Team IHMC's Lessons Learned from the DARPA Robotics Challenge: Finding Data in the Rubble

This article presents a retrospective analysis of Team IHMC's experience throughout the DARPA Robotics Challenge (DRC), where we took first or second place overall in each of the three phases. As an extremely demanding challenge typical of DARPA, the DRC required rapid research and development...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of field robotics 2017-03, Vol.34 (2), p.241-261
Hauptverfasser: Johnson, Matthew, Shrewsbury, Brandon, Bertrand, Sylvain, Calvert, Duncan, Wu, Tingfan, Duran, Daniel, Stephen, Douglas, Mertins, Nathan, Carff, John, Rifenburgh, William, Smith, Jesper, Schmidt‐Wetekam, Chris, Faconti, Davide, Graber‐Tilton, Alex, Eyssette, Nicolas, Meier, Tobias, Kalkov, Igor, Craig, Travis, Payton, Nick, McCrory, Stephen, Wiedebach, Georg, Layton, Brooke, Neuhaus, Peter, Pratt, Jerry
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 261
container_issue 2
container_start_page 241
container_title Journal of field robotics
container_volume 34
creator Johnson, Matthew
Shrewsbury, Brandon
Bertrand, Sylvain
Calvert, Duncan
Wu, Tingfan
Duran, Daniel
Stephen, Douglas
Mertins, Nathan
Carff, John
Rifenburgh, William
Smith, Jesper
Schmidt‐Wetekam, Chris
Faconti, Davide
Graber‐Tilton, Alex
Eyssette, Nicolas
Meier, Tobias
Kalkov, Igor
Craig, Travis
Payton, Nick
McCrory, Stephen
Wiedebach, Georg
Layton, Brooke
Neuhaus, Peter
Pratt, Jerry
description This article presents a retrospective analysis of Team IHMC's experience throughout the DARPA Robotics Challenge (DRC), where we took first or second place overall in each of the three phases. As an extremely demanding challenge typical of DARPA, the DRC required rapid research and development to push the boundaries of robotics and set a new benchmark for complex robotic behavior. We present how we addressed each of the eight tasks of the DRC and review our performance in the Finals. While the ambitious competition schedule limited extensive experimentation, we will review the data we collected during the approximately three years of our participation. We discuss some of the significant lessons learned that contributed to our success in the DRC. These include hardware lessons, software lessons, and human‐robot integration lessons. We describe refinements to the coactive design methodology that helped our designers connect human–machine interaction theory to both implementation and empirical data. This approach helped our team focus our limited resources on the issues most critical to success. In addition to helping readers understand our experiences in developing on a Boston Dynamics Atlas robot for the DRC, we hope this article will provide insights that apply more widely to robotics development and design of human–machine systems.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/rob.21674
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1884102021</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4314350771</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-5401acf94de91e2af7f5ebba4fc31e43ba02332603bec9ef9969c6d40f045a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10D1PwzAQBuAIgUQpDPwDSwzAkNZOnA-zlZTSSkVFURcmy07ObaokLnYi1H9P2iAGJKb3hudOp9dxbgkeEYy9sdFy5JEwomfOgARB6FIWRue_c8AunStrdxhTP2bBwPlYg6jQYv6W3Fu0BGt1fUxhasiRMrpCzRbQdJK-T1CqpW6KzKJkK8oS6g08oVlR50W9QVPRCFTUJ522UpZw7VwoUVq4-cmhs569rJO5u1y9LpLJ0s38KKZuQDERmWI0B0bAEypSAUgpqMp8AtSXAnu-74XYl5AxUIyFLAtzihWmgSD-0Hnoz-6N_mzBNrwqbAZlKWrQreUkjinBHvaO9O4P3enW1N1znQrjsOsIs0499ioz2loDiu9NUQlz4ATzY8e865ifOu7suLdfRQmH_yFPV8_9xjfprHsm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1868615509</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Team IHMC's Lessons Learned from the DARPA Robotics Challenge: Finding Data in the Rubble</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Johnson, Matthew ; Shrewsbury, Brandon ; Bertrand, Sylvain ; Calvert, Duncan ; Wu, Tingfan ; Duran, Daniel ; Stephen, Douglas ; Mertins, Nathan ; Carff, John ; Rifenburgh, William ; Smith, Jesper ; Schmidt‐Wetekam, Chris ; Faconti, Davide ; Graber‐Tilton, Alex ; Eyssette, Nicolas ; Meier, Tobias ; Kalkov, Igor ; Craig, Travis ; Payton, Nick ; McCrory, Stephen ; Wiedebach, Georg ; Layton, Brooke ; Neuhaus, Peter ; Pratt, Jerry</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Matthew ; Shrewsbury, Brandon ; Bertrand, Sylvain ; Calvert, Duncan ; Wu, Tingfan ; Duran, Daniel ; Stephen, Douglas ; Mertins, Nathan ; Carff, John ; Rifenburgh, William ; Smith, Jesper ; Schmidt‐Wetekam, Chris ; Faconti, Davide ; Graber‐Tilton, Alex ; Eyssette, Nicolas ; Meier, Tobias ; Kalkov, Igor ; Craig, Travis ; Payton, Nick ; McCrory, Stephen ; Wiedebach, Georg ; Layton, Brooke ; Neuhaus, Peter ; Pratt, Jerry</creatorcontrib><description>This article presents a retrospective analysis of Team IHMC's experience throughout the DARPA Robotics Challenge (DRC), where we took first or second place overall in each of the three phases. As an extremely demanding challenge typical of DARPA, the DRC required rapid research and development to push the boundaries of robotics and set a new benchmark for complex robotic behavior. We present how we addressed each of the eight tasks of the DRC and review our performance in the Finals. While the ambitious competition schedule limited extensive experimentation, we will review the data we collected during the approximately three years of our participation. We discuss some of the significant lessons learned that contributed to our success in the DRC. These include hardware lessons, software lessons, and human‐robot integration lessons. We describe refinements to the coactive design methodology that helped our designers connect human–machine interaction theory to both implementation and empirical data. This approach helped our team focus our limited resources on the issues most critical to success. In addition to helping readers understand our experiences in developing on a Boston Dynamics Atlas robot for the DRC, we hope this article will provide insights that apply more widely to robotics development and design of human–machine systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1556-4959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-4967</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rob.21674</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Boundaries ; Computer programs ; Design ; Design engineering ; Dynamical systems ; Readers ; Research and development ; Robotics ; Robots</subject><ispartof>Journal of field robotics, 2017-03, Vol.34 (2), p.241-261</ispartof><rights>2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-5401acf94de91e2af7f5ebba4fc31e43ba02332603bec9ef9969c6d40f045a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-5401acf94de91e2af7f5ebba4fc31e43ba02332603bec9ef9969c6d40f045a13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Frob.21674$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Frob.21674$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shrewsbury, Brandon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertrand, Sylvain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvert, Duncan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Tingfan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duran, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephen, Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mertins, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carff, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rifenburgh, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Jesper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt‐Wetekam, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faconti, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graber‐Tilton, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eyssette, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meier, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalkov, Igor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craig, Travis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payton, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCrory, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiedebach, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Layton, Brooke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neuhaus, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratt, Jerry</creatorcontrib><title>Team IHMC's Lessons Learned from the DARPA Robotics Challenge: Finding Data in the Rubble</title><title>Journal of field robotics</title><description>This article presents a retrospective analysis of Team IHMC's experience throughout the DARPA Robotics Challenge (DRC), where we took first or second place overall in each of the three phases. As an extremely demanding challenge typical of DARPA, the DRC required rapid research and development to push the boundaries of robotics and set a new benchmark for complex robotic behavior. We present how we addressed each of the eight tasks of the DRC and review our performance in the Finals. While the ambitious competition schedule limited extensive experimentation, we will review the data we collected during the approximately three years of our participation. We discuss some of the significant lessons learned that contributed to our success in the DRC. These include hardware lessons, software lessons, and human‐robot integration lessons. We describe refinements to the coactive design methodology that helped our designers connect human–machine interaction theory to both implementation and empirical data. This approach helped our team focus our limited resources on the issues most critical to success. In addition to helping readers understand our experiences in developing on a Boston Dynamics Atlas robot for the DRC, we hope this article will provide insights that apply more widely to robotics development and design of human–machine systems.</description><subject>Boundaries</subject><subject>Computer programs</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Design engineering</subject><subject>Dynamical systems</subject><subject>Readers</subject><subject>Research and development</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Robots</subject><issn>1556-4959</issn><issn>1556-4967</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10D1PwzAQBuAIgUQpDPwDSwzAkNZOnA-zlZTSSkVFURcmy07ObaokLnYi1H9P2iAGJKb3hudOp9dxbgkeEYy9sdFy5JEwomfOgARB6FIWRue_c8AunStrdxhTP2bBwPlYg6jQYv6W3Fu0BGt1fUxhasiRMrpCzRbQdJK-T1CqpW6KzKJkK8oS6g08oVlR50W9QVPRCFTUJ522UpZw7VwoUVq4-cmhs569rJO5u1y9LpLJ0s38KKZuQDERmWI0B0bAEypSAUgpqMp8AtSXAnu-74XYl5AxUIyFLAtzihWmgSD-0Hnoz-6N_mzBNrwqbAZlKWrQreUkjinBHvaO9O4P3enW1N1znQrjsOsIs0499ioz2loDiu9NUQlz4ATzY8e865ifOu7suLdfRQmH_yFPV8_9xjfprHsm</recordid><startdate>201703</startdate><enddate>201703</enddate><creator>Johnson, Matthew</creator><creator>Shrewsbury, Brandon</creator><creator>Bertrand, Sylvain</creator><creator>Calvert, Duncan</creator><creator>Wu, Tingfan</creator><creator>Duran, Daniel</creator><creator>Stephen, Douglas</creator><creator>Mertins, Nathan</creator><creator>Carff, John</creator><creator>Rifenburgh, William</creator><creator>Smith, Jesper</creator><creator>Schmidt‐Wetekam, Chris</creator><creator>Faconti, Davide</creator><creator>Graber‐Tilton, Alex</creator><creator>Eyssette, Nicolas</creator><creator>Meier, Tobias</creator><creator>Kalkov, Igor</creator><creator>Craig, Travis</creator><creator>Payton, Nick</creator><creator>McCrory, Stephen</creator><creator>Wiedebach, Georg</creator><creator>Layton, Brooke</creator><creator>Neuhaus, Peter</creator><creator>Pratt, Jerry</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201703</creationdate><title>Team IHMC's Lessons Learned from the DARPA Robotics Challenge: Finding Data in the Rubble</title><author>Johnson, Matthew ; Shrewsbury, Brandon ; Bertrand, Sylvain ; Calvert, Duncan ; Wu, Tingfan ; Duran, Daniel ; Stephen, Douglas ; Mertins, Nathan ; Carff, John ; Rifenburgh, William ; Smith, Jesper ; Schmidt‐Wetekam, Chris ; Faconti, Davide ; Graber‐Tilton, Alex ; Eyssette, Nicolas ; Meier, Tobias ; Kalkov, Igor ; Craig, Travis ; Payton, Nick ; McCrory, Stephen ; Wiedebach, Georg ; Layton, Brooke ; Neuhaus, Peter ; Pratt, Jerry</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-5401acf94de91e2af7f5ebba4fc31e43ba02332603bec9ef9969c6d40f045a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Boundaries</topic><topic>Computer programs</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Design engineering</topic><topic>Dynamical systems</topic><topic>Readers</topic><topic>Research and development</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Robots</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shrewsbury, Brandon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertrand, Sylvain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvert, Duncan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Tingfan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duran, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephen, Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mertins, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carff, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rifenburgh, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Jesper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt‐Wetekam, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faconti, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graber‐Tilton, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eyssette, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meier, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalkov, Igor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craig, Travis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payton, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCrory, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiedebach, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Layton, Brooke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neuhaus, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratt, Jerry</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of field robotics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnson, Matthew</au><au>Shrewsbury, Brandon</au><au>Bertrand, Sylvain</au><au>Calvert, Duncan</au><au>Wu, Tingfan</au><au>Duran, Daniel</au><au>Stephen, Douglas</au><au>Mertins, Nathan</au><au>Carff, John</au><au>Rifenburgh, William</au><au>Smith, Jesper</au><au>Schmidt‐Wetekam, Chris</au><au>Faconti, Davide</au><au>Graber‐Tilton, Alex</au><au>Eyssette, Nicolas</au><au>Meier, Tobias</au><au>Kalkov, Igor</au><au>Craig, Travis</au><au>Payton, Nick</au><au>McCrory, Stephen</au><au>Wiedebach, Georg</au><au>Layton, Brooke</au><au>Neuhaus, Peter</au><au>Pratt, Jerry</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Team IHMC's Lessons Learned from the DARPA Robotics Challenge: Finding Data in the Rubble</atitle><jtitle>Journal of field robotics</jtitle><date>2017-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>241</spage><epage>261</epage><pages>241-261</pages><issn>1556-4959</issn><eissn>1556-4967</eissn><abstract>This article presents a retrospective analysis of Team IHMC's experience throughout the DARPA Robotics Challenge (DRC), where we took first or second place overall in each of the three phases. As an extremely demanding challenge typical of DARPA, the DRC required rapid research and development to push the boundaries of robotics and set a new benchmark for complex robotic behavior. We present how we addressed each of the eight tasks of the DRC and review our performance in the Finals. While the ambitious competition schedule limited extensive experimentation, we will review the data we collected during the approximately three years of our participation. We discuss some of the significant lessons learned that contributed to our success in the DRC. These include hardware lessons, software lessons, and human‐robot integration lessons. We describe refinements to the coactive design methodology that helped our designers connect human–machine interaction theory to both implementation and empirical data. This approach helped our team focus our limited resources on the issues most critical to success. In addition to helping readers understand our experiences in developing on a Boston Dynamics Atlas robot for the DRC, we hope this article will provide insights that apply more widely to robotics development and design of human–machine systems.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/rob.21674</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1556-4959
ispartof Journal of field robotics, 2017-03, Vol.34 (2), p.241-261
issn 1556-4959
1556-4967
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1884102021
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Boundaries
Computer programs
Design
Design engineering
Dynamical systems
Readers
Research and development
Robotics
Robots
title Team IHMC's Lessons Learned from the DARPA Robotics Challenge: Finding Data in the Rubble
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T13%3A16%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Team%20IHMC's%20Lessons%20Learned%20from%20the%20DARPA%20Robotics%20Challenge:%20Finding%20Data%20in%20the%20Rubble&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20field%20robotics&rft.au=Johnson,%20Matthew&rft.date=2017-03&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=241&rft.epage=261&rft.pages=241-261&rft.issn=1556-4959&rft.eissn=1556-4967&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rob.21674&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4314350771%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1868615509&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true