Team IHMC's Lessons Learned from the DARPA Robotics Challenge: Finding Data in the Rubble
This article presents a retrospective analysis of Team IHMC's experience throughout the DARPA Robotics Challenge (DRC), where we took first or second place overall in each of the three phases. As an extremely demanding challenge typical of DARPA, the DRC required rapid research and development...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of field robotics 2017-03, Vol.34 (2), p.241-261 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 261 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 241 |
container_title | Journal of field robotics |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Johnson, Matthew Shrewsbury, Brandon Bertrand, Sylvain Calvert, Duncan Wu, Tingfan Duran, Daniel Stephen, Douglas Mertins, Nathan Carff, John Rifenburgh, William Smith, Jesper Schmidt‐Wetekam, Chris Faconti, Davide Graber‐Tilton, Alex Eyssette, Nicolas Meier, Tobias Kalkov, Igor Craig, Travis Payton, Nick McCrory, Stephen Wiedebach, Georg Layton, Brooke Neuhaus, Peter Pratt, Jerry |
description | This article presents a retrospective analysis of Team IHMC's experience throughout the DARPA Robotics Challenge (DRC), where we took first or second place overall in each of the three phases. As an extremely demanding challenge typical of DARPA, the DRC required rapid research and development to push the boundaries of robotics and set a new benchmark for complex robotic behavior. We present how we addressed each of the eight tasks of the DRC and review our performance in the Finals. While the ambitious competition schedule limited extensive experimentation, we will review the data we collected during the approximately three years of our participation. We discuss some of the significant lessons learned that contributed to our success in the DRC. These include hardware lessons, software lessons, and human‐robot integration lessons. We describe refinements to the coactive design methodology that helped our designers connect human–machine interaction theory to both implementation and empirical data. This approach helped our team focus our limited resources on the issues most critical to success. In addition to helping readers understand our experiences in developing on a Boston Dynamics Atlas robot for the DRC, we hope this article will provide insights that apply more widely to robotics development and design of human–machine systems. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/rob.21674 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1884102021</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4314350771</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-5401acf94de91e2af7f5ebba4fc31e43ba02332603bec9ef9969c6d40f045a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10D1PwzAQBuAIgUQpDPwDSwzAkNZOnA-zlZTSSkVFURcmy07ObaokLnYi1H9P2iAGJKb3hudOp9dxbgkeEYy9sdFy5JEwomfOgARB6FIWRue_c8AunStrdxhTP2bBwPlYg6jQYv6W3Fu0BGt1fUxhasiRMrpCzRbQdJK-T1CqpW6KzKJkK8oS6g08oVlR50W9QVPRCFTUJ522UpZw7VwoUVq4-cmhs569rJO5u1y9LpLJ0s38KKZuQDERmWI0B0bAEypSAUgpqMp8AtSXAnu-74XYl5AxUIyFLAtzihWmgSD-0Hnoz-6N_mzBNrwqbAZlKWrQreUkjinBHvaO9O4P3enW1N1znQrjsOsIs0499ioz2loDiu9NUQlz4ATzY8e865ifOu7suLdfRQmH_yFPV8_9xjfprHsm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1868615509</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Team IHMC's Lessons Learned from the DARPA Robotics Challenge: Finding Data in the Rubble</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Johnson, Matthew ; Shrewsbury, Brandon ; Bertrand, Sylvain ; Calvert, Duncan ; Wu, Tingfan ; Duran, Daniel ; Stephen, Douglas ; Mertins, Nathan ; Carff, John ; Rifenburgh, William ; Smith, Jesper ; Schmidt‐Wetekam, Chris ; Faconti, Davide ; Graber‐Tilton, Alex ; Eyssette, Nicolas ; Meier, Tobias ; Kalkov, Igor ; Craig, Travis ; Payton, Nick ; McCrory, Stephen ; Wiedebach, Georg ; Layton, Brooke ; Neuhaus, Peter ; Pratt, Jerry</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Matthew ; Shrewsbury, Brandon ; Bertrand, Sylvain ; Calvert, Duncan ; Wu, Tingfan ; Duran, Daniel ; Stephen, Douglas ; Mertins, Nathan ; Carff, John ; Rifenburgh, William ; Smith, Jesper ; Schmidt‐Wetekam, Chris ; Faconti, Davide ; Graber‐Tilton, Alex ; Eyssette, Nicolas ; Meier, Tobias ; Kalkov, Igor ; Craig, Travis ; Payton, Nick ; McCrory, Stephen ; Wiedebach, Georg ; Layton, Brooke ; Neuhaus, Peter ; Pratt, Jerry</creatorcontrib><description>This article presents a retrospective analysis of Team IHMC's experience throughout the DARPA Robotics Challenge (DRC), where we took first or second place overall in each of the three phases. As an extremely demanding challenge typical of DARPA, the DRC required rapid research and development to push the boundaries of robotics and set a new benchmark for complex robotic behavior. We present how we addressed each of the eight tasks of the DRC and review our performance in the Finals. While the ambitious competition schedule limited extensive experimentation, we will review the data we collected during the approximately three years of our participation. We discuss some of the significant lessons learned that contributed to our success in the DRC. These include hardware lessons, software lessons, and human‐robot integration lessons. We describe refinements to the coactive design methodology that helped our designers connect human–machine interaction theory to both implementation and empirical data. This approach helped our team focus our limited resources on the issues most critical to success. In addition to helping readers understand our experiences in developing on a Boston Dynamics Atlas robot for the DRC, we hope this article will provide insights that apply more widely to robotics development and design of human–machine systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1556-4959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-4967</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rob.21674</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Boundaries ; Computer programs ; Design ; Design engineering ; Dynamical systems ; Readers ; Research and development ; Robotics ; Robots</subject><ispartof>Journal of field robotics, 2017-03, Vol.34 (2), p.241-261</ispartof><rights>2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-5401acf94de91e2af7f5ebba4fc31e43ba02332603bec9ef9969c6d40f045a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-5401acf94de91e2af7f5ebba4fc31e43ba02332603bec9ef9969c6d40f045a13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Frob.21674$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Frob.21674$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shrewsbury, Brandon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertrand, Sylvain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvert, Duncan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Tingfan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duran, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephen, Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mertins, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carff, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rifenburgh, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Jesper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt‐Wetekam, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faconti, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graber‐Tilton, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eyssette, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meier, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalkov, Igor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craig, Travis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payton, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCrory, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiedebach, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Layton, Brooke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neuhaus, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratt, Jerry</creatorcontrib><title>Team IHMC's Lessons Learned from the DARPA Robotics Challenge: Finding Data in the Rubble</title><title>Journal of field robotics</title><description>This article presents a retrospective analysis of Team IHMC's experience throughout the DARPA Robotics Challenge (DRC), where we took first or second place overall in each of the three phases. As an extremely demanding challenge typical of DARPA, the DRC required rapid research and development to push the boundaries of robotics and set a new benchmark for complex robotic behavior. We present how we addressed each of the eight tasks of the DRC and review our performance in the Finals. While the ambitious competition schedule limited extensive experimentation, we will review the data we collected during the approximately three years of our participation. We discuss some of the significant lessons learned that contributed to our success in the DRC. These include hardware lessons, software lessons, and human‐robot integration lessons. We describe refinements to the coactive design methodology that helped our designers connect human–machine interaction theory to both implementation and empirical data. This approach helped our team focus our limited resources on the issues most critical to success. In addition to helping readers understand our experiences in developing on a Boston Dynamics Atlas robot for the DRC, we hope this article will provide insights that apply more widely to robotics development and design of human–machine systems.</description><subject>Boundaries</subject><subject>Computer programs</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Design engineering</subject><subject>Dynamical systems</subject><subject>Readers</subject><subject>Research and development</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Robots</subject><issn>1556-4959</issn><issn>1556-4967</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10D1PwzAQBuAIgUQpDPwDSwzAkNZOnA-zlZTSSkVFURcmy07ObaokLnYi1H9P2iAGJKb3hudOp9dxbgkeEYy9sdFy5JEwomfOgARB6FIWRue_c8AunStrdxhTP2bBwPlYg6jQYv6W3Fu0BGt1fUxhasiRMrpCzRbQdJK-T1CqpW6KzKJkK8oS6g08oVlR50W9QVPRCFTUJ522UpZw7VwoUVq4-cmhs569rJO5u1y9LpLJ0s38KKZuQDERmWI0B0bAEypSAUgpqMp8AtSXAnu-74XYl5AxUIyFLAtzihWmgSD-0Hnoz-6N_mzBNrwqbAZlKWrQreUkjinBHvaO9O4P3enW1N1znQrjsOsIs0499ioz2loDiu9NUQlz4ATzY8e865ifOu7suLdfRQmH_yFPV8_9xjfprHsm</recordid><startdate>201703</startdate><enddate>201703</enddate><creator>Johnson, Matthew</creator><creator>Shrewsbury, Brandon</creator><creator>Bertrand, Sylvain</creator><creator>Calvert, Duncan</creator><creator>Wu, Tingfan</creator><creator>Duran, Daniel</creator><creator>Stephen, Douglas</creator><creator>Mertins, Nathan</creator><creator>Carff, John</creator><creator>Rifenburgh, William</creator><creator>Smith, Jesper</creator><creator>Schmidt‐Wetekam, Chris</creator><creator>Faconti, Davide</creator><creator>Graber‐Tilton, Alex</creator><creator>Eyssette, Nicolas</creator><creator>Meier, Tobias</creator><creator>Kalkov, Igor</creator><creator>Craig, Travis</creator><creator>Payton, Nick</creator><creator>McCrory, Stephen</creator><creator>Wiedebach, Georg</creator><creator>Layton, Brooke</creator><creator>Neuhaus, Peter</creator><creator>Pratt, Jerry</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201703</creationdate><title>Team IHMC's Lessons Learned from the DARPA Robotics Challenge: Finding Data in the Rubble</title><author>Johnson, Matthew ; Shrewsbury, Brandon ; Bertrand, Sylvain ; Calvert, Duncan ; Wu, Tingfan ; Duran, Daniel ; Stephen, Douglas ; Mertins, Nathan ; Carff, John ; Rifenburgh, William ; Smith, Jesper ; Schmidt‐Wetekam, Chris ; Faconti, Davide ; Graber‐Tilton, Alex ; Eyssette, Nicolas ; Meier, Tobias ; Kalkov, Igor ; Craig, Travis ; Payton, Nick ; McCrory, Stephen ; Wiedebach, Georg ; Layton, Brooke ; Neuhaus, Peter ; Pratt, Jerry</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-5401acf94de91e2af7f5ebba4fc31e43ba02332603bec9ef9969c6d40f045a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Boundaries</topic><topic>Computer programs</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Design engineering</topic><topic>Dynamical systems</topic><topic>Readers</topic><topic>Research and development</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Robots</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shrewsbury, Brandon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertrand, Sylvain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvert, Duncan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Tingfan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duran, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephen, Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mertins, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carff, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rifenburgh, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Jesper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt‐Wetekam, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faconti, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graber‐Tilton, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eyssette, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meier, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalkov, Igor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craig, Travis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payton, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCrory, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiedebach, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Layton, Brooke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neuhaus, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratt, Jerry</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of field robotics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnson, Matthew</au><au>Shrewsbury, Brandon</au><au>Bertrand, Sylvain</au><au>Calvert, Duncan</au><au>Wu, Tingfan</au><au>Duran, Daniel</au><au>Stephen, Douglas</au><au>Mertins, Nathan</au><au>Carff, John</au><au>Rifenburgh, William</au><au>Smith, Jesper</au><au>Schmidt‐Wetekam, Chris</au><au>Faconti, Davide</au><au>Graber‐Tilton, Alex</au><au>Eyssette, Nicolas</au><au>Meier, Tobias</au><au>Kalkov, Igor</au><au>Craig, Travis</au><au>Payton, Nick</au><au>McCrory, Stephen</au><au>Wiedebach, Georg</au><au>Layton, Brooke</au><au>Neuhaus, Peter</au><au>Pratt, Jerry</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Team IHMC's Lessons Learned from the DARPA Robotics Challenge: Finding Data in the Rubble</atitle><jtitle>Journal of field robotics</jtitle><date>2017-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>241</spage><epage>261</epage><pages>241-261</pages><issn>1556-4959</issn><eissn>1556-4967</eissn><abstract>This article presents a retrospective analysis of Team IHMC's experience throughout the DARPA Robotics Challenge (DRC), where we took first or second place overall in each of the three phases. As an extremely demanding challenge typical of DARPA, the DRC required rapid research and development to push the boundaries of robotics and set a new benchmark for complex robotic behavior. We present how we addressed each of the eight tasks of the DRC and review our performance in the Finals. While the ambitious competition schedule limited extensive experimentation, we will review the data we collected during the approximately three years of our participation. We discuss some of the significant lessons learned that contributed to our success in the DRC. These include hardware lessons, software lessons, and human‐robot integration lessons. We describe refinements to the coactive design methodology that helped our designers connect human–machine interaction theory to both implementation and empirical data. This approach helped our team focus our limited resources on the issues most critical to success. In addition to helping readers understand our experiences in developing on a Boston Dynamics Atlas robot for the DRC, we hope this article will provide insights that apply more widely to robotics development and design of human–machine systems.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/rob.21674</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1556-4959 |
ispartof | Journal of field robotics, 2017-03, Vol.34 (2), p.241-261 |
issn | 1556-4959 1556-4967 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1884102021 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Boundaries Computer programs Design Design engineering Dynamical systems Readers Research and development Robotics Robots |
title | Team IHMC's Lessons Learned from the DARPA Robotics Challenge: Finding Data in the Rubble |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T13%3A16%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Team%20IHMC's%20Lessons%20Learned%20from%20the%20DARPA%20Robotics%20Challenge:%20Finding%20Data%20in%20the%20Rubble&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20field%20robotics&rft.au=Johnson,%20Matthew&rft.date=2017-03&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=241&rft.epage=261&rft.pages=241-261&rft.issn=1556-4959&rft.eissn=1556-4967&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rob.21674&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4314350771%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1868615509&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |