Is there inter‐procedural transfer of skills in intraocular surgery? A randomized controlled trial
Purpose To investigate how experience in simulated cataract surgery impacts and transfers to the learning curves for novices in vitreoretinal surgery. Methods Twelve ophthalmology residents without previous experience in intraocular surgery were randomized to (1) intensive training in cataract surge...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England) England), 2017-12, Vol.95 (8), p.845-851 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 851 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 845 |
container_title | Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England) |
container_volume | 95 |
creator | Thomsen, Ann Sofia Skou Kiilgaard, Jens Folke Cour, Morten Brydges, Ryan Konge, Lars |
description | Purpose
To investigate how experience in simulated cataract surgery impacts and transfers to the learning curves for novices in vitreoretinal surgery.
Methods
Twelve ophthalmology residents without previous experience in intraocular surgery were randomized to (1) intensive training in cataract surgery on a virtual‐reality simulator until passing a test with predefined validity evidence (cataract trainees) or to (2) no cataract surgery training (novices). Possible skill transfer was assessed using a test consisting of all 11 vitreoretinal modules on the EyeSi virtual‐reality simulator. All participants repeated the test of vitreoretinal surgical skills until their performance curve plateaued. Three experienced vitreoretinal surgeons also performed the test to establish validity evidence. Analysis with independent samples t‐tests was performed.
Results
The vitreoretinal test on the EyeSi simulator demonstrated evidence of validity, given statistically significant differences in mean test scores for the first repetition; experienced surgeons scored higher than novices (p = 0.023) and cataract trainees (p = 0.003). Internal consistency for the 11 modules of the test was acceptable (Cronbach's α = 0.73). Our findings did not indicate a transfer effect with no significant differences found between cataract trainees and novices in their starting scores (mean ± SD 381 ± 129 points versus 455 ± 82 points, p = 0.262), time to reach maximum performance level (10.7 ± 3.0 hr versus 8.7 ± 2.8 hr, p = 0.265), or maximum scores (785 ± 162 points versus 805 ± 73 points, p = 0.791).
Conclusion
Pretraining in cataract surgery did not demonstrate any measurable effect on vitreoretinal procedural performance. The results of this study indicate that we should not anticipate extensive transfer of surgical skills when planning training programmes in intraocular surgery. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/aos.13434 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1884169035</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1973998467</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-20925b13802b215d1ff6bab29763f76a0b3139350985254b86beadaed04df6db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E9PwyAYBnBiNG5OD34BQ-JFD92gFNqezLL4Z8kSD2rijUCh2knHhDZmnvwIfkY_iczOHUzkwnv45YH3AeAYoyEOZySsH2KSkGQH9HFKaURSlu1uZ_rYAwfezxFimLFkH_TijKSYsLQP1NTD5lk7DatFo93Xx-fS2UKr1gkDGycWvtQO2hL6l8oYH9QaOmGL1ggHfeuetFtdwDEMVtm6etcKFjYQa0wYG1cJcwj2SmG8PtrcA_BwdXk_uYlmt9fTyXgWFSTLkihGeUwlJhmKZYypwmXJpJBxnjJSpkwgSTDJCUV5RmOayIxJLZTQCiWqZEqSATjrcsMOr632Da8rX2hjxELb1nMcXsEsR4QGevqHzm3rFuF3HOcpyfMsYWlQ550qnPXe6ZIvXVULt-IY8XX1PFTPf6oP9mST2Mpaq6387TqAUQfeKqNX_yfx8e1dF_kNqc-Osw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1973998467</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is there inter‐procedural transfer of skills in intraocular surgery? A randomized controlled trial</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Thomsen, Ann Sofia Skou ; Kiilgaard, Jens Folke ; Cour, Morten ; Brydges, Ryan ; Konge, Lars</creator><creatorcontrib>Thomsen, Ann Sofia Skou ; Kiilgaard, Jens Folke ; Cour, Morten ; Brydges, Ryan ; Konge, Lars</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
To investigate how experience in simulated cataract surgery impacts and transfers to the learning curves for novices in vitreoretinal surgery.
Methods
Twelve ophthalmology residents without previous experience in intraocular surgery were randomized to (1) intensive training in cataract surgery on a virtual‐reality simulator until passing a test with predefined validity evidence (cataract trainees) or to (2) no cataract surgery training (novices). Possible skill transfer was assessed using a test consisting of all 11 vitreoretinal modules on the EyeSi virtual‐reality simulator. All participants repeated the test of vitreoretinal surgical skills until their performance curve plateaued. Three experienced vitreoretinal surgeons also performed the test to establish validity evidence. Analysis with independent samples t‐tests was performed.
Results
The vitreoretinal test on the EyeSi simulator demonstrated evidence of validity, given statistically significant differences in mean test scores for the first repetition; experienced surgeons scored higher than novices (p = 0.023) and cataract trainees (p = 0.003). Internal consistency for the 11 modules of the test was acceptable (Cronbach's α = 0.73). Our findings did not indicate a transfer effect with no significant differences found between cataract trainees and novices in their starting scores (mean ± SD 381 ± 129 points versus 455 ± 82 points, p = 0.262), time to reach maximum performance level (10.7 ± 3.0 hr versus 8.7 ± 2.8 hr, p = 0.265), or maximum scores (785 ± 162 points versus 805 ± 73 points, p = 0.791).
Conclusion
Pretraining in cataract surgery did not demonstrate any measurable effect on vitreoretinal procedural performance. The results of this study indicate that we should not anticipate extensive transfer of surgical skills when planning training programmes in intraocular surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1755-375X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1755-3768</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/aos.13434</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28371367</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>assessment/formative feedback ; cataract surgery ; Cataracts ; Eye surgery ; Medical personnel ; Ophthalmology ; Randomization ; simulation‐based training ; Skills ; Statistical analysis ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; vitreoretinal surgery</subject><ispartof>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England), 2017-12, Vol.95 (8), p.845-851</ispartof><rights>2017 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2017 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-20925b13802b215d1ff6bab29763f76a0b3139350985254b86beadaed04df6db3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-20925b13802b215d1ff6bab29763f76a0b3139350985254b86beadaed04df6db3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4249-581X ; 0000-0003-1054-1460</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Faos.13434$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Faos.13434$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28371367$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thomsen, Ann Sofia Skou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiilgaard, Jens Folke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cour, Morten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brydges, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konge, Lars</creatorcontrib><title>Is there inter‐procedural transfer of skills in intraocular surgery? A randomized controlled trial</title><title>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)</title><addtitle>Acta Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Purpose
To investigate how experience in simulated cataract surgery impacts and transfers to the learning curves for novices in vitreoretinal surgery.
Methods
Twelve ophthalmology residents without previous experience in intraocular surgery were randomized to (1) intensive training in cataract surgery on a virtual‐reality simulator until passing a test with predefined validity evidence (cataract trainees) or to (2) no cataract surgery training (novices). Possible skill transfer was assessed using a test consisting of all 11 vitreoretinal modules on the EyeSi virtual‐reality simulator. All participants repeated the test of vitreoretinal surgical skills until their performance curve plateaued. Three experienced vitreoretinal surgeons also performed the test to establish validity evidence. Analysis with independent samples t‐tests was performed.
Results
The vitreoretinal test on the EyeSi simulator demonstrated evidence of validity, given statistically significant differences in mean test scores for the first repetition; experienced surgeons scored higher than novices (p = 0.023) and cataract trainees (p = 0.003). Internal consistency for the 11 modules of the test was acceptable (Cronbach's α = 0.73). Our findings did not indicate a transfer effect with no significant differences found between cataract trainees and novices in their starting scores (mean ± SD 381 ± 129 points versus 455 ± 82 points, p = 0.262), time to reach maximum performance level (10.7 ± 3.0 hr versus 8.7 ± 2.8 hr, p = 0.265), or maximum scores (785 ± 162 points versus 805 ± 73 points, p = 0.791).
Conclusion
Pretraining in cataract surgery did not demonstrate any measurable effect on vitreoretinal procedural performance. The results of this study indicate that we should not anticipate extensive transfer of surgical skills when planning training programmes in intraocular surgery.</description><subject>assessment/formative feedback</subject><subject>cataract surgery</subject><subject>Cataracts</subject><subject>Eye surgery</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Randomization</subject><subject>simulation‐based training</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>vitreoretinal surgery</subject><issn>1755-375X</issn><issn>1755-3768</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10E9PwyAYBnBiNG5OD34BQ-JFD92gFNqezLL4Z8kSD2rijUCh2knHhDZmnvwIfkY_iczOHUzkwnv45YH3AeAYoyEOZySsH2KSkGQH9HFKaURSlu1uZ_rYAwfezxFimLFkH_TijKSYsLQP1NTD5lk7DatFo93Xx-fS2UKr1gkDGycWvtQO2hL6l8oYH9QaOmGL1ggHfeuetFtdwDEMVtm6etcKFjYQa0wYG1cJcwj2SmG8PtrcA_BwdXk_uYlmt9fTyXgWFSTLkihGeUwlJhmKZYypwmXJpJBxnjJSpkwgSTDJCUV5RmOayIxJLZTQCiWqZEqSATjrcsMOr632Da8rX2hjxELb1nMcXsEsR4QGevqHzm3rFuF3HOcpyfMsYWlQ550qnPXe6ZIvXVULt-IY8XX1PFTPf6oP9mST2Mpaq6387TqAUQfeKqNX_yfx8e1dF_kNqc-Osw</recordid><startdate>201712</startdate><enddate>201712</enddate><creator>Thomsen, Ann Sofia Skou</creator><creator>Kiilgaard, Jens Folke</creator><creator>Cour, Morten</creator><creator>Brydges, Ryan</creator><creator>Konge, Lars</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4249-581X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1054-1460</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201712</creationdate><title>Is there inter‐procedural transfer of skills in intraocular surgery? A randomized controlled trial</title><author>Thomsen, Ann Sofia Skou ; Kiilgaard, Jens Folke ; Cour, Morten ; Brydges, Ryan ; Konge, Lars</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-20925b13802b215d1ff6bab29763f76a0b3139350985254b86beadaed04df6db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>assessment/formative feedback</topic><topic>cataract surgery</topic><topic>Cataracts</topic><topic>Eye surgery</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Randomization</topic><topic>simulation‐based training</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>vitreoretinal surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thomsen, Ann Sofia Skou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiilgaard, Jens Folke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cour, Morten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brydges, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konge, Lars</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thomsen, Ann Sofia Skou</au><au>Kiilgaard, Jens Folke</au><au>Cour, Morten</au><au>Brydges, Ryan</au><au>Konge, Lars</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is there inter‐procedural transfer of skills in intraocular surgery? A randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2017-12</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>845</spage><epage>851</epage><pages>845-851</pages><issn>1755-375X</issn><eissn>1755-3768</eissn><abstract>Purpose
To investigate how experience in simulated cataract surgery impacts and transfers to the learning curves for novices in vitreoretinal surgery.
Methods
Twelve ophthalmology residents without previous experience in intraocular surgery were randomized to (1) intensive training in cataract surgery on a virtual‐reality simulator until passing a test with predefined validity evidence (cataract trainees) or to (2) no cataract surgery training (novices). Possible skill transfer was assessed using a test consisting of all 11 vitreoretinal modules on the EyeSi virtual‐reality simulator. All participants repeated the test of vitreoretinal surgical skills until their performance curve plateaued. Three experienced vitreoretinal surgeons also performed the test to establish validity evidence. Analysis with independent samples t‐tests was performed.
Results
The vitreoretinal test on the EyeSi simulator demonstrated evidence of validity, given statistically significant differences in mean test scores for the first repetition; experienced surgeons scored higher than novices (p = 0.023) and cataract trainees (p = 0.003). Internal consistency for the 11 modules of the test was acceptable (Cronbach's α = 0.73). Our findings did not indicate a transfer effect with no significant differences found between cataract trainees and novices in their starting scores (mean ± SD 381 ± 129 points versus 455 ± 82 points, p = 0.262), time to reach maximum performance level (10.7 ± 3.0 hr versus 8.7 ± 2.8 hr, p = 0.265), or maximum scores (785 ± 162 points versus 805 ± 73 points, p = 0.791).
Conclusion
Pretraining in cataract surgery did not demonstrate any measurable effect on vitreoretinal procedural performance. The results of this study indicate that we should not anticipate extensive transfer of surgical skills when planning training programmes in intraocular surgery.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28371367</pmid><doi>10.1111/aos.13434</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4249-581X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1054-1460</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1755-375X |
ispartof | Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England), 2017-12, Vol.95 (8), p.845-851 |
issn | 1755-375X 1755-3768 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1884169035 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection) |
subjects | assessment/formative feedback cataract surgery Cataracts Eye surgery Medical personnel Ophthalmology Randomization simulation‐based training Skills Statistical analysis Surgeons Surgery vitreoretinal surgery |
title | Is there inter‐procedural transfer of skills in intraocular surgery? A randomized controlled trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T20%3A50%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20there%20inter%E2%80%90procedural%20transfer%20of%20skills%20in%20intraocular%20surgery?%20A%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=Acta%20ophthalmologica%20(Oxford,%20England)&rft.au=Thomsen,%20Ann%20Sofia%20Skou&rft.date=2017-12&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=845&rft.epage=851&rft.pages=845-851&rft.issn=1755-375X&rft.eissn=1755-3768&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/aos.13434&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1973998467%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1973998467&rft_id=info:pmid/28371367&rfr_iscdi=true |