One Hundred Years of Work Design Research: Looking Back and Looking Forward

In this article we take a big picture perspective on work design research. In the first section of the paper we identify influential work design articles and use scientific mapping to identify distinct clusters of research. Pulling this material together, we identify five key work design perspective...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied psychology 2017-03, Vol.102 (3), p.403-420
Hauptverfasser: Parker, Sharon K., Morgeson, Frederick P., Johns, Gary
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 420
container_issue 3
container_start_page 403
container_title Journal of applied psychology
container_volume 102
creator Parker, Sharon K.
Morgeson, Frederick P.
Johns, Gary
description In this article we take a big picture perspective on work design research. In the first section of the paper we identify influential work design articles and use scientific mapping to identify distinct clusters of research. Pulling this material together, we identify five key work design perspectives that map onto distinct historical developments: (a) sociotechnical systems and autonomous work groups, (b) job characteristics model, (c) job demands-control model, (d) job demands-resources model, and (e) role theory. The grounding of these perspectives in the past is understandable, but we suggest that some of the distinction between clusters is convenient rather than substantive. Thus we also identify contemporary integrative perspectives on work design that build connections across the clusters and we argue that there is scope for further integration. In the second section of the paper, we review the role of Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) in shaping work design research. We conclude that JAP has played a vital role in the advancement of this topic over the last 100 years. Nevertheless, we suspect that to continue to play a leading role in advancing the science and practice of work design, the journal might need to publish research that is broader, more contextualized, and team-oriented. In the third section, we address the impact of work design research on: applied psychology and management, disciplines beyond our own, management thinking, work practice, and national policy agendas. Finally, we draw together observations from our analysis and identify key future directions for the field.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/apl0000106
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1884096525</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1867543675</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a490t-7f85e93991aef7762146ef141430af31bc4adea73bc6c0a84e5098061e93caf73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0d9rFDEQB_DgD-xZ--IfIAu-FHF1svndN63WigcFUcSnMJedrdvb26zJLaX_vTmuVvBBzEMCw2e-TBjGnnJ4xUGY1zgNUA4HfY8tuBOu5lbJ--zIGculENaBbOABWwA0vHYFHrDHOV-VFikcPGIHjeW2kVot2KeLkarzeWwTtdV3wpSr2FXfYlpX7yj3l2P1mXIphx8n1TLGdT9eVm8xrCsc27vCWUzXmNon7GGHQ6aj2_eQfT17_-X0vF5efPh4-mZZo3SwrU1nFZWpHUfqjNENl5o6LstwgJ3gqyCxJTRiFXQAtJIUOAual6aAnRGH7HifO6X4c6a89Zs-BxoGHCnO2XNrJTitGvUfVBslRbkKff4XvYpzGstHijIWFBfW_ltpLRqt1E692KuQYs6JOj-lfoPpxnPwux36Pzss-Nlt5LzaUHtHfy-pgJd7gBP6Kd8ETNs-DJTDnBKN211YSW288BKE-AWlT5_u</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1866326558</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>One Hundred Years of Work Design Research: Looking Back and Looking Forward</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Parker, Sharon K. ; Morgeson, Frederick P. ; Johns, Gary</creator><contributor>Chen, Gilad</contributor><creatorcontrib>Parker, Sharon K. ; Morgeson, Frederick P. ; Johns, Gary ; Chen, Gilad</creatorcontrib><description>In this article we take a big picture perspective on work design research. In the first section of the paper we identify influential work design articles and use scientific mapping to identify distinct clusters of research. Pulling this material together, we identify five key work design perspectives that map onto distinct historical developments: (a) sociotechnical systems and autonomous work groups, (b) job characteristics model, (c) job demands-control model, (d) job demands-resources model, and (e) role theory. The grounding of these perspectives in the past is understandable, but we suggest that some of the distinction between clusters is convenient rather than substantive. Thus we also identify contemporary integrative perspectives on work design that build connections across the clusters and we argue that there is scope for further integration. In the second section of the paper, we review the role of Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) in shaping work design research. We conclude that JAP has played a vital role in the advancement of this topic over the last 100 years. Nevertheless, we suspect that to continue to play a leading role in advancing the science and practice of work design, the journal might need to publish research that is broader, more contextualized, and team-oriented. In the third section, we address the impact of work design research on: applied psychology and management, disciplines beyond our own, management thinking, work practice, and national policy agendas. Finally, we draw together observations from our analysis and identify key future directions for the field.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9010</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781433890420</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1433890429</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1854</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/apl0000106</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28182465</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAPGBP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Applied Psychology ; Cluster analysis ; Effectiveness ; Employment ; Group dynamics ; Human ; Human Resource Management ; Humans ; Industrial and Organizational Psychology ; Job Characteristics ; Job design ; Management theory ; Occupational psychology ; Organization and Administration ; Psychology, Applied ; Research methodology ; Research methods ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied psychology, 2017-03, Vol.102 (3), p.403-420</ispartof><rights>2017 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>(c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).</rights><rights>2017, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Mar 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a490t-7f85e93991aef7762146ef141430af31bc4adea73bc6c0a84e5098061e93caf73</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-0978-1873</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28182465$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Chen, Gilad</contributor><creatorcontrib>Parker, Sharon K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgeson, Frederick P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johns, Gary</creatorcontrib><title>One Hundred Years of Work Design Research: Looking Back and Looking Forward</title><title>Journal of applied psychology</title><addtitle>J Appl Psychol</addtitle><description>In this article we take a big picture perspective on work design research. In the first section of the paper we identify influential work design articles and use scientific mapping to identify distinct clusters of research. Pulling this material together, we identify five key work design perspectives that map onto distinct historical developments: (a) sociotechnical systems and autonomous work groups, (b) job characteristics model, (c) job demands-control model, (d) job demands-resources model, and (e) role theory. The grounding of these perspectives in the past is understandable, but we suggest that some of the distinction between clusters is convenient rather than substantive. Thus we also identify contemporary integrative perspectives on work design that build connections across the clusters and we argue that there is scope for further integration. In the second section of the paper, we review the role of Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) in shaping work design research. We conclude that JAP has played a vital role in the advancement of this topic over the last 100 years. Nevertheless, we suspect that to continue to play a leading role in advancing the science and practice of work design, the journal might need to publish research that is broader, more contextualized, and team-oriented. In the third section, we address the impact of work design research on: applied psychology and management, disciplines beyond our own, management thinking, work practice, and national policy agendas. Finally, we draw together observations from our analysis and identify key future directions for the field.</description><subject>Applied Psychology</subject><subject>Cluster analysis</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Group dynamics</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Human Resource Management</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Industrial and Organizational Psychology</subject><subject>Job Characteristics</subject><subject>Job design</subject><subject>Management theory</subject><subject>Occupational psychology</subject><subject>Organization and Administration</subject><subject>Psychology, Applied</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Research methods</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0021-9010</issn><issn>1939-1854</issn><isbn>9781433890420</isbn><isbn>1433890429</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0d9rFDEQB_DgD-xZ--IfIAu-FHF1svndN63WigcFUcSnMJedrdvb26zJLaX_vTmuVvBBzEMCw2e-TBjGnnJ4xUGY1zgNUA4HfY8tuBOu5lbJ--zIGculENaBbOABWwA0vHYFHrDHOV-VFikcPGIHjeW2kVot2KeLkarzeWwTtdV3wpSr2FXfYlpX7yj3l2P1mXIphx8n1TLGdT9eVm8xrCsc27vCWUzXmNon7GGHQ6aj2_eQfT17_-X0vF5efPh4-mZZo3SwrU1nFZWpHUfqjNENl5o6LstwgJ3gqyCxJTRiFXQAtJIUOAual6aAnRGH7HifO6X4c6a89Zs-BxoGHCnO2XNrJTitGvUfVBslRbkKff4XvYpzGstHijIWFBfW_ltpLRqt1E692KuQYs6JOj-lfoPpxnPwux36Pzss-Nlt5LzaUHtHfy-pgJd7gBP6Kd8ETNs-DJTDnBKN211YSW288BKE-AWlT5_u</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Parker, Sharon K.</creator><creator>Morgeson, Frederick P.</creator><creator>Johns, Gary</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0978-1873</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>One Hundred Years of Work Design Research: Looking Back and Looking Forward</title><author>Parker, Sharon K. ; Morgeson, Frederick P. ; Johns, Gary</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a490t-7f85e93991aef7762146ef141430af31bc4adea73bc6c0a84e5098061e93caf73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Applied Psychology</topic><topic>Cluster analysis</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Group dynamics</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Human Resource Management</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Industrial and Organizational Psychology</topic><topic>Job Characteristics</topic><topic>Job design</topic><topic>Management theory</topic><topic>Occupational psychology</topic><topic>Organization and Administration</topic><topic>Psychology, Applied</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Research methods</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parker, Sharon K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgeson, Frederick P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johns, Gary</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parker, Sharon K.</au><au>Morgeson, Frederick P.</au><au>Johns, Gary</au><au>Chen, Gilad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>One Hundred Years of Work Design Research: Looking Back and Looking Forward</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Psychol</addtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>403</spage><epage>420</epage><pages>403-420</pages><issn>0021-9010</issn><eissn>1939-1854</eissn><isbn>9781433890420</isbn><isbn>1433890429</isbn><coden>JAPGBP</coden><abstract>In this article we take a big picture perspective on work design research. In the first section of the paper we identify influential work design articles and use scientific mapping to identify distinct clusters of research. Pulling this material together, we identify five key work design perspectives that map onto distinct historical developments: (a) sociotechnical systems and autonomous work groups, (b) job characteristics model, (c) job demands-control model, (d) job demands-resources model, and (e) role theory. The grounding of these perspectives in the past is understandable, but we suggest that some of the distinction between clusters is convenient rather than substantive. Thus we also identify contemporary integrative perspectives on work design that build connections across the clusters and we argue that there is scope for further integration. In the second section of the paper, we review the role of Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) in shaping work design research. We conclude that JAP has played a vital role in the advancement of this topic over the last 100 years. Nevertheless, we suspect that to continue to play a leading role in advancing the science and practice of work design, the journal might need to publish research that is broader, more contextualized, and team-oriented. In the third section, we address the impact of work design research on: applied psychology and management, disciplines beyond our own, management thinking, work practice, and national policy agendas. Finally, we draw together observations from our analysis and identify key future directions for the field.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>28182465</pmid><doi>10.1037/apl0000106</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0978-1873</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9010
ispartof Journal of applied psychology, 2017-03, Vol.102 (3), p.403-420
issn 0021-9010
1939-1854
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1884096525
source MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Applied Psychology
Cluster analysis
Effectiveness
Employment
Group dynamics
Human
Human Resource Management
Humans
Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Job Characteristics
Job design
Management theory
Occupational psychology
Organization and Administration
Psychology, Applied
Research methodology
Research methods
Studies
title One Hundred Years of Work Design Research: Looking Back and Looking Forward
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T13%3A39%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=One%20Hundred%20Years%20of%20Work%20Design%20Research:%20Looking%20Back%20and%20Looking%20Forward&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20psychology&rft.au=Parker,%20Sharon%20K.&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=403&rft.epage=420&rft.pages=403-420&rft.issn=0021-9010&rft.eissn=1939-1854&rft.isbn=9781433890420&rft.isbn_list=1433890429&rft.coden=JAPGBP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/apl0000106&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1867543675%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1866326558&rft_id=info:pmid/28182465&rfr_iscdi=true