Cochlear Implantation in Inner Ear Malformations: Systematic Review of Speech Perception Outcomes and Intraoperative Findings

Objective (1) To analyze reported speech perception outcomes in patients with inner ear malformations who undergo cochlear implantation, (2) to review the surgical complications and findings, and (3) to compare the 2 classification systems of Jackler and Sennaroglu. Data Sources PubMed, Scopus (incl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery 2017-05, Vol.156 (5), p.783-793
Hauptverfasser: Farhood, Zachary, Nguyen, Shaun A., Miller, Stephen C., Holcomb, Meredith A., Meyer, Ted A., Rizk, and Habib G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 793
container_issue 5
container_start_page 783
container_title Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery
container_volume 156
creator Farhood, Zachary
Nguyen, Shaun A.
Miller, Stephen C.
Holcomb, Meredith A.
Meyer, Ted A.
Rizk, and Habib G.
description Objective (1) To analyze reported speech perception outcomes in patients with inner ear malformations who undergo cochlear implantation, (2) to review the surgical complications and findings, and (3) to compare the 2 classification systems of Jackler and Sennaroglu. Data Sources PubMed, Scopus (including Embase), Medline, and CINAHL Plus. Review Methods Fifty-nine articles were included that contained speech perception and/or intraoperative data. Cases were differentiated depending on whether the Jackler or Sennaroglu malformation classification was used. A meta-analysis of proportions examined incidences of complete insertion, gusher, and facial nerve aberrancy. For speech perception data, weighted means and standard deviations were calculated for all malformations for short-, medium-, and long-term follow-up. Speech tests were grouped into 3 categories—closed-set words, open-set words, and open-set sentences—and then compared through a comparison-of-means t test. Results Complete insertion was seen in 81.8% of all inner ear malformations (95% CI: 72.6-89.5); gusher was reported in 39.1% of cases (95% CI: 30.3-48.2); and facial nerve anomalies were encountered in 34.4% (95% CI: 20.1-50.3). Significant improvements in average performance were seen for closed- and open-set tests across all malformation types at 12 months postoperatively. Conclusions Cochlear implantation outcomes are favorable for those with inner ear malformations from a surgical and speech outcome standpoint. Accurate classification of anatomic malformations, as well as standardization of postimplantation speech outcomes, is necessary to improve understanding of the impact of implantation in this difficult patient population.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0194599817696502
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1884168692</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0194599817696502</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1884168692</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4522-9706dddcf6ba8b0dffa596eb4928c4f363549575b46d358b94ed957d2951378b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1v1DAQxS1ERZfCnRPykUvATvzJDVZdulLbRRTOkWNP2lSJHeyk1R7433G6hQMS6mk08977yX4IvaHkPaVSfiBUM661olJowUn5DK0o0bIQ-fIcrRa5WPRj9DKlW0KIEFK-QMelqiQTpVihX-tgb3owEW-HsTd-MlMXPO483noPEZ9m5cL0bYjDg5I-4qt9mmDZLP4Gdx3c49DiqxHA3uCvEC2MD4jdPNkwQMLGuwybogkjxBy7A7zpvOv8dXqFjlrTJ3j9OE_Qj83p9_VZcb77sl1_Oi8s42VZaEmEc862ojGqIa5tDdcCGqZLZVlbiYozzSVvmHAVV41m4PLuSs1pJVVTnaB3B-4Yw88Z0lQPXbLQ5w9DmFNNlWJUKKHLbCUHq40hpQhtPcZuMHFfU1Ivpdf_lp4jbx_pczOA-xv403I2qIPhvuth_ySw3p1dft4QRauFXRyiyVxDfRvm6HNR_3_Lb7qYmv8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1884168692</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cochlear Implantation in Inner Ear Malformations: Systematic Review of Speech Perception Outcomes and Intraoperative Findings</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Farhood, Zachary ; Nguyen, Shaun A. ; Miller, Stephen C. ; Holcomb, Meredith A. ; Meyer, Ted A. ; Rizk, and Habib G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Farhood, Zachary ; Nguyen, Shaun A. ; Miller, Stephen C. ; Holcomb, Meredith A. ; Meyer, Ted A. ; Rizk, and Habib G.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective (1) To analyze reported speech perception outcomes in patients with inner ear malformations who undergo cochlear implantation, (2) to review the surgical complications and findings, and (3) to compare the 2 classification systems of Jackler and Sennaroglu. Data Sources PubMed, Scopus (including Embase), Medline, and CINAHL Plus. Review Methods Fifty-nine articles were included that contained speech perception and/or intraoperative data. Cases were differentiated depending on whether the Jackler or Sennaroglu malformation classification was used. A meta-analysis of proportions examined incidences of complete insertion, gusher, and facial nerve aberrancy. For speech perception data, weighted means and standard deviations were calculated for all malformations for short-, medium-, and long-term follow-up. Speech tests were grouped into 3 categories—closed-set words, open-set words, and open-set sentences—and then compared through a comparison-of-means t test. Results Complete insertion was seen in 81.8% of all inner ear malformations (95% CI: 72.6-89.5); gusher was reported in 39.1% of cases (95% CI: 30.3-48.2); and facial nerve anomalies were encountered in 34.4% (95% CI: 20.1-50.3). Significant improvements in average performance were seen for closed- and open-set tests across all malformation types at 12 months postoperatively. Conclusions Cochlear implantation outcomes are favorable for those with inner ear malformations from a surgical and speech outcome standpoint. Accurate classification of anatomic malformations, as well as standardization of postimplantation speech outcomes, is necessary to improve understanding of the impact of implantation in this difficult patient population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0194-5998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0194599817696502</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28374626</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Child, Preschool ; Cochlea - surgery ; cochlear implantation ; Cochlear Implantation - adverse effects ; Cochlear Implantation - methods ; Cochlear Implants ; cochleovestibular dysplasia ; Congenital Abnormalities - diagnosis ; Congenital Abnormalities - surgery ; Ear, Inner - abnormalities ; Ear, Inner - surgery ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Infant ; inner ear malformations ; Intraoperative Complications - physiopathology ; Intraoperative Complications - surgery ; Male ; Risk Assessment ; speech perception ; Speech Perception - physiology ; Speech Production Measurement ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, 2017-05, Vol.156 (5), p.783-793</ispartof><rights>American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2017</rights><rights>2017 American Association of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery Foundation (AAO‐HNSF)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4522-9706dddcf6ba8b0dffa596eb4928c4f363549575b46d358b94ed957d2951378b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4522-9706dddcf6ba8b0dffa596eb4928c4f363549575b46d358b94ed957d2951378b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0194599817696502$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0194599817696502$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,776,780,788,1411,21798,27899,27901,27902,43597,43598,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28374626$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Farhood, Zachary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Shaun A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Stephen C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holcomb, Meredith A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Ted A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rizk, and Habib G.</creatorcontrib><title>Cochlear Implantation in Inner Ear Malformations: Systematic Review of Speech Perception Outcomes and Intraoperative Findings</title><title>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</title><addtitle>Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg</addtitle><description>Objective (1) To analyze reported speech perception outcomes in patients with inner ear malformations who undergo cochlear implantation, (2) to review the surgical complications and findings, and (3) to compare the 2 classification systems of Jackler and Sennaroglu. Data Sources PubMed, Scopus (including Embase), Medline, and CINAHL Plus. Review Methods Fifty-nine articles were included that contained speech perception and/or intraoperative data. Cases were differentiated depending on whether the Jackler or Sennaroglu malformation classification was used. A meta-analysis of proportions examined incidences of complete insertion, gusher, and facial nerve aberrancy. For speech perception data, weighted means and standard deviations were calculated for all malformations for short-, medium-, and long-term follow-up. Speech tests were grouped into 3 categories—closed-set words, open-set words, and open-set sentences—and then compared through a comparison-of-means t test. Results Complete insertion was seen in 81.8% of all inner ear malformations (95% CI: 72.6-89.5); gusher was reported in 39.1% of cases (95% CI: 30.3-48.2); and facial nerve anomalies were encountered in 34.4% (95% CI: 20.1-50.3). Significant improvements in average performance were seen for closed- and open-set tests across all malformation types at 12 months postoperatively. Conclusions Cochlear implantation outcomes are favorable for those with inner ear malformations from a surgical and speech outcome standpoint. Accurate classification of anatomic malformations, as well as standardization of postimplantation speech outcomes, is necessary to improve understanding of the impact of implantation in this difficult patient population.</description><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Cochlea - surgery</subject><subject>cochlear implantation</subject><subject>Cochlear Implantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cochlear Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Cochlear Implants</subject><subject>cochleovestibular dysplasia</subject><subject>Congenital Abnormalities - diagnosis</subject><subject>Congenital Abnormalities - surgery</subject><subject>Ear, Inner - abnormalities</subject><subject>Ear, Inner - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>inner ear malformations</subject><subject>Intraoperative Complications - physiopathology</subject><subject>Intraoperative Complications - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>speech perception</subject><subject>Speech Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Speech Production Measurement</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0194-5998</issn><issn>1097-6817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1v1DAQxS1ERZfCnRPykUvATvzJDVZdulLbRRTOkWNP2lSJHeyk1R7433G6hQMS6mk08977yX4IvaHkPaVSfiBUM661olJowUn5DK0o0bIQ-fIcrRa5WPRj9DKlW0KIEFK-QMelqiQTpVihX-tgb3owEW-HsTd-MlMXPO483noPEZ9m5cL0bYjDg5I-4qt9mmDZLP4Gdx3c49DiqxHA3uCvEC2MD4jdPNkwQMLGuwybogkjxBy7A7zpvOv8dXqFjlrTJ3j9OE_Qj83p9_VZcb77sl1_Oi8s42VZaEmEc862ojGqIa5tDdcCGqZLZVlbiYozzSVvmHAVV41m4PLuSs1pJVVTnaB3B-4Yw88Z0lQPXbLQ5w9DmFNNlWJUKKHLbCUHq40hpQhtPcZuMHFfU1Ivpdf_lp4jbx_pczOA-xv403I2qIPhvuth_ySw3p1dft4QRauFXRyiyVxDfRvm6HNR_3_Lb7qYmv8</recordid><startdate>201705</startdate><enddate>201705</enddate><creator>Farhood, Zachary</creator><creator>Nguyen, Shaun A.</creator><creator>Miller, Stephen C.</creator><creator>Holcomb, Meredith A.</creator><creator>Meyer, Ted A.</creator><creator>Rizk, and Habib G.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201705</creationdate><title>Cochlear Implantation in Inner Ear Malformations: Systematic Review of Speech Perception Outcomes and Intraoperative Findings</title><author>Farhood, Zachary ; Nguyen, Shaun A. ; Miller, Stephen C. ; Holcomb, Meredith A. ; Meyer, Ted A. ; Rizk, and Habib G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4522-9706dddcf6ba8b0dffa596eb4928c4f363549575b46d358b94ed957d2951378b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Cochlea - surgery</topic><topic>cochlear implantation</topic><topic>Cochlear Implantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cochlear Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Cochlear Implants</topic><topic>cochleovestibular dysplasia</topic><topic>Congenital Abnormalities - diagnosis</topic><topic>Congenital Abnormalities - surgery</topic><topic>Ear, Inner - abnormalities</topic><topic>Ear, Inner - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>inner ear malformations</topic><topic>Intraoperative Complications - physiopathology</topic><topic>Intraoperative Complications - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>speech perception</topic><topic>Speech Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Speech Production Measurement</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Farhood, Zachary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Shaun A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Stephen C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holcomb, Meredith A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Ted A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rizk, and Habib G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Farhood, Zachary</au><au>Nguyen, Shaun A.</au><au>Miller, Stephen C.</au><au>Holcomb, Meredith A.</au><au>Meyer, Ted A.</au><au>Rizk, and Habib G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cochlear Implantation in Inner Ear Malformations: Systematic Review of Speech Perception Outcomes and Intraoperative Findings</atitle><jtitle>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg</addtitle><date>2017-05</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>156</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>783</spage><epage>793</epage><pages>783-793</pages><issn>0194-5998</issn><eissn>1097-6817</eissn><abstract>Objective (1) To analyze reported speech perception outcomes in patients with inner ear malformations who undergo cochlear implantation, (2) to review the surgical complications and findings, and (3) to compare the 2 classification systems of Jackler and Sennaroglu. Data Sources PubMed, Scopus (including Embase), Medline, and CINAHL Plus. Review Methods Fifty-nine articles were included that contained speech perception and/or intraoperative data. Cases were differentiated depending on whether the Jackler or Sennaroglu malformation classification was used. A meta-analysis of proportions examined incidences of complete insertion, gusher, and facial nerve aberrancy. For speech perception data, weighted means and standard deviations were calculated for all malformations for short-, medium-, and long-term follow-up. Speech tests were grouped into 3 categories—closed-set words, open-set words, and open-set sentences—and then compared through a comparison-of-means t test. Results Complete insertion was seen in 81.8% of all inner ear malformations (95% CI: 72.6-89.5); gusher was reported in 39.1% of cases (95% CI: 30.3-48.2); and facial nerve anomalies were encountered in 34.4% (95% CI: 20.1-50.3). Significant improvements in average performance were seen for closed- and open-set tests across all malformation types at 12 months postoperatively. Conclusions Cochlear implantation outcomes are favorable for those with inner ear malformations from a surgical and speech outcome standpoint. Accurate classification of anatomic malformations, as well as standardization of postimplantation speech outcomes, is necessary to improve understanding of the impact of implantation in this difficult patient population.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>28374626</pmid><doi>10.1177/0194599817696502</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0194-5998
ispartof Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, 2017-05, Vol.156 (5), p.783-793
issn 0194-5998
1097-6817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1884168692
source SAGE Complete A-Z List; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Child, Preschool
Cochlea - surgery
cochlear implantation
Cochlear Implantation - adverse effects
Cochlear Implantation - methods
Cochlear Implants
cochleovestibular dysplasia
Congenital Abnormalities - diagnosis
Congenital Abnormalities - surgery
Ear, Inner - abnormalities
Ear, Inner - surgery
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Infant
inner ear malformations
Intraoperative Complications - physiopathology
Intraoperative Complications - surgery
Male
Risk Assessment
speech perception
Speech Perception - physiology
Speech Production Measurement
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
title Cochlear Implantation in Inner Ear Malformations: Systematic Review of Speech Perception Outcomes and Intraoperative Findings
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T20%3A16%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cochlear%20Implantation%20in%20Inner%20Ear%20Malformations:%20Systematic%20Review%20of%20Speech%20Perception%20Outcomes%20and%20Intraoperative%20Findings&rft.jtitle=Otolaryngology-head%20and%20neck%20surgery&rft.au=Farhood,%20Zachary&rft.date=2017-05&rft.volume=156&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=783&rft.epage=793&rft.pages=783-793&rft.issn=0194-5998&rft.eissn=1097-6817&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0194599817696502&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1884168692%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1884168692&rft_id=info:pmid/28374626&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0194599817696502&rfr_iscdi=true