The effectiveness of intrauterine insemination: A matched cohort study

Abstract Objective To study the effectiveness of an intrauterine insemination (IUI) program compared to no treatment in subfertile couples with unexplained subfertility and a poor prognosis on natural conception. Study design A retrospective matched cohort study in which ongoing pregnancy rates in 7...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology 2017-05, Vol.212, p.91-95
Hauptverfasser: Scholten, Irma, van Zijl, Maud, Custers, Inge M, Brandes, Monique, Gianotten, Judith, van der Linden, Paul J.Q, Hompes, Peter G.A, van der Veen, Fulco, Mol, Ben W.J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 95
container_issue
container_start_page 91
container_title European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology
container_volume 212
creator Scholten, Irma
van Zijl, Maud
Custers, Inge M
Brandes, Monique
Gianotten, Judith
van der Linden, Paul J.Q
Hompes, Peter G.A
van der Veen, Fulco
Mol, Ben W.J
description Abstract Objective To study the effectiveness of an intrauterine insemination (IUI) program compared to no treatment in subfertile couples with unexplained subfertility and a poor prognosis on natural conception. Study design A retrospective matched cohort study in which ongoing pregnancy rates in 72 couples who voluntarily dropped out of treatment with IUI were compared to ongoing pregnancy rates in 144 couples who continued treatment with IUI. Couples with unexplained subfertility, mild male subfertility or cervical factor subfertility who started treatment with IUI between January 2000 and December 2008 were included. Couples were matched on hospital, age, duration of subfertility, primary or secondary subfertility and diagnosis. Primary outcome was cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate after three years. Time to pregnancy was censored at the moment couples were lost to follow up or when their child wish ended and, for the no-treatment group, when couples re-started treatment. Results After three years, there were 18 pregnancies in the stopped treatment group (25%) versus 41 pregnancies in the IUI group (28%) (RR 1.1 (0.59–2.2)( p = 0.4)). The cumulative pregnancy rate after three years was 40% in both groups, showing no difference in time to ongoing pregnancy (shared frailty model p = 0.86). Conclusions In couples with unexplained subfertility and a poor prognosis for natural conception, treatment with IUI does not to add to expectant management. There is need for a randomized clinical trial comparing IUI with expectant management in these couples.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.03.028
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881772181</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0301211517301392</els_id><sourcerecordid>1881772181</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-b9ba5dbca4f7387317383cdbcc75a10a147dc62cea0950820c87b58c6af672a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9r3TAMx83oaF-7_gdl5LhLUstOYmeHQSnrDyj0sO5sHEfZc5rYne0U3n8_P163wy7VQULiKwl9RMgF0AootJdThZP_FfqKURAV5RVl8gPZgBSsFG1TH5EN5RRKBtCckNMYJ5qN8-6YnDDJ6052sCE3T1sscBzRJPuKDmMs_FhYl4JeEwbrMCcRF-t0st59La6KRSezxaEwfutDKmJah90n8nHUc8Tzt3hGft58f7q-Kx8eb--vrx5KU4NIZd_1uhl6o-tRcCk4ZM9NLhjRaKAaajGYlhnUtGuoZNRI0TfStHpsBdMNPyNfDnNfgv-9YkxqsdHgPGuHfo0KpAQhGEjI0vogNcHHGHBUL8EuOuwUULUnqCZ1IKj2BBXlKhPMbZ_fNqz9gsO_pr_IsuDbQYD5zleLQUVj0RkcbMgU1eDtexv-H2Bm66zR8zPuME5-DS4zVKAiU1T92H9x_8QMiwLvGP8DTI6Yvw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1881772181</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effectiveness of intrauterine insemination: A matched cohort study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Scholten, Irma ; van Zijl, Maud ; Custers, Inge M ; Brandes, Monique ; Gianotten, Judith ; van der Linden, Paul J.Q ; Hompes, Peter G.A ; van der Veen, Fulco ; Mol, Ben W.J</creator><creatorcontrib>Scholten, Irma ; van Zijl, Maud ; Custers, Inge M ; Brandes, Monique ; Gianotten, Judith ; van der Linden, Paul J.Q ; Hompes, Peter G.A ; van der Veen, Fulco ; Mol, Ben W.J</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective To study the effectiveness of an intrauterine insemination (IUI) program compared to no treatment in subfertile couples with unexplained subfertility and a poor prognosis on natural conception. Study design A retrospective matched cohort study in which ongoing pregnancy rates in 72 couples who voluntarily dropped out of treatment with IUI were compared to ongoing pregnancy rates in 144 couples who continued treatment with IUI. Couples with unexplained subfertility, mild male subfertility or cervical factor subfertility who started treatment with IUI between January 2000 and December 2008 were included. Couples were matched on hospital, age, duration of subfertility, primary or secondary subfertility and diagnosis. Primary outcome was cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate after three years. Time to pregnancy was censored at the moment couples were lost to follow up or when their child wish ended and, for the no-treatment group, when couples re-started treatment. Results After three years, there were 18 pregnancies in the stopped treatment group (25%) versus 41 pregnancies in the IUI group (28%) (RR 1.1 (0.59–2.2)( p = 0.4)). The cumulative pregnancy rate after three years was 40% in both groups, showing no difference in time to ongoing pregnancy (shared frailty model p = 0.86). Conclusions In couples with unexplained subfertility and a poor prognosis for natural conception, treatment with IUI does not to add to expectant management. There is need for a randomized clinical trial comparing IUI with expectant management in these couples.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-2115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7654</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.03.028</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28349891</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Effectiveness ; Expectant management ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Humans ; Infertility - therapy ; Insemination, Artificial - methods ; Insemination, Artificial - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Intrauterine insemination ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Rate ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Retrospective Studies ; Time-to-Pregnancy ; Treatment Outcome ; Unexplained subfertility</subject><ispartof>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology, 2017-05, Vol.212, p.91-95</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2017 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-b9ba5dbca4f7387317383cdbcc75a10a147dc62cea0950820c87b58c6af672a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-b9ba5dbca4f7387317383cdbcc75a10a147dc62cea0950820c87b58c6af672a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.03.028$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28349891$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scholten, Irma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Zijl, Maud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Custers, Inge M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandes, Monique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gianotten, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Linden, Paul J.Q</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hompes, Peter G.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Veen, Fulco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mol, Ben W.J</creatorcontrib><title>The effectiveness of intrauterine insemination: A matched cohort study</title><title>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology</title><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective To study the effectiveness of an intrauterine insemination (IUI) program compared to no treatment in subfertile couples with unexplained subfertility and a poor prognosis on natural conception. Study design A retrospective matched cohort study in which ongoing pregnancy rates in 72 couples who voluntarily dropped out of treatment with IUI were compared to ongoing pregnancy rates in 144 couples who continued treatment with IUI. Couples with unexplained subfertility, mild male subfertility or cervical factor subfertility who started treatment with IUI between January 2000 and December 2008 were included. Couples were matched on hospital, age, duration of subfertility, primary or secondary subfertility and diagnosis. Primary outcome was cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate after three years. Time to pregnancy was censored at the moment couples were lost to follow up or when their child wish ended and, for the no-treatment group, when couples re-started treatment. Results After three years, there were 18 pregnancies in the stopped treatment group (25%) versus 41 pregnancies in the IUI group (28%) (RR 1.1 (0.59–2.2)( p = 0.4)). The cumulative pregnancy rate after three years was 40% in both groups, showing no difference in time to ongoing pregnancy (shared frailty model p = 0.86). Conclusions In couples with unexplained subfertility and a poor prognosis for natural conception, treatment with IUI does not to add to expectant management. There is need for a randomized clinical trial comparing IUI with expectant management in these couples.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Expectant management</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infertility - therapy</subject><subject>Insemination, Artificial - methods</subject><subject>Insemination, Artificial - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Intrauterine insemination</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Rate</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Time-to-Pregnancy</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Unexplained subfertility</subject><issn>0301-2115</issn><issn>1872-7654</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc9r3TAMx83oaF-7_gdl5LhLUstOYmeHQSnrDyj0sO5sHEfZc5rYne0U3n8_P163wy7VQULiKwl9RMgF0AootJdThZP_FfqKURAV5RVl8gPZgBSsFG1TH5EN5RRKBtCckNMYJ5qN8-6YnDDJ6052sCE3T1sscBzRJPuKDmMs_FhYl4JeEwbrMCcRF-t0st59La6KRSezxaEwfutDKmJah90n8nHUc8Tzt3hGft58f7q-Kx8eb--vrx5KU4NIZd_1uhl6o-tRcCk4ZM9NLhjRaKAaajGYlhnUtGuoZNRI0TfStHpsBdMNPyNfDnNfgv-9YkxqsdHgPGuHfo0KpAQhGEjI0vogNcHHGHBUL8EuOuwUULUnqCZ1IKj2BBXlKhPMbZ_fNqz9gsO_pr_IsuDbQYD5zleLQUVj0RkcbMgU1eDtexv-H2Bm66zR8zPuME5-DS4zVKAiU1T92H9x_8QMiwLvGP8DTI6Yvw</recordid><startdate>20170501</startdate><enddate>20170501</enddate><creator>Scholten, Irma</creator><creator>van Zijl, Maud</creator><creator>Custers, Inge M</creator><creator>Brandes, Monique</creator><creator>Gianotten, Judith</creator><creator>van der Linden, Paul J.Q</creator><creator>Hompes, Peter G.A</creator><creator>van der Veen, Fulco</creator><creator>Mol, Ben W.J</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170501</creationdate><title>The effectiveness of intrauterine insemination: A matched cohort study</title><author>Scholten, Irma ; van Zijl, Maud ; Custers, Inge M ; Brandes, Monique ; Gianotten, Judith ; van der Linden, Paul J.Q ; Hompes, Peter G.A ; van der Veen, Fulco ; Mol, Ben W.J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-b9ba5dbca4f7387317383cdbcc75a10a147dc62cea0950820c87b58c6af672a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Expectant management</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infertility - therapy</topic><topic>Insemination, Artificial - methods</topic><topic>Insemination, Artificial - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Intrauterine insemination</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Rate</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Time-to-Pregnancy</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Unexplained subfertility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scholten, Irma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Zijl, Maud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Custers, Inge M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandes, Monique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gianotten, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Linden, Paul J.Q</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hompes, Peter G.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Veen, Fulco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mol, Ben W.J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scholten, Irma</au><au>van Zijl, Maud</au><au>Custers, Inge M</au><au>Brandes, Monique</au><au>Gianotten, Judith</au><au>van der Linden, Paul J.Q</au><au>Hompes, Peter G.A</au><au>van der Veen, Fulco</au><au>Mol, Ben W.J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effectiveness of intrauterine insemination: A matched cohort study</atitle><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><date>2017-05-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>212</volume><spage>91</spage><epage>95</epage><pages>91-95</pages><issn>0301-2115</issn><eissn>1872-7654</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective To study the effectiveness of an intrauterine insemination (IUI) program compared to no treatment in subfertile couples with unexplained subfertility and a poor prognosis on natural conception. Study design A retrospective matched cohort study in which ongoing pregnancy rates in 72 couples who voluntarily dropped out of treatment with IUI were compared to ongoing pregnancy rates in 144 couples who continued treatment with IUI. Couples with unexplained subfertility, mild male subfertility or cervical factor subfertility who started treatment with IUI between January 2000 and December 2008 were included. Couples were matched on hospital, age, duration of subfertility, primary or secondary subfertility and diagnosis. Primary outcome was cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate after three years. Time to pregnancy was censored at the moment couples were lost to follow up or when their child wish ended and, for the no-treatment group, when couples re-started treatment. Results After three years, there were 18 pregnancies in the stopped treatment group (25%) versus 41 pregnancies in the IUI group (28%) (RR 1.1 (0.59–2.2)( p = 0.4)). The cumulative pregnancy rate after three years was 40% in both groups, showing no difference in time to ongoing pregnancy (shared frailty model p = 0.86). Conclusions In couples with unexplained subfertility and a poor prognosis for natural conception, treatment with IUI does not to add to expectant management. There is need for a randomized clinical trial comparing IUI with expectant management in these couples.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>28349891</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.03.028</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-2115
ispartof European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology, 2017-05, Vol.212, p.91-95
issn 0301-2115
1872-7654
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881772181
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Effectiveness
Expectant management
Female
Fertilization in Vitro - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Infertility - therapy
Insemination, Artificial - methods
Insemination, Artificial - statistics & numerical data
Intrauterine insemination
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Rate
Proportional Hazards Models
Retrospective Studies
Time-to-Pregnancy
Treatment Outcome
Unexplained subfertility
title The effectiveness of intrauterine insemination: A matched cohort study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T10%3A19%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effectiveness%20of%20intrauterine%20insemination:%20A%20matched%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology%20and%20reproductive%20biology&rft.au=Scholten,%20Irma&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.volume=212&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=95&rft.pages=91-95&rft.issn=0301-2115&rft.eissn=1872-7654&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.03.028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1881772181%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1881772181&rft_id=info:pmid/28349891&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0301211517301392&rfr_iscdi=true