Colloids in Cardiac Surgery—Friend or Foe?

Objective The right choice of fluid replacement still is a matter of debate. Recently, two large-scale studies on the use of hydroxyethyl starches (HES) in the intensive care setting have been published, which have caused a huge shift in the daily practice of volume therapy. These results have been...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia 2017-10, Vol.31 (5), p.1639-1648
Hauptverfasser: Ryhammer, Pia Katarina, MD, Tang, Mariann, MD, PHD, Hoffmann-Petersen, Joachim, MD, Leonaviciute, Dovile, MD, Greisen, Jacob, MD, PHD, Storebjerg Gissel, Marie, RN, Jakobsen, Carl-Johan, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1648
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1639
container_title Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia
container_volume 31
creator Ryhammer, Pia Katarina, MD
Tang, Mariann, MD, PHD
Hoffmann-Petersen, Joachim, MD
Leonaviciute, Dovile, MD
Greisen, Jacob, MD, PHD
Storebjerg Gissel, Marie, RN
Jakobsen, Carl-Johan, MD
description Objective The right choice of fluid replacement still is a matter of debate. Recently, two large-scale studies on the use of hydroxyethyl starches (HES) in the intensive care setting have been published, which have caused a huge shift in the daily practice of volume therapy. These results have been applied to patients outside intensive care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact this change has had on the outcomes in a large population of cardiac surgery patients, with a focus on the type of colloid infusion. Design A prospective, registered, observational study, using propensity score matching. Setting Cohort study from 3 university hospitals using a common registry. Participants The study comprised 17,742 patients who were referred for cardiac surgery from 2007 to 2014. Interventions Patients were divided in groups according to perioperative fluid replacement with either crystalloids or colloids. The colloid group was further divided into HES or human albumin (HA). Analyses were based on the following 3 subsections: HES versus crystalloids, HA versus crystalloids, and HES versus HA, with use of propensity score matching or direct matching of cases. Primary outcome parameters were 30-day and 6-month mortality, new postoperative renal replacement therapy, and new cardiac ischemic events. Measurements and Main Results The groups were fully comparable in individual analyses. The use of HES had no impact on new dialysis and 30-day mortality. A Cox proportional regression analysis showed that HES had no impact on 6-month mortality and new postoperative ischemic events. When comparing HA with crystalloid use, a significantly increased risk in crude analysis was demonstrated on all outcome parameters; and when comparing HA with HES, a significantly higher risk was observed in HA patients in mortality parameters and new postoperative, but after adjustment, only the risk of new postoperative dialysis persisted. Conclusion This study underlined the difficulties in establishing hardcore outcome data, even in large cohort studies. The findings seemed to diminish the magnitude of risk when using HES in cardiac surgery patients and seriously questioned the choice of HA when a plasma expander is needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.02.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1884163758</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1053077017300514</els_id><sourcerecordid>1884163758</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-765d1f66edb701ab1eaa0e534baed9ca914115a7e30709861fb9f84574913e9b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9q3DAQh0VpaP71BXoIPvZQOxrJsmwoKWXJJoGFHDY9C1kaFzleK5XWgb3lIfqEeZLIbNpDDjnNHL7fD-YbQr4ALYAKft4X_aPRBaMgC8oKSuEDOQLBWV6XjH1Me6JyKiU9JMcx9gkAIeQncshqLlkjxBH5tvDD4J2NmRuzhQ7WaZOtp_Abw-756e8yOBxt5kO29PjjlBx0eoj4-XWekF_Ly7vFdb66vbpZ_FzlpgTY5rISFrqqQttKCroF1Jqi4GWr0TZGN5AwoSVyKmlTV9C1TVeXQpYNcGxafkK-7nsfgv8zYdyqjYsGh0GP6KeooK5LqLgUdULZHjXBxxiwUw_BbXTYKaBqvl_1arakZkuKMpUkpNDZa__UbtD-j_zTkoDvewDTlY8Og4omiTBoXUCzVda79_sv3sTN4EZn9HCPO4y9n8KY_ClQMQXUeu6Z3wSSUyqg5C_Y0Ivh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1884163758</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Colloids in Cardiac Surgery—Friend or Foe?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ryhammer, Pia Katarina, MD ; Tang, Mariann, MD, PHD ; Hoffmann-Petersen, Joachim, MD ; Leonaviciute, Dovile, MD ; Greisen, Jacob, MD, PHD ; Storebjerg Gissel, Marie, RN ; Jakobsen, Carl-Johan, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Ryhammer, Pia Katarina, MD ; Tang, Mariann, MD, PHD ; Hoffmann-Petersen, Joachim, MD ; Leonaviciute, Dovile, MD ; Greisen, Jacob, MD, PHD ; Storebjerg Gissel, Marie, RN ; Jakobsen, Carl-Johan, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Objective The right choice of fluid replacement still is a matter of debate. Recently, two large-scale studies on the use of hydroxyethyl starches (HES) in the intensive care setting have been published, which have caused a huge shift in the daily practice of volume therapy. These results have been applied to patients outside intensive care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact this change has had on the outcomes in a large population of cardiac surgery patients, with a focus on the type of colloid infusion. Design A prospective, registered, observational study, using propensity score matching. Setting Cohort study from 3 university hospitals using a common registry. Participants The study comprised 17,742 patients who were referred for cardiac surgery from 2007 to 2014. Interventions Patients were divided in groups according to perioperative fluid replacement with either crystalloids or colloids. The colloid group was further divided into HES or human albumin (HA). Analyses were based on the following 3 subsections: HES versus crystalloids, HA versus crystalloids, and HES versus HA, with use of propensity score matching or direct matching of cases. Primary outcome parameters were 30-day and 6-month mortality, new postoperative renal replacement therapy, and new cardiac ischemic events. Measurements and Main Results The groups were fully comparable in individual analyses. The use of HES had no impact on new dialysis and 30-day mortality. A Cox proportional regression analysis showed that HES had no impact on 6-month mortality and new postoperative ischemic events. When comparing HA with crystalloid use, a significantly increased risk in crude analysis was demonstrated on all outcome parameters; and when comparing HA with HES, a significantly higher risk was observed in HA patients in mortality parameters and new postoperative, but after adjustment, only the risk of new postoperative dialysis persisted. Conclusion This study underlined the difficulties in establishing hardcore outcome data, even in large cohort studies. The findings seemed to diminish the magnitude of risk when using HES in cardiac surgery patients and seriously questioned the choice of HA when a plasma expander is needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-0770</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.02.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28372955</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Anesthesia &amp; Perioperative Care ; cardiac recovery ; cardiac surgery ; Cardiac Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Cardiac Surgical Procedures - mortality ; Cardiac Surgical Procedures - trends ; Cohort Studies ; Colloids ; Critical Care ; dialysis ; Female ; Fluid Therapy - adverse effects ; Fluid Therapy - methods ; Fluid Therapy - mortality ; Follow-Up Studies ; human albumin ; Humans ; hydroxyethyl starch ; Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives - administration &amp; dosage ; Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives - adverse effects ; ischemic heart disease ; Isotonic Solutions - administration &amp; dosage ; Isotonic Solutions - adverse effects ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Plasma Substitutes - administration &amp; dosage ; Plasma Substitutes - adverse effects ; Prospective Studies ; Registries ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia, 2017-10, Vol.31 (5), p.1639-1648</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2017 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-765d1f66edb701ab1eaa0e534baed9ca914115a7e30709861fb9f84574913e9b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-765d1f66edb701ab1eaa0e534baed9ca914115a7e30709861fb9f84574913e9b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053077017300514$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28372955$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ryhammer, Pia Katarina, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Mariann, MD, PHD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann-Petersen, Joachim, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leonaviciute, Dovile, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greisen, Jacob, MD, PHD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storebjerg Gissel, Marie, RN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jakobsen, Carl-Johan, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Colloids in Cardiac Surgery—Friend or Foe?</title><title>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia</title><addtitle>J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth</addtitle><description>Objective The right choice of fluid replacement still is a matter of debate. Recently, two large-scale studies on the use of hydroxyethyl starches (HES) in the intensive care setting have been published, which have caused a huge shift in the daily practice of volume therapy. These results have been applied to patients outside intensive care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact this change has had on the outcomes in a large population of cardiac surgery patients, with a focus on the type of colloid infusion. Design A prospective, registered, observational study, using propensity score matching. Setting Cohort study from 3 university hospitals using a common registry. Participants The study comprised 17,742 patients who were referred for cardiac surgery from 2007 to 2014. Interventions Patients were divided in groups according to perioperative fluid replacement with either crystalloids or colloids. The colloid group was further divided into HES or human albumin (HA). Analyses were based on the following 3 subsections: HES versus crystalloids, HA versus crystalloids, and HES versus HA, with use of propensity score matching or direct matching of cases. Primary outcome parameters were 30-day and 6-month mortality, new postoperative renal replacement therapy, and new cardiac ischemic events. Measurements and Main Results The groups were fully comparable in individual analyses. The use of HES had no impact on new dialysis and 30-day mortality. A Cox proportional regression analysis showed that HES had no impact on 6-month mortality and new postoperative ischemic events. When comparing HA with crystalloid use, a significantly increased risk in crude analysis was demonstrated on all outcome parameters; and when comparing HA with HES, a significantly higher risk was observed in HA patients in mortality parameters and new postoperative, but after adjustment, only the risk of new postoperative dialysis persisted. Conclusion This study underlined the difficulties in establishing hardcore outcome data, even in large cohort studies. The findings seemed to diminish the magnitude of risk when using HES in cardiac surgery patients and seriously questioned the choice of HA when a plasma expander is needed.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anesthesia &amp; Perioperative Care</subject><subject>cardiac recovery</subject><subject>cardiac surgery</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - mortality</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - trends</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Colloids</subject><subject>Critical Care</subject><subject>dialysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluid Therapy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Fluid Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Fluid Therapy - mortality</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>human albumin</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>hydroxyethyl starch</subject><subject>Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives - adverse effects</subject><subject>ischemic heart disease</subject><subject>Isotonic Solutions - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Isotonic Solutions - adverse effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Plasma Substitutes - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Plasma Substitutes - adverse effects</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>1053-0770</issn><issn>1532-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9q3DAQh0VpaP71BXoIPvZQOxrJsmwoKWXJJoGFHDY9C1kaFzleK5XWgb3lIfqEeZLIbNpDDjnNHL7fD-YbQr4ALYAKft4X_aPRBaMgC8oKSuEDOQLBWV6XjH1Me6JyKiU9JMcx9gkAIeQncshqLlkjxBH5tvDD4J2NmRuzhQ7WaZOtp_Abw-756e8yOBxt5kO29PjjlBx0eoj4-XWekF_Ly7vFdb66vbpZ_FzlpgTY5rISFrqqQttKCroF1Jqi4GWr0TZGN5AwoSVyKmlTV9C1TVeXQpYNcGxafkK-7nsfgv8zYdyqjYsGh0GP6KeooK5LqLgUdULZHjXBxxiwUw_BbXTYKaBqvl_1arakZkuKMpUkpNDZa__UbtD-j_zTkoDvewDTlY8Og4omiTBoXUCzVda79_sv3sTN4EZn9HCPO4y9n8KY_ClQMQXUeu6Z3wSSUyqg5C_Y0Ivh</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>Ryhammer, Pia Katarina, MD</creator><creator>Tang, Mariann, MD, PHD</creator><creator>Hoffmann-Petersen, Joachim, MD</creator><creator>Leonaviciute, Dovile, MD</creator><creator>Greisen, Jacob, MD, PHD</creator><creator>Storebjerg Gissel, Marie, RN</creator><creator>Jakobsen, Carl-Johan, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>Colloids in Cardiac Surgery—Friend or Foe?</title><author>Ryhammer, Pia Katarina, MD ; Tang, Mariann, MD, PHD ; Hoffmann-Petersen, Joachim, MD ; Leonaviciute, Dovile, MD ; Greisen, Jacob, MD, PHD ; Storebjerg Gissel, Marie, RN ; Jakobsen, Carl-Johan, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-765d1f66edb701ab1eaa0e534baed9ca914115a7e30709861fb9f84574913e9b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anesthesia &amp; Perioperative Care</topic><topic>cardiac recovery</topic><topic>cardiac surgery</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - mortality</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - trends</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Colloids</topic><topic>Critical Care</topic><topic>dialysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluid Therapy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Fluid Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Fluid Therapy - mortality</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>human albumin</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>hydroxyethyl starch</topic><topic>Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives - adverse effects</topic><topic>ischemic heart disease</topic><topic>Isotonic Solutions - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Isotonic Solutions - adverse effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Plasma Substitutes - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Plasma Substitutes - adverse effects</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ryhammer, Pia Katarina, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Mariann, MD, PHD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann-Petersen, Joachim, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leonaviciute, Dovile, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greisen, Jacob, MD, PHD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storebjerg Gissel, Marie, RN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jakobsen, Carl-Johan, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ryhammer, Pia Katarina, MD</au><au>Tang, Mariann, MD, PHD</au><au>Hoffmann-Petersen, Joachim, MD</au><au>Leonaviciute, Dovile, MD</au><au>Greisen, Jacob, MD, PHD</au><au>Storebjerg Gissel, Marie, RN</au><au>Jakobsen, Carl-Johan, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Colloids in Cardiac Surgery—Friend or Foe?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth</addtitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1639</spage><epage>1648</epage><pages>1639-1648</pages><issn>1053-0770</issn><eissn>1532-8422</eissn><abstract>Objective The right choice of fluid replacement still is a matter of debate. Recently, two large-scale studies on the use of hydroxyethyl starches (HES) in the intensive care setting have been published, which have caused a huge shift in the daily practice of volume therapy. These results have been applied to patients outside intensive care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact this change has had on the outcomes in a large population of cardiac surgery patients, with a focus on the type of colloid infusion. Design A prospective, registered, observational study, using propensity score matching. Setting Cohort study from 3 university hospitals using a common registry. Participants The study comprised 17,742 patients who were referred for cardiac surgery from 2007 to 2014. Interventions Patients were divided in groups according to perioperative fluid replacement with either crystalloids or colloids. The colloid group was further divided into HES or human albumin (HA). Analyses were based on the following 3 subsections: HES versus crystalloids, HA versus crystalloids, and HES versus HA, with use of propensity score matching or direct matching of cases. Primary outcome parameters were 30-day and 6-month mortality, new postoperative renal replacement therapy, and new cardiac ischemic events. Measurements and Main Results The groups were fully comparable in individual analyses. The use of HES had no impact on new dialysis and 30-day mortality. A Cox proportional regression analysis showed that HES had no impact on 6-month mortality and new postoperative ischemic events. When comparing HA with crystalloid use, a significantly increased risk in crude analysis was demonstrated on all outcome parameters; and when comparing HA with HES, a significantly higher risk was observed in HA patients in mortality parameters and new postoperative, but after adjustment, only the risk of new postoperative dialysis persisted. Conclusion This study underlined the difficulties in establishing hardcore outcome data, even in large cohort studies. The findings seemed to diminish the magnitude of risk when using HES in cardiac surgery patients and seriously questioned the choice of HA when a plasma expander is needed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28372955</pmid><doi>10.1053/j.jvca.2017.02.001</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-0770
ispartof Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia, 2017-10, Vol.31 (5), p.1639-1648
issn 1053-0770
1532-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1884163758
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aged
Anesthesia & Perioperative Care
cardiac recovery
cardiac surgery
Cardiac Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Cardiac Surgical Procedures - mortality
Cardiac Surgical Procedures - trends
Cohort Studies
Colloids
Critical Care
dialysis
Female
Fluid Therapy - adverse effects
Fluid Therapy - methods
Fluid Therapy - mortality
Follow-Up Studies
human albumin
Humans
hydroxyethyl starch
Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives - administration & dosage
Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives - adverse effects
ischemic heart disease
Isotonic Solutions - administration & dosage
Isotonic Solutions - adverse effects
Male
Middle Aged
Plasma Substitutes - administration & dosage
Plasma Substitutes - adverse effects
Prospective Studies
Registries
Retrospective Studies
title Colloids in Cardiac Surgery—Friend or Foe?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T19%3A35%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Colloids%20in%20Cardiac%20Surgery%E2%80%94Friend%20or%20Foe?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cardiothoracic%20and%20vascular%20anesthesia&rft.au=Ryhammer,%20Pia%20Katarina,%20MD&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1639&rft.epage=1648&rft.pages=1639-1648&rft.issn=1053-0770&rft.eissn=1532-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/j.jvca.2017.02.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1884163758%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1884163758&rft_id=info:pmid/28372955&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1053077017300514&rfr_iscdi=true