVN7ObWNda6HDz_zBitIlHY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18841885</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Reliability of Brood Patches in Assessing Reproductive Status in the Marbled Murrelet: Words of Caution</title><source>BioOne Complete</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>McFarlane Tranquilla, Laura A ; Bradley, Russell W ; Lank, David B ; Williams, Tony D ; Lougheed, Lynn W ; Cooke, Fred</creator><creatorcontrib>McFarlane Tranquilla, Laura A ; Bradley, Russell W ; Lank, David B ; Williams, Tony D ; Lougheed, Lynn W ; Cooke, Fred</creatorcontrib><description>The assumption that brood patches identify incubating birds is a pervasive one in avian literature, and as a result, brood patches are often used to infer breeding status. Although the developmental stages of the brood patch with specific reproductive stages in passerines have been described, this information for seabirds is not often reported. Thus, for birds whose breeding activities are not easily observed, it is difficult to confirm (1) that it is valid to assume that a bird which has some stage of brood patch is a nester or putative nester, and (2) whether specific stages of brood patch development reflect specific stages of the breeding cycle. We tested the utility of brood patch scores to infer breeding status in a non-colonial seabird, the Marbled Murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus), a species always captured away from the nest site. We confirmed the breeding status of murrelets with brood patches, and assessed the specific stages of brood patch development to the timing of egg-production (using a physiological analysis) and the onset of incubation (using radio telemetry). Murrelets with brood patches were not always nesters or putative nesters (58% of birds with brood patches were producing eggs, and 56% of radio-tagged birds with brood patches began incubation), and brood patch score did not predict which birds were more likely to become egg-producers or incubators. Specific brood patch stages did not always correlate with specific breeding stages (e.g., the brood patch of egg-producers ranged from absent to fully-developed). Birds with fully developed brood patches took from 3-30 days to start incubation. Brood patch development accurately depicted the average population incubation time, but we caution against using brood patches to predict the timing of an individual breeding attempt, and suggest that when possible, researchers should try to confirm breeding activities using other methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1524-4695</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5390</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1675/1524-4695(2003)026[0108:TROBPI]2.0.CO;2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Waterbird Society</publisher><subject>Aviculture ; Bird nesting ; Brachyramphus marmoratus ; Breeding ; Breeding seasons ; Brood patch ; Eggs ; Female animals ; Incubation ; Marbled Murrelet ; radio telemetry ; reproductive status ; Sea birds ; vitellogenin ; Waterfowl ; Wildlife ecology</subject><ispartof>Waterbirds (De Leon Springs, Fla.), 2003-03, Vol.26 (1), p.108-118</ispartof><rights>The Waterbird Society</rights><rights>Copyright 2003 Waterbird Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b401t-9e03d8b98e875401e949b01e3ef6c6fb1b9ea3ffb8a35204611d53ffa30394453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b401t-9e03d8b98e875401e949b01e3ef6c6fb1b9ea3ffb8a35204611d53ffa30394453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1675/1524-4695(2003)026[0108:TROBPI]2.0.CO;2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1522474$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,26982,27928,27929,52367,58021,58254</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McFarlane Tranquilla, Laura A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Russell W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lank, David B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Tony D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lougheed, Lynn W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooke, Fred</creatorcontrib><title>The Reliability of Brood Patches in Assessing Reproductive Status in the Marbled Murrelet: Words of Caution</title><title>Waterbirds (De Leon Springs, Fla.)</title><description>The assumption that brood patches identify incubating birds is a pervasive one in avian literature, and as a result, brood patches are often used to infer breeding status. Although the developmental stages of the brood patch with specific reproductive stages in passerines have been described, this information for seabirds is not often reported. Thus, for birds whose breeding activities are not easily observed, it is difficult to confirm (1) that it is valid to assume that a bird which has some stage of brood patch is a nester or putative nester, and (2) whether specific stages of brood patch development reflect specific stages of the breeding cycle. We tested the utility of brood patch scores to infer breeding status in a non-colonial seabird, the Marbled Murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus), a species always captured away from the nest site. We confirmed the breeding status of murrelets with brood patches, and assessed the specific stages of brood patch development to the timing of egg-production (using a physiological analysis) and the onset of incubation (using radio telemetry). Murrelets with brood patches were not always nesters or putative nesters (58% of birds with brood patches were producing eggs, and 56% of radio-tagged birds with brood patches began incubation), and brood patch score did not predict which birds were more likely to become egg-producers or incubators. Specific brood patch stages did not always correlate with specific breeding stages (e.g., the brood patch of egg-producers ranged from absent to fully-developed). Birds with fully developed brood patches took from 3-30 days to start incubation. Brood patch development accurately depicted the average population incubation time, but we caution against using brood patches to predict the timing of an individual breeding attempt, and suggest that when possible, researchers should try to confirm breeding activities using other methods.</description><subject>Aviculture</subject><subject>Bird nesting</subject><subject>Brachyramphus marmoratus</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Breeding seasons</subject><subject>Brood patch</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>Incubation</subject><subject>Marbled Murrelet</subject><subject>radio telemetry</subject><subject>reproductive status</subject><subject>Sea birds</subject><subject>vitellogenin</subject><subject>Waterfowl</subject><subject>Wildlife ecology</subject><issn>1524-4695</issn><issn>1938-5390</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqdkM1O3DAURiPUSlDKG7DwqmoXmfFvJqYriAYYCTQIBrFAlWUnN8U0xIPtIPH2OE0r9iysa_t-99g6WTYneEaKhZgTQXnOCym-U4zZD0yLe0xwebS5Xp9crX7RGZ5V6590J9sjkpW5YBJ_Svv_U7vZlxAeMaaULuhe9mfzAOgaOquN7Wx8Ra5FJ965Bl3pWD9AQLZHxyFACLb_nZJb75qhjvYF0E3UcfgbiAlyqb3poEGXg_fQQTxCd843YQRWeojW9V-zz63uAhz8q_vZ7elyU53nF-uzVXV8kRuOScwlYNaURpZQLkS6AcmlSYVBW9RFa4iRoFnbmlIzQTEvCGlEOmuGmeRcsP3s28RNf30eIET1ZEMNXad7cENQpCx5WmPwbArW3oXgoVVbb5-0f1UEq1G2GrWpUZsaZaskW42y1SRbUYVVtVY0kQ4n0mOIzr9jBKV8wVN7ObWNda6HDz_zBitIlHY</recordid><startdate>20030301</startdate><enddate>20030301</enddate><creator>McFarlane Tranquilla, Laura A</creator><creator>Bradley, Russell W</creator><creator>Lank, David B</creator><creator>Williams, Tony D</creator><creator>Lougheed, Lynn W</creator><creator>Cooke, Fred</creator><general>Waterbird Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030301</creationdate><title>The Reliability of Brood Patches in Assessing Reproductive Status in the Marbled Murrelet: Words of Caution</title><author>McFarlane Tranquilla, Laura A ; Bradley, Russell W ; Lank, David B ; Williams, Tony D ; Lougheed, Lynn W ; Cooke, Fred</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b401t-9e03d8b98e875401e949b01e3ef6c6fb1b9ea3ffb8a35204611d53ffa30394453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Aviculture</topic><topic>Bird nesting</topic><topic>Brachyramphus marmoratus</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Breeding seasons</topic><topic>Brood patch</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>Incubation</topic><topic>Marbled Murrelet</topic><topic>radio telemetry</topic><topic>reproductive status</topic><topic>Sea birds</topic><topic>vitellogenin</topic><topic>Waterfowl</topic><topic>Wildlife ecology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McFarlane Tranquilla, Laura A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Russell W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lank, David B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Tony D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lougheed, Lynn W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooke, Fred</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Waterbirds (De Leon Springs, Fla.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McFarlane Tranquilla, Laura A</au><au>Bradley, Russell W</au><au>Lank, David B</au><au>Williams, Tony D</au><au>Lougheed, Lynn W</au><au>Cooke, Fred</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Reliability of Brood Patches in Assessing Reproductive Status in the Marbled Murrelet: Words of Caution</atitle><jtitle>Waterbirds (De Leon Springs, Fla.)</jtitle><date>2003-03-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>108</spage><epage>118</epage><pages>108-118</pages><issn>1524-4695</issn><eissn>1938-5390</eissn><abstract>The assumption that brood patches identify incubating birds is a pervasive one in avian literature, and as a result, brood patches are often used to infer breeding status. Although the developmental stages of the brood patch with specific reproductive stages in passerines have been described, this information for seabirds is not often reported. Thus, for birds whose breeding activities are not easily observed, it is difficult to confirm (1) that it is valid to assume that a bird which has some stage of brood patch is a nester or putative nester, and (2) whether specific stages of brood patch development reflect specific stages of the breeding cycle. We tested the utility of brood patch scores to infer breeding status in a non-colonial seabird, the Marbled Murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus), a species always captured away from the nest site. We confirmed the breeding status of murrelets with brood patches, and assessed the specific stages of brood patch development to the timing of egg-production (using a physiological analysis) and the onset of incubation (using radio telemetry). Murrelets with brood patches were not always nesters or putative nesters (58% of birds with brood patches were producing eggs, and 56% of radio-tagged birds with brood patches began incubation), and brood patch score did not predict which birds were more likely to become egg-producers or incubators. Specific brood patch stages did not always correlate with specific breeding stages (e.g., the brood patch of egg-producers ranged from absent to fully-developed). Birds with fully developed brood patches took from 3-30 days to start incubation. Brood patch development accurately depicted the average population incubation time, but we caution against using brood patches to predict the timing of an individual breeding attempt, and suggest that when possible, researchers should try to confirm breeding activities using other methods.</abstract><pub>Waterbird Society</pub><doi>10.1675/1524-4695(2003)026[0108:TROBPI]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1524-4695
ispartof Waterbirds (De Leon Springs, Fla.), 2003-03, Vol.26 (1), p.108-118
issn 1524-4695
1938-5390
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18841885
source BioOne Complete; JSTOR
subjects Aviculture
Bird nesting
Brachyramphus marmoratus
Breeding
Breeding seasons
Brood patch
Eggs
Female animals
Incubation
Marbled Murrelet
radio telemetry
reproductive status
Sea birds
vitellogenin
Waterfowl
Wildlife ecology
title The Reliability of Brood Patches in Assessing Reproductive Status in the Marbled Murrelet: Words of Caution
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T12%3A28%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Reliability%20of%20Brood%20Patches%20in%20Assessing%20Reproductive%20Status%20in%20the%20Marbled%20Murrelet:%20Words%20of%20Caution&rft.jtitle=Waterbirds%20(De%20Leon%20Springs,%20Fla.)&rft.au=McFarlane%20Tranquilla,%20Laura%20A&rft.date=2003-03-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=108&rft.epage=118&rft.pages=108-118&rft.issn=1524-4695&rft.eissn=1938-5390&rft_id=info:doi/10.1675/1524-4695(2003)026%5B0108:TROBPI%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1522474%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18841885&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1522474&rfr_iscdi=true