Structure of the Dospert: Is There Evidence for a General Risk Factor?

Structure of the Dospert: Is There Evidence for a General Risk Factor?

The Domain‐specific Risk‐taking scale was designed to assess risk taking in specific domains. This approach is unconventional in personality assessment but reflects conventional wisdom in the decision community that cross‐situational consistency in risk taking is more myth than reality. We applied b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of behavioral decision making 2017-04, Vol.30 (2), p.400-406
Hauptverfasser: Highhouse, Scott, Nye, Christopher D., Zhang, Don C., Rada, Thaddeus B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
bifactor analysis
Decision making
DOSPERT
personality
Risk
risk taking
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 406
container_issue 2
container_start_page 400
container_title Journal of behavioral decision making
container_volume 30
creator Highhouse, Scott
Nye, Christopher D.
Zhang, Don C.
Rada, Thaddeus B.
description The Domain‐specific Risk‐taking scale was designed to assess risk taking in specific domains. This approach is unconventional in personality assessment but reflects conventional wisdom in the decision community that cross‐situational consistency in risk taking is more myth than reality. We applied bifactor analysis to a large sample (n = 921) of responses to the Domain‐specific Risk Taking. Results showed that, in addition to domain‐specific facets, there does appear to be evidence for a general risk‐taking disposition. And this general appetite for risk appears to be useful for predicting real‐world outcomes. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/bdm.1953
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1884097758</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4320913889</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3573-e9ae1acf4af91293e9faf9794990ebe417838030568938f20b538eb49c26afd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1LAzEQBuAgCtYq-BMCXrxsnWx2m8SLaL8sVATtPWTTCd26bWqyq_Tfu7WCIHiagXl4GV5CLhn0GEB6UyzWPaZyfkQ6DJRKQAh2TDogVZbwNBen5CzGFUB749Ah49c6NLZuAlLvaL1EOvRxi6G-pdNI50tsD6OPcoEbi9T5QA2d4AaDqehLGd_o2Njah7tzcuJMFfHiZ3bJfDyaDx6T2fNkOrifJZbngieoDDJjXWacYqniqFy7CZUpBVhgxoTkEjjkfam4dCkUOZdYZMqmfeMWvEuuD7Hb4N8bjLVel9FiVZkN-iZqJmUGSohctvTqD135Jmza51olJOSMZf3fQBt8jAGd3oZybcJOM9D7PnXbp9732dLkQD_LCnf_Ov0wfPr2X6cIc7s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1878051146</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Structure of the Dospert: Is There Evidence for a General Risk Factor?</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Highhouse, Scott ; Nye, Christopher D. ; Zhang, Don C. ; Rada, Thaddeus B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Highhouse, Scott ; Nye, Christopher D. ; Zhang, Don C. ; Rada, Thaddeus B.</creatorcontrib><description>The Domain‐specific Risk‐taking scale was designed to assess risk taking in specific domains. This approach is unconventional in personality assessment but reflects conventional wisdom in the decision community that cross‐situational consistency in risk taking is more myth than reality. We applied bifactor analysis to a large sample (n = 921) of responses to the Domain‐specific Risk Taking. Results showed that, in addition to domain‐specific facets, there does appear to be evidence for a general risk‐taking disposition. And this general appetite for risk appears to be useful for predicting real‐world outcomes. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-3257</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/bdm.1953</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>bifactor analysis ; Decision making ; DOSPERT ; personality ; Risk ; risk taking</subject><ispartof>Journal of behavioral decision making, 2017-04, Vol.30 (2), p.400-406</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3573-e9ae1acf4af91293e9faf9794990ebe417838030568938f20b538eb49c26afd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3573-e9ae1acf4af91293e9faf9794990ebe417838030568938f20b538eb49c26afd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fbdm.1953$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fbdm.1953$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Highhouse, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nye, Christopher D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Don C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rada, Thaddeus B.</creatorcontrib><title>Structure of the Dospert: Is There Evidence for a General Risk Factor?</title><title>Journal of behavioral decision making</title><description>The Domain‐specific Risk‐taking scale was designed to assess risk taking in specific domains. This approach is unconventional in personality assessment but reflects conventional wisdom in the decision community that cross‐situational consistency in risk taking is more myth than reality. We applied bifactor analysis to a large sample (n = 921) of responses to the Domain‐specific Risk Taking. Results showed that, in addition to domain‐specific facets, there does appear to be evidence for a general risk‐taking disposition. And this general appetite for risk appears to be useful for predicting real‐world outcomes. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>bifactor analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>DOSPERT</subject><subject>personality</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>risk taking</subject><issn>0894-3257</issn><issn>1099-0771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10E1LAzEQBuAgCtYq-BMCXrxsnWx2m8SLaL8sVATtPWTTCd26bWqyq_Tfu7WCIHiagXl4GV5CLhn0GEB6UyzWPaZyfkQ6DJRKQAh2TDogVZbwNBen5CzGFUB749Ah49c6NLZuAlLvaL1EOvRxi6G-pdNI50tsD6OPcoEbi9T5QA2d4AaDqehLGd_o2Njah7tzcuJMFfHiZ3bJfDyaDx6T2fNkOrifJZbngieoDDJjXWacYqniqFy7CZUpBVhgxoTkEjjkfam4dCkUOZdYZMqmfeMWvEuuD7Hb4N8bjLVel9FiVZkN-iZqJmUGSohctvTqD135Jmza51olJOSMZf3fQBt8jAGd3oZybcJOM9D7PnXbp9732dLkQD_LCnf_Ov0wfPr2X6cIc7s</recordid><startdate>201704</startdate><enddate>201704</enddate><creator>Highhouse, Scott</creator><creator>Nye, Christopher D.</creator><creator>Zhang, Don C.</creator><creator>Rada, Thaddeus B.</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201704</creationdate><title>Structure of the Dospert: Is There Evidence for a General Risk Factor?</title><author>Highhouse, Scott ; Nye, Christopher D. ; Zhang, Don C. ; Rada, Thaddeus B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3573-e9ae1acf4af91293e9faf9794990ebe417838030568938f20b538eb49c26afd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>bifactor analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>DOSPERT</topic><topic>personality</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>risk taking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Highhouse, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nye, Christopher D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Don C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rada, Thaddeus B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of behavioral decision making</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Highhouse, Scott</au><au>Nye, Christopher D.</au><au>Zhang, Don C.</au><au>Rada, Thaddeus B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Structure of the Dospert: Is There Evidence for a General Risk Factor?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of behavioral decision making</jtitle><date>2017-04</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>400</spage><epage>406</epage><pages>400-406</pages><issn>0894-3257</issn><eissn>1099-0771</eissn><abstract>The Domain‐specific Risk‐taking scale was designed to assess risk taking in specific domains. This approach is unconventional in personality assessment but reflects conventional wisdom in the decision community that cross‐situational consistency in risk taking is more myth than reality. We applied bifactor analysis to a large sample (n = 921) of responses to the Domain‐specific Risk Taking. Results showed that, in addition to domain‐specific facets, there does appear to be evidence for a general risk‐taking disposition. And this general appetite for risk appears to be useful for predicting real‐world outcomes. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/bdm.1953</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0894-3257
ispartof Journal of behavioral decision making, 2017-04, Vol.30 (2), p.400-406
issn 0894-3257
1099-0771
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1884097758
source EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects bifactor analysis
Decision making
DOSPERT
personality
Risk
risk taking
title Structure of the Dospert: Is There Evidence for a General Risk Factor?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T18%3A05%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Structure%20of%20the%20Dospert:%20Is%20There%20Evidence%20for%20a%20General%20Risk%20Factor?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20behavioral%20decision%20making&rft.au=Highhouse,%20Scott&rft.date=2017-04&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=400&rft.epage=406&rft.pages=400-406&rft.issn=0894-3257&rft.eissn=1099-0771&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/bdm.1953&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4320913889%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1878051146&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true