Modelling trends in woody vegetation structure in semi-arid Australia as determined from aerial photography

Accounting of carbon stocks in woody vegetation for greenhouse purposes requires definition of medium term trends with accurate error assessment. Tree and shrub cover was sampled through time at randomly located sites over a large area of central Queensland, Australia using aerial photography from 1...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental management 2003-08, Vol.68 (4), p.421-436
Hauptverfasser: Fensham, Roderick John, Low Choy, Sama J., Fairfax, Russell James, Cavallaro, Paul C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 436
container_issue 4
container_start_page 421
container_title Journal of environmental management
container_volume 68
creator Fensham, Roderick John
Low Choy, Sama J.
Fairfax, Russell James
Cavallaro, Paul C.
description Accounting of carbon stocks in woody vegetation for greenhouse purposes requires definition of medium term trends with accurate error assessment. Tree and shrub cover was sampled through time at randomly located sites over a large area of central Queensland, Australia using aerial photography from 1945 to 1999. Calibration models developed from field data for the same land types as those represented within the study area allowed for the extrapolation of overstorey and understorey cover, basal area and biomass values and these were modelled as trends over the latter half of the 20th century. These structural attributes have declined over the region because of land clearing with values for biomass changing from a mean of 58.0(±1.2) t/ha in 1953 to 41.1(±1.0) t/ha in 1991. The biomass of Acacia on clay and Eucalypt on texture contrast soils land types has declined most dramatically. Within uncleared vegetation there was an overall trend of increase from 56.1(±1.2) t/ha in 1951 to 67.6(±1.3) t/ha in 1995. The increase in structural attributes within uncleared vegetation was most pronounced for the Eucalypt on texture contrast soils and Eucalypt on clay land types. It was demonstrated that the sites sampled were representative of their land types and that spatial bias of the photography, undetected tree-killing, sampling error, inherent variability of structural attributes and measurement error should not have impacted greatly on bias or precision of trend estimates for well-sampled land types. Certainly the errors are not likely to be substantial for trends averaged over all land types and they provide an accurate assessment of the magnitude and direction of change. The technique presented here would appear to be a robust means of accounting for the above-ground woody component of woodlands and open forests and will also contribute to a broader understanding of savanna dynamics.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0301-4797(03)00111-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18823906</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301479703001117</els_id><sourcerecordid>18823906</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-60d9c6a033064f960922199c67be9156eb8df6c74560ce90b044afa142ce7d703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUGLFDEQhYMo7rj6E5QgKHporXS6k85JlmVXhRUP6jlkkurZrN3JmKRX5t-b2Rlc8OKpoOp7RdV7hDxn8I4BE--_AQfWdFLJN8DfAjDGGvmArBiovhkEh4dk9Rc5IU9yvgEA3jL5mJywdpBykP2K_PwSHU6TDxtaEgaXqQ_0d4xuR29xg8UUHwPNJS22LAn304yzb0zyjp4tdWAmb6jJ1GHBNPuAjo4pztRg8mai2-tY4iaZ7fXuKXk0minjs2M9JT8uL76ff2quvn78fH521diuU6UR4JQVBjgH0Y1KgGpbpmpLrlGxXuB6cKOwsusFWFSwhq4zo2Fda1E6CfyUvD7s3ab4a8Fc9OyzrV-agHHJmg1DyxWICr78B7yJSwr1Ns1UL9qBS16h_gDZFHNOOOpt8rNJO81A76PQd1Hovc8auL6LQsuqe3FcvqxndPeqo_cVeHUETLZmGpMJ1ud7rlMShBwq9-HAYfXs1mPS2XoMFp1PaIt20f_nlD_ci6Xl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195628373</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modelling trends in woody vegetation structure in semi-arid Australia as determined from aerial photography</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Fensham, Roderick John ; Low Choy, Sama J. ; Fairfax, Russell James ; Cavallaro, Paul C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fensham, Roderick John ; Low Choy, Sama J. ; Fairfax, Russell James ; Cavallaro, Paul C.</creatorcontrib><description>Accounting of carbon stocks in woody vegetation for greenhouse purposes requires definition of medium term trends with accurate error assessment. Tree and shrub cover was sampled through time at randomly located sites over a large area of central Queensland, Australia using aerial photography from 1945 to 1999. Calibration models developed from field data for the same land types as those represented within the study area allowed for the extrapolation of overstorey and understorey cover, basal area and biomass values and these were modelled as trends over the latter half of the 20th century. These structural attributes have declined over the region because of land clearing with values for biomass changing from a mean of 58.0(±1.2) t/ha in 1953 to 41.1(±1.0) t/ha in 1991. The biomass of Acacia on clay and Eucalypt on texture contrast soils land types has declined most dramatically. Within uncleared vegetation there was an overall trend of increase from 56.1(±1.2) t/ha in 1951 to 67.6(±1.3) t/ha in 1995. The increase in structural attributes within uncleared vegetation was most pronounced for the Eucalypt on texture contrast soils and Eucalypt on clay land types. It was demonstrated that the sites sampled were representative of their land types and that spatial bias of the photography, undetected tree-killing, sampling error, inherent variability of structural attributes and measurement error should not have impacted greatly on bias or precision of trend estimates for well-sampled land types. Certainly the errors are not likely to be substantial for trends averaged over all land types and they provide an accurate assessment of the magnitude and direction of change. The technique presented here would appear to be a robust means of accounting for the above-ground woody component of woodlands and open forests and will also contribute to a broader understanding of savanna dynamics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0301-4797(03)00111-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12877875</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEVMAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aerial photography ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Applied ecology ; Australia ; Aves ; Biological and medical sciences ; Calibration ; Carbon accounting ; Clearing ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Demecology ; Desert Climate ; Ecosystem ; Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Greenhouse ; Models, Theoretical ; Photography ; Plant Development ; Population Dynamics ; Savanna ; Vertebrata ; Wilderness areas</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2003-08, Vol.68 (4), p.421-436</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Academic Press Ltd. Aug 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-60d9c6a033064f960922199c67be9156eb8df6c74560ce90b044afa142ce7d703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-60d9c6a033064f960922199c67be9156eb8df6c74560ce90b044afa142ce7d703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4797(03)00111-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14970678$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12877875$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fensham, Roderick John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Low Choy, Sama J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fairfax, Russell James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavallaro, Paul C.</creatorcontrib><title>Modelling trends in woody vegetation structure in semi-arid Australia as determined from aerial photography</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><description>Accounting of carbon stocks in woody vegetation for greenhouse purposes requires definition of medium term trends with accurate error assessment. Tree and shrub cover was sampled through time at randomly located sites over a large area of central Queensland, Australia using aerial photography from 1945 to 1999. Calibration models developed from field data for the same land types as those represented within the study area allowed for the extrapolation of overstorey and understorey cover, basal area and biomass values and these were modelled as trends over the latter half of the 20th century. These structural attributes have declined over the region because of land clearing with values for biomass changing from a mean of 58.0(±1.2) t/ha in 1953 to 41.1(±1.0) t/ha in 1991. The biomass of Acacia on clay and Eucalypt on texture contrast soils land types has declined most dramatically. Within uncleared vegetation there was an overall trend of increase from 56.1(±1.2) t/ha in 1951 to 67.6(±1.3) t/ha in 1995. The increase in structural attributes within uncleared vegetation was most pronounced for the Eucalypt on texture contrast soils and Eucalypt on clay land types. It was demonstrated that the sites sampled were representative of their land types and that spatial bias of the photography, undetected tree-killing, sampling error, inherent variability of structural attributes and measurement error should not have impacted greatly on bias or precision of trend estimates for well-sampled land types. Certainly the errors are not likely to be substantial for trends averaged over all land types and they provide an accurate assessment of the magnitude and direction of change. The technique presented here would appear to be a robust means of accounting for the above-ground woody component of woodlands and open forests and will also contribute to a broader understanding of savanna dynamics.</description><subject>Aerial photography</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Carbon accounting</subject><subject>Clearing</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Demecology</subject><subject>Desert Climate</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Greenhouse</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Photography</subject><subject>Plant Development</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Savanna</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><subject>Wilderness areas</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUGLFDEQhYMo7rj6E5QgKHporXS6k85JlmVXhRUP6jlkkurZrN3JmKRX5t-b2Rlc8OKpoOp7RdV7hDxn8I4BE--_AQfWdFLJN8DfAjDGGvmArBiovhkEh4dk9Rc5IU9yvgEA3jL5mJywdpBykP2K_PwSHU6TDxtaEgaXqQ_0d4xuR29xg8UUHwPNJS22LAn304yzb0zyjp4tdWAmb6jJ1GHBNPuAjo4pztRg8mai2-tY4iaZ7fXuKXk0minjs2M9JT8uL76ff2quvn78fH521diuU6UR4JQVBjgH0Y1KgGpbpmpLrlGxXuB6cKOwsusFWFSwhq4zo2Fda1E6CfyUvD7s3ab4a8Fc9OyzrV-agHHJmg1DyxWICr78B7yJSwr1Ns1UL9qBS16h_gDZFHNOOOpt8rNJO81A76PQd1Hovc8auL6LQsuqe3FcvqxndPeqo_cVeHUETLZmGpMJ1ud7rlMShBwq9-HAYfXs1mPS2XoMFp1PaIt20f_nlD_ci6Xl</recordid><startdate>20030801</startdate><enddate>20030801</enddate><creator>Fensham, Roderick John</creator><creator>Low Choy, Sama J.</creator><creator>Fairfax, Russell James</creator><creator>Cavallaro, Paul C.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Academic Press Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030801</creationdate><title>Modelling trends in woody vegetation structure in semi-arid Australia as determined from aerial photography</title><author>Fensham, Roderick John ; Low Choy, Sama J. ; Fairfax, Russell James ; Cavallaro, Paul C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-60d9c6a033064f960922199c67be9156eb8df6c74560ce90b044afa142ce7d703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Aerial photography</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Carbon accounting</topic><topic>Clearing</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Demecology</topic><topic>Desert Climate</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Greenhouse</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Photography</topic><topic>Plant Development</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Savanna</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><topic>Wilderness areas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fensham, Roderick John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Low Choy, Sama J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fairfax, Russell James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavallaro, Paul C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fensham, Roderick John</au><au>Low Choy, Sama J.</au><au>Fairfax, Russell James</au><au>Cavallaro, Paul C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modelling trends in woody vegetation structure in semi-arid Australia as determined from aerial photography</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2003-08-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>421</spage><epage>436</epage><pages>421-436</pages><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><coden>JEVMAW</coden><abstract>Accounting of carbon stocks in woody vegetation for greenhouse purposes requires definition of medium term trends with accurate error assessment. Tree and shrub cover was sampled through time at randomly located sites over a large area of central Queensland, Australia using aerial photography from 1945 to 1999. Calibration models developed from field data for the same land types as those represented within the study area allowed for the extrapolation of overstorey and understorey cover, basal area and biomass values and these were modelled as trends over the latter half of the 20th century. These structural attributes have declined over the region because of land clearing with values for biomass changing from a mean of 58.0(±1.2) t/ha in 1953 to 41.1(±1.0) t/ha in 1991. The biomass of Acacia on clay and Eucalypt on texture contrast soils land types has declined most dramatically. Within uncleared vegetation there was an overall trend of increase from 56.1(±1.2) t/ha in 1951 to 67.6(±1.3) t/ha in 1995. The increase in structural attributes within uncleared vegetation was most pronounced for the Eucalypt on texture contrast soils and Eucalypt on clay land types. It was demonstrated that the sites sampled were representative of their land types and that spatial bias of the photography, undetected tree-killing, sampling error, inherent variability of structural attributes and measurement error should not have impacted greatly on bias or precision of trend estimates for well-sampled land types. Certainly the errors are not likely to be substantial for trends averaged over all land types and they provide an accurate assessment of the magnitude and direction of change. The technique presented here would appear to be a robust means of accounting for the above-ground woody component of woodlands and open forests and will also contribute to a broader understanding of savanna dynamics.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>12877875</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0301-4797(03)00111-7</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4797
ispartof Journal of environmental management, 2003-08, Vol.68 (4), p.421-436
issn 0301-4797
1095-8630
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18823906
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Aerial photography
Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Applied ecology
Australia
Aves
Biological and medical sciences
Calibration
Carbon accounting
Clearing
Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
Demecology
Desert Climate
Ecosystem
Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration
Environmental Monitoring - methods
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Greenhouse
Models, Theoretical
Photography
Plant Development
Population Dynamics
Savanna
Vertebrata
Wilderness areas
title Modelling trends in woody vegetation structure in semi-arid Australia as determined from aerial photography
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T20%3A06%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modelling%20trends%20in%20woody%20vegetation%20structure%20in%20semi-arid%20Australia%20as%20determined%20from%20aerial%20photography&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Fensham,%20Roderick%20John&rft.date=2003-08-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=421&rft.epage=436&rft.pages=421-436&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft.coden=JEVMAW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0301-4797(03)00111-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18823906%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195628373&rft_id=info:pmid/12877875&rft_els_id=S0301479703001117&rfr_iscdi=true