Colloids in Cardiac Surgery—Friend or Foe?
Objective The right choice of fluid replacement still is a matter of debate. Recently, two large-scale studies on the use of hydroxyethyl starches (HES) in the intensive care setting have been published, which have caused a huge shift in the daily practice of volume therapy. These results have been...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia 2017-10, Vol.31 (5), p.1639-1648 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1648 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1639 |
container_title | Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Ryhammer, Pia Katarina, MD Tang, Mariann, MD, PHD Hoffmann-Petersen, Joachim, MD Leonaviciute, Dovile, MD Greisen, Jacob, MD, PHD Storebjerg Gissel, Marie, RN Jakobsen, Carl-Johan, MD |
description | Objective The right choice of fluid replacement still is a matter of debate. Recently, two large-scale studies on the use of hydroxyethyl starches (HES) in the intensive care setting have been published, which have caused a huge shift in the daily practice of volume therapy. These results have been applied to patients outside intensive care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact this change has had on the outcomes in a large population of cardiac surgery patients, with a focus on the type of colloid infusion. Design A prospective, registered, observational study, using propensity score matching. Setting Cohort study from 3 university hospitals using a common registry. Participants The study comprised 17,742 patients who were referred for cardiac surgery from 2007 to 2014. Interventions Patients were divided in groups according to perioperative fluid replacement with either crystalloids or colloids. The colloid group was further divided into HES or human albumin (HA). Analyses were based on the following 3 subsections: HES versus crystalloids, HA versus crystalloids, and HES versus HA, with use of propensity score matching or direct matching of cases. Primary outcome parameters were 30-day and 6-month mortality, new postoperative renal replacement therapy, and new cardiac ischemic events. Measurements and Main Results The groups were fully comparable in individual analyses. The use of HES had no impact on new dialysis and 30-day mortality. A Cox proportional regression analysis showed that HES had no impact on 6-month mortality and new postoperative ischemic events. When comparing HA with crystalloid use, a significantly increased risk in crude analysis was demonstrated on all outcome parameters; and when comparing HA with HES, a significantly higher risk was observed in HA patients in mortality parameters and new postoperative, but after adjustment, only the risk of new postoperative dialysis persisted. Conclusion This study underlined the difficulties in establishing hardcore outcome data, even in large cohort studies. The findings seemed to diminish the magnitude of risk when using HES in cardiac surgery patients and seriously questioned the choice of HA when a plasma expander is needed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.02.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1884163758</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1053077017300514</els_id><sourcerecordid>1884163758</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-765d1f66edb701ab1eaa0e534baed9ca914115a7e30709861fb9f84574913e9b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9q3DAQh0VpaP71BXoIPvZQOxrJsmwoKWXJJoGFHDY9C1kaFzleK5XWgb3lIfqEeZLIbNpDDjnNHL7fD-YbQr4ALYAKft4X_aPRBaMgC8oKSuEDOQLBWV6XjH1Me6JyKiU9JMcx9gkAIeQncshqLlkjxBH5tvDD4J2NmRuzhQ7WaZOtp_Abw-756e8yOBxt5kO29PjjlBx0eoj4-XWekF_Ly7vFdb66vbpZ_FzlpgTY5rISFrqqQttKCroF1Jqi4GWr0TZGN5AwoSVyKmlTV9C1TVeXQpYNcGxafkK-7nsfgv8zYdyqjYsGh0GP6KeooK5LqLgUdULZHjXBxxiwUw_BbXTYKaBqvl_1arakZkuKMpUkpNDZa__UbtD-j_zTkoDvewDTlY8Og4omiTBoXUCzVda79_sv3sTN4EZn9HCPO4y9n8KY_ClQMQXUeu6Z3wSSUyqg5C_Y0Ivh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1884163758</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Colloids in Cardiac Surgery—Friend or Foe?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ryhammer, Pia Katarina, MD ; Tang, Mariann, MD, PHD ; Hoffmann-Petersen, Joachim, MD ; Leonaviciute, Dovile, MD ; Greisen, Jacob, MD, PHD ; Storebjerg Gissel, Marie, RN ; Jakobsen, Carl-Johan, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Ryhammer, Pia Katarina, MD ; Tang, Mariann, MD, PHD ; Hoffmann-Petersen, Joachim, MD ; Leonaviciute, Dovile, MD ; Greisen, Jacob, MD, PHD ; Storebjerg Gissel, Marie, RN ; Jakobsen, Carl-Johan, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Objective The right choice of fluid replacement still is a matter of debate. Recently, two large-scale studies on the use of hydroxyethyl starches (HES) in the intensive care setting have been published, which have caused a huge shift in the daily practice of volume therapy. These results have been applied to patients outside intensive care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact this change has had on the outcomes in a large population of cardiac surgery patients, with a focus on the type of colloid infusion. Design A prospective, registered, observational study, using propensity score matching. Setting Cohort study from 3 university hospitals using a common registry. Participants The study comprised 17,742 patients who were referred for cardiac surgery from 2007 to 2014. Interventions Patients were divided in groups according to perioperative fluid replacement with either crystalloids or colloids. The colloid group was further divided into HES or human albumin (HA). Analyses were based on the following 3 subsections: HES versus crystalloids, HA versus crystalloids, and HES versus HA, with use of propensity score matching or direct matching of cases. Primary outcome parameters were 30-day and 6-month mortality, new postoperative renal replacement therapy, and new cardiac ischemic events. Measurements and Main Results The groups were fully comparable in individual analyses. The use of HES had no impact on new dialysis and 30-day mortality. A Cox proportional regression analysis showed that HES had no impact on 6-month mortality and new postoperative ischemic events. When comparing HA with crystalloid use, a significantly increased risk in crude analysis was demonstrated on all outcome parameters; and when comparing HA with HES, a significantly higher risk was observed in HA patients in mortality parameters and new postoperative, but after adjustment, only the risk of new postoperative dialysis persisted. Conclusion This study underlined the difficulties in establishing hardcore outcome data, even in large cohort studies. The findings seemed to diminish the magnitude of risk when using HES in cardiac surgery patients and seriously questioned the choice of HA when a plasma expander is needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-0770</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.02.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28372955</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Anesthesia & Perioperative Care ; cardiac recovery ; cardiac surgery ; Cardiac Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Cardiac Surgical Procedures - mortality ; Cardiac Surgical Procedures - trends ; Cohort Studies ; Colloids ; Critical Care ; dialysis ; Female ; Fluid Therapy - adverse effects ; Fluid Therapy - methods ; Fluid Therapy - mortality ; Follow-Up Studies ; human albumin ; Humans ; hydroxyethyl starch ; Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives - administration & dosage ; Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives - adverse effects ; ischemic heart disease ; Isotonic Solutions - administration & dosage ; Isotonic Solutions - adverse effects ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Plasma Substitutes - administration & dosage ; Plasma Substitutes - adverse effects ; Prospective Studies ; Registries ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia, 2017-10, Vol.31 (5), p.1639-1648</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2017 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-765d1f66edb701ab1eaa0e534baed9ca914115a7e30709861fb9f84574913e9b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-765d1f66edb701ab1eaa0e534baed9ca914115a7e30709861fb9f84574913e9b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053077017300514$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28372955$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ryhammer, Pia Katarina, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Mariann, MD, PHD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann-Petersen, Joachim, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leonaviciute, Dovile, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greisen, Jacob, MD, PHD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storebjerg Gissel, Marie, RN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jakobsen, Carl-Johan, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Colloids in Cardiac Surgery—Friend or Foe?</title><title>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia</title><addtitle>J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth</addtitle><description>Objective The right choice of fluid replacement still is a matter of debate. Recently, two large-scale studies on the use of hydroxyethyl starches (HES) in the intensive care setting have been published, which have caused a huge shift in the daily practice of volume therapy. These results have been applied to patients outside intensive care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact this change has had on the outcomes in a large population of cardiac surgery patients, with a focus on the type of colloid infusion. Design A prospective, registered, observational study, using propensity score matching. Setting Cohort study from 3 university hospitals using a common registry. Participants The study comprised 17,742 patients who were referred for cardiac surgery from 2007 to 2014. Interventions Patients were divided in groups according to perioperative fluid replacement with either crystalloids or colloids. The colloid group was further divided into HES or human albumin (HA). Analyses were based on the following 3 subsections: HES versus crystalloids, HA versus crystalloids, and HES versus HA, with use of propensity score matching or direct matching of cases. Primary outcome parameters were 30-day and 6-month mortality, new postoperative renal replacement therapy, and new cardiac ischemic events. Measurements and Main Results The groups were fully comparable in individual analyses. The use of HES had no impact on new dialysis and 30-day mortality. A Cox proportional regression analysis showed that HES had no impact on 6-month mortality and new postoperative ischemic events. When comparing HA with crystalloid use, a significantly increased risk in crude analysis was demonstrated on all outcome parameters; and when comparing HA with HES, a significantly higher risk was observed in HA patients in mortality parameters and new postoperative, but after adjustment, only the risk of new postoperative dialysis persisted. Conclusion This study underlined the difficulties in establishing hardcore outcome data, even in large cohort studies. The findings seemed to diminish the magnitude of risk when using HES in cardiac surgery patients and seriously questioned the choice of HA when a plasma expander is needed.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anesthesia & Perioperative Care</subject><subject>cardiac recovery</subject><subject>cardiac surgery</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - mortality</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - trends</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Colloids</subject><subject>Critical Care</subject><subject>dialysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluid Therapy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Fluid Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Fluid Therapy - mortality</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>human albumin</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>hydroxyethyl starch</subject><subject>Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives - adverse effects</subject><subject>ischemic heart disease</subject><subject>Isotonic Solutions - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Isotonic Solutions - adverse effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Plasma Substitutes - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Plasma Substitutes - adverse effects</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>1053-0770</issn><issn>1532-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9q3DAQh0VpaP71BXoIPvZQOxrJsmwoKWXJJoGFHDY9C1kaFzleK5XWgb3lIfqEeZLIbNpDDjnNHL7fD-YbQr4ALYAKft4X_aPRBaMgC8oKSuEDOQLBWV6XjH1Me6JyKiU9JMcx9gkAIeQncshqLlkjxBH5tvDD4J2NmRuzhQ7WaZOtp_Abw-756e8yOBxt5kO29PjjlBx0eoj4-XWekF_Ly7vFdb66vbpZ_FzlpgTY5rISFrqqQttKCroF1Jqi4GWr0TZGN5AwoSVyKmlTV9C1TVeXQpYNcGxafkK-7nsfgv8zYdyqjYsGh0GP6KeooK5LqLgUdULZHjXBxxiwUw_BbXTYKaBqvl_1arakZkuKMpUkpNDZa__UbtD-j_zTkoDvewDTlY8Og4omiTBoXUCzVda79_sv3sTN4EZn9HCPO4y9n8KY_ClQMQXUeu6Z3wSSUyqg5C_Y0Ivh</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>Ryhammer, Pia Katarina, MD</creator><creator>Tang, Mariann, MD, PHD</creator><creator>Hoffmann-Petersen, Joachim, MD</creator><creator>Leonaviciute, Dovile, MD</creator><creator>Greisen, Jacob, MD, PHD</creator><creator>Storebjerg Gissel, Marie, RN</creator><creator>Jakobsen, Carl-Johan, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>Colloids in Cardiac Surgery—Friend or Foe?</title><author>Ryhammer, Pia Katarina, MD ; Tang, Mariann, MD, PHD ; Hoffmann-Petersen, Joachim, MD ; Leonaviciute, Dovile, MD ; Greisen, Jacob, MD, PHD ; Storebjerg Gissel, Marie, RN ; Jakobsen, Carl-Johan, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-765d1f66edb701ab1eaa0e534baed9ca914115a7e30709861fb9f84574913e9b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anesthesia & Perioperative Care</topic><topic>cardiac recovery</topic><topic>cardiac surgery</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - mortality</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - trends</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Colloids</topic><topic>Critical Care</topic><topic>dialysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluid Therapy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Fluid Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Fluid Therapy - mortality</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>human albumin</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>hydroxyethyl starch</topic><topic>Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives - adverse effects</topic><topic>ischemic heart disease</topic><topic>Isotonic Solutions - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Isotonic Solutions - adverse effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Plasma Substitutes - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Plasma Substitutes - adverse effects</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ryhammer, Pia Katarina, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Mariann, MD, PHD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann-Petersen, Joachim, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leonaviciute, Dovile, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greisen, Jacob, MD, PHD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storebjerg Gissel, Marie, RN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jakobsen, Carl-Johan, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ryhammer, Pia Katarina, MD</au><au>Tang, Mariann, MD, PHD</au><au>Hoffmann-Petersen, Joachim, MD</au><au>Leonaviciute, Dovile, MD</au><au>Greisen, Jacob, MD, PHD</au><au>Storebjerg Gissel, Marie, RN</au><au>Jakobsen, Carl-Johan, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Colloids in Cardiac Surgery—Friend or Foe?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth</addtitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1639</spage><epage>1648</epage><pages>1639-1648</pages><issn>1053-0770</issn><eissn>1532-8422</eissn><abstract>Objective The right choice of fluid replacement still is a matter of debate. Recently, two large-scale studies on the use of hydroxyethyl starches (HES) in the intensive care setting have been published, which have caused a huge shift in the daily practice of volume therapy. These results have been applied to patients outside intensive care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact this change has had on the outcomes in a large population of cardiac surgery patients, with a focus on the type of colloid infusion. Design A prospective, registered, observational study, using propensity score matching. Setting Cohort study from 3 university hospitals using a common registry. Participants The study comprised 17,742 patients who were referred for cardiac surgery from 2007 to 2014. Interventions Patients were divided in groups according to perioperative fluid replacement with either crystalloids or colloids. The colloid group was further divided into HES or human albumin (HA). Analyses were based on the following 3 subsections: HES versus crystalloids, HA versus crystalloids, and HES versus HA, with use of propensity score matching or direct matching of cases. Primary outcome parameters were 30-day and 6-month mortality, new postoperative renal replacement therapy, and new cardiac ischemic events. Measurements and Main Results The groups were fully comparable in individual analyses. The use of HES had no impact on new dialysis and 30-day mortality. A Cox proportional regression analysis showed that HES had no impact on 6-month mortality and new postoperative ischemic events. When comparing HA with crystalloid use, a significantly increased risk in crude analysis was demonstrated on all outcome parameters; and when comparing HA with HES, a significantly higher risk was observed in HA patients in mortality parameters and new postoperative, but after adjustment, only the risk of new postoperative dialysis persisted. Conclusion This study underlined the difficulties in establishing hardcore outcome data, even in large cohort studies. The findings seemed to diminish the magnitude of risk when using HES in cardiac surgery patients and seriously questioned the choice of HA when a plasma expander is needed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28372955</pmid><doi>10.1053/j.jvca.2017.02.001</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1053-0770 |
ispartof | Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia, 2017-10, Vol.31 (5), p.1639-1648 |
issn | 1053-0770 1532-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1884163758 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Aged Anesthesia & Perioperative Care cardiac recovery cardiac surgery Cardiac Surgical Procedures - adverse effects Cardiac Surgical Procedures - mortality Cardiac Surgical Procedures - trends Cohort Studies Colloids Critical Care dialysis Female Fluid Therapy - adverse effects Fluid Therapy - methods Fluid Therapy - mortality Follow-Up Studies human albumin Humans hydroxyethyl starch Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives - administration & dosage Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives - adverse effects ischemic heart disease Isotonic Solutions - administration & dosage Isotonic Solutions - adverse effects Male Middle Aged Plasma Substitutes - administration & dosage Plasma Substitutes - adverse effects Prospective Studies Registries Retrospective Studies |
title | Colloids in Cardiac Surgery—Friend or Foe? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T19%3A35%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Colloids%20in%20Cardiac%20Surgery%E2%80%94Friend%20or%20Foe?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cardiothoracic%20and%20vascular%20anesthesia&rft.au=Ryhammer,%20Pia%20Katarina,%20MD&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1639&rft.epage=1648&rft.pages=1639-1648&rft.issn=1053-0770&rft.eissn=1532-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/j.jvca.2017.02.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1884163758%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1884163758&rft_id=info:pmid/28372955&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1053077017300514&rfr_iscdi=true |