Are Social, Economic and Environmental Well-Being Equally Important in all Countries Around the World? A Study by Income Levels
The main objective of this paper was to see whether different countries around the world show differences in their sustainability levels as captured in the indicators from the Sustainable Society Index (SSI, Van de Kerk and Manuel in Ecol Econ 66:228–242, 2012) according to their level of income. To...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Social indicators research 2017-03, Vol.131 (2), p.543-565 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 565 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 543 |
container_title | Social indicators research |
container_volume | 131 |
creator | Rodríguez-Rosa, Miguel Gallego-Álvarez, Isabel Vicente-Galindo, Mª Purificación Galindo-Villardón, Mª Purificación |
description | The main objective of this paper was to see whether different countries around the world show differences in their sustainability levels as captured in the indicators from the Sustainable Society Index (SSI, Van de Kerk and Manuel in Ecol Econ 66:228–242, 2012) according to their level of income. To do so, the X-STATIS and CO-STATIS multivariate techniques were employed. With these methods, our sample of 151 countries and 21 indicators can be jointly represented along four time periods. The results obtained permit us to visualize that the groups of countries by income levels show differences in some of the variables from the SSI, because of the lack of proximities between those variables and the countries. Moreover, with the X-STATIS technique, the possible evolution of the countries or indicators over time can be represented, and with CO-STATIS, the relations between the social, economic and environmental aspects can be shown as well. From our results we were able to deduce that, on the one hand, social and economic indicators, such as Public Debt or Employment, are associated with countries having high and upper-middle incomes, for example, Chile, Israel, Malta, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Spain, Portugal, France, Poland and Czech Republic. On the other hand, countries with low and lower-middle incomes are more associated with environmental issues. Also, after finding that the differences between the countries by income levels are mainly caused by the economic indicators, we carried out two CO-STATIS analyses, one for social and economic variables, and the other for economic and environmental variables. These findings led us to deduce that, generally, the social and economic indicators are not related to each other, nor are the economic indicators related to the environmental ones. However, for some of the countries individually both relations may be possible. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11205-016-1257-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1884097766</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48715555</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48715555</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-10b6c2d5e2b72c71fbedd3c9793b63e6ec6fa49eac4188a9d25fcc0745b1a0373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUGL1DAUx4soOK5-AA9CwIsHoy9J07QnGYdRFwY8rLLHkKava4c0mU3SZefkVzdLRcSDubwQfr_38vhX1UsG7xiAep8Y4yApsIYyLhW9f1RtmFSCQsfZ42oDAgRtBcDT6llKRwCQtaw31c9tRHIV7GTcW7K3wYd5ssT4gez93RSDn9Fn48g1Okc_4uRvyP52Mc6dyeV8CjEbn8nkSXkhu7D4HCdMZBvLdSD5B5LrEN3wgWzJVV6GM-mL522YkRzwDl16Xj0ZjUv44ne9qL5_2n_bfaGHr58vd9sDtTXUmTLoG8sHibxX3Co29jgMwnaqE30jsEHbjKbu0Niata3pBi5Ha0HVsmcGhBIX1Zu17ymG2wVT1vOUbFnKeAxL0sWqoVOqaQr6-h_0GJboy-8KVQa2XCkoFFspG0NKEUd9itNs4lkz0A-R6DUSXSLRD5Ho--Lw1UmF9TcY_-r8H-nVKh1TDvHPlLpVTJYjfgHijJjY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1879382770</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are Social, Economic and Environmental Well-Being Equally Important in all Countries Around the World? A Study by Income Levels</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Rodríguez-Rosa, Miguel ; Gallego-Álvarez, Isabel ; Vicente-Galindo, Mª Purificación ; Galindo-Villardón, Mª Purificación</creator><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-Rosa, Miguel ; Gallego-Álvarez, Isabel ; Vicente-Galindo, Mª Purificación ; Galindo-Villardón, Mª Purificación</creatorcontrib><description>The main objective of this paper was to see whether different countries around the world show differences in their sustainability levels as captured in the indicators from the Sustainable Society Index (SSI, Van de Kerk and Manuel in Ecol Econ 66:228–242, 2012) according to their level of income. To do so, the X-STATIS and CO-STATIS multivariate techniques were employed. With these methods, our sample of 151 countries and 21 indicators can be jointly represented along four time periods. The results obtained permit us to visualize that the groups of countries by income levels show differences in some of the variables from the SSI, because of the lack of proximities between those variables and the countries. Moreover, with the X-STATIS technique, the possible evolution of the countries or indicators over time can be represented, and with CO-STATIS, the relations between the social, economic and environmental aspects can be shown as well. From our results we were able to deduce that, on the one hand, social and economic indicators, such as Public Debt or Employment, are associated with countries having high and upper-middle incomes, for example, Chile, Israel, Malta, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Spain, Portugal, France, Poland and Czech Republic. On the other hand, countries with low and lower-middle incomes are more associated with environmental issues. Also, after finding that the differences between the countries by income levels are mainly caused by the economic indicators, we carried out two CO-STATIS analyses, one for social and economic variables, and the other for economic and environmental variables. These findings led us to deduce that, generally, the social and economic indicators are not related to each other, nor are the economic indicators related to the environmental ones. However, for some of the countries individually both relations may be possible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0303-8300</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0921</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11205-016-1257-x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SINRDZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Comparative analysis ; Cultural differences ; Economic conditions ; Economic indicators ; Economics ; Employment ; Environmental aspects ; Environmental conditions ; GNI ; Gross National Income ; Human Geography ; Income ; Manycountries ; Microeconomics ; Multivariate Analysis ; Public debt ; Public Health ; Quality of Life Research ; Research Methodology ; Social conditions & trends ; Social Indicators ; Social Problems ; Social research ; Social Sciences ; Society ; Sociology ; Statistical Analysis ; Studies ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development ; Thinking Skills ; Well being</subject><ispartof>Social indicators research, 2017-03, Vol.131 (2), p.543-565</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media 2016</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016</rights><rights>Social Indicators Research is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-10b6c2d5e2b72c71fbedd3c9793b63e6ec6fa49eac4188a9d25fcc0745b1a0373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-10b6c2d5e2b72c71fbedd3c9793b63e6ec6fa49eac4188a9d25fcc0745b1a0373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48715555$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48715555$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,805,27351,27931,27932,33781,41495,42564,51326,58024,58257</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-Rosa, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallego-Álvarez, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vicente-Galindo, Mª Purificación</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galindo-Villardón, Mª Purificación</creatorcontrib><title>Are Social, Economic and Environmental Well-Being Equally Important in all Countries Around the World? A Study by Income Levels</title><title>Social indicators research</title><addtitle>Soc Indic Res</addtitle><description>The main objective of this paper was to see whether different countries around the world show differences in their sustainability levels as captured in the indicators from the Sustainable Society Index (SSI, Van de Kerk and Manuel in Ecol Econ 66:228–242, 2012) according to their level of income. To do so, the X-STATIS and CO-STATIS multivariate techniques were employed. With these methods, our sample of 151 countries and 21 indicators can be jointly represented along four time periods. The results obtained permit us to visualize that the groups of countries by income levels show differences in some of the variables from the SSI, because of the lack of proximities between those variables and the countries. Moreover, with the X-STATIS technique, the possible evolution of the countries or indicators over time can be represented, and with CO-STATIS, the relations between the social, economic and environmental aspects can be shown as well. From our results we were able to deduce that, on the one hand, social and economic indicators, such as Public Debt or Employment, are associated with countries having high and upper-middle incomes, for example, Chile, Israel, Malta, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Spain, Portugal, France, Poland and Czech Republic. On the other hand, countries with low and lower-middle incomes are more associated with environmental issues. Also, after finding that the differences between the countries by income levels are mainly caused by the economic indicators, we carried out two CO-STATIS analyses, one for social and economic variables, and the other for economic and environmental variables. These findings led us to deduce that, generally, the social and economic indicators are not related to each other, nor are the economic indicators related to the environmental ones. However, for some of the countries individually both relations may be possible.</description><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Cultural differences</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Economic indicators</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>GNI</subject><subject>Gross National Income</subject><subject>Human Geography</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Manycountries</subject><subject>Microeconomics</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Public debt</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Social conditions & trends</subject><subject>Social Indicators</subject><subject>Social Problems</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Thinking Skills</subject><subject>Well being</subject><issn>0303-8300</issn><issn>1573-0921</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUGL1DAUx4soOK5-AA9CwIsHoy9J07QnGYdRFwY8rLLHkKava4c0mU3SZefkVzdLRcSDubwQfr_38vhX1UsG7xiAep8Y4yApsIYyLhW9f1RtmFSCQsfZ42oDAgRtBcDT6llKRwCQtaw31c9tRHIV7GTcW7K3wYd5ssT4gez93RSDn9Fn48g1Okc_4uRvyP52Mc6dyeV8CjEbn8nkSXkhu7D4HCdMZBvLdSD5B5LrEN3wgWzJVV6GM-mL522YkRzwDl16Xj0ZjUv44ne9qL5_2n_bfaGHr58vd9sDtTXUmTLoG8sHibxX3Co29jgMwnaqE30jsEHbjKbu0Niata3pBi5Ha0HVsmcGhBIX1Zu17ymG2wVT1vOUbFnKeAxL0sWqoVOqaQr6-h_0GJboy-8KVQa2XCkoFFspG0NKEUd9itNs4lkz0A-R6DUSXSLRD5Ho--Lw1UmF9TcY_-r8H-nVKh1TDvHPlLpVTJYjfgHijJjY</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Rodríguez-Rosa, Miguel</creator><creator>Gallego-Álvarez, Isabel</creator><creator>Vicente-Galindo, Mª Purificación</creator><creator>Galindo-Villardón, Mª Purificación</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>Are Social, Economic and Environmental Well-Being Equally Important in all Countries Around the World? A Study by Income Levels</title><author>Rodríguez-Rosa, Miguel ; Gallego-Álvarez, Isabel ; Vicente-Galindo, Mª Purificación ; Galindo-Villardón, Mª Purificación</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-10b6c2d5e2b72c71fbedd3c9793b63e6ec6fa49eac4188a9d25fcc0745b1a0373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Cultural differences</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Economic indicators</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>GNI</topic><topic>Gross National Income</topic><topic>Human Geography</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Manycountries</topic><topic>Microeconomics</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Public debt</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Social conditions & trends</topic><topic>Social Indicators</topic><topic>Social Problems</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Thinking Skills</topic><topic>Well being</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-Rosa, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallego-Álvarez, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vicente-Galindo, Mª Purificación</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galindo-Villardón, Mª Purificación</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Social indicators research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rodríguez-Rosa, Miguel</au><au>Gallego-Álvarez, Isabel</au><au>Vicente-Galindo, Mª Purificación</au><au>Galindo-Villardón, Mª Purificación</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are Social, Economic and Environmental Well-Being Equally Important in all Countries Around the World? A Study by Income Levels</atitle><jtitle>Social indicators research</jtitle><stitle>Soc Indic Res</stitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>131</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>543</spage><epage>565</epage><pages>543-565</pages><issn>0303-8300</issn><eissn>1573-0921</eissn><coden>SINRDZ</coden><abstract>The main objective of this paper was to see whether different countries around the world show differences in their sustainability levels as captured in the indicators from the Sustainable Society Index (SSI, Van de Kerk and Manuel in Ecol Econ 66:228–242, 2012) according to their level of income. To do so, the X-STATIS and CO-STATIS multivariate techniques were employed. With these methods, our sample of 151 countries and 21 indicators can be jointly represented along four time periods. The results obtained permit us to visualize that the groups of countries by income levels show differences in some of the variables from the SSI, because of the lack of proximities between those variables and the countries. Moreover, with the X-STATIS technique, the possible evolution of the countries or indicators over time can be represented, and with CO-STATIS, the relations between the social, economic and environmental aspects can be shown as well. From our results we were able to deduce that, on the one hand, social and economic indicators, such as Public Debt or Employment, are associated with countries having high and upper-middle incomes, for example, Chile, Israel, Malta, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Spain, Portugal, France, Poland and Czech Republic. On the other hand, countries with low and lower-middle incomes are more associated with environmental issues. Also, after finding that the differences between the countries by income levels are mainly caused by the economic indicators, we carried out two CO-STATIS analyses, one for social and economic variables, and the other for economic and environmental variables. These findings led us to deduce that, generally, the social and economic indicators are not related to each other, nor are the economic indicators related to the environmental ones. However, for some of the countries individually both relations may be possible.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s11205-016-1257-x</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0303-8300 |
ispartof | Social indicators research, 2017-03, Vol.131 (2), p.543-565 |
issn | 0303-8300 1573-0921 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1884097766 |
source | SpringerNature Journals; Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Comparative analysis Cultural differences Economic conditions Economic indicators Economics Employment Environmental aspects Environmental conditions GNI Gross National Income Human Geography Income Manycountries Microeconomics Multivariate Analysis Public debt Public Health Quality of Life Research Research Methodology Social conditions & trends Social Indicators Social Problems Social research Social Sciences Society Sociology Statistical Analysis Studies Sustainability Sustainable development Thinking Skills Well being |
title | Are Social, Economic and Environmental Well-Being Equally Important in all Countries Around the World? A Study by Income Levels |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T05%3A16%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20Social,%20Economic%20and%20Environmental%20Well-Being%20Equally%20Important%20in%20all%20Countries%20Around%20the%20World?%20A%20Study%20by%20Income%20Levels&rft.jtitle=Social%20indicators%20research&rft.au=Rodr%C3%ADguez-Rosa,%20Miguel&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=131&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=543&rft.epage=565&rft.pages=543-565&rft.issn=0303-8300&rft.eissn=1573-0921&rft.coden=SINRDZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11205-016-1257-x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48715555%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1879382770&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48715555&rfr_iscdi=true |