Effectiveness of manualized case management on utilization of evidence-based treatments for children and adolescents after maltreatment: A randomized controlled trial
Abstract The objective of this study was to compare structured case management (CM) to usual care (UC) for helping victims of child abuse and neglect (CAN) with mental disorders access evidence-based treatment (EBT). N = 121 children and adolescents aged 4–17 with a history of CAN and a current ment...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Child abuse & neglect 2017-05, Vol.67, p.371-382 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 382 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 371 |
container_title | Child abuse & neglect |
container_volume | 67 |
creator | Ganser, Helene Gertrud Münzer, Annika Witt, Andreas Plener, Paul Lukas Muche, Rainer Rosner, Rita Hagl, Maria Goldbeck, Lutz |
description | Abstract The objective of this study was to compare structured case management (CM) to usual care (UC) for helping victims of child abuse and neglect (CAN) with mental disorders access evidence-based treatment (EBT). N = 121 children and adolescents aged 4–17 with a history of CAN and a current mental disorder were recruited in three German states in a multi-center parallel group trial. They were randomly assigned, stratified by study site and level of psychosocial functioning, to receive CM additionally to UC or only UC. CM was delivered by trained professionals and volunteers, most of them affiliated to local child welfare agencies or NGOs. UC comprised child welfare services typically delivered in Germany. The primary outcome was EBT utilization after 6 months. Secondary outcome was the time until commencement of EBT. Outcomes were determined by semi-structured clinical interviews with assessors blinded to group allocation. Predictors of access to EBT and barriers to utilization of treatment were analyzed. The intent to treat analysis showed that after 6 months 23 of 60 participants recruited to CM (38%) and 19 of 61 participants recruited to UC (31%) were using EBT, χ2 (1, N = 121) = 0.689, p = .261. Female gender, out-of-home placement, and home state were significant predictors of access to EBT. Less than 40% of participants across both groups were successfully referred to EBT. Access to EBT seems to be in part due to system-level barriers, namely lack of implementation of EBT in community settings. Trial Registration: DRKS00003979 German Clinical Trials Register |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.03.008 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1883840132</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S014521341730100X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1883840132</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-6e2b325c1680461ddcffb170ab06474ee9f760e3244cef174eee63af709a62b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks9u1DAQxiMEokvhDRCyxKWXBE_sxFkOSFVVWqRKHACJm-XYY_Di2MVOVioPxHPidEuResEX_5nffDP256p6CbQBCv2bXaO_OzUuTUtBNJQ1lA6Pqg0MgtVCdOJxtaHAu7oFxo-qZznvaBmd6J5WR-3A-o63w6b6fW4t6tntMWDOJFoyqbAo736hIVplXPfqG04YZhIDWWZXYmp2ZV1g3DuDQWM9FtSQOaGaVzQTGxMpDXqTMBAVDFEmesz6NqjsjKko-_uEt-SUpILF6VA5hjlF7281nfLPqydW-Ywv7ubj6sv7889nl_XVx4sPZ6dXtea8m-se25G1nYZ-oLwHY7S1IwiqRtpzwRG3VvQUWcu5RgvrCfZMWUG3qm_HgR1XJwfd6xR_LphnObnSs_cqYFyyhGFgA6fA2oK-foDu4pJC6U7CtufAtwBQKH6gdIo5J7TyOrlJpRsJVK4-yp08-ChXHyVlsvhY0l7diS_jhOY-6a9xBXh3ALC8xt5hklm71QnjUvFTmuj-V-GhgPYuOK38D7zB_O8uMreSyk_rX1q_EghGgdKv7A_bb8jt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1964149111</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of manualized case management on utilization of evidence-based treatments for children and adolescents after maltreatment: A randomized controlled trial</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Ganser, Helene Gertrud ; Münzer, Annika ; Witt, Andreas ; Plener, Paul Lukas ; Muche, Rainer ; Rosner, Rita ; Hagl, Maria ; Goldbeck, Lutz</creator><creatorcontrib>Ganser, Helene Gertrud ; Münzer, Annika ; Witt, Andreas ; Plener, Paul Lukas ; Muche, Rainer ; Rosner, Rita ; Hagl, Maria ; Goldbeck, Lutz</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The objective of this study was to compare structured case management (CM) to usual care (UC) for helping victims of child abuse and neglect (CAN) with mental disorders access evidence-based treatment (EBT). N = 121 children and adolescents aged 4–17 with a history of CAN and a current mental disorder were recruited in three German states in a multi-center parallel group trial. They were randomly assigned, stratified by study site and level of psychosocial functioning, to receive CM additionally to UC or only UC. CM was delivered by trained professionals and volunteers, most of them affiliated to local child welfare agencies or NGOs. UC comprised child welfare services typically delivered in Germany. The primary outcome was EBT utilization after 6 months. Secondary outcome was the time until commencement of EBT. Outcomes were determined by semi-structured clinical interviews with assessors blinded to group allocation. Predictors of access to EBT and barriers to utilization of treatment were analyzed. The intent to treat analysis showed that after 6 months 23 of 60 participants recruited to CM (38%) and 19 of 61 participants recruited to UC (31%) were using EBT, χ2 (1, N = 121) = 0.689, p = .261. Female gender, out-of-home placement, and home state were significant predictors of access to EBT. Less than 40% of participants across both groups were successfully referred to EBT. Access to EBT seems to be in part due to system-level barriers, namely lack of implementation of EBT in community settings. Trial Registration: DRKS00003979 German Clinical Trials Register</description><identifier>ISSN: 0145-2134</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7757</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.03.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28365428</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Abused children ; Adolescent ; Adolescents ; Assessors ; Case Management ; Child ; Child abuse & neglect ; Child Abuse - psychology ; Child Abuse - therapy ; Child abuse and neglect ; Child Health Services - utilization ; Child Neglect ; Child placement ; Child Welfare ; Children ; Clinical interviews ; Clinical trials ; Constraints ; Dissemination/implementation ; Evidence-based medicine ; Evidence-Based Practice ; Evidence-based treatment ; Female ; Germany ; Health Services Accessibility ; Humans ; Intention to Treat Analysis ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Male ; Maltreatment ; Mental disorders ; Mental Disorders - etiology ; Mental Disorders - therapy ; Mental Health Services - utilization ; NGOs ; Nongovernmental organizations ; Pediatrics ; Psychiatry ; Psychosocial factors ; Psychosocial functioning ; Sex Factors ; Teenagers ; Treatment methods ; Victims ; Volunteers ; Welfare services</subject><ispartof>Child abuse & neglect, 2017-05, Vol.67, p.371-382</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. May 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-6e2b325c1680461ddcffb170ab06474ee9f760e3244cef174eee63af709a62b83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-6e2b325c1680461ddcffb170ab06474ee9f760e3244cef174eee63af709a62b83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.03.008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,30998,33773,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28365428$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ganser, Helene Gertrud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Münzer, Annika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witt, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plener, Paul Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muche, Rainer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosner, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagl, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldbeck, Lutz</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of manualized case management on utilization of evidence-based treatments for children and adolescents after maltreatment: A randomized controlled trial</title><title>Child abuse & neglect</title><addtitle>Child Abuse Negl</addtitle><description>Abstract The objective of this study was to compare structured case management (CM) to usual care (UC) for helping victims of child abuse and neglect (CAN) with mental disorders access evidence-based treatment (EBT). N = 121 children and adolescents aged 4–17 with a history of CAN and a current mental disorder were recruited in three German states in a multi-center parallel group trial. They were randomly assigned, stratified by study site and level of psychosocial functioning, to receive CM additionally to UC or only UC. CM was delivered by trained professionals and volunteers, most of them affiliated to local child welfare agencies or NGOs. UC comprised child welfare services typically delivered in Germany. The primary outcome was EBT utilization after 6 months. Secondary outcome was the time until commencement of EBT. Outcomes were determined by semi-structured clinical interviews with assessors blinded to group allocation. Predictors of access to EBT and barriers to utilization of treatment were analyzed. The intent to treat analysis showed that after 6 months 23 of 60 participants recruited to CM (38%) and 19 of 61 participants recruited to UC (31%) were using EBT, χ2 (1, N = 121) = 0.689, p = .261. Female gender, out-of-home placement, and home state were significant predictors of access to EBT. Less than 40% of participants across both groups were successfully referred to EBT. Access to EBT seems to be in part due to system-level barriers, namely lack of implementation of EBT in community settings. Trial Registration: DRKS00003979 German Clinical Trials Register</description><subject>Abused children</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Assessors</subject><subject>Case Management</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child abuse & neglect</subject><subject>Child Abuse - psychology</subject><subject>Child Abuse - therapy</subject><subject>Child abuse and neglect</subject><subject>Child Health Services - utilization</subject><subject>Child Neglect</subject><subject>Child placement</subject><subject>Child Welfare</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Clinical interviews</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Constraints</subject><subject>Dissemination/implementation</subject><subject>Evidence-based medicine</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Practice</subject><subject>Evidence-based treatment</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intention to Treat Analysis</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maltreatment</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - etiology</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - therapy</subject><subject>Mental Health Services - utilization</subject><subject>NGOs</subject><subject>Nongovernmental organizations</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychosocial factors</subject><subject>Psychosocial functioning</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>Treatment methods</subject><subject>Victims</subject><subject>Volunteers</subject><subject>Welfare services</subject><issn>0145-2134</issn><issn>1873-7757</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks9u1DAQxiMEokvhDRCyxKWXBE_sxFkOSFVVWqRKHACJm-XYY_Di2MVOVioPxHPidEuResEX_5nffDP256p6CbQBCv2bXaO_OzUuTUtBNJQ1lA6Pqg0MgtVCdOJxtaHAu7oFxo-qZznvaBmd6J5WR-3A-o63w6b6fW4t6tntMWDOJFoyqbAo736hIVplXPfqG04YZhIDWWZXYmp2ZV1g3DuDQWM9FtSQOaGaVzQTGxMpDXqTMBAVDFEmesz6NqjsjKko-_uEt-SUpILF6VA5hjlF7281nfLPqydW-Ywv7ubj6sv7889nl_XVx4sPZ6dXtea8m-se25G1nYZ-oLwHY7S1IwiqRtpzwRG3VvQUWcu5RgvrCfZMWUG3qm_HgR1XJwfd6xR_LphnObnSs_cqYFyyhGFgA6fA2oK-foDu4pJC6U7CtufAtwBQKH6gdIo5J7TyOrlJpRsJVK4-yp08-ChXHyVlsvhY0l7diS_jhOY-6a9xBXh3ALC8xt5hklm71QnjUvFTmuj-V-GhgPYuOK38D7zB_O8uMreSyk_rX1q_EghGgdKv7A_bb8jt</recordid><startdate>20170501</startdate><enddate>20170501</enddate><creator>Ganser, Helene Gertrud</creator><creator>Münzer, Annika</creator><creator>Witt, Andreas</creator><creator>Plener, Paul Lukas</creator><creator>Muche, Rainer</creator><creator>Rosner, Rita</creator><creator>Hagl, Maria</creator><creator>Goldbeck, Lutz</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170501</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of manualized case management on utilization of evidence-based treatments for children and adolescents after maltreatment: A randomized controlled trial</title><author>Ganser, Helene Gertrud ; Münzer, Annika ; Witt, Andreas ; Plener, Paul Lukas ; Muche, Rainer ; Rosner, Rita ; Hagl, Maria ; Goldbeck, Lutz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-6e2b325c1680461ddcffb170ab06474ee9f760e3244cef174eee63af709a62b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Abused children</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Assessors</topic><topic>Case Management</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child abuse & neglect</topic><topic>Child Abuse - psychology</topic><topic>Child Abuse - therapy</topic><topic>Child abuse and neglect</topic><topic>Child Health Services - utilization</topic><topic>Child Neglect</topic><topic>Child placement</topic><topic>Child Welfare</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Clinical interviews</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Constraints</topic><topic>Dissemination/implementation</topic><topic>Evidence-based medicine</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Practice</topic><topic>Evidence-based treatment</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intention to Treat Analysis</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maltreatment</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - etiology</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - therapy</topic><topic>Mental Health Services - utilization</topic><topic>NGOs</topic><topic>Nongovernmental organizations</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychosocial factors</topic><topic>Psychosocial functioning</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>Treatment methods</topic><topic>Victims</topic><topic>Volunteers</topic><topic>Welfare services</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ganser, Helene Gertrud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Münzer, Annika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witt, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plener, Paul Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muche, Rainer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosner, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagl, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldbeck, Lutz</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Child abuse & neglect</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ganser, Helene Gertrud</au><au>Münzer, Annika</au><au>Witt, Andreas</au><au>Plener, Paul Lukas</au><au>Muche, Rainer</au><au>Rosner, Rita</au><au>Hagl, Maria</au><au>Goldbeck, Lutz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of manualized case management on utilization of evidence-based treatments for children and adolescents after maltreatment: A randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>Child abuse & neglect</jtitle><addtitle>Child Abuse Negl</addtitle><date>2017-05-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>67</volume><spage>371</spage><epage>382</epage><pages>371-382</pages><issn>0145-2134</issn><eissn>1873-7757</eissn><abstract>Abstract The objective of this study was to compare structured case management (CM) to usual care (UC) for helping victims of child abuse and neglect (CAN) with mental disorders access evidence-based treatment (EBT). N = 121 children and adolescents aged 4–17 with a history of CAN and a current mental disorder were recruited in three German states in a multi-center parallel group trial. They were randomly assigned, stratified by study site and level of psychosocial functioning, to receive CM additionally to UC or only UC. CM was delivered by trained professionals and volunteers, most of them affiliated to local child welfare agencies or NGOs. UC comprised child welfare services typically delivered in Germany. The primary outcome was EBT utilization after 6 months. Secondary outcome was the time until commencement of EBT. Outcomes were determined by semi-structured clinical interviews with assessors blinded to group allocation. Predictors of access to EBT and barriers to utilization of treatment were analyzed. The intent to treat analysis showed that after 6 months 23 of 60 participants recruited to CM (38%) and 19 of 61 participants recruited to UC (31%) were using EBT, χ2 (1, N = 121) = 0.689, p = .261. Female gender, out-of-home placement, and home state were significant predictors of access to EBT. Less than 40% of participants across both groups were successfully referred to EBT. Access to EBT seems to be in part due to system-level barriers, namely lack of implementation of EBT in community settings. Trial Registration: DRKS00003979 German Clinical Trials Register</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28365428</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.03.008</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0145-2134 |
ispartof | Child abuse & neglect, 2017-05, Vol.67, p.371-382 |
issn | 0145-2134 1873-7757 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1883840132 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Abused children Adolescent Adolescents Assessors Case Management Child Child abuse & neglect Child Abuse - psychology Child Abuse - therapy Child abuse and neglect Child Health Services - utilization Child Neglect Child placement Child Welfare Children Clinical interviews Clinical trials Constraints Dissemination/implementation Evidence-based medicine Evidence-Based Practice Evidence-based treatment Female Germany Health Services Accessibility Humans Intention to Treat Analysis Kaplan-Meier Estimate Male Maltreatment Mental disorders Mental Disorders - etiology Mental Disorders - therapy Mental Health Services - utilization NGOs Nongovernmental organizations Pediatrics Psychiatry Psychosocial factors Psychosocial functioning Sex Factors Teenagers Treatment methods Victims Volunteers Welfare services |
title | Effectiveness of manualized case management on utilization of evidence-based treatments for children and adolescents after maltreatment: A randomized controlled trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T07%3A48%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20manualized%20case%20management%20on%20utilization%20of%20evidence-based%20treatments%20for%20children%20and%20adolescents%20after%20maltreatment:%20A%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=Child%20abuse%20&%20neglect&rft.au=Ganser,%20Helene%20Gertrud&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.volume=67&rft.spage=371&rft.epage=382&rft.pages=371-382&rft.issn=0145-2134&rft.eissn=1873-7757&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.03.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1883840132%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1964149111&rft_id=info:pmid/28365428&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S014521341730100X&rfr_iscdi=true |