Radiation perception in Europe

There are big differences between public perception of the risks of ionising radiation and the information provided. The Fukushima accident demonstrated even greater need for better communication. So in 2013 the European Commission launched the Eagle (Enhancing education, training and communication...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nuclear engineering international 2016-01, Vol.61 (738), p.40-41
Hauptverfasser: Zeleznik, Nadja, Constantin, Marin, Schneider, Nina, Mays, Claire, Zakrzewska, Grazyna, Diaconu, Daniela
Format: Magazinearticle
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 41
container_issue 738
container_start_page 40
container_title Nuclear engineering international
container_volume 61
creator Zeleznik, Nadja
Constantin, Marin
Schneider, Nina
Mays, Claire
Zakrzewska, Grazyna
Diaconu, Daniela
description There are big differences between public perception of the risks of ionising radiation and the information provided. The Fukushima accident demonstrated even greater need for better communication. So in 2013 the European Commission launched the Eagle (Enhancing education, training and communication processes for informed behaviours and decision-making related to ionising radiation risks) project, which aims to improve communication strategies to support informed societal decision-making.
format Magazinearticle
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1884113089</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A443283737</galeid><sourcerecordid>A443283737</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g232t-182f654484d434a280a6b95277e2297304d25979fe7f4f7cea54fad019e9e3013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptjEtPwzAQhH0AiRL4C6hHDgT5sa7tY1WVh1QJCcE5cpN1MErtkE3-PxHl0EM10uzu6Ju9YAvOpSu15uaKXRN98_m2Ahbs7t030Y8xp2WPQ4393xrTcjsNuccbdhl8R3j7Pwv2-bT92LyUu7fn1816V7ZSybEUVoaVBrDQgAIvLfervdPSGJTSGcWhkdoZF9AECKZGryH4hguHDhUXqmD3x7_9kH8mpLE6RKqx63zCPFElrAUhFLduRssj2voOq5hCHgdft5hw8F1OGOIcrwGUtMrMKtjjGX5Wg4dYny08nBT2E8WENBvF9muk1k9Ep_gvHDRnkw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>1884113089</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>Radiation perception in Europe</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Zeleznik, Nadja ; Constantin, Marin ; Schneider, Nina ; Mays, Claire ; Zakrzewska, Grazyna ; Diaconu, Daniela</creator><creatorcontrib>Zeleznik, Nadja ; Constantin, Marin ; Schneider, Nina ; Mays, Claire ; Zakrzewska, Grazyna ; Diaconu, Daniela</creatorcontrib><description>There are big differences between public perception of the risks of ionising radiation and the information provided. The Fukushima accident demonstrated even greater need for better communication. So in 2013 the European Commission launched the Eagle (Enhancing education, training and communication processes for informed behaviours and decision-making related to ionising radiation risks) project, which aims to improve communication strategies to support informed societal decision-making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-5507</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>NS Media Group Limited</publisher><subject>Accidents ; Decision making ; Education ; Influence ; Information dissemination ; Ionization chambers ; Nuclear accidents ; People (Constitutional law) ; Perception ; Risk perception ; Strategy ; Surveys</subject><ispartof>Nuclear engineering international, 2016-01, Vol.61 (738), p.40-41</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 NS Media Group Limited</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zeleznik, Nadja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Constantin, Marin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mays, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zakrzewska, Grazyna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diaconu, Daniela</creatorcontrib><title>Radiation perception in Europe</title><title>Nuclear engineering international</title><description>There are big differences between public perception of the risks of ionising radiation and the information provided. The Fukushima accident demonstrated even greater need for better communication. So in 2013 the European Commission launched the Eagle (Enhancing education, training and communication processes for informed behaviours and decision-making related to ionising radiation risks) project, which aims to improve communication strategies to support informed societal decision-making.</description><subject>Accidents</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Information dissemination</subject><subject>Ionization chambers</subject><subject>Nuclear accidents</subject><subject>People (Constitutional law)</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Risk perception</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><issn>0029-5507</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><recordid>eNptjEtPwzAQhH0AiRL4C6hHDgT5sa7tY1WVh1QJCcE5cpN1MErtkE3-PxHl0EM10uzu6Ju9YAvOpSu15uaKXRN98_m2Ahbs7t030Y8xp2WPQ4393xrTcjsNuccbdhl8R3j7Pwv2-bT92LyUu7fn1816V7ZSybEUVoaVBrDQgAIvLfervdPSGJTSGcWhkdoZF9AECKZGryH4hguHDhUXqmD3x7_9kH8mpLE6RKqx63zCPFElrAUhFLduRssj2voOq5hCHgdft5hw8F1OGOIcrwGUtMrMKtjjGX5Wg4dYny08nBT2E8WENBvF9muk1k9Ep_gvHDRnkw</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Zeleznik, Nadja</creator><creator>Constantin, Marin</creator><creator>Schneider, Nina</creator><creator>Mays, Claire</creator><creator>Zakrzewska, Grazyna</creator><creator>Diaconu, Daniela</creator><general>NS Media Group Limited</general><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Radiation perception in Europe</title><author>Zeleznik, Nadja ; Constantin, Marin ; Schneider, Nina ; Mays, Claire ; Zakrzewska, Grazyna ; Diaconu, Daniela</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g232t-182f654484d434a280a6b95277e2297304d25979fe7f4f7cea54fad019e9e3013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Accidents</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Information dissemination</topic><topic>Ionization chambers</topic><topic>Nuclear accidents</topic><topic>People (Constitutional law)</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Risk perception</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zeleznik, Nadja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Constantin, Marin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mays, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zakrzewska, Grazyna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diaconu, Daniela</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Nuclear engineering international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zeleznik, Nadja</au><au>Constantin, Marin</au><au>Schneider, Nina</au><au>Mays, Claire</au><au>Zakrzewska, Grazyna</au><au>Diaconu, Daniela</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiation perception in Europe</atitle><jtitle>Nuclear engineering international</jtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>738</issue><spage>40</spage><epage>41</epage><pages>40-41</pages><issn>0029-5507</issn><abstract>There are big differences between public perception of the risks of ionising radiation and the information provided. The Fukushima accident demonstrated even greater need for better communication. So in 2013 the European Commission launched the Eagle (Enhancing education, training and communication processes for informed behaviours and decision-making related to ionising radiation risks) project, which aims to improve communication strategies to support informed societal decision-making.</abstract><pub>NS Media Group Limited</pub><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0029-5507
ispartof Nuclear engineering international, 2016-01, Vol.61 (738), p.40-41
issn 0029-5507
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1884113089
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Accidents
Decision making
Education
Influence
Information dissemination
Ionization chambers
Nuclear accidents
People (Constitutional law)
Perception
Risk perception
Strategy
Surveys
title Radiation perception in Europe
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T02%3A29%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiation%20perception%20in%20Europe&rft.jtitle=Nuclear%20engineering%20international&rft.au=Zeleznik,%20Nadja&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=738&rft.spage=40&rft.epage=41&rft.pages=40-41&rft.issn=0029-5507&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA443283737%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1884113089&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A443283737&rfr_iscdi=true