Which interval is most crucial to presentation and survival in gastroesophageal cancer: A systematic review
Aim The aim of this study was to identify the most crucial interval to encourage earlier diagnosis in with gastroesophageal cancer and to identify potential factors effecting this interval. Background Gastroesophageal malignancy is the eighth most commonly presenting cancer with one of the worst sur...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of advanced nursing 2017-10, Vol.73 (10), p.2270-2282 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2282 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 2270 |
| container_title | Journal of advanced nursing |
| container_volume | 73 |
| creator | Lee, Amanda Khulusi, Sam Watson, Roger |
| description | Aim
The aim of this study was to identify the most crucial interval to encourage earlier diagnosis in with gastroesophageal cancer and to identify potential factors effecting this interval.
Background
Gastroesophageal malignancy is the eighth most commonly presenting cancer with one of the worst survival rates. Identifying the most crucial period for intervention to inform earlier diagnosis is an important step towards improving survival.
Design
Mixed methods literature review.
Data Sources
CINAHL, MEDLINE and Academic search primer online databases were searched using keywords and inclusion/exclusion criteria. Empirical evidence published between 2000–2016 with a focus on gastroesophageal cancer presentation and survival was reviewed to inform this study.
Review methods
Twelve studies were extracted for further review. Selected studies were appraised and presented through Olensen's “delay interval” framework to inform the most crucial interval to survival in gastroesophageal cancer.
Results
The findings identify the patient interval as the most critical period for encouraging earlier presentation and reducing advanced stage presentation in gastroesophageal cancer. The article also highlighted some methodological limitations to cancer research, such as a lack of consensus in definitions which prevent statistical meta‐analysis of cancer data, survivor bias in gastroesophageal cancer studies and a significant lack of qualitative evidence to reveal patient experience in presenting with this cancer.
Conclusion
Further research into the patient interval is required to elicit information on how and why patients present with their cancer symptoms. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jan.13308 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1884170183</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1884170183</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-104cd1129394cac31ff9273999ad7ab5143911ccd819a725750661583da13f913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10U1PHCEYB3Bi2uj6cvALNCS9tIdRHp55AW8b09o2Ri8ajwQZxmU7AyvMrNlvL7raQxO5EMiPf57wJ-QY2AnkdbrU_gQQmdghM8C6Knhdik9kxpDJgpeM75H9lJaMAXLOd8keF9iwipcz8vdu4cyCOj_auNY9dYkOIY3UxMm4fB4DXUWbrB_16IKn2rc0TXHtXrGnDzqNMdgUVgv9YPOd0d7YeEbnNG3SaIf8zNBo184-HZLPne6TPXrbD8jtzx8357-Ky-uL3-fzy8KgEKIAVpoWgEuUpdEGoeskb1BKqdtG31dQogQwphUgdcOrpmJ1DZXAVgN2EvCAfNvmrmJ4nGwa1eCSsX2vvQ1TUiBECQ0DgZl-_Y8uwxR9nk6BxEbyukGR1fetMjGkFG2nVtENOm4UMPXSgMoNqNcGsv3yljjdD7b9J9-_PIPTLXhyvd18nKT-zK-2kc9vZI7u</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1937926738</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Which interval is most crucial to presentation and survival in gastroesophageal cancer: A systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Lee, Amanda ; Khulusi, Sam ; Watson, Roger</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Amanda ; Khulusi, Sam ; Watson, Roger</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
The aim of this study was to identify the most crucial interval to encourage earlier diagnosis in with gastroesophageal cancer and to identify potential factors effecting this interval.
Background
Gastroesophageal malignancy is the eighth most commonly presenting cancer with one of the worst survival rates. Identifying the most crucial period for intervention to inform earlier diagnosis is an important step towards improving survival.
Design
Mixed methods literature review.
Data Sources
CINAHL, MEDLINE and Academic search primer online databases were searched using keywords and inclusion/exclusion criteria. Empirical evidence published between 2000–2016 with a focus on gastroesophageal cancer presentation and survival was reviewed to inform this study.
Review methods
Twelve studies were extracted for further review. Selected studies were appraised and presented through Olensen's “delay interval” framework to inform the most crucial interval to survival in gastroesophageal cancer.
Results
The findings identify the patient interval as the most critical period for encouraging earlier presentation and reducing advanced stage presentation in gastroesophageal cancer. The article also highlighted some methodological limitations to cancer research, such as a lack of consensus in definitions which prevent statistical meta‐analysis of cancer data, survivor bias in gastroesophageal cancer studies and a significant lack of qualitative evidence to reveal patient experience in presenting with this cancer.
Conclusion
Further research into the patient interval is required to elicit information on how and why patients present with their cancer symptoms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0309-2402</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2648</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jan.13308</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28370524</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>advanced presentation ; Advanced stage ; Bias ; Cancer ; cancer data ; cancer methodology ; Clinical outcomes ; Early Detection of Cancer ; early presentation ; Electronic publishing ; Esophageal cancer ; Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology ; Evidence-based nursing ; GOC ; Health behavior ; Humans ; interval delay ; late presentation ; literature review methodology ; Literature reviews ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical research ; Medical screening ; Nursing ; oesophagogastric cancer ; Stomach Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Stomach Neoplasms - pathology ; Survival Analysis ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Journal of advanced nursing, 2017-10, Vol.73 (10), p.2270-2282</ispartof><rights>2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-104cd1129394cac31ff9273999ad7ab5143911ccd819a725750661583da13f913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-104cd1129394cac31ff9273999ad7ab5143911ccd819a725750661583da13f913</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1378-3123</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjan.13308$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjan.13308$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,30980,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28370524$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khulusi, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, Roger</creatorcontrib><title>Which interval is most crucial to presentation and survival in gastroesophageal cancer: A systematic review</title><title>Journal of advanced nursing</title><addtitle>J Adv Nurs</addtitle><description>Aim
The aim of this study was to identify the most crucial interval to encourage earlier diagnosis in with gastroesophageal cancer and to identify potential factors effecting this interval.
Background
Gastroesophageal malignancy is the eighth most commonly presenting cancer with one of the worst survival rates. Identifying the most crucial period for intervention to inform earlier diagnosis is an important step towards improving survival.
Design
Mixed methods literature review.
Data Sources
CINAHL, MEDLINE and Academic search primer online databases were searched using keywords and inclusion/exclusion criteria. Empirical evidence published between 2000–2016 with a focus on gastroesophageal cancer presentation and survival was reviewed to inform this study.
Review methods
Twelve studies were extracted for further review. Selected studies were appraised and presented through Olensen's “delay interval” framework to inform the most crucial interval to survival in gastroesophageal cancer.
Results
The findings identify the patient interval as the most critical period for encouraging earlier presentation and reducing advanced stage presentation in gastroesophageal cancer. The article also highlighted some methodological limitations to cancer research, such as a lack of consensus in definitions which prevent statistical meta‐analysis of cancer data, survivor bias in gastroesophageal cancer studies and a significant lack of qualitative evidence to reveal patient experience in presenting with this cancer.
Conclusion
Further research into the patient interval is required to elicit information on how and why patients present with their cancer symptoms.</description><subject>advanced presentation</subject><subject>Advanced stage</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>cancer data</subject><subject>cancer methodology</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer</subject><subject>early presentation</subject><subject>Electronic publishing</subject><subject>Esophageal cancer</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Evidence-based nursing</subject><subject>GOC</subject><subject>Health behavior</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>interval delay</subject><subject>late presentation</subject><subject>literature review methodology</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>oesophagogastric cancer</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0309-2402</issn><issn>1365-2648</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp10U1PHCEYB3Bi2uj6cvALNCS9tIdRHp55AW8b09o2Ri8ajwQZxmU7AyvMrNlvL7raQxO5EMiPf57wJ-QY2AnkdbrU_gQQmdghM8C6Knhdik9kxpDJgpeM75H9lJaMAXLOd8keF9iwipcz8vdu4cyCOj_auNY9dYkOIY3UxMm4fB4DXUWbrB_16IKn2rc0TXHtXrGnDzqNMdgUVgv9YPOd0d7YeEbnNG3SaIf8zNBo184-HZLPne6TPXrbD8jtzx8357-Ky-uL3-fzy8KgEKIAVpoWgEuUpdEGoeskb1BKqdtG31dQogQwphUgdcOrpmJ1DZXAVgN2EvCAfNvmrmJ4nGwa1eCSsX2vvQ1TUiBECQ0DgZl-_Y8uwxR9nk6BxEbyukGR1fetMjGkFG2nVtENOm4UMPXSgMoNqNcGsv3yljjdD7b9J9-_PIPTLXhyvd18nKT-zK-2kc9vZI7u</recordid><startdate>201710</startdate><enddate>201710</enddate><creator>Lee, Amanda</creator><creator>Khulusi, Sam</creator><creator>Watson, Roger</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1378-3123</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201710</creationdate><title>Which interval is most crucial to presentation and survival in gastroesophageal cancer: A systematic review</title><author>Lee, Amanda ; Khulusi, Sam ; Watson, Roger</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-104cd1129394cac31ff9273999ad7ab5143911ccd819a725750661583da13f913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>advanced presentation</topic><topic>Advanced stage</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>cancer data</topic><topic>cancer methodology</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer</topic><topic>early presentation</topic><topic>Electronic publishing</topic><topic>Esophageal cancer</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Evidence-based nursing</topic><topic>GOC</topic><topic>Health behavior</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>interval delay</topic><topic>late presentation</topic><topic>literature review methodology</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>oesophagogastric cancer</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khulusi, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, Roger</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of advanced nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Amanda</au><au>Khulusi, Sam</au><au>Watson, Roger</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Which interval is most crucial to presentation and survival in gastroesophageal cancer: A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of advanced nursing</jtitle><addtitle>J Adv Nurs</addtitle><date>2017-10</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2270</spage><epage>2282</epage><pages>2270-2282</pages><issn>0309-2402</issn><eissn>1365-2648</eissn><abstract>Aim
The aim of this study was to identify the most crucial interval to encourage earlier diagnosis in with gastroesophageal cancer and to identify potential factors effecting this interval.
Background
Gastroesophageal malignancy is the eighth most commonly presenting cancer with one of the worst survival rates. Identifying the most crucial period for intervention to inform earlier diagnosis is an important step towards improving survival.
Design
Mixed methods literature review.
Data Sources
CINAHL, MEDLINE and Academic search primer online databases were searched using keywords and inclusion/exclusion criteria. Empirical evidence published between 2000–2016 with a focus on gastroesophageal cancer presentation and survival was reviewed to inform this study.
Review methods
Twelve studies were extracted for further review. Selected studies were appraised and presented through Olensen's “delay interval” framework to inform the most crucial interval to survival in gastroesophageal cancer.
Results
The findings identify the patient interval as the most critical period for encouraging earlier presentation and reducing advanced stage presentation in gastroesophageal cancer. The article also highlighted some methodological limitations to cancer research, such as a lack of consensus in definitions which prevent statistical meta‐analysis of cancer data, survivor bias in gastroesophageal cancer studies and a significant lack of qualitative evidence to reveal patient experience in presenting with this cancer.
Conclusion
Further research into the patient interval is required to elicit information on how and why patients present with their cancer symptoms.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28370524</pmid><doi>10.1111/jan.13308</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1378-3123</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0309-2402 |
| ispartof | Journal of advanced nursing, 2017-10, Vol.73 (10), p.2270-2282 |
| issn | 0309-2402 1365-2648 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1884170183 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | advanced presentation Advanced stage Bias Cancer cancer data cancer methodology Clinical outcomes Early Detection of Cancer early presentation Electronic publishing Esophageal cancer Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology Evidence-based nursing GOC Health behavior Humans interval delay late presentation literature review methodology Literature reviews Medical diagnosis Medical research Medical screening Nursing oesophagogastric cancer Stomach Neoplasms - diagnosis Stomach Neoplasms - pathology Survival Analysis Systematic review |
| title | Which interval is most crucial to presentation and survival in gastroesophageal cancer: A systematic review |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T11%3A37%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Which%20interval%20is%20most%20crucial%20to%20presentation%20and%20survival%20in%20gastroesophageal%20cancer:%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20advanced%20nursing&rft.au=Lee,%20Amanda&rft.date=2017-10&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2270&rft.epage=2282&rft.pages=2270-2282&rft.issn=0309-2402&rft.eissn=1365-2648&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jan.13308&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1884170183%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1937926738&rft_id=info:pmid/28370524&rfr_iscdi=true |