Rate of electronic health record adoption in South Korea: A nation-wide survey
Highlights • We aimed to evaluate the rate of adoption of EHR systems in South Korea in 2015 and to compare the findings with equivalent South Korean data from 2010, as well as with US data from 2010 and 2014. For the comparison, we used the same or equivalent questionnaires developed by Jha et al....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland) Ireland), 2017-05, Vol.101, p.100-107 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 107 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 100 |
container_title | International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland) |
container_volume | 101 |
creator | Kim, Young-Gun Jung, Kyoungwon Park, Young-Taek Shin, Dahye Cho, Soo Yeon Yoon, Dukyong Park, Rae Woong |
description | Highlights • We aimed to evaluate the rate of adoption of EHR systems in South Korea in 2015 and to compare the findings with equivalent South Korean data from 2010, as well as with US data from 2010 and 2014. For the comparison, we used the same or equivalent questionnaires developed by Jha et al. at each data point. • In this study, 11.6% of South Korean tertiary teaching and general hospitals had a comprehensive EHR, and 46.5% had a basic EHR, in 2015. • The EHR adoption rate in Korean hospitals (37.2%) was higher than that in US hospitals in 2010 (15.1%), but this trend was reversed in 2015 (58.1% vs. 75.2%) after financial support was provided to US hospitals after the HITECH Act was passed. • A clinical decision support system (CDSS) was the most frequently missing function required to meet the criteria for a comprehensive EHR in hospitals with a basic EHR system. • The major barriers to adoption of EHR system were economic problems: the capital cost was the most frequent barrier to EHR adoption (48%), followed by concerns regarding the ongoing cost of maintenance (11%). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.02.009 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881773611</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1386505617300400</els_id><sourcerecordid>1881773611</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-cf06d9887997b276d62ae620a7c9e77b360b9cc894d6545f1fde863355142d663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1TAQhSMEog_4C5WXbJKOH7EdFoiqghZRUamFteVrT1SH3PhiJ0X33-PotizYsLKlOeeM5jtVdUahoUDl-dCEYYs-TH3DgKoGWAPQvaiOqVas1kzwl-XPtaxbaOVRdZLzAEUIrXhdHTHNhRICjqtvd3ZGEnuCI7o5xSk48oB2nB9IQheTJ9bH3RziRMJE7uNSBl9jQvueXJDJroP6d_BI8pIecf-metXbMePbp_e0-vH50_fL6_rm9urL5cVN7QTjc-16kL7TWnWd2jAlvWQWJQOrXIdKbbiETeec7oSXrWh72nvUkvO2pYJ5Kflp9e6Qu0vx14J5NtuQHY6jnTAu2VCtqVJcUlqk8iB1KeacsDe7FLY27Q0Fs7I0g3lmaVaWBpgpLIvx7GnHsinjv7ZneEXw8SDAculjwGSyCzi5ElXYzcbH8P8dH_6JcGMoHdjxJ-4xD3FJU-FoqMnFYO7XRtdCqeIAAoD_AZbRnEY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1881773611</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rate of electronic health record adoption in South Korea: A nation-wide survey</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kim, Young-Gun ; Jung, Kyoungwon ; Park, Young-Taek ; Shin, Dahye ; Cho, Soo Yeon ; Yoon, Dukyong ; Park, Rae Woong</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young-Gun ; Jung, Kyoungwon ; Park, Young-Taek ; Shin, Dahye ; Cho, Soo Yeon ; Yoon, Dukyong ; Park, Rae Woong</creatorcontrib><description>Highlights • We aimed to evaluate the rate of adoption of EHR systems in South Korea in 2015 and to compare the findings with equivalent South Korean data from 2010, as well as with US data from 2010 and 2014. For the comparison, we used the same or equivalent questionnaires developed by Jha et al. at each data point. • In this study, 11.6% of South Korean tertiary teaching and general hospitals had a comprehensive EHR, and 46.5% had a basic EHR, in 2015. • The EHR adoption rate in Korean hospitals (37.2%) was higher than that in US hospitals in 2010 (15.1%), but this trend was reversed in 2015 (58.1% vs. 75.2%) after financial support was provided to US hospitals after the HITECH Act was passed. • A clinical decision support system (CDSS) was the most frequently missing function required to meet the criteria for a comprehensive EHR in hospitals with a basic EHR system. • The major barriers to adoption of EHR system were economic problems: the capital cost was the most frequent barrier to EHR adoption (48%), followed by concerns regarding the ongoing cost of maintenance (11%).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1386-5056</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8243</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.02.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28347440</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Electronic health records ; Electronic Health Records - statistics & numerical data ; Electronic Health Records - utilization ; Hospital information systems ; Hospitals, General - statistics & numerical data ; Hospitals, Teaching - statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Medical order entry systems ; Other ; Practice Management, Medical ; Republic of Korea</subject><ispartof>International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland), 2017-05, Vol.101, p.100-107</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-cf06d9887997b276d62ae620a7c9e77b360b9cc894d6545f1fde863355142d663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-cf06d9887997b276d62ae620a7c9e77b360b9cc894d6545f1fde863355142d663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505617300400$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28347440$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young-Gun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Kyoungwon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Young-Taek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Dahye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Soo Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Dukyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Rae Woong</creatorcontrib><title>Rate of electronic health record adoption in South Korea: A nation-wide survey</title><title>International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland)</title><addtitle>Int J Med Inform</addtitle><description>Highlights • We aimed to evaluate the rate of adoption of EHR systems in South Korea in 2015 and to compare the findings with equivalent South Korean data from 2010, as well as with US data from 2010 and 2014. For the comparison, we used the same or equivalent questionnaires developed by Jha et al. at each data point. • In this study, 11.6% of South Korean tertiary teaching and general hospitals had a comprehensive EHR, and 46.5% had a basic EHR, in 2015. • The EHR adoption rate in Korean hospitals (37.2%) was higher than that in US hospitals in 2010 (15.1%), but this trend was reversed in 2015 (58.1% vs. 75.2%) after financial support was provided to US hospitals after the HITECH Act was passed. • A clinical decision support system (CDSS) was the most frequently missing function required to meet the criteria for a comprehensive EHR in hospitals with a basic EHR system. • The major barriers to adoption of EHR system were economic problems: the capital cost was the most frequent barrier to EHR adoption (48%), followed by concerns regarding the ongoing cost of maintenance (11%).</description><subject>Electronic health records</subject><subject>Electronic Health Records - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Electronic Health Records - utilization</subject><subject>Hospital information systems</subject><subject>Hospitals, General - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Hospitals, Teaching - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Medical order entry systems</subject><subject>Other</subject><subject>Practice Management, Medical</subject><subject>Republic of Korea</subject><issn>1386-5056</issn><issn>1872-8243</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtv1TAQhSMEog_4C5WXbJKOH7EdFoiqghZRUamFteVrT1SH3PhiJ0X33-PotizYsLKlOeeM5jtVdUahoUDl-dCEYYs-TH3DgKoGWAPQvaiOqVas1kzwl-XPtaxbaOVRdZLzAEUIrXhdHTHNhRICjqtvd3ZGEnuCI7o5xSk48oB2nB9IQheTJ9bH3RziRMJE7uNSBl9jQvueXJDJroP6d_BI8pIecf-metXbMePbp_e0-vH50_fL6_rm9urL5cVN7QTjc-16kL7TWnWd2jAlvWQWJQOrXIdKbbiETeec7oSXrWh72nvUkvO2pYJ5Kflp9e6Qu0vx14J5NtuQHY6jnTAu2VCtqVJcUlqk8iB1KeacsDe7FLY27Q0Fs7I0g3lmaVaWBpgpLIvx7GnHsinjv7ZneEXw8SDAculjwGSyCzi5ElXYzcbH8P8dH_6JcGMoHdjxJ-4xD3FJU-FoqMnFYO7XRtdCqeIAAoD_AZbRnEY</recordid><startdate>20170501</startdate><enddate>20170501</enddate><creator>Kim, Young-Gun</creator><creator>Jung, Kyoungwon</creator><creator>Park, Young-Taek</creator><creator>Shin, Dahye</creator><creator>Cho, Soo Yeon</creator><creator>Yoon, Dukyong</creator><creator>Park, Rae Woong</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170501</creationdate><title>Rate of electronic health record adoption in South Korea: A nation-wide survey</title><author>Kim, Young-Gun ; Jung, Kyoungwon ; Park, Young-Taek ; Shin, Dahye ; Cho, Soo Yeon ; Yoon, Dukyong ; Park, Rae Woong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-cf06d9887997b276d62ae620a7c9e77b360b9cc894d6545f1fde863355142d663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Electronic health records</topic><topic>Electronic Health Records - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Electronic Health Records - utilization</topic><topic>Hospital information systems</topic><topic>Hospitals, General - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Hospitals, Teaching - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Medical order entry systems</topic><topic>Other</topic><topic>Practice Management, Medical</topic><topic>Republic of Korea</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young-Gun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Kyoungwon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Young-Taek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Dahye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Soo Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Dukyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Rae Woong</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Young-Gun</au><au>Jung, Kyoungwon</au><au>Park, Young-Taek</au><au>Shin, Dahye</au><au>Cho, Soo Yeon</au><au>Yoon, Dukyong</au><au>Park, Rae Woong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rate of electronic health record adoption in South Korea: A nation-wide survey</atitle><jtitle>International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland)</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Med Inform</addtitle><date>2017-05-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>101</volume><spage>100</spage><epage>107</epage><pages>100-107</pages><issn>1386-5056</issn><eissn>1872-8243</eissn><abstract>Highlights • We aimed to evaluate the rate of adoption of EHR systems in South Korea in 2015 and to compare the findings with equivalent South Korean data from 2010, as well as with US data from 2010 and 2014. For the comparison, we used the same or equivalent questionnaires developed by Jha et al. at each data point. • In this study, 11.6% of South Korean tertiary teaching and general hospitals had a comprehensive EHR, and 46.5% had a basic EHR, in 2015. • The EHR adoption rate in Korean hospitals (37.2%) was higher than that in US hospitals in 2010 (15.1%), but this trend was reversed in 2015 (58.1% vs. 75.2%) after financial support was provided to US hospitals after the HITECH Act was passed. • A clinical decision support system (CDSS) was the most frequently missing function required to meet the criteria for a comprehensive EHR in hospitals with a basic EHR system. • The major barriers to adoption of EHR system were economic problems: the capital cost was the most frequent barrier to EHR adoption (48%), followed by concerns regarding the ongoing cost of maintenance (11%).</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>28347440</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.02.009</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1386-5056 |
ispartof | International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland), 2017-05, Vol.101, p.100-107 |
issn | 1386-5056 1872-8243 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881773611 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Electronic health records Electronic Health Records - statistics & numerical data Electronic Health Records - utilization Hospital information systems Hospitals, General - statistics & numerical data Hospitals, Teaching - statistics & numerical data Humans Internal Medicine Medical order entry systems Other Practice Management, Medical Republic of Korea |
title | Rate of electronic health record adoption in South Korea: A nation-wide survey |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T12%3A16%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rate%20of%20electronic%20health%20record%20adoption%20in%20South%20Korea:%20A%20nation-wide%20survey&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20medical%20informatics%20(Shannon,%20Ireland)&rft.au=Kim,%20Young-Gun&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.volume=101&rft.spage=100&rft.epage=107&rft.pages=100-107&rft.issn=1386-5056&rft.eissn=1872-8243&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.02.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1881773611%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1881773611&rft_id=info:pmid/28347440&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1386505617300400&rfr_iscdi=true |