Is there inter‐procedural transfer of skills in intraocular surgery? A randomized controlled trial

Purpose To investigate how experience in simulated cataract surgery impacts and transfers to the learning curves for novices in vitreoretinal surgery. Methods Twelve ophthalmology residents without previous experience in intraocular surgery were randomized to (1) intensive training in cataract surge...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England) England), 2017-12, Vol.95 (8), p.845-851
Hauptverfasser: Thomsen, Ann Sofia Skou, Kiilgaard, Jens Folke, Cour, Morten, Brydges, Ryan, Konge, Lars
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 851
container_issue 8
container_start_page 845
container_title Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)
container_volume 95
creator Thomsen, Ann Sofia Skou
Kiilgaard, Jens Folke
Cour, Morten
Brydges, Ryan
Konge, Lars
description Purpose To investigate how experience in simulated cataract surgery impacts and transfers to the learning curves for novices in vitreoretinal surgery. Methods Twelve ophthalmology residents without previous experience in intraocular surgery were randomized to (1) intensive training in cataract surgery on a virtual‐reality simulator until passing a test with predefined validity evidence (cataract trainees) or to (2) no cataract surgery training (novices). Possible skill transfer was assessed using a test consisting of all 11 vitreoretinal modules on the EyeSi virtual‐reality simulator. All participants repeated the test of vitreoretinal surgical skills until their performance curve plateaued. Three experienced vitreoretinal surgeons also performed the test to establish validity evidence. Analysis with independent samples t‐tests was performed. Results The vitreoretinal test on the EyeSi simulator demonstrated evidence of validity, given statistically significant differences in mean test scores for the first repetition; experienced surgeons scored higher than novices (p = 0.023) and cataract trainees (p = 0.003). Internal consistency for the 11 modules of the test was acceptable (Cronbach's α = 0.73). Our findings did not indicate a transfer effect with no significant differences found between cataract trainees and novices in their starting scores (mean ± SD 381 ± 129 points versus 455 ± 82 points, p = 0.262), time to reach maximum performance level (10.7 ± 3.0 hr versus 8.7 ± 2.8 hr, p = 0.265), or maximum scores (785 ± 162 points versus 805 ± 73 points, p = 0.791). Conclusion Pretraining in cataract surgery did not demonstrate any measurable effect on vitreoretinal procedural performance. The results of this study indicate that we should not anticipate extensive transfer of surgical skills when planning training programmes in intraocular surgery.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/aos.13434
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1884169035</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1973998467</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-20925b13802b215d1ff6bab29763f76a0b3139350985254b86beadaed04df6db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E9PwyAYBnBiNG5OD34BQ-JFD92gFNqezLL4Z8kSD2rijUCh2knHhDZmnvwIfkY_iczOHUzkwnv45YH3AeAYoyEOZySsH2KSkGQH9HFKaURSlu1uZ_rYAwfezxFimLFkH_TijKSYsLQP1NTD5lk7DatFo93Xx-fS2UKr1gkDGycWvtQO2hL6l8oYH9QaOmGL1ggHfeuetFtdwDEMVtm6etcKFjYQa0wYG1cJcwj2SmG8PtrcA_BwdXk_uYlmt9fTyXgWFSTLkihGeUwlJhmKZYypwmXJpJBxnjJSpkwgSTDJCUV5RmOayIxJLZTQCiWqZEqSATjrcsMOr632Da8rX2hjxELb1nMcXsEsR4QGevqHzm3rFuF3HOcpyfMsYWlQ550qnPXe6ZIvXVULt-IY8XX1PFTPf6oP9mST2Mpaq6387TqAUQfeKqNX_yfx8e1dF_kNqc-Osw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1973998467</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is there inter‐procedural transfer of skills in intraocular surgery? A randomized controlled trial</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Thomsen, Ann Sofia Skou ; Kiilgaard, Jens Folke ; Cour, Morten ; Brydges, Ryan ; Konge, Lars</creator><creatorcontrib>Thomsen, Ann Sofia Skou ; Kiilgaard, Jens Folke ; Cour, Morten ; Brydges, Ryan ; Konge, Lars</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To investigate how experience in simulated cataract surgery impacts and transfers to the learning curves for novices in vitreoretinal surgery. Methods Twelve ophthalmology residents without previous experience in intraocular surgery were randomized to (1) intensive training in cataract surgery on a virtual‐reality simulator until passing a test with predefined validity evidence (cataract trainees) or to (2) no cataract surgery training (novices). Possible skill transfer was assessed using a test consisting of all 11 vitreoretinal modules on the EyeSi virtual‐reality simulator. All participants repeated the test of vitreoretinal surgical skills until their performance curve plateaued. Three experienced vitreoretinal surgeons also performed the test to establish validity evidence. Analysis with independent samples t‐tests was performed. Results The vitreoretinal test on the EyeSi simulator demonstrated evidence of validity, given statistically significant differences in mean test scores for the first repetition; experienced surgeons scored higher than novices (p = 0.023) and cataract trainees (p = 0.003). Internal consistency for the 11 modules of the test was acceptable (Cronbach's α = 0.73). Our findings did not indicate a transfer effect with no significant differences found between cataract trainees and novices in their starting scores (mean ± SD 381 ± 129 points versus 455 ± 82 points, p = 0.262), time to reach maximum performance level (10.7 ± 3.0 hr versus 8.7 ± 2.8 hr, p = 0.265), or maximum scores (785 ± 162 points versus 805 ± 73 points, p = 0.791). Conclusion Pretraining in cataract surgery did not demonstrate any measurable effect on vitreoretinal procedural performance. The results of this study indicate that we should not anticipate extensive transfer of surgical skills when planning training programmes in intraocular surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1755-375X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1755-3768</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/aos.13434</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28371367</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>assessment/formative feedback ; cataract surgery ; Cataracts ; Eye surgery ; Medical personnel ; Ophthalmology ; Randomization ; simulation‐based training ; Skills ; Statistical analysis ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; vitreoretinal surgery</subject><ispartof>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England), 2017-12, Vol.95 (8), p.845-851</ispartof><rights>2017 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2017 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-20925b13802b215d1ff6bab29763f76a0b3139350985254b86beadaed04df6db3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-20925b13802b215d1ff6bab29763f76a0b3139350985254b86beadaed04df6db3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4249-581X ; 0000-0003-1054-1460</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Faos.13434$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Faos.13434$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28371367$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thomsen, Ann Sofia Skou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiilgaard, Jens Folke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cour, Morten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brydges, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konge, Lars</creatorcontrib><title>Is there inter‐procedural transfer of skills in intraocular surgery? A randomized controlled trial</title><title>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)</title><addtitle>Acta Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Purpose To investigate how experience in simulated cataract surgery impacts and transfers to the learning curves for novices in vitreoretinal surgery. Methods Twelve ophthalmology residents without previous experience in intraocular surgery were randomized to (1) intensive training in cataract surgery on a virtual‐reality simulator until passing a test with predefined validity evidence (cataract trainees) or to (2) no cataract surgery training (novices). Possible skill transfer was assessed using a test consisting of all 11 vitreoretinal modules on the EyeSi virtual‐reality simulator. All participants repeated the test of vitreoretinal surgical skills until their performance curve plateaued. Three experienced vitreoretinal surgeons also performed the test to establish validity evidence. Analysis with independent samples t‐tests was performed. Results The vitreoretinal test on the EyeSi simulator demonstrated evidence of validity, given statistically significant differences in mean test scores for the first repetition; experienced surgeons scored higher than novices (p = 0.023) and cataract trainees (p = 0.003). Internal consistency for the 11 modules of the test was acceptable (Cronbach's α = 0.73). Our findings did not indicate a transfer effect with no significant differences found between cataract trainees and novices in their starting scores (mean ± SD 381 ± 129 points versus 455 ± 82 points, p = 0.262), time to reach maximum performance level (10.7 ± 3.0 hr versus 8.7 ± 2.8 hr, p = 0.265), or maximum scores (785 ± 162 points versus 805 ± 73 points, p = 0.791). Conclusion Pretraining in cataract surgery did not demonstrate any measurable effect on vitreoretinal procedural performance. The results of this study indicate that we should not anticipate extensive transfer of surgical skills when planning training programmes in intraocular surgery.</description><subject>assessment/formative feedback</subject><subject>cataract surgery</subject><subject>Cataracts</subject><subject>Eye surgery</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Randomization</subject><subject>simulation‐based training</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>vitreoretinal surgery</subject><issn>1755-375X</issn><issn>1755-3768</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10E9PwyAYBnBiNG5OD34BQ-JFD92gFNqezLL4Z8kSD2rijUCh2knHhDZmnvwIfkY_iczOHUzkwnv45YH3AeAYoyEOZySsH2KSkGQH9HFKaURSlu1uZ_rYAwfezxFimLFkH_TijKSYsLQP1NTD5lk7DatFo93Xx-fS2UKr1gkDGycWvtQO2hL6l8oYH9QaOmGL1ggHfeuetFtdwDEMVtm6etcKFjYQa0wYG1cJcwj2SmG8PtrcA_BwdXk_uYlmt9fTyXgWFSTLkihGeUwlJhmKZYypwmXJpJBxnjJSpkwgSTDJCUV5RmOayIxJLZTQCiWqZEqSATjrcsMOr632Da8rX2hjxELb1nMcXsEsR4QGevqHzm3rFuF3HOcpyfMsYWlQ550qnPXe6ZIvXVULt-IY8XX1PFTPf6oP9mST2Mpaq6387TqAUQfeKqNX_yfx8e1dF_kNqc-Osw</recordid><startdate>201712</startdate><enddate>201712</enddate><creator>Thomsen, Ann Sofia Skou</creator><creator>Kiilgaard, Jens Folke</creator><creator>Cour, Morten</creator><creator>Brydges, Ryan</creator><creator>Konge, Lars</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4249-581X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1054-1460</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201712</creationdate><title>Is there inter‐procedural transfer of skills in intraocular surgery? A randomized controlled trial</title><author>Thomsen, Ann Sofia Skou ; Kiilgaard, Jens Folke ; Cour, Morten ; Brydges, Ryan ; Konge, Lars</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-20925b13802b215d1ff6bab29763f76a0b3139350985254b86beadaed04df6db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>assessment/formative feedback</topic><topic>cataract surgery</topic><topic>Cataracts</topic><topic>Eye surgery</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Randomization</topic><topic>simulation‐based training</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>vitreoretinal surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thomsen, Ann Sofia Skou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiilgaard, Jens Folke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cour, Morten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brydges, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konge, Lars</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thomsen, Ann Sofia Skou</au><au>Kiilgaard, Jens Folke</au><au>Cour, Morten</au><au>Brydges, Ryan</au><au>Konge, Lars</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is there inter‐procedural transfer of skills in intraocular surgery? A randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2017-12</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>845</spage><epage>851</epage><pages>845-851</pages><issn>1755-375X</issn><eissn>1755-3768</eissn><abstract>Purpose To investigate how experience in simulated cataract surgery impacts and transfers to the learning curves for novices in vitreoretinal surgery. Methods Twelve ophthalmology residents without previous experience in intraocular surgery were randomized to (1) intensive training in cataract surgery on a virtual‐reality simulator until passing a test with predefined validity evidence (cataract trainees) or to (2) no cataract surgery training (novices). Possible skill transfer was assessed using a test consisting of all 11 vitreoretinal modules on the EyeSi virtual‐reality simulator. All participants repeated the test of vitreoretinal surgical skills until their performance curve plateaued. Three experienced vitreoretinal surgeons also performed the test to establish validity evidence. Analysis with independent samples t‐tests was performed. Results The vitreoretinal test on the EyeSi simulator demonstrated evidence of validity, given statistically significant differences in mean test scores for the first repetition; experienced surgeons scored higher than novices (p = 0.023) and cataract trainees (p = 0.003). Internal consistency for the 11 modules of the test was acceptable (Cronbach's α = 0.73). Our findings did not indicate a transfer effect with no significant differences found between cataract trainees and novices in their starting scores (mean ± SD 381 ± 129 points versus 455 ± 82 points, p = 0.262), time to reach maximum performance level (10.7 ± 3.0 hr versus 8.7 ± 2.8 hr, p = 0.265), or maximum scores (785 ± 162 points versus 805 ± 73 points, p = 0.791). Conclusion Pretraining in cataract surgery did not demonstrate any measurable effect on vitreoretinal procedural performance. The results of this study indicate that we should not anticipate extensive transfer of surgical skills when planning training programmes in intraocular surgery.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28371367</pmid><doi>10.1111/aos.13434</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4249-581X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1054-1460</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1755-375X
ispartof Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England), 2017-12, Vol.95 (8), p.845-851
issn 1755-375X
1755-3768
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1884169035
source Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)
subjects assessment/formative feedback
cataract surgery
Cataracts
Eye surgery
Medical personnel
Ophthalmology
Randomization
simulation‐based training
Skills
Statistical analysis
Surgeons
Surgery
vitreoretinal surgery
title Is there inter‐procedural transfer of skills in intraocular surgery? A randomized controlled trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T20%3A50%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20there%20inter%E2%80%90procedural%20transfer%20of%20skills%20in%20intraocular%20surgery?%20A%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=Acta%20ophthalmologica%20(Oxford,%20England)&rft.au=Thomsen,%20Ann%20Sofia%20Skou&rft.date=2017-12&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=845&rft.epage=851&rft.pages=845-851&rft.issn=1755-375X&rft.eissn=1755-3768&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/aos.13434&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1973998467%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1973998467&rft_id=info:pmid/28371367&rfr_iscdi=true