Rate of electronic health record adoption in South Korea: A nation-wide survey

Highlights • We aimed to evaluate the rate of adoption of EHR systems in South Korea in 2015 and to compare the findings with equivalent South Korean data from 2010, as well as with US data from 2010 and 2014. For the comparison, we used the same or equivalent questionnaires developed by Jha et al....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland) Ireland), 2017-05, Vol.101, p.100-107
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Young-Gun, Jung, Kyoungwon, Park, Young-Taek, Shin, Dahye, Cho, Soo Yeon, Yoon, Dukyong, Park, Rae Woong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 107
container_issue
container_start_page 100
container_title International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland)
container_volume 101
creator Kim, Young-Gun
Jung, Kyoungwon
Park, Young-Taek
Shin, Dahye
Cho, Soo Yeon
Yoon, Dukyong
Park, Rae Woong
description Highlights • We aimed to evaluate the rate of adoption of EHR systems in South Korea in 2015 and to compare the findings with equivalent South Korean data from 2010, as well as with US data from 2010 and 2014. For the comparison, we used the same or equivalent questionnaires developed by Jha et al. at each data point. • In this study, 11.6% of South Korean tertiary teaching and general hospitals had a comprehensive EHR, and 46.5% had a basic EHR, in 2015. • The EHR adoption rate in Korean hospitals (37.2%) was higher than that in US hospitals in 2010 (15.1%), but this trend was reversed in 2015 (58.1% vs. 75.2%) after financial support was provided to US hospitals after the HITECH Act was passed. • A clinical decision support system (CDSS) was the most frequently missing function required to meet the criteria for a comprehensive EHR in hospitals with a basic EHR system. • The major barriers to adoption of EHR system were economic problems: the capital cost was the most frequent barrier to EHR adoption (48%), followed by concerns regarding the ongoing cost of maintenance (11%).
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.02.009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881773611</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1386505617300400</els_id><sourcerecordid>1881773611</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-cf06d9887997b276d62ae620a7c9e77b360b9cc894d6545f1fde863355142d663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1TAQhSMEog_4C5WXbJKOH7EdFoiqghZRUamFteVrT1SH3PhiJ0X33-PotizYsLKlOeeM5jtVdUahoUDl-dCEYYs-TH3DgKoGWAPQvaiOqVas1kzwl-XPtaxbaOVRdZLzAEUIrXhdHTHNhRICjqtvd3ZGEnuCI7o5xSk48oB2nB9IQheTJ9bH3RziRMJE7uNSBl9jQvueXJDJroP6d_BI8pIecf-metXbMePbp_e0-vH50_fL6_rm9urL5cVN7QTjc-16kL7TWnWd2jAlvWQWJQOrXIdKbbiETeec7oSXrWh72nvUkvO2pYJ5Kflp9e6Qu0vx14J5NtuQHY6jnTAu2VCtqVJcUlqk8iB1KeacsDe7FLY27Q0Fs7I0g3lmaVaWBpgpLIvx7GnHsinjv7ZneEXw8SDAculjwGSyCzi5ElXYzcbH8P8dH_6JcGMoHdjxJ-4xD3FJU-FoqMnFYO7XRtdCqeIAAoD_AZbRnEY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1881773611</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rate of electronic health record adoption in South Korea: A nation-wide survey</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kim, Young-Gun ; Jung, Kyoungwon ; Park, Young-Taek ; Shin, Dahye ; Cho, Soo Yeon ; Yoon, Dukyong ; Park, Rae Woong</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young-Gun ; Jung, Kyoungwon ; Park, Young-Taek ; Shin, Dahye ; Cho, Soo Yeon ; Yoon, Dukyong ; Park, Rae Woong</creatorcontrib><description>Highlights • We aimed to evaluate the rate of adoption of EHR systems in South Korea in 2015 and to compare the findings with equivalent South Korean data from 2010, as well as with US data from 2010 and 2014. For the comparison, we used the same or equivalent questionnaires developed by Jha et al. at each data point. • In this study, 11.6% of South Korean tertiary teaching and general hospitals had a comprehensive EHR, and 46.5% had a basic EHR, in 2015. • The EHR adoption rate in Korean hospitals (37.2%) was higher than that in US hospitals in 2010 (15.1%), but this trend was reversed in 2015 (58.1% vs. 75.2%) after financial support was provided to US hospitals after the HITECH Act was passed. • A clinical decision support system (CDSS) was the most frequently missing function required to meet the criteria for a comprehensive EHR in hospitals with a basic EHR system. • The major barriers to adoption of EHR system were economic problems: the capital cost was the most frequent barrier to EHR adoption (48%), followed by concerns regarding the ongoing cost of maintenance (11%).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1386-5056</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8243</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.02.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28347440</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Electronic health records ; Electronic Health Records - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Electronic Health Records - utilization ; Hospital information systems ; Hospitals, General - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Hospitals, Teaching - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Medical order entry systems ; Other ; Practice Management, Medical ; Republic of Korea</subject><ispartof>International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland), 2017-05, Vol.101, p.100-107</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-cf06d9887997b276d62ae620a7c9e77b360b9cc894d6545f1fde863355142d663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-cf06d9887997b276d62ae620a7c9e77b360b9cc894d6545f1fde863355142d663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505617300400$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28347440$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young-Gun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Kyoungwon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Young-Taek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Dahye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Soo Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Dukyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Rae Woong</creatorcontrib><title>Rate of electronic health record adoption in South Korea: A nation-wide survey</title><title>International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland)</title><addtitle>Int J Med Inform</addtitle><description>Highlights • We aimed to evaluate the rate of adoption of EHR systems in South Korea in 2015 and to compare the findings with equivalent South Korean data from 2010, as well as with US data from 2010 and 2014. For the comparison, we used the same or equivalent questionnaires developed by Jha et al. at each data point. • In this study, 11.6% of South Korean tertiary teaching and general hospitals had a comprehensive EHR, and 46.5% had a basic EHR, in 2015. • The EHR adoption rate in Korean hospitals (37.2%) was higher than that in US hospitals in 2010 (15.1%), but this trend was reversed in 2015 (58.1% vs. 75.2%) after financial support was provided to US hospitals after the HITECH Act was passed. • A clinical decision support system (CDSS) was the most frequently missing function required to meet the criteria for a comprehensive EHR in hospitals with a basic EHR system. • The major barriers to adoption of EHR system were economic problems: the capital cost was the most frequent barrier to EHR adoption (48%), followed by concerns regarding the ongoing cost of maintenance (11%).</description><subject>Electronic health records</subject><subject>Electronic Health Records - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Electronic Health Records - utilization</subject><subject>Hospital information systems</subject><subject>Hospitals, General - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Hospitals, Teaching - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Medical order entry systems</subject><subject>Other</subject><subject>Practice Management, Medical</subject><subject>Republic of Korea</subject><issn>1386-5056</issn><issn>1872-8243</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtv1TAQhSMEog_4C5WXbJKOH7EdFoiqghZRUamFteVrT1SH3PhiJ0X33-PotizYsLKlOeeM5jtVdUahoUDl-dCEYYs-TH3DgKoGWAPQvaiOqVas1kzwl-XPtaxbaOVRdZLzAEUIrXhdHTHNhRICjqtvd3ZGEnuCI7o5xSk48oB2nB9IQheTJ9bH3RziRMJE7uNSBl9jQvueXJDJroP6d_BI8pIecf-metXbMePbp_e0-vH50_fL6_rm9urL5cVN7QTjc-16kL7TWnWd2jAlvWQWJQOrXIdKbbiETeec7oSXrWh72nvUkvO2pYJ5Kflp9e6Qu0vx14J5NtuQHY6jnTAu2VCtqVJcUlqk8iB1KeacsDe7FLY27Q0Fs7I0g3lmaVaWBpgpLIvx7GnHsinjv7ZneEXw8SDAculjwGSyCzi5ElXYzcbH8P8dH_6JcGMoHdjxJ-4xD3FJU-FoqMnFYO7XRtdCqeIAAoD_AZbRnEY</recordid><startdate>20170501</startdate><enddate>20170501</enddate><creator>Kim, Young-Gun</creator><creator>Jung, Kyoungwon</creator><creator>Park, Young-Taek</creator><creator>Shin, Dahye</creator><creator>Cho, Soo Yeon</creator><creator>Yoon, Dukyong</creator><creator>Park, Rae Woong</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170501</creationdate><title>Rate of electronic health record adoption in South Korea: A nation-wide survey</title><author>Kim, Young-Gun ; Jung, Kyoungwon ; Park, Young-Taek ; Shin, Dahye ; Cho, Soo Yeon ; Yoon, Dukyong ; Park, Rae Woong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-cf06d9887997b276d62ae620a7c9e77b360b9cc894d6545f1fde863355142d663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Electronic health records</topic><topic>Electronic Health Records - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Electronic Health Records - utilization</topic><topic>Hospital information systems</topic><topic>Hospitals, General - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Hospitals, Teaching - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Medical order entry systems</topic><topic>Other</topic><topic>Practice Management, Medical</topic><topic>Republic of Korea</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young-Gun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Kyoungwon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Young-Taek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Dahye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Soo Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Dukyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Rae Woong</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Young-Gun</au><au>Jung, Kyoungwon</au><au>Park, Young-Taek</au><au>Shin, Dahye</au><au>Cho, Soo Yeon</au><au>Yoon, Dukyong</au><au>Park, Rae Woong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rate of electronic health record adoption in South Korea: A nation-wide survey</atitle><jtitle>International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland)</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Med Inform</addtitle><date>2017-05-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>101</volume><spage>100</spage><epage>107</epage><pages>100-107</pages><issn>1386-5056</issn><eissn>1872-8243</eissn><abstract>Highlights • We aimed to evaluate the rate of adoption of EHR systems in South Korea in 2015 and to compare the findings with equivalent South Korean data from 2010, as well as with US data from 2010 and 2014. For the comparison, we used the same or equivalent questionnaires developed by Jha et al. at each data point. • In this study, 11.6% of South Korean tertiary teaching and general hospitals had a comprehensive EHR, and 46.5% had a basic EHR, in 2015. • The EHR adoption rate in Korean hospitals (37.2%) was higher than that in US hospitals in 2010 (15.1%), but this trend was reversed in 2015 (58.1% vs. 75.2%) after financial support was provided to US hospitals after the HITECH Act was passed. • A clinical decision support system (CDSS) was the most frequently missing function required to meet the criteria for a comprehensive EHR in hospitals with a basic EHR system. • The major barriers to adoption of EHR system were economic problems: the capital cost was the most frequent barrier to EHR adoption (48%), followed by concerns regarding the ongoing cost of maintenance (11%).</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>28347440</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.02.009</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1386-5056
ispartof International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland), 2017-05, Vol.101, p.100-107
issn 1386-5056
1872-8243
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881773611
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Electronic health records
Electronic Health Records - statistics & numerical data
Electronic Health Records - utilization
Hospital information systems
Hospitals, General - statistics & numerical data
Hospitals, Teaching - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Internal Medicine
Medical order entry systems
Other
Practice Management, Medical
Republic of Korea
title Rate of electronic health record adoption in South Korea: A nation-wide survey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T12%3A16%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rate%20of%20electronic%20health%20record%20adoption%20in%20South%20Korea:%20A%20nation-wide%20survey&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20medical%20informatics%20(Shannon,%20Ireland)&rft.au=Kim,%20Young-Gun&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.volume=101&rft.spage=100&rft.epage=107&rft.pages=100-107&rft.issn=1386-5056&rft.eissn=1872-8243&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.02.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1881773611%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1881773611&rft_id=info:pmid/28347440&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1386505617300400&rfr_iscdi=true