A Meta-Analysis of the Global Prevalence Rates of Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus Contamination of Different Raw Meat Products
Previous research has indicated that raw meats are frequently contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus, but data regarding the pooled prevalence rates of S. aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) contamination in different types of raw meat products (beef, chicken, and pork) and across dif...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of food protection 2017-05, Vol.80 (5), p.763-774 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 774 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 763 |
| container_title | Journal of food protection |
| container_volume | 80 |
| creator | Ou, Qianting Peng, Yang Lin, Dongxin Bai, Chan Zhang, Ting Lin, Jialing Ye, Xiaohua Yao, Zhenjiang |
| description | Previous research has indicated that raw meats are frequently contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus, but data regarding the pooled prevalence rates of S. aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) contamination in different types of raw meat products (beef, chicken, and pork) and across different periods, regions, and purchase locations remain inconsistent. We systematically searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid, Web of Science, and HighWire databases to identify studies published up to June 2016. The STROBE guidelines were used to assess the quality of the 39 studies included in this meta-analysis. We observed no significant differences in the pooled prevalence rates of S. aureus and MRSA contamination identified in various raw meat products, with overall pooled prevalence rates of 29.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 22.8 to 35.9%) and 3.2% (95% CI, 1.8 to 4.9%) identified for the two contaminants, respectively. In the subgroup analyses, the prevalence of S. aureus contamination in chicken products was highest in Asian studies and significantly decreased over time worldwide. In European studies, the prevalence rates of S. aureus contamination in chicken and pork products were lower than those reported on other continents. The pooled prevalence rates of S. aureus contamination in chicken and pork products and MRSA contamination in beef and pork products were significantly higher in samples collected from retail sources than in samples collected from slaughterhouses and processing plants. These results highlight the need for good hygiene during transportation to and manipulation at retail outlets to reduce the risk of transmission of S. aureus and MRSA from meat products to humans. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-355 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1882500619</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4321895539</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-701643704086538f61d45d0e50686ca7d93015f1ee848e13b93b4d14bee1b2de3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkctu1DAUhi0EotOWN0AoEhs2ntrxJc5yNKWFqqjVFCR2luOcaFx57CF2QPMmfVwcelmwOovz_f-RzofQe0qWnFFxRpisManVz-XVxS2mEjMhXqEFbTnHLWmb12jxghyh45TuCSF1W8u36KhWTKha0gV6WFXfIBu8CsYfkktVHKq8herSx8746naE38ZDsFBtTIZ_67ts9tuDjzZaO6XKTCPMI_Rz09ZZ570LeAOlLZuQq7vlM7OOIZudCya7GOaqczcMMEKBNuZPiZtcLsZ-sjmdojeD8QnePc0T9OPi8_f1F3x9c_l1vbrGlimacUOo5KwhnCgpmBok7bnoCQgilbSm6VtGqBgogOIKKOta1vGe8g6AdnUP7AR9euzdj_HXBCnrnUsWvDcB4pQ0VaoWhEjaFvTjf-h9nMbyuJlqiaCsUTPFHyk7xpRGGPR-dDszHjQlejanZy161qKLOU2lLuZK7MNT-dTtoH8JPatifwGX75UL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1890513789</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Meta-Analysis of the Global Prevalence Rates of Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus Contamination of Different Raw Meat Products</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ou, Qianting ; Peng, Yang ; Lin, Dongxin ; Bai, Chan ; Zhang, Ting ; Lin, Jialing ; Ye, Xiaohua ; Yao, Zhenjiang</creator><creatorcontrib>Ou, Qianting ; Peng, Yang ; Lin, Dongxin ; Bai, Chan ; Zhang, Ting ; Lin, Jialing ; Ye, Xiaohua ; Yao, Zhenjiang</creatorcontrib><description>Previous research has indicated that raw meats are frequently contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus, but data regarding the pooled prevalence rates of S. aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) contamination in different types of raw meat products (beef, chicken, and pork) and across different periods, regions, and purchase locations remain inconsistent. We systematically searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid, Web of Science, and HighWire databases to identify studies published up to June 2016. The STROBE guidelines were used to assess the quality of the 39 studies included in this meta-analysis. We observed no significant differences in the pooled prevalence rates of S. aureus and MRSA contamination identified in various raw meat products, with overall pooled prevalence rates of 29.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 22.8 to 35.9%) and 3.2% (95% CI, 1.8 to 4.9%) identified for the two contaminants, respectively. In the subgroup analyses, the prevalence of S. aureus contamination in chicken products was highest in Asian studies and significantly decreased over time worldwide. In European studies, the prevalence rates of S. aureus contamination in chicken and pork products were lower than those reported on other continents. The pooled prevalence rates of S. aureus contamination in chicken and pork products and MRSA contamination in beef and pork products were significantly higher in samples collected from retail sources than in samples collected from slaughterhouses and processing plants. These results highlight the need for good hygiene during transportation to and manipulation at retail outlets to reduce the risk of transmission of S. aureus and MRSA from meat products to humans.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0362-028X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-9097</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-355</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28358261</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Limited</publisher><subject>Abattoirs ; Bacterial infections ; Beef ; Bias ; Chickens ; Contaminants ; Contamination ; Disease prevention ; Food contamination & poisoning ; Food safety ; Hygiene ; Illnesses ; Meat ; Meat products ; Meta-analysis ; Methods ; Pathogens ; Penicillin ; Pork ; Poultry ; Public health ; Quality ; Risk reduction ; Sample size ; Staphylococcus infections ; Studies ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Journal of food protection, 2017-05, Vol.80 (5), p.763-774</ispartof><rights>Copyright ©, International Association for Food Protection.</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services May 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-701643704086538f61d45d0e50686ca7d93015f1ee848e13b93b4d14bee1b2de3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-701643704086538f61d45d0e50686ca7d93015f1ee848e13b93b4d14bee1b2de3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1890513789?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28358261$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ou, Qianting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Dongxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bai, Chan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Jialing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ye, Xiaohua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Zhenjiang</creatorcontrib><title>A Meta-Analysis of the Global Prevalence Rates of Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus Contamination of Different Raw Meat Products</title><title>Journal of food protection</title><addtitle>J Food Prot</addtitle><description>Previous research has indicated that raw meats are frequently contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus, but data regarding the pooled prevalence rates of S. aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) contamination in different types of raw meat products (beef, chicken, and pork) and across different periods, regions, and purchase locations remain inconsistent. We systematically searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid, Web of Science, and HighWire databases to identify studies published up to June 2016. The STROBE guidelines were used to assess the quality of the 39 studies included in this meta-analysis. We observed no significant differences in the pooled prevalence rates of S. aureus and MRSA contamination identified in various raw meat products, with overall pooled prevalence rates of 29.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 22.8 to 35.9%) and 3.2% (95% CI, 1.8 to 4.9%) identified for the two contaminants, respectively. In the subgroup analyses, the prevalence of S. aureus contamination in chicken products was highest in Asian studies and significantly decreased over time worldwide. In European studies, the prevalence rates of S. aureus contamination in chicken and pork products were lower than those reported on other continents. The pooled prevalence rates of S. aureus contamination in chicken and pork products and MRSA contamination in beef and pork products were significantly higher in samples collected from retail sources than in samples collected from slaughterhouses and processing plants. These results highlight the need for good hygiene during transportation to and manipulation at retail outlets to reduce the risk of transmission of S. aureus and MRSA from meat products to humans.</description><subject>Abattoirs</subject><subject>Bacterial infections</subject><subject>Beef</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Food contamination & poisoning</subject><subject>Food safety</subject><subject>Hygiene</subject><subject>Illnesses</subject><subject>Meat</subject><subject>Meat products</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Penicillin</subject><subject>Pork</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Risk reduction</subject><subject>Sample size</subject><subject>Staphylococcus infections</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0362-028X</issn><issn>1944-9097</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkctu1DAUhi0EotOWN0AoEhs2ntrxJc5yNKWFqqjVFCR2luOcaFx57CF2QPMmfVwcelmwOovz_f-RzofQe0qWnFFxRpisManVz-XVxS2mEjMhXqEFbTnHLWmb12jxghyh45TuCSF1W8u36KhWTKha0gV6WFXfIBu8CsYfkktVHKq8herSx8746naE38ZDsFBtTIZ_67ts9tuDjzZaO6XKTCPMI_Rz09ZZ570LeAOlLZuQq7vlM7OOIZudCya7GOaqczcMMEKBNuZPiZtcLsZ-sjmdojeD8QnePc0T9OPi8_f1F3x9c_l1vbrGlimacUOo5KwhnCgpmBok7bnoCQgilbSm6VtGqBgogOIKKOta1vGe8g6AdnUP7AR9euzdj_HXBCnrnUsWvDcB4pQ0VaoWhEjaFvTjf-h9nMbyuJlqiaCsUTPFHyk7xpRGGPR-dDszHjQlejanZy161qKLOU2lLuZK7MNT-dTtoH8JPatifwGX75UL</recordid><startdate>20170501</startdate><enddate>20170501</enddate><creator>Ou, Qianting</creator><creator>Peng, Yang</creator><creator>Lin, Dongxin</creator><creator>Bai, Chan</creator><creator>Zhang, Ting</creator><creator>Lin, Jialing</creator><creator>Ye, Xiaohua</creator><creator>Yao, Zhenjiang</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170501</creationdate><title>A Meta-Analysis of the Global Prevalence Rates of Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus Contamination of Different Raw Meat Products</title><author>Ou, Qianting ; Peng, Yang ; Lin, Dongxin ; Bai, Chan ; Zhang, Ting ; Lin, Jialing ; Ye, Xiaohua ; Yao, Zhenjiang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-701643704086538f61d45d0e50686ca7d93015f1ee848e13b93b4d14bee1b2de3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Abattoirs</topic><topic>Bacterial infections</topic><topic>Beef</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Food contamination & poisoning</topic><topic>Food safety</topic><topic>Hygiene</topic><topic>Illnesses</topic><topic>Meat</topic><topic>Meat products</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Penicillin</topic><topic>Pork</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Risk reduction</topic><topic>Sample size</topic><topic>Staphylococcus infections</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ou, Qianting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Dongxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bai, Chan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Jialing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ye, Xiaohua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Zhenjiang</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of food protection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ou, Qianting</au><au>Peng, Yang</au><au>Lin, Dongxin</au><au>Bai, Chan</au><au>Zhang, Ting</au><au>Lin, Jialing</au><au>Ye, Xiaohua</au><au>Yao, Zhenjiang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Meta-Analysis of the Global Prevalence Rates of Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus Contamination of Different Raw Meat Products</atitle><jtitle>Journal of food protection</jtitle><addtitle>J Food Prot</addtitle><date>2017-05-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>763</spage><epage>774</epage><pages>763-774</pages><issn>0362-028X</issn><eissn>1944-9097</eissn><abstract>Previous research has indicated that raw meats are frequently contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus, but data regarding the pooled prevalence rates of S. aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) contamination in different types of raw meat products (beef, chicken, and pork) and across different periods, regions, and purchase locations remain inconsistent. We systematically searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid, Web of Science, and HighWire databases to identify studies published up to June 2016. The STROBE guidelines were used to assess the quality of the 39 studies included in this meta-analysis. We observed no significant differences in the pooled prevalence rates of S. aureus and MRSA contamination identified in various raw meat products, with overall pooled prevalence rates of 29.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 22.8 to 35.9%) and 3.2% (95% CI, 1.8 to 4.9%) identified for the two contaminants, respectively. In the subgroup analyses, the prevalence of S. aureus contamination in chicken products was highest in Asian studies and significantly decreased over time worldwide. In European studies, the prevalence rates of S. aureus contamination in chicken and pork products were lower than those reported on other continents. The pooled prevalence rates of S. aureus contamination in chicken and pork products and MRSA contamination in beef and pork products were significantly higher in samples collected from retail sources than in samples collected from slaughterhouses and processing plants. These results highlight the need for good hygiene during transportation to and manipulation at retail outlets to reduce the risk of transmission of S. aureus and MRSA from meat products to humans.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><pmid>28358261</pmid><doi>10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-355</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0362-028X |
| ispartof | Journal of food protection, 2017-05, Vol.80 (5), p.763-774 |
| issn | 0362-028X 1944-9097 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1882500619 |
| source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Abattoirs Bacterial infections Beef Bias Chickens Contaminants Contamination Disease prevention Food contamination & poisoning Food safety Hygiene Illnesses Meat Meat products Meta-analysis Methods Pathogens Penicillin Pork Poultry Public health Quality Risk reduction Sample size Staphylococcus infections Studies Systematic review |
| title | A Meta-Analysis of the Global Prevalence Rates of Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus Contamination of Different Raw Meat Products |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T21%3A52%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Meta-Analysis%20of%20the%20Global%20Prevalence%20Rates%20of%20Staphylococcus%20aureus%20and%20Methicillin-Resistant%20S.%20aureus%20Contamination%20of%20Different%20Raw%20Meat%20Products&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20food%20protection&rft.au=Ou,%20Qianting&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=763&rft.epage=774&rft.pages=763-774&rft.issn=0362-028X&rft.eissn=1944-9097&rft_id=info:doi/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-355&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4321895539%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1890513789&rft_id=info:pmid/28358261&rfr_iscdi=true |