Integrating count and detection—nondetection data to model population dynamics
There is increasing need for methods that integrate multiple data types into a single analytical framework as the spatial and temporal scale of ecological research expands. Current work on this topic primarily focuses on combining capture–recapture data from marked individuals with other data types...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecology (Durham) 2017-06, Vol.98 (6), p.1640-1650 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1650 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1640 |
container_title | Ecology (Durham) |
container_volume | 98 |
creator | Zipkin, Elise F. Rossman, Sam Yackulic, Charles B. Wiens, J. David Thorson, James T. Davis, Raymond J. Gran, Evan H. Campbell |
description | There is increasing need for methods that integrate multiple data types into a single analytical framework as the spatial and temporal scale of ecological research expands. Current work on this topic primarily focuses on combining capture–recapture data from marked individuals with other data types into integrated population models. Yet, studies of species distributions and trends often rely on data from unmarked individuals across broad scales where local abundance and environmental variables may vary. We present a modeling framework for integrating detection–nondetection and count data into a single analysis to estimate population dynamics, abundance, and individual detection probabilities during sampling. Our dynamic population model assumes that site-specific abundance can change over time according to survival of individuals and gains through reproduction and immigration. The observation process for each data type is modeled by assuming that every individual present at a site has an equal probability of being detected during sampling processes. We examine our modeling approach through a series of simulations illustrating the relative value of count vs. detection-nondetection data under a variety of parameter values and survey configurations. We also provide an empirical example of the model by combining long-term detection-nondetection data (1995–2014) with newly collected count data (2015–2016) from a growing population of Barred Owl (Strix varia) in the Pacific Northwest to examine the factors influencing population abundance over time. Our model provides a foundation for incorporating unmarked data within a single framework, even in cases where sampling processes yield different detection probabilities. This approach will be useful for survey design and to researchers interested in incorporating historical or citizen science data into analyses focused on understanding how demographic rates drive population abundance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ecy.1831 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1884166187</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26164813</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26164813</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4371-8f075b95b4aac96a37184ad2f5724da05e0bc70ce731bd16e45179299287081f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KxDAQx4Mo7roKvoBS8OKla6ZJ83GUZf0AQQ968BTSNJUubbI2KbI3H8In9Ems7LqC4FyGmfnxY_gjdAx4ChhnF9aspiAI7KAxSCJTCRzvojHGkKWS5WKEDkJY4KGAin00ygRhkvN8jB5uXbQvnY61e0mM711MtCuT0kZrYu3d5_uH8247JqWOOok-aX1pm2Tpl32j14eV021twiHaq3QT7NGmT9DT1fxxdpPe3V_fzi7vUkMJh1RUmOeFzAuqtZFMDztBdZlVOc9oqXFucWE4NpYTKEpglubAZSZlJjgWUJEJOl97l51_7W2Iqq2DsU2jnfV9UCAEBcZA8AE9-4MufN-54TsFEhMqGZbyV2g6H0JnK7Xs6lZ3KwVYfaeshpTVd8oDeroR9kVryy34E-sApGvgrW7s6l-Rms-eN8KTNb8I0Xe_PgaMCiDkCxy0j6k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1903496099</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integrating count and detection—nondetection data to model population dynamics</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Zipkin, Elise F. ; Rossman, Sam ; Yackulic, Charles B. ; Wiens, J. David ; Thorson, James T. ; Davis, Raymond J. ; Gran, Evan H. Campbell</creator><creatorcontrib>Zipkin, Elise F. ; Rossman, Sam ; Yackulic, Charles B. ; Wiens, J. David ; Thorson, James T. ; Davis, Raymond J. ; Gran, Evan H. Campbell</creatorcontrib><description>There is increasing need for methods that integrate multiple data types into a single analytical framework as the spatial and temporal scale of ecological research expands. Current work on this topic primarily focuses on combining capture–recapture data from marked individuals with other data types into integrated population models. Yet, studies of species distributions and trends often rely on data from unmarked individuals across broad scales where local abundance and environmental variables may vary. We present a modeling framework for integrating detection–nondetection and count data into a single analysis to estimate population dynamics, abundance, and individual detection probabilities during sampling. Our dynamic population model assumes that site-specific abundance can change over time according to survival of individuals and gains through reproduction and immigration. The observation process for each data type is modeled by assuming that every individual present at a site has an equal probability of being detected during sampling processes. We examine our modeling approach through a series of simulations illustrating the relative value of count vs. detection-nondetection data under a variety of parameter values and survey configurations. We also provide an empirical example of the model by combining long-term detection-nondetection data (1995–2014) with newly collected count data (2015–2016) from a growing population of Barred Owl (Strix varia) in the Pacific Northwest to examine the factors influencing population abundance over time. Our model provides a foundation for incorporating unmarked data within a single framework, even in cases where sampling processes yield different detection probabilities. This approach will be useful for survey design and to researchers interested in incorporating historical or citizen science data into analyses focused on understanding how demographic rates drive population abundance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ecy.1831</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28369775</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Animal populations ; Animals ; Capture-recapture studies ; Computer simulation ; Dail‐Madsen model ; Data analysis ; Data models ; Data types ; Demographics ; Demography ; detection probability ; Ecological distribution ; Ecological modeling ; Ecological monitoring ; Ecological research ; Ecology ; Empirical analysis ; integrated population model ; Metapopulation ecology ; Models, Theoretical ; Northwestern United States ; N‐mixture model ; occupancy ; Owls ; Population Dynamics ; Population ecology ; Population estimates ; Sampling ; Simulations ; Strigiformes ; Strix varia ; unmarked data ; Wildlife ecology</subject><ispartof>Ecology (Durham), 2017-06, Vol.98 (6), p.1640-1650</ispartof><rights>2017 The Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2017 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2017 by the Ecological Society of America.</rights><rights>2017 Ecological Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4371-8f075b95b4aac96a37184ad2f5724da05e0bc70ce731bd16e45179299287081f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4371-8f075b95b4aac96a37184ad2f5724da05e0bc70ce731bd16e45179299287081f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26164813$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26164813$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28369775$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zipkin, Elise F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossman, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yackulic, Charles B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiens, J. David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorson, James T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Raymond J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gran, Evan H. Campbell</creatorcontrib><title>Integrating count and detection—nondetection data to model population dynamics</title><title>Ecology (Durham)</title><addtitle>Ecology</addtitle><description>There is increasing need for methods that integrate multiple data types into a single analytical framework as the spatial and temporal scale of ecological research expands. Current work on this topic primarily focuses on combining capture–recapture data from marked individuals with other data types into integrated population models. Yet, studies of species distributions and trends often rely on data from unmarked individuals across broad scales where local abundance and environmental variables may vary. We present a modeling framework for integrating detection–nondetection and count data into a single analysis to estimate population dynamics, abundance, and individual detection probabilities during sampling. Our dynamic population model assumes that site-specific abundance can change over time according to survival of individuals and gains through reproduction and immigration. The observation process for each data type is modeled by assuming that every individual present at a site has an equal probability of being detected during sampling processes. We examine our modeling approach through a series of simulations illustrating the relative value of count vs. detection-nondetection data under a variety of parameter values and survey configurations. We also provide an empirical example of the model by combining long-term detection-nondetection data (1995–2014) with newly collected count data (2015–2016) from a growing population of Barred Owl (Strix varia) in the Pacific Northwest to examine the factors influencing population abundance over time. Our model provides a foundation for incorporating unmarked data within a single framework, even in cases where sampling processes yield different detection probabilities. This approach will be useful for survey design and to researchers interested in incorporating historical or citizen science data into analyses focused on understanding how demographic rates drive population abundance.</description><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Capture-recapture studies</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Dail‐Madsen model</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Data models</subject><subject>Data types</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>detection probability</subject><subject>Ecological distribution</subject><subject>Ecological modeling</subject><subject>Ecological monitoring</subject><subject>Ecological research</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>integrated population model</subject><subject>Metapopulation ecology</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Northwestern United States</subject><subject>N‐mixture model</subject><subject>occupancy</subject><subject>Owls</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Population ecology</subject><subject>Population estimates</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Simulations</subject><subject>Strigiformes</subject><subject>Strix varia</subject><subject>unmarked data</subject><subject>Wildlife ecology</subject><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1KxDAQx4Mo7roKvoBS8OKla6ZJ83GUZf0AQQ968BTSNJUubbI2KbI3H8In9Ems7LqC4FyGmfnxY_gjdAx4ChhnF9aspiAI7KAxSCJTCRzvojHGkKWS5WKEDkJY4KGAin00ygRhkvN8jB5uXbQvnY61e0mM711MtCuT0kZrYu3d5_uH8247JqWOOok-aX1pm2Tpl32j14eV021twiHaq3QT7NGmT9DT1fxxdpPe3V_fzi7vUkMJh1RUmOeFzAuqtZFMDztBdZlVOc9oqXFucWE4NpYTKEpglubAZSZlJjgWUJEJOl97l51_7W2Iqq2DsU2jnfV9UCAEBcZA8AE9-4MufN-54TsFEhMqGZbyV2g6H0JnK7Xs6lZ3KwVYfaeshpTVd8oDeroR9kVryy34E-sApGvgrW7s6l-Rms-eN8KTNb8I0Xe_PgaMCiDkCxy0j6k</recordid><startdate>201706</startdate><enddate>201706</enddate><creator>Zipkin, Elise F.</creator><creator>Rossman, Sam</creator><creator>Yackulic, Charles B.</creator><creator>Wiens, J. David</creator><creator>Thorson, James T.</creator><creator>Davis, Raymond J.</creator><creator>Gran, Evan H. Campbell</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201706</creationdate><title>Integrating count and detection—nondetection data to model population dynamics</title><author>Zipkin, Elise F. ; Rossman, Sam ; Yackulic, Charles B. ; Wiens, J. David ; Thorson, James T. ; Davis, Raymond J. ; Gran, Evan H. Campbell</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4371-8f075b95b4aac96a37184ad2f5724da05e0bc70ce731bd16e45179299287081f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Capture-recapture studies</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Dail‐Madsen model</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Data models</topic><topic>Data types</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>detection probability</topic><topic>Ecological distribution</topic><topic>Ecological modeling</topic><topic>Ecological monitoring</topic><topic>Ecological research</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>integrated population model</topic><topic>Metapopulation ecology</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Northwestern United States</topic><topic>N‐mixture model</topic><topic>occupancy</topic><topic>Owls</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Population ecology</topic><topic>Population estimates</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Simulations</topic><topic>Strigiformes</topic><topic>Strix varia</topic><topic>unmarked data</topic><topic>Wildlife ecology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zipkin, Elise F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossman, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yackulic, Charles B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiens, J. David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorson, James T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Raymond J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gran, Evan H. Campbell</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zipkin, Elise F.</au><au>Rossman, Sam</au><au>Yackulic, Charles B.</au><au>Wiens, J. David</au><au>Thorson, James T.</au><au>Davis, Raymond J.</au><au>Gran, Evan H. Campbell</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Integrating count and detection—nondetection data to model population dynamics</atitle><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle><addtitle>Ecology</addtitle><date>2017-06</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1640</spage><epage>1650</epage><pages>1640-1650</pages><issn>0012-9658</issn><eissn>1939-9170</eissn><abstract>There is increasing need for methods that integrate multiple data types into a single analytical framework as the spatial and temporal scale of ecological research expands. Current work on this topic primarily focuses on combining capture–recapture data from marked individuals with other data types into integrated population models. Yet, studies of species distributions and trends often rely on data from unmarked individuals across broad scales where local abundance and environmental variables may vary. We present a modeling framework for integrating detection–nondetection and count data into a single analysis to estimate population dynamics, abundance, and individual detection probabilities during sampling. Our dynamic population model assumes that site-specific abundance can change over time according to survival of individuals and gains through reproduction and immigration. The observation process for each data type is modeled by assuming that every individual present at a site has an equal probability of being detected during sampling processes. We examine our modeling approach through a series of simulations illustrating the relative value of count vs. detection-nondetection data under a variety of parameter values and survey configurations. We also provide an empirical example of the model by combining long-term detection-nondetection data (1995–2014) with newly collected count data (2015–2016) from a growing population of Barred Owl (Strix varia) in the Pacific Northwest to examine the factors influencing population abundance over time. Our model provides a foundation for incorporating unmarked data within a single framework, even in cases where sampling processes yield different detection probabilities. This approach will be useful for survey design and to researchers interested in incorporating historical or citizen science data into analyses focused on understanding how demographic rates drive population abundance.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28369775</pmid><doi>10.1002/ecy.1831</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0012-9658 |
ispartof | Ecology (Durham), 2017-06, Vol.98 (6), p.1640-1650 |
issn | 0012-9658 1939-9170 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1884166187 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Animal populations Animals Capture-recapture studies Computer simulation Dail‐Madsen model Data analysis Data models Data types Demographics Demography detection probability Ecological distribution Ecological modeling Ecological monitoring Ecological research Ecology Empirical analysis integrated population model Metapopulation ecology Models, Theoretical Northwestern United States N‐mixture model occupancy Owls Population Dynamics Population ecology Population estimates Sampling Simulations Strigiformes Strix varia unmarked data Wildlife ecology |
title | Integrating count and detection—nondetection data to model population dynamics |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T07%3A17%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integrating%20count%20and%20detection%E2%80%94nondetection%20data%20to%20model%20population%20dynamics&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20(Durham)&rft.au=Zipkin,%20Elise%20F.&rft.date=2017-06&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1640&rft.epage=1650&rft.pages=1640-1650&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ecy.1831&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26164813%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1903496099&rft_id=info:pmid/28369775&rft_jstor_id=26164813&rfr_iscdi=true |