Osteoporosis in the Women’s Health Initiative: Another Treatment Gap?
Abstract Background Osteoporotic fractures are associated with high morbidity, mortality, and cost. Methods We performed a post hoc analysis of the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) clinical trials (CT) data to assess osteoporosis treatment and identify participant characteristics associated with util...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of medicine 2017-08, Vol.130 (8), p.937-948 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 948 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 937 |
container_title | The American journal of medicine |
container_volume | 130 |
creator | Sattari, Maryam, MD, MS Cauley, Jane A., DrPH Garvan, Cynthia, PhD Johnson, Karen C., MD, MPH LaMonte, Michael J., PhD MPH Li, Wenjun, PhD Limacher, Marian, MD Manini, Todd, PhD Sarto, Gloria E., MD, PhD Sullivan, Shannon D., MD, PhD Wactawski-Wende, Jean, PhD Beyth, Rebecca J., MD, MSc |
description | Abstract Background Osteoporotic fractures are associated with high morbidity, mortality, and cost. Methods We performed a post hoc analysis of the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) clinical trials (CT) data to assess osteoporosis treatment and identify participant characteristics associated with utilization of osteoporosis medication(s) after new diagnoses of osteoporosis and/or fracture. Information from visits prior to and immediately subsequent to the first fracture event or osteoporosis diagnosis were evaluated for medication use. A full logistic regression model was used to identify factors predictive of osteoporosis medication use after a fracture and/or a diagnosis of osteoporosis. Results The median length of follow-up from enrollment to the last WHI clinic visit for the study cohort was 13.9 years. Among the 13,990 women who reported new diagnoses of osteoporosis and/or fracture between enrollment and their final WHI visit, and also had medication data available, 21.6% reported taking an osteoporosis medication other than estrogen. Higher daily calcium intake, diagnosis of osteoporosis alone or both osteoporosis and fracture (compared to diagnosis of fracture alone), Asian or Pacific Islander race/ethnicity (compared to white/Caucasian), higher income, and hormone therapy use (past or present) were associated with significantly higher likelihood of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy. Women with black/African-American race/ethnicity (compared to white/Caucasian), BMI > 30 (compared to BMI of 18.5-24.9), current tobacco use (compared to past use or lifetime nonusers), and history of arthritis were less likely to use osteoporosis treatment. Conclusion Despite well-established treatment guidelines in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and/or history of fractures, pharmacotherapy use was suboptimal in this study. Initiation of osteoporosis treatment after fragility fracture may represent an opportunity to improve later outcomes in these high-risk women. Specific attention needs to be paid to increasing treatment among women with fragility fractures, obesity, current tobacco use, history of arthritis or of black race/ethnicity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.02.042 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1883841229</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0002934317303224</els_id><sourcerecordid>1883841229</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-2fc45df34a3163dce0b512ffe2a271a75e949ab0379f0ecdb1120e0aeb339eca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFO3DAQhi1UVLa0b4CqHHtJOh47yYZDK4TogoTEAVCPluNMhNMkXmwvEre-Rl-PJ6mjhUsvPVkjf_-M5hvGTjgUHHj1dSj0NEzUFQi8LgALkHjAVrwsy7zmFb5jKwDAvBFSHLEPIQyphKas3rMjXIuqkliu2OYmRHJb512wIbNzFh8o--kmml9-_wnZJekxPmRXs41WR_tEp9nZ7BLjsztPOiYuZhu9_f6RHfZ6DPTp9T1m9z8u7s4v8-ubzdX52XVuZCVijr2RZdcLqQWvRGcI2pJj3xNqrLmuS2pko1sQddMDma7lHIFAUytEQ0aLY_Zl33fr3eOOQlSTDYbGUc_kdkHx9VqsJUdsEir3qEnLBU-92no7af-sOKhFoRrUXqFaFCpAlRSm2OfXCbt2-XsLvTlLwLc9QGnPJ0teBWNpNtRZTyaqztn_Tfi3gRntbI0ef9EzhcHt_JwcKq5CCqjb5YzLFXktQCBK8ReVEJmL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1883841229</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Osteoporosis in the Women’s Health Initiative: Another Treatment Gap?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Sattari, Maryam, MD, MS ; Cauley, Jane A., DrPH ; Garvan, Cynthia, PhD ; Johnson, Karen C., MD, MPH ; LaMonte, Michael J., PhD MPH ; Li, Wenjun, PhD ; Limacher, Marian, MD ; Manini, Todd, PhD ; Sarto, Gloria E., MD, PhD ; Sullivan, Shannon D., MD, PhD ; Wactawski-Wende, Jean, PhD ; Beyth, Rebecca J., MD, MSc</creator><creatorcontrib>Sattari, Maryam, MD, MS ; Cauley, Jane A., DrPH ; Garvan, Cynthia, PhD ; Johnson, Karen C., MD, MPH ; LaMonte, Michael J., PhD MPH ; Li, Wenjun, PhD ; Limacher, Marian, MD ; Manini, Todd, PhD ; Sarto, Gloria E., MD, PhD ; Sullivan, Shannon D., MD, PhD ; Wactawski-Wende, Jean, PhD ; Beyth, Rebecca J., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Osteoporotic fractures are associated with high morbidity, mortality, and cost. Methods We performed a post hoc analysis of the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) clinical trials (CT) data to assess osteoporosis treatment and identify participant characteristics associated with utilization of osteoporosis medication(s) after new diagnoses of osteoporosis and/or fracture. Information from visits prior to and immediately subsequent to the first fracture event or osteoporosis diagnosis were evaluated for medication use. A full logistic regression model was used to identify factors predictive of osteoporosis medication use after a fracture and/or a diagnosis of osteoporosis. Results The median length of follow-up from enrollment to the last WHI clinic visit for the study cohort was 13.9 years. Among the 13,990 women who reported new diagnoses of osteoporosis and/or fracture between enrollment and their final WHI visit, and also had medication data available, 21.6% reported taking an osteoporosis medication other than estrogen. Higher daily calcium intake, diagnosis of osteoporosis alone or both osteoporosis and fracture (compared to diagnosis of fracture alone), Asian or Pacific Islander race/ethnicity (compared to white/Caucasian), higher income, and hormone therapy use (past or present) were associated with significantly higher likelihood of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy. Women with black/African-American race/ethnicity (compared to white/Caucasian), BMI > 30 (compared to BMI of 18.5-24.9), current tobacco use (compared to past use or lifetime nonusers), and history of arthritis were less likely to use osteoporosis treatment. Conclusion Despite well-established treatment guidelines in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and/or history of fractures, pharmacotherapy use was suboptimal in this study. Initiation of osteoporosis treatment after fragility fracture may represent an opportunity to improve later outcomes in these high-risk women. Specific attention needs to be paid to increasing treatment among women with fragility fractures, obesity, current tobacco use, history of arthritis or of black race/ethnicity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9343</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-7162</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.02.042</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28366425</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Bone Density Conservation Agents - therapeutic use ; Calcium - therapeutic use ; Disparity ; Educational Status ; Female ; Forecasting ; Fracture ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Logistic Models ; Longitudinal Studies ; Middle Aged ; Multicenter Studies as Topic ; Osteoporosis ; Osteoporosis - complications ; Osteoporosis - drug therapy ; Osteoporosis - epidemiology ; Osteoporotic Fractures - epidemiology ; Osteoporotic Fractures - prevention & control ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data ; Social Class ; Treatment ; United States - epidemiology ; Vitamin D - therapeutic use ; Women's Health - statistics & numerical data</subject><ispartof>The American journal of medicine, 2017-08, Vol.130 (8), p.937-948</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-2fc45df34a3163dce0b512ffe2a271a75e949ab0379f0ecdb1120e0aeb339eca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-2fc45df34a3163dce0b512ffe2a271a75e949ab0379f0ecdb1120e0aeb339eca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.02.042$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28366425$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sattari, Maryam, MD, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cauley, Jane A., DrPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garvan, Cynthia, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Karen C., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaMonte, Michael J., PhD MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Wenjun, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Limacher, Marian, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manini, Todd, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarto, Gloria E., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Shannon D., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wactawski-Wende, Jean, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beyth, Rebecca J., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><title>Osteoporosis in the Women’s Health Initiative: Another Treatment Gap?</title><title>The American journal of medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Med</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Osteoporotic fractures are associated with high morbidity, mortality, and cost. Methods We performed a post hoc analysis of the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) clinical trials (CT) data to assess osteoporosis treatment and identify participant characteristics associated with utilization of osteoporosis medication(s) after new diagnoses of osteoporosis and/or fracture. Information from visits prior to and immediately subsequent to the first fracture event or osteoporosis diagnosis were evaluated for medication use. A full logistic regression model was used to identify factors predictive of osteoporosis medication use after a fracture and/or a diagnosis of osteoporosis. Results The median length of follow-up from enrollment to the last WHI clinic visit for the study cohort was 13.9 years. Among the 13,990 women who reported new diagnoses of osteoporosis and/or fracture between enrollment and their final WHI visit, and also had medication data available, 21.6% reported taking an osteoporosis medication other than estrogen. Higher daily calcium intake, diagnosis of osteoporosis alone or both osteoporosis and fracture (compared to diagnosis of fracture alone), Asian or Pacific Islander race/ethnicity (compared to white/Caucasian), higher income, and hormone therapy use (past or present) were associated with significantly higher likelihood of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy. Women with black/African-American race/ethnicity (compared to white/Caucasian), BMI > 30 (compared to BMI of 18.5-24.9), current tobacco use (compared to past use or lifetime nonusers), and history of arthritis were less likely to use osteoporosis treatment. Conclusion Despite well-established treatment guidelines in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and/or history of fractures, pharmacotherapy use was suboptimal in this study. Initiation of osteoporosis treatment after fragility fracture may represent an opportunity to improve later outcomes in these high-risk women. Specific attention needs to be paid to increasing treatment among women with fragility fractures, obesity, current tobacco use, history of arthritis or of black race/ethnicity.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Bone Density Conservation Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Calcium - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Disparity</subject><subject>Educational Status</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Fracture</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multicenter Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - complications</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Osteoporotic Fractures - epidemiology</subject><subject>Osteoporotic Fractures - prevention & control</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Social Class</subject><subject>Treatment</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><subject>Vitamin D - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Women's Health - statistics & numerical data</subject><issn>0002-9343</issn><issn>1555-7162</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFO3DAQhi1UVLa0b4CqHHtJOh47yYZDK4TogoTEAVCPluNMhNMkXmwvEre-Rl-PJ6mjhUsvPVkjf_-M5hvGTjgUHHj1dSj0NEzUFQi8LgALkHjAVrwsy7zmFb5jKwDAvBFSHLEPIQyphKas3rMjXIuqkliu2OYmRHJb512wIbNzFh8o--kmml9-_wnZJekxPmRXs41WR_tEp9nZ7BLjsztPOiYuZhu9_f6RHfZ6DPTp9T1m9z8u7s4v8-ubzdX52XVuZCVijr2RZdcLqQWvRGcI2pJj3xNqrLmuS2pko1sQddMDma7lHIFAUytEQ0aLY_Zl33fr3eOOQlSTDYbGUc_kdkHx9VqsJUdsEir3qEnLBU-92no7af-sOKhFoRrUXqFaFCpAlRSm2OfXCbt2-XsLvTlLwLc9QGnPJ0teBWNpNtRZTyaqztn_Tfi3gRntbI0ef9EzhcHt_JwcKq5CCqjb5YzLFXktQCBK8ReVEJmL</recordid><startdate>20170801</startdate><enddate>20170801</enddate><creator>Sattari, Maryam, MD, MS</creator><creator>Cauley, Jane A., DrPH</creator><creator>Garvan, Cynthia, PhD</creator><creator>Johnson, Karen C., MD, MPH</creator><creator>LaMonte, Michael J., PhD MPH</creator><creator>Li, Wenjun, PhD</creator><creator>Limacher, Marian, MD</creator><creator>Manini, Todd, PhD</creator><creator>Sarto, Gloria E., MD, PhD</creator><creator>Sullivan, Shannon D., MD, PhD</creator><creator>Wactawski-Wende, Jean, PhD</creator><creator>Beyth, Rebecca J., MD, MSc</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170801</creationdate><title>Osteoporosis in the Women’s Health Initiative: Another Treatment Gap?</title><author>Sattari, Maryam, MD, MS ; Cauley, Jane A., DrPH ; Garvan, Cynthia, PhD ; Johnson, Karen C., MD, MPH ; LaMonte, Michael J., PhD MPH ; Li, Wenjun, PhD ; Limacher, Marian, MD ; Manini, Todd, PhD ; Sarto, Gloria E., MD, PhD ; Sullivan, Shannon D., MD, PhD ; Wactawski-Wende, Jean, PhD ; Beyth, Rebecca J., MD, MSc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-2fc45df34a3163dce0b512ffe2a271a75e949ab0379f0ecdb1120e0aeb339eca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Bone Density Conservation Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Calcium - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Disparity</topic><topic>Educational Status</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Fracture</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multicenter Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - complications</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Osteoporotic Fractures - epidemiology</topic><topic>Osteoporotic Fractures - prevention & control</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Social Class</topic><topic>Treatment</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><topic>Vitamin D - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Women's Health - statistics & numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sattari, Maryam, MD, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cauley, Jane A., DrPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garvan, Cynthia, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Karen C., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaMonte, Michael J., PhD MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Wenjun, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Limacher, Marian, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manini, Todd, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarto, Gloria E., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Shannon D., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wactawski-Wende, Jean, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beyth, Rebecca J., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sattari, Maryam, MD, MS</au><au>Cauley, Jane A., DrPH</au><au>Garvan, Cynthia, PhD</au><au>Johnson, Karen C., MD, MPH</au><au>LaMonte, Michael J., PhD MPH</au><au>Li, Wenjun, PhD</au><au>Limacher, Marian, MD</au><au>Manini, Todd, PhD</au><au>Sarto, Gloria E., MD, PhD</au><au>Sullivan, Shannon D., MD, PhD</au><au>Wactawski-Wende, Jean, PhD</au><au>Beyth, Rebecca J., MD, MSc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Osteoporosis in the Women’s Health Initiative: Another Treatment Gap?</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Med</addtitle><date>2017-08-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>130</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>937</spage><epage>948</epage><pages>937-948</pages><issn>0002-9343</issn><eissn>1555-7162</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Osteoporotic fractures are associated with high morbidity, mortality, and cost. Methods We performed a post hoc analysis of the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) clinical trials (CT) data to assess osteoporosis treatment and identify participant characteristics associated with utilization of osteoporosis medication(s) after new diagnoses of osteoporosis and/or fracture. Information from visits prior to and immediately subsequent to the first fracture event or osteoporosis diagnosis were evaluated for medication use. A full logistic regression model was used to identify factors predictive of osteoporosis medication use after a fracture and/or a diagnosis of osteoporosis. Results The median length of follow-up from enrollment to the last WHI clinic visit for the study cohort was 13.9 years. Among the 13,990 women who reported new diagnoses of osteoporosis and/or fracture between enrollment and their final WHI visit, and also had medication data available, 21.6% reported taking an osteoporosis medication other than estrogen. Higher daily calcium intake, diagnosis of osteoporosis alone or both osteoporosis and fracture (compared to diagnosis of fracture alone), Asian or Pacific Islander race/ethnicity (compared to white/Caucasian), higher income, and hormone therapy use (past or present) were associated with significantly higher likelihood of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy. Women with black/African-American race/ethnicity (compared to white/Caucasian), BMI > 30 (compared to BMI of 18.5-24.9), current tobacco use (compared to past use or lifetime nonusers), and history of arthritis were less likely to use osteoporosis treatment. Conclusion Despite well-established treatment guidelines in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and/or history of fractures, pharmacotherapy use was suboptimal in this study. Initiation of osteoporosis treatment after fragility fracture may represent an opportunity to improve later outcomes in these high-risk women. Specific attention needs to be paid to increasing treatment among women with fragility fractures, obesity, current tobacco use, history of arthritis or of black race/ethnicity.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28366425</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.02.042</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9343 |
ispartof | The American journal of medicine, 2017-08, Vol.130 (8), p.937-948 |
issn | 0002-9343 1555-7162 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1883841229 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Aged Bone Density Conservation Agents - therapeutic use Calcium - therapeutic use Disparity Educational Status Female Forecasting Fracture Humans Internal Medicine Logistic Models Longitudinal Studies Middle Aged Multicenter Studies as Topic Osteoporosis Osteoporosis - complications Osteoporosis - drug therapy Osteoporosis - epidemiology Osteoporotic Fractures - epidemiology Osteoporotic Fractures - prevention & control Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data Social Class Treatment United States - epidemiology Vitamin D - therapeutic use Women's Health - statistics & numerical data |
title | Osteoporosis in the Women’s Health Initiative: Another Treatment Gap? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T11%3A28%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Osteoporosis%20in%20the%20Women%E2%80%99s%20Health%20Initiative:%20Another%20Treatment%20Gap?&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20medicine&rft.au=Sattari,%20Maryam,%20MD,%20MS&rft.date=2017-08-01&rft.volume=130&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=937&rft.epage=948&rft.pages=937-948&rft.issn=0002-9343&rft.eissn=1555-7162&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.02.042&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1883841229%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1883841229&rft_id=info:pmid/28366425&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0002934317303224&rfr_iscdi=true |