Clinical and Radiographic outcomes of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty at a Minimum follow-up of 10 Years: Results from an Independent Centre

Background Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (MoMHR) has been proposed as an effective surgical treatment for young and active patients with symptomatic hip disease. Recently, good clinical and radiographic outcomes have been reported by the designer surgeons at a 15.3 years follow-up; however, results...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hip international 2017-03, Vol.27 (2), p.134-139
Hauptverfasser: Moroni, Antonio, Miscione, Maria Teresa, Orsini, Riccardo, Micera, Giovanni, Mosca, Salvatore, Sinapi, Fabrizio, De Girolamo, Laura, Banfi, Giuseppe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 139
container_issue 2
container_start_page 134
container_title Hip international
container_volume 27
creator Moroni, Antonio
Miscione, Maria Teresa
Orsini, Riccardo
Micera, Giovanni
Mosca, Salvatore
Sinapi, Fabrizio
De Girolamo, Laura
Banfi, Giuseppe
description Background Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (MoMHR) has been proposed as an effective surgical treatment for young and active patients with symptomatic hip disease. Recently, good clinical and radiographic outcomes have been reported by the designer surgeons at a 15.3 years follow-up; however, results at long follow-up by non-designer surgeons are less satisfactory. The aim of the study was to investigate if MoMHR can produce satisfactory clinical and radiographic results and if survival rate can be high even if the procedure is performed by non-designer surgeons. Methods All patients were assessed about implant survival. All patients completed an Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Harris Hip Score (HHS) and a University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score preoperatively, at 1 year and at last available follow-up; at this time, a standard anteroposterior weight-bearing radiograph was performed. Results The survival rate with revision for any reason is 96%, similar to those obtained by designer surgeons. All the clinical scores improved over time: according to the OHS the survivors are asymptomatic and according to the UCLA maintain a high level of function. 6 remodellings of the femoral neck and 2 heterotopic bone formations were seen, but they were asymptomatic. Conclusions As designer surgeons have already shown, MoMHR can provide in active patients a durable treatment for hip arthritis, with low risk of revision and good results at 10 years follow-up, even if the procedure is performed by non-designer surgeons.
doi_str_mv 10.5301/hipint.5000424
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1883182134</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.5301_hipint.5000424</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1883182134</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-ba4cdde26f12180abc2a6271c4267f2f3a8344a8f0daa9705c1ff13ab605507e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUlvFDEQRq0IRDauOSIfkVAP5aWXcAsjskhBSFE4cGrVuO1pR3a7sd1C-Sf83DiZITcuZct-9Ur2R8gZg1UtgH0e7WynvKoBQHJ5QI5Yy2XVQNO-KXvGoWrL1SE5TukBgPPzWr4jh7wTDYcajsjftbOTVegoTgO9w8GGbcR5tIqGJavgdaLB0Dxq-tVGb6ftiJ5e25ne6bREg6oc0YuYxxhmhyk_UswU6fdi9YunJjgX_lTL_GxhQH9pjOnLS7PLiZoYfJlMb6ZBz7qUKdN1KVGfkrcGXdLv9-sJ-Xn57X59Xd3-uLpZX9xWSgiWqw1KNQyaN4Zx1gFuFMeGt0xJ3rSGG4GdkBI7AwPieQu1YsYwgZsG6hpaLU7Ix513juH3olPuvU1KO4eTDkvqWdcJ1nEmZEFXO1TFkFLUpp-j9Rgfewb9cxr9Lo1-n0Zp-LB3Lxuvh1f83_cX4NMOSLjV_UNY4lTe-j_dE6d7log</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1883182134</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical and Radiographic outcomes of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty at a Minimum follow-up of 10 Years: Results from an Independent Centre</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Moroni, Antonio ; Miscione, Maria Teresa ; Orsini, Riccardo ; Micera, Giovanni ; Mosca, Salvatore ; Sinapi, Fabrizio ; De Girolamo, Laura ; Banfi, Giuseppe</creator><creatorcontrib>Moroni, Antonio ; Miscione, Maria Teresa ; Orsini, Riccardo ; Micera, Giovanni ; Mosca, Salvatore ; Sinapi, Fabrizio ; De Girolamo, Laura ; Banfi, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><description>Background Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (MoMHR) has been proposed as an effective surgical treatment for young and active patients with symptomatic hip disease. Recently, good clinical and radiographic outcomes have been reported by the designer surgeons at a 15.3 years follow-up; however, results at long follow-up by non-designer surgeons are less satisfactory. The aim of the study was to investigate if MoMHR can produce satisfactory clinical and radiographic results and if survival rate can be high even if the procedure is performed by non-designer surgeons. Methods All patients were assessed about implant survival. All patients completed an Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Harris Hip Score (HHS) and a University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score preoperatively, at 1 year and at last available follow-up; at this time, a standard anteroposterior weight-bearing radiograph was performed. Results The survival rate with revision for any reason is 96%, similar to those obtained by designer surgeons. All the clinical scores improved over time: according to the OHS the survivors are asymptomatic and according to the UCLA maintain a high level of function. 6 remodellings of the femoral neck and 2 heterotopic bone formations were seen, but they were asymptomatic. Conclusions As designer surgeons have already shown, MoMHR can provide in active patients a durable treatment for hip arthritis, with low risk of revision and good results at 10 years follow-up, even if the procedure is performed by non-designer surgeons.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1120-7000</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1724-6067</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5301/hipint.5000424</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28362050</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Academic Medical Centers ; Adult ; Age Factors ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods ; California ; Cohort Studies ; Databases, Factual ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hip Joint - physiopathology ; Hip Joint - surgery ; Hip Prosthesis ; Humans ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Male ; Metal-on-Metal Joint Prostheses ; Middle Aged ; Osteoarthritis, Hip - diagnostic imaging ; Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Prosthesis Failure ; Radiography - methods ; Reoperation - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Hip international, 2017-03, Vol.27 (2), p.134-139</ispartof><rights>2017 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-ba4cdde26f12180abc2a6271c4267f2f3a8344a8f0daa9705c1ff13ab605507e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-ba4cdde26f12180abc2a6271c4267f2f3a8344a8f0daa9705c1ff13ab605507e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.5301/hipint.5000424$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5301/hipint.5000424$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28362050$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moroni, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miscione, Maria Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orsini, Riccardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Micera, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosca, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinapi, Fabrizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Girolamo, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banfi, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical and Radiographic outcomes of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty at a Minimum follow-up of 10 Years: Results from an Independent Centre</title><title>Hip international</title><addtitle>Hip Int</addtitle><description>Background Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (MoMHR) has been proposed as an effective surgical treatment for young and active patients with symptomatic hip disease. Recently, good clinical and radiographic outcomes have been reported by the designer surgeons at a 15.3 years follow-up; however, results at long follow-up by non-designer surgeons are less satisfactory. The aim of the study was to investigate if MoMHR can produce satisfactory clinical and radiographic results and if survival rate can be high even if the procedure is performed by non-designer surgeons. Methods All patients were assessed about implant survival. All patients completed an Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Harris Hip Score (HHS) and a University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score preoperatively, at 1 year and at last available follow-up; at this time, a standard anteroposterior weight-bearing radiograph was performed. Results The survival rate with revision for any reason is 96%, similar to those obtained by designer surgeons. All the clinical scores improved over time: according to the OHS the survivors are asymptomatic and according to the UCLA maintain a high level of function. 6 remodellings of the femoral neck and 2 heterotopic bone formations were seen, but they were asymptomatic. Conclusions As designer surgeons have already shown, MoMHR can provide in active patients a durable treatment for hip arthritis, with low risk of revision and good results at 10 years follow-up, even if the procedure is performed by non-designer surgeons.</description><subject>Academic Medical Centers</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hip Joint - physiopathology</subject><subject>Hip Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Hip Prosthesis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Metal-on-Metal Joint Prostheses</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Hip - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Prosthesis Failure</subject><subject>Radiography - methods</subject><subject>Reoperation - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1120-7000</issn><issn>1724-6067</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUlvFDEQRq0IRDauOSIfkVAP5aWXcAsjskhBSFE4cGrVuO1pR3a7sd1C-Sf83DiZITcuZct-9Ur2R8gZg1UtgH0e7WynvKoBQHJ5QI5Yy2XVQNO-KXvGoWrL1SE5TukBgPPzWr4jh7wTDYcajsjftbOTVegoTgO9w8GGbcR5tIqGJavgdaLB0Dxq-tVGb6ftiJ5e25ne6bREg6oc0YuYxxhmhyk_UswU6fdi9YunJjgX_lTL_GxhQH9pjOnLS7PLiZoYfJlMb6ZBz7qUKdN1KVGfkrcGXdLv9-sJ-Xn57X59Xd3-uLpZX9xWSgiWqw1KNQyaN4Zx1gFuFMeGt0xJ3rSGG4GdkBI7AwPieQu1YsYwgZsG6hpaLU7Ix513juH3olPuvU1KO4eTDkvqWdcJ1nEmZEFXO1TFkFLUpp-j9Rgfewb9cxr9Lo1-n0Zp-LB3Lxuvh1f83_cX4NMOSLjV_UNY4lTe-j_dE6d7log</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Moroni, Antonio</creator><creator>Miscione, Maria Teresa</creator><creator>Orsini, Riccardo</creator><creator>Micera, Giovanni</creator><creator>Mosca, Salvatore</creator><creator>Sinapi, Fabrizio</creator><creator>De Girolamo, Laura</creator><creator>Banfi, Giuseppe</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>Clinical and Radiographic outcomes of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty at a Minimum follow-up of 10 Years: Results from an Independent Centre</title><author>Moroni, Antonio ; Miscione, Maria Teresa ; Orsini, Riccardo ; Micera, Giovanni ; Mosca, Salvatore ; Sinapi, Fabrizio ; De Girolamo, Laura ; Banfi, Giuseppe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-ba4cdde26f12180abc2a6271c4267f2f3a8344a8f0daa9705c1ff13ab605507e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Academic Medical Centers</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hip Joint - physiopathology</topic><topic>Hip Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Hip Prosthesis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Metal-on-Metal Joint Prostheses</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Hip - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Prosthesis Failure</topic><topic>Radiography - methods</topic><topic>Reoperation - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moroni, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miscione, Maria Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orsini, Riccardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Micera, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosca, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinapi, Fabrizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Girolamo, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banfi, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Hip international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moroni, Antonio</au><au>Miscione, Maria Teresa</au><au>Orsini, Riccardo</au><au>Micera, Giovanni</au><au>Mosca, Salvatore</au><au>Sinapi, Fabrizio</au><au>De Girolamo, Laura</au><au>Banfi, Giuseppe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical and Radiographic outcomes of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty at a Minimum follow-up of 10 Years: Results from an Independent Centre</atitle><jtitle>Hip international</jtitle><addtitle>Hip Int</addtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>134</spage><epage>139</epage><pages>134-139</pages><issn>1120-7000</issn><eissn>1724-6067</eissn><abstract>Background Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (MoMHR) has been proposed as an effective surgical treatment for young and active patients with symptomatic hip disease. Recently, good clinical and radiographic outcomes have been reported by the designer surgeons at a 15.3 years follow-up; however, results at long follow-up by non-designer surgeons are less satisfactory. The aim of the study was to investigate if MoMHR can produce satisfactory clinical and radiographic results and if survival rate can be high even if the procedure is performed by non-designer surgeons. Methods All patients were assessed about implant survival. All patients completed an Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Harris Hip Score (HHS) and a University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score preoperatively, at 1 year and at last available follow-up; at this time, a standard anteroposterior weight-bearing radiograph was performed. Results The survival rate with revision for any reason is 96%, similar to those obtained by designer surgeons. All the clinical scores improved over time: according to the OHS the survivors are asymptomatic and according to the UCLA maintain a high level of function. 6 remodellings of the femoral neck and 2 heterotopic bone formations were seen, but they were asymptomatic. Conclusions As designer surgeons have already shown, MoMHR can provide in active patients a durable treatment for hip arthritis, with low risk of revision and good results at 10 years follow-up, even if the procedure is performed by non-designer surgeons.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>28362050</pmid><doi>10.5301/hipint.5000424</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1120-7000
ispartof Hip international, 2017-03, Vol.27 (2), p.134-139
issn 1120-7000
1724-6067
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1883182134
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Academic Medical Centers
Adult
Age Factors
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods
California
Cohort Studies
Databases, Factual
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hip Joint - physiopathology
Hip Joint - surgery
Hip Prosthesis
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Metal-on-Metal Joint Prostheses
Middle Aged
Osteoarthritis, Hip - diagnostic imaging
Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery
Proportional Hazards Models
Prosthesis Failure
Radiography - methods
Reoperation - methods
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
title Clinical and Radiographic outcomes of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty at a Minimum follow-up of 10 Years: Results from an Independent Centre
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T09%3A38%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20and%20Radiographic%20outcomes%20of%20the%20Birmingham%20Hip%20Resurfacing%20Arthroplasty%20at%20a%20Minimum%20follow-up%20of%2010%20Years:%20Results%20from%20an%20Independent%20Centre&rft.jtitle=Hip%20international&rft.au=Moroni,%20Antonio&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=134&rft.epage=139&rft.pages=134-139&rft.issn=1120-7000&rft.eissn=1724-6067&rft_id=info:doi/10.5301/hipint.5000424&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1883182134%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1883182134&rft_id=info:pmid/28362050&rft_sage_id=10.5301_hipint.5000424&rfr_iscdi=true