Effectiveness of manualized case management on utilization of evidence-based treatments for children and adolescents after maltreatment: A randomized controlled trial

Abstract The objective of this study was to compare structured case management (CM) to usual care (UC) for helping victims of child abuse and neglect (CAN) with mental disorders access evidence-based treatment (EBT). N = 121 children and adolescents aged 4–17 with a history of CAN and a current ment...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Child abuse & neglect 2017-05, Vol.67, p.371-382
Hauptverfasser: Ganser, Helene Gertrud, Münzer, Annika, Witt, Andreas, Plener, Paul Lukas, Muche, Rainer, Rosner, Rita, Hagl, Maria, Goldbeck, Lutz
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 382
container_issue
container_start_page 371
container_title Child abuse & neglect
container_volume 67
creator Ganser, Helene Gertrud
Münzer, Annika
Witt, Andreas
Plener, Paul Lukas
Muche, Rainer
Rosner, Rita
Hagl, Maria
Goldbeck, Lutz
description Abstract The objective of this study was to compare structured case management (CM) to usual care (UC) for helping victims of child abuse and neglect (CAN) with mental disorders access evidence-based treatment (EBT). N = 121 children and adolescents aged 4–17 with a history of CAN and a current mental disorder were recruited in three German states in a multi-center parallel group trial. They were randomly assigned, stratified by study site and level of psychosocial functioning, to receive CM additionally to UC or only UC. CM was delivered by trained professionals and volunteers, most of them affiliated to local child welfare agencies or NGOs. UC comprised child welfare services typically delivered in Germany. The primary outcome was EBT utilization after 6 months. Secondary outcome was the time until commencement of EBT. Outcomes were determined by semi-structured clinical interviews with assessors blinded to group allocation. Predictors of access to EBT and barriers to utilization of treatment were analyzed. The intent to treat analysis showed that after 6 months 23 of 60 participants recruited to CM (38%) and 19 of 61 participants recruited to UC (31%) were using EBT, χ2 (1, N = 121) = 0.689, p = .261. Female gender, out-of-home placement, and home state were significant predictors of access to EBT. Less than 40% of participants across both groups were successfully referred to EBT. Access to EBT seems to be in part due to system-level barriers, namely lack of implementation of EBT in community settings. Trial Registration: DRKS00003979 German Clinical Trials Register
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.03.008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1883840132</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S014521341730100X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1883840132</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-6e2b325c1680461ddcffb170ab06474ee9f760e3244cef174eee63af709a62b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks9u1DAQxiMEokvhDRCyxKWXBE_sxFkOSFVVWqRKHACJm-XYY_Di2MVOVioPxHPidEuResEX_5nffDP256p6CbQBCv2bXaO_OzUuTUtBNJQ1lA6Pqg0MgtVCdOJxtaHAu7oFxo-qZznvaBmd6J5WR-3A-o63w6b6fW4t6tntMWDOJFoyqbAo736hIVplXPfqG04YZhIDWWZXYmp2ZV1g3DuDQWM9FtSQOaGaVzQTGxMpDXqTMBAVDFEmesz6NqjsjKko-_uEt-SUpILF6VA5hjlF7281nfLPqydW-Ywv7ubj6sv7889nl_XVx4sPZ6dXtea8m-se25G1nYZ-oLwHY7S1IwiqRtpzwRG3VvQUWcu5RgvrCfZMWUG3qm_HgR1XJwfd6xR_LphnObnSs_cqYFyyhGFgA6fA2oK-foDu4pJC6U7CtufAtwBQKH6gdIo5J7TyOrlJpRsJVK4-yp08-ChXHyVlsvhY0l7diS_jhOY-6a9xBXh3ALC8xt5hklm71QnjUvFTmuj-V-GhgPYuOK38D7zB_O8uMreSyk_rX1q_EghGgdKv7A_bb8jt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1964149111</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of manualized case management on utilization of evidence-based treatments for children and adolescents after maltreatment: A randomized controlled trial</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Ganser, Helene Gertrud ; Münzer, Annika ; Witt, Andreas ; Plener, Paul Lukas ; Muche, Rainer ; Rosner, Rita ; Hagl, Maria ; Goldbeck, Lutz</creator><creatorcontrib>Ganser, Helene Gertrud ; Münzer, Annika ; Witt, Andreas ; Plener, Paul Lukas ; Muche, Rainer ; Rosner, Rita ; Hagl, Maria ; Goldbeck, Lutz</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The objective of this study was to compare structured case management (CM) to usual care (UC) for helping victims of child abuse and neglect (CAN) with mental disorders access evidence-based treatment (EBT). N = 121 children and adolescents aged 4–17 with a history of CAN and a current mental disorder were recruited in three German states in a multi-center parallel group trial. They were randomly assigned, stratified by study site and level of psychosocial functioning, to receive CM additionally to UC or only UC. CM was delivered by trained professionals and volunteers, most of them affiliated to local child welfare agencies or NGOs. UC comprised child welfare services typically delivered in Germany. The primary outcome was EBT utilization after 6 months. Secondary outcome was the time until commencement of EBT. Outcomes were determined by semi-structured clinical interviews with assessors blinded to group allocation. Predictors of access to EBT and barriers to utilization of treatment were analyzed. The intent to treat analysis showed that after 6 months 23 of 60 participants recruited to CM (38%) and 19 of 61 participants recruited to UC (31%) were using EBT, χ2 (1, N = 121) = 0.689, p = .261. Female gender, out-of-home placement, and home state were significant predictors of access to EBT. Less than 40% of participants across both groups were successfully referred to EBT. Access to EBT seems to be in part due to system-level barriers, namely lack of implementation of EBT in community settings. Trial Registration: DRKS00003979 German Clinical Trials Register</description><identifier>ISSN: 0145-2134</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7757</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.03.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28365428</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Abused children ; Adolescent ; Adolescents ; Assessors ; Case Management ; Child ; Child abuse &amp; neglect ; Child Abuse - psychology ; Child Abuse - therapy ; Child abuse and neglect ; Child Health Services - utilization ; Child Neglect ; Child placement ; Child Welfare ; Children ; Clinical interviews ; Clinical trials ; Constraints ; Dissemination/implementation ; Evidence-based medicine ; Evidence-Based Practice ; Evidence-based treatment ; Female ; Germany ; Health Services Accessibility ; Humans ; Intention to Treat Analysis ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Male ; Maltreatment ; Mental disorders ; Mental Disorders - etiology ; Mental Disorders - therapy ; Mental Health Services - utilization ; NGOs ; Nongovernmental organizations ; Pediatrics ; Psychiatry ; Psychosocial factors ; Psychosocial functioning ; Sex Factors ; Teenagers ; Treatment methods ; Victims ; Volunteers ; Welfare services</subject><ispartof>Child abuse &amp; neglect, 2017-05, Vol.67, p.371-382</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. May 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-6e2b325c1680461ddcffb170ab06474ee9f760e3244cef174eee63af709a62b83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-6e2b325c1680461ddcffb170ab06474ee9f760e3244cef174eee63af709a62b83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.03.008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,30998,33773,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28365428$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ganser, Helene Gertrud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Münzer, Annika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witt, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plener, Paul Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muche, Rainer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosner, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagl, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldbeck, Lutz</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of manualized case management on utilization of evidence-based treatments for children and adolescents after maltreatment: A randomized controlled trial</title><title>Child abuse &amp; neglect</title><addtitle>Child Abuse Negl</addtitle><description>Abstract The objective of this study was to compare structured case management (CM) to usual care (UC) for helping victims of child abuse and neglect (CAN) with mental disorders access evidence-based treatment (EBT). N = 121 children and adolescents aged 4–17 with a history of CAN and a current mental disorder were recruited in three German states in a multi-center parallel group trial. They were randomly assigned, stratified by study site and level of psychosocial functioning, to receive CM additionally to UC or only UC. CM was delivered by trained professionals and volunteers, most of them affiliated to local child welfare agencies or NGOs. UC comprised child welfare services typically delivered in Germany. The primary outcome was EBT utilization after 6 months. Secondary outcome was the time until commencement of EBT. Outcomes were determined by semi-structured clinical interviews with assessors blinded to group allocation. Predictors of access to EBT and barriers to utilization of treatment were analyzed. The intent to treat analysis showed that after 6 months 23 of 60 participants recruited to CM (38%) and 19 of 61 participants recruited to UC (31%) were using EBT, χ2 (1, N = 121) = 0.689, p = .261. Female gender, out-of-home placement, and home state were significant predictors of access to EBT. Less than 40% of participants across both groups were successfully referred to EBT. Access to EBT seems to be in part due to system-level barriers, namely lack of implementation of EBT in community settings. Trial Registration: DRKS00003979 German Clinical Trials Register</description><subject>Abused children</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Assessors</subject><subject>Case Management</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child abuse &amp; neglect</subject><subject>Child Abuse - psychology</subject><subject>Child Abuse - therapy</subject><subject>Child abuse and neglect</subject><subject>Child Health Services - utilization</subject><subject>Child Neglect</subject><subject>Child placement</subject><subject>Child Welfare</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Clinical interviews</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Constraints</subject><subject>Dissemination/implementation</subject><subject>Evidence-based medicine</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Practice</subject><subject>Evidence-based treatment</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intention to Treat Analysis</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maltreatment</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - etiology</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - therapy</subject><subject>Mental Health Services - utilization</subject><subject>NGOs</subject><subject>Nongovernmental organizations</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychosocial factors</subject><subject>Psychosocial functioning</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>Treatment methods</subject><subject>Victims</subject><subject>Volunteers</subject><subject>Welfare services</subject><issn>0145-2134</issn><issn>1873-7757</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks9u1DAQxiMEokvhDRCyxKWXBE_sxFkOSFVVWqRKHACJm-XYY_Di2MVOVioPxHPidEuResEX_5nffDP256p6CbQBCv2bXaO_OzUuTUtBNJQ1lA6Pqg0MgtVCdOJxtaHAu7oFxo-qZznvaBmd6J5WR-3A-o63w6b6fW4t6tntMWDOJFoyqbAo736hIVplXPfqG04YZhIDWWZXYmp2ZV1g3DuDQWM9FtSQOaGaVzQTGxMpDXqTMBAVDFEmesz6NqjsjKko-_uEt-SUpILF6VA5hjlF7281nfLPqydW-Ywv7ubj6sv7889nl_XVx4sPZ6dXtea8m-se25G1nYZ-oLwHY7S1IwiqRtpzwRG3VvQUWcu5RgvrCfZMWUG3qm_HgR1XJwfd6xR_LphnObnSs_cqYFyyhGFgA6fA2oK-foDu4pJC6U7CtufAtwBQKH6gdIo5J7TyOrlJpRsJVK4-yp08-ChXHyVlsvhY0l7diS_jhOY-6a9xBXh3ALC8xt5hklm71QnjUvFTmuj-V-GhgPYuOK38D7zB_O8uMreSyk_rX1q_EghGgdKv7A_bb8jt</recordid><startdate>20170501</startdate><enddate>20170501</enddate><creator>Ganser, Helene Gertrud</creator><creator>Münzer, Annika</creator><creator>Witt, Andreas</creator><creator>Plener, Paul Lukas</creator><creator>Muche, Rainer</creator><creator>Rosner, Rita</creator><creator>Hagl, Maria</creator><creator>Goldbeck, Lutz</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170501</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of manualized case management on utilization of evidence-based treatments for children and adolescents after maltreatment: A randomized controlled trial</title><author>Ganser, Helene Gertrud ; Münzer, Annika ; Witt, Andreas ; Plener, Paul Lukas ; Muche, Rainer ; Rosner, Rita ; Hagl, Maria ; Goldbeck, Lutz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-6e2b325c1680461ddcffb170ab06474ee9f760e3244cef174eee63af709a62b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Abused children</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Assessors</topic><topic>Case Management</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child abuse &amp; neglect</topic><topic>Child Abuse - psychology</topic><topic>Child Abuse - therapy</topic><topic>Child abuse and neglect</topic><topic>Child Health Services - utilization</topic><topic>Child Neglect</topic><topic>Child placement</topic><topic>Child Welfare</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Clinical interviews</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Constraints</topic><topic>Dissemination/implementation</topic><topic>Evidence-based medicine</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Practice</topic><topic>Evidence-based treatment</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intention to Treat Analysis</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maltreatment</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - etiology</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - therapy</topic><topic>Mental Health Services - utilization</topic><topic>NGOs</topic><topic>Nongovernmental organizations</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychosocial factors</topic><topic>Psychosocial functioning</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>Treatment methods</topic><topic>Victims</topic><topic>Volunteers</topic><topic>Welfare services</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ganser, Helene Gertrud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Münzer, Annika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witt, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plener, Paul Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muche, Rainer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosner, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagl, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldbeck, Lutz</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Child abuse &amp; neglect</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ganser, Helene Gertrud</au><au>Münzer, Annika</au><au>Witt, Andreas</au><au>Plener, Paul Lukas</au><au>Muche, Rainer</au><au>Rosner, Rita</au><au>Hagl, Maria</au><au>Goldbeck, Lutz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of manualized case management on utilization of evidence-based treatments for children and adolescents after maltreatment: A randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>Child abuse &amp; neglect</jtitle><addtitle>Child Abuse Negl</addtitle><date>2017-05-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>67</volume><spage>371</spage><epage>382</epage><pages>371-382</pages><issn>0145-2134</issn><eissn>1873-7757</eissn><abstract>Abstract The objective of this study was to compare structured case management (CM) to usual care (UC) for helping victims of child abuse and neglect (CAN) with mental disorders access evidence-based treatment (EBT). N = 121 children and adolescents aged 4–17 with a history of CAN and a current mental disorder were recruited in three German states in a multi-center parallel group trial. They were randomly assigned, stratified by study site and level of psychosocial functioning, to receive CM additionally to UC or only UC. CM was delivered by trained professionals and volunteers, most of them affiliated to local child welfare agencies or NGOs. UC comprised child welfare services typically delivered in Germany. The primary outcome was EBT utilization after 6 months. Secondary outcome was the time until commencement of EBT. Outcomes were determined by semi-structured clinical interviews with assessors blinded to group allocation. Predictors of access to EBT and barriers to utilization of treatment were analyzed. The intent to treat analysis showed that after 6 months 23 of 60 participants recruited to CM (38%) and 19 of 61 participants recruited to UC (31%) were using EBT, χ2 (1, N = 121) = 0.689, p = .261. Female gender, out-of-home placement, and home state were significant predictors of access to EBT. Less than 40% of participants across both groups were successfully referred to EBT. Access to EBT seems to be in part due to system-level barriers, namely lack of implementation of EBT in community settings. Trial Registration: DRKS00003979 German Clinical Trials Register</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28365428</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.03.008</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0145-2134
ispartof Child abuse & neglect, 2017-05, Vol.67, p.371-382
issn 0145-2134
1873-7757
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1883840132
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Abused children
Adolescent
Adolescents
Assessors
Case Management
Child
Child abuse & neglect
Child Abuse - psychology
Child Abuse - therapy
Child abuse and neglect
Child Health Services - utilization
Child Neglect
Child placement
Child Welfare
Children
Clinical interviews
Clinical trials
Constraints
Dissemination/implementation
Evidence-based medicine
Evidence-Based Practice
Evidence-based treatment
Female
Germany
Health Services Accessibility
Humans
Intention to Treat Analysis
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Maltreatment
Mental disorders
Mental Disorders - etiology
Mental Disorders - therapy
Mental Health Services - utilization
NGOs
Nongovernmental organizations
Pediatrics
Psychiatry
Psychosocial factors
Psychosocial functioning
Sex Factors
Teenagers
Treatment methods
Victims
Volunteers
Welfare services
title Effectiveness of manualized case management on utilization of evidence-based treatments for children and adolescents after maltreatment: A randomized controlled trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T07%3A48%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20manualized%20case%20management%20on%20utilization%20of%20evidence-based%20treatments%20for%20children%20and%20adolescents%20after%20maltreatment:%20A%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=Child%20abuse%20&%20neglect&rft.au=Ganser,%20Helene%20Gertrud&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.volume=67&rft.spage=371&rft.epage=382&rft.pages=371-382&rft.issn=0145-2134&rft.eissn=1873-7757&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.03.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1883840132%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1964149111&rft_id=info:pmid/28365428&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S014521341730100X&rfr_iscdi=true