Effectiveness of amphibians as biodiversity surrogates in pond conservation
Amphibian decline has led to worldwide conservation efforts, including the identification and designation of sites for their protection. These sites could also play an important role in the conservation of other freshwater taxa. In 89 ponds in Switzerland, we assessed the effectiveness of amphibians...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Conservation biology 2017-04, Vol.31 (2), p.437-445 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 445 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 437 |
container_title | Conservation biology |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Ilg, Christiane Oertli, Beat |
description | Amphibian decline has led to worldwide conservation efforts, including the identification and designation of sites for their protection. These sites could also play an important role in the conservation of other freshwater taxa. In 89 ponds in Switzerland, we assessed the effectiveness of amphibians as a surrogate for 4 taxonomic groups that occur in the same freshwater ecosystems as amphibians: dragonflies, aquatic beetles, aquatic gastropods, and aquatic plants. The ponds were all of high value for amphibian conservation. Cross-taxon correlations were tested for species richness and conservation value, and Mantel tests were used to investigate community congruence. Species richness, conservation value, and community composition of amphibians were weakly congruent with these measures for the other taxonomic groups. Paired comparisons for the 5 groups considered showed that for each metric, amphibians had the lowest degree of congruence. Our results imply that site designation for amphibian conservation will not necessarily provide protection for freshwater biodiversity as a whole. To provide adequate protection for freshwater species, we recommend other taxonomic groups be considered in addition to amphibians in the prioritization and site designation process. La declinación de anfibios ha resultado en esfuerzos de conservación a nivel mundial, incluyendo a la identificación y designación de sitios para su protección. Estos sitios podrían desempeñar un papel importante en la conservación de otros taxones de agua dulce. Valoramos la efectividad de los anfibios como sustitutos de cuatro grupos taxonómicos que se encuentran en los mismos ecosistemas de agua dulce que los anfibios en 89 estanques en Suiza: libélulas, escarabajos acuáticos, gasterópodos acuáticos y plantas acuáticas. Todos los estanques tenían un valor alto de conservación. Las correlaciones entre taxones fueron evaluadas en riqueza de especies y valor de conservación. También se usaron pruebas de Mantel para investigar la congruencia de la comunidad. La riqueza de especies, el valor de conservación y la composición de la comunidad de anfibios fue congruente deforma débil con estas medidas para los otros grupos taxonómicos. Las comparaciones emparejadas para estos cinco grupos considerados mostraron que, por cada medida los anfibios tenían el grado más bajo de congruencia. Nuestros resultados implican que la designación de sitios para la conservación de anfibios no proporcionará necesariamente |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/cobi.12802 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881769330</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44202385</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44202385</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4402-2bb1c03e7f26d51d796d4cebc8ebfd0169f140b2e9d5072b3c80a30a608a2f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0c1vFCEYBnBiNHatXrxrJvFiTKa-Lx8DHHVTtbFJL70TYEDZ7A4rzNTsfy912x48NHKAw_vjSeAh5DXCGbb10WeXzpAqoE_ICgVlPUqmn5IVKKV6pTQ9IS9q3QCAFsifkxMqBTCp6Ip8P48x-DndhCnU2uXY2d3-Z3LJTrWztXMpj21YapoPXV1KyT_sHGqXpm6fp7Hzeaqh3Ng55ekleRbttoZXd-cpuf5yfr3-1l9efb1Yf7rsPedAe-ocemBBRjqMAkeph5H74LwKLo6Ag47IwdGgRwGSOuYVWAZ2AGVpZOyUvD_G7kv-tYQ6m12qPmy3dgp5qQaVQjloxuA_KEepKQBv9N0_dJOXMrV3GNTtD4e24aNKSUFBCCqa-nBUvuRaS4hmX9LOloNBMLeVmdvKzN_KGn57F7m4XRgf6H1HDeAR_E7bcHgkyqyvPl_ch7453tnUOZeHO5zTNlSC_QGsvakU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1875205525</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of amphibians as biodiversity surrogates in pond conservation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Ilg, Christiane ; Oertli, Beat</creator><creatorcontrib>Ilg, Christiane ; Oertli, Beat</creatorcontrib><description>Amphibian decline has led to worldwide conservation efforts, including the identification and designation of sites for their protection. These sites could also play an important role in the conservation of other freshwater taxa. In 89 ponds in Switzerland, we assessed the effectiveness of amphibians as a surrogate for 4 taxonomic groups that occur in the same freshwater ecosystems as amphibians: dragonflies, aquatic beetles, aquatic gastropods, and aquatic plants. The ponds were all of high value for amphibian conservation. Cross-taxon correlations were tested for species richness and conservation value, and Mantel tests were used to investigate community congruence. Species richness, conservation value, and community composition of amphibians were weakly congruent with these measures for the other taxonomic groups. Paired comparisons for the 5 groups considered showed that for each metric, amphibians had the lowest degree of congruence. Our results imply that site designation for amphibian conservation will not necessarily provide protection for freshwater biodiversity as a whole. To provide adequate protection for freshwater species, we recommend other taxonomic groups be considered in addition to amphibians in the prioritization and site designation process. La declinación de anfibios ha resultado en esfuerzos de conservación a nivel mundial, incluyendo a la identificación y designación de sitios para su protección. Estos sitios podrían desempeñar un papel importante en la conservación de otros taxones de agua dulce. Valoramos la efectividad de los anfibios como sustitutos de cuatro grupos taxonómicos que se encuentran en los mismos ecosistemas de agua dulce que los anfibios en 89 estanques en Suiza: libélulas, escarabajos acuáticos, gasterópodos acuáticos y plantas acuáticas. Todos los estanques tenían un valor alto de conservación. Las correlaciones entre taxones fueron evaluadas en riqueza de especies y valor de conservación. También se usaron pruebas de Mantel para investigar la congruencia de la comunidad. La riqueza de especies, el valor de conservación y la composición de la comunidad de anfibios fue congruente deforma débil con estas medidas para los otros grupos taxonómicos. Las comparaciones emparejadas para estos cinco grupos considerados mostraron que, por cada medida los anfibios tenían el grado más bajo de congruencia. Nuestros resultados implican que la designación de sitios para la conservación de anfibios no proporcionará necesariamente protección para la biodiversidad de agua dulce en total. Para proporcionar la protección adecuada para las especies de agua dulce, recomendamos que otros grupos taxonómicos sean considerados además de los anfibios en la priorización y el proceso de designación de sitio.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-8892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-1739</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12802</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27503782</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>Amphibians ; Animals ; Aquatic ecosystems ; Aquatic molluscs ; Aquatic plants ; Aquatic reptiles ; Beetles ; Biodiversity ; Communities ; Community composition ; community congruence ; congruencia de comunidad ; congruencia entre taxones ; Conservation ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; conservation value ; cross‐taxon congruence ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystems ; Fresh water ; Freshwater ; Freshwater ecosystems ; Gastropoda ; habitat prioritization ; Inland water environment ; Insecta ; Insects ; macroinvertebrados ; macroinvertebrates ; Mantel test ; Marine molluscs ; Odonata ; plantas acuáticas ; Ponds ; priorización de hábitat ; Protection ; prueba de Mantel ; Reptiles & amphibians ; Species richness ; surrogacy ; sustituciones ; Switzerland ; Taxa ; Taxonomy ; valor de conservación ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Conservation biology, 2017-04, Vol.31 (2), p.437-445</ispartof><rights>2017 Society for Conservation Biology</rights><rights>2016 Society for Conservation Biology</rights><rights>2016 Society for Conservation Biology.</rights><rights>2017, Society for Conservation Biology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4402-2bb1c03e7f26d51d796d4cebc8ebfd0169f140b2e9d5072b3c80a30a608a2f33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4402-2bb1c03e7f26d51d796d4cebc8ebfd0169f140b2e9d5072b3c80a30a608a2f33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44202385$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44202385$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580,58022,58255</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27503782$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ilg, Christiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oertli, Beat</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of amphibians as biodiversity surrogates in pond conservation</title><title>Conservation biology</title><addtitle>Conserv Biol</addtitle><description>Amphibian decline has led to worldwide conservation efforts, including the identification and designation of sites for their protection. These sites could also play an important role in the conservation of other freshwater taxa. In 89 ponds in Switzerland, we assessed the effectiveness of amphibians as a surrogate for 4 taxonomic groups that occur in the same freshwater ecosystems as amphibians: dragonflies, aquatic beetles, aquatic gastropods, and aquatic plants. The ponds were all of high value for amphibian conservation. Cross-taxon correlations were tested for species richness and conservation value, and Mantel tests were used to investigate community congruence. Species richness, conservation value, and community composition of amphibians were weakly congruent with these measures for the other taxonomic groups. Paired comparisons for the 5 groups considered showed that for each metric, amphibians had the lowest degree of congruence. Our results imply that site designation for amphibian conservation will not necessarily provide protection for freshwater biodiversity as a whole. To provide adequate protection for freshwater species, we recommend other taxonomic groups be considered in addition to amphibians in the prioritization and site designation process. La declinación de anfibios ha resultado en esfuerzos de conservación a nivel mundial, incluyendo a la identificación y designación de sitios para su protección. Estos sitios podrían desempeñar un papel importante en la conservación de otros taxones de agua dulce. Valoramos la efectividad de los anfibios como sustitutos de cuatro grupos taxonómicos que se encuentran en los mismos ecosistemas de agua dulce que los anfibios en 89 estanques en Suiza: libélulas, escarabajos acuáticos, gasterópodos acuáticos y plantas acuáticas. Todos los estanques tenían un valor alto de conservación. Las correlaciones entre taxones fueron evaluadas en riqueza de especies y valor de conservación. También se usaron pruebas de Mantel para investigar la congruencia de la comunidad. La riqueza de especies, el valor de conservación y la composición de la comunidad de anfibios fue congruente deforma débil con estas medidas para los otros grupos taxonómicos. Las comparaciones emparejadas para estos cinco grupos considerados mostraron que, por cada medida los anfibios tenían el grado más bajo de congruencia. Nuestros resultados implican que la designación de sitios para la conservación de anfibios no proporcionará necesariamente protección para la biodiversidad de agua dulce en total. Para proporcionar la protección adecuada para las especies de agua dulce, recomendamos que otros grupos taxonómicos sean considerados además de los anfibios en la priorización y el proceso de designación de sitio.</description><subject>Amphibians</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Aquatic molluscs</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Aquatic reptiles</subject><subject>Beetles</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>community congruence</subject><subject>congruencia de comunidad</subject><subject>congruencia entre taxones</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>conservation value</subject><subject>cross‐taxon congruence</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Fresh water</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater ecosystems</subject><subject>Gastropoda</subject><subject>habitat prioritization</subject><subject>Inland water environment</subject><subject>Insecta</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>macroinvertebrados</subject><subject>macroinvertebrates</subject><subject>Mantel test</subject><subject>Marine molluscs</subject><subject>Odonata</subject><subject>plantas acuáticas</subject><subject>Ponds</subject><subject>priorización de hábitat</subject><subject>Protection</subject><subject>prueba de Mantel</subject><subject>Reptiles & amphibians</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>surrogacy</subject><subject>sustituciones</subject><subject>Switzerland</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>valor de conservación</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>0888-8892</issn><issn>1523-1739</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0c1vFCEYBnBiNHatXrxrJvFiTKa-Lx8DHHVTtbFJL70TYEDZ7A4rzNTsfy912x48NHKAw_vjSeAh5DXCGbb10WeXzpAqoE_ICgVlPUqmn5IVKKV6pTQ9IS9q3QCAFsifkxMqBTCp6Ip8P48x-DndhCnU2uXY2d3-Z3LJTrWztXMpj21YapoPXV1KyT_sHGqXpm6fp7Hzeaqh3Ng55ekleRbttoZXd-cpuf5yfr3-1l9efb1Yf7rsPedAe-ocemBBRjqMAkeph5H74LwKLo6Ag47IwdGgRwGSOuYVWAZ2AGVpZOyUvD_G7kv-tYQ6m12qPmy3dgp5qQaVQjloxuA_KEepKQBv9N0_dJOXMrV3GNTtD4e24aNKSUFBCCqa-nBUvuRaS4hmX9LOloNBMLeVmdvKzN_KGn57F7m4XRgf6H1HDeAR_E7bcHgkyqyvPl_ch7453tnUOZeHO5zTNlSC_QGsvakU</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Ilg, Christiane</creator><creator>Oertli, Beat</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of amphibians as biodiversity surrogates in pond conservation</title><author>Ilg, Christiane ; Oertli, Beat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4402-2bb1c03e7f26d51d796d4cebc8ebfd0169f140b2e9d5072b3c80a30a608a2f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Amphibians</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Aquatic molluscs</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Aquatic reptiles</topic><topic>Beetles</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>community congruence</topic><topic>congruencia de comunidad</topic><topic>congruencia entre taxones</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>conservation value</topic><topic>cross‐taxon congruence</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Fresh water</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater ecosystems</topic><topic>Gastropoda</topic><topic>habitat prioritization</topic><topic>Inland water environment</topic><topic>Insecta</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>macroinvertebrados</topic><topic>macroinvertebrates</topic><topic>Mantel test</topic><topic>Marine molluscs</topic><topic>Odonata</topic><topic>plantas acuáticas</topic><topic>Ponds</topic><topic>priorización de hábitat</topic><topic>Protection</topic><topic>prueba de Mantel</topic><topic>Reptiles & amphibians</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>surrogacy</topic><topic>sustituciones</topic><topic>Switzerland</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>valor de conservación</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ilg, Christiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oertli, Beat</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ilg, Christiane</au><au>Oertli, Beat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of amphibians as biodiversity surrogates in pond conservation</atitle><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle><addtitle>Conserv Biol</addtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>437</spage><epage>445</epage><pages>437-445</pages><issn>0888-8892</issn><eissn>1523-1739</eissn><abstract>Amphibian decline has led to worldwide conservation efforts, including the identification and designation of sites for their protection. These sites could also play an important role in the conservation of other freshwater taxa. In 89 ponds in Switzerland, we assessed the effectiveness of amphibians as a surrogate for 4 taxonomic groups that occur in the same freshwater ecosystems as amphibians: dragonflies, aquatic beetles, aquatic gastropods, and aquatic plants. The ponds were all of high value for amphibian conservation. Cross-taxon correlations were tested for species richness and conservation value, and Mantel tests were used to investigate community congruence. Species richness, conservation value, and community composition of amphibians were weakly congruent with these measures for the other taxonomic groups. Paired comparisons for the 5 groups considered showed that for each metric, amphibians had the lowest degree of congruence. Our results imply that site designation for amphibian conservation will not necessarily provide protection for freshwater biodiversity as a whole. To provide adequate protection for freshwater species, we recommend other taxonomic groups be considered in addition to amphibians in the prioritization and site designation process. La declinación de anfibios ha resultado en esfuerzos de conservación a nivel mundial, incluyendo a la identificación y designación de sitios para su protección. Estos sitios podrían desempeñar un papel importante en la conservación de otros taxones de agua dulce. Valoramos la efectividad de los anfibios como sustitutos de cuatro grupos taxonómicos que se encuentran en los mismos ecosistemas de agua dulce que los anfibios en 89 estanques en Suiza: libélulas, escarabajos acuáticos, gasterópodos acuáticos y plantas acuáticas. Todos los estanques tenían un valor alto de conservación. Las correlaciones entre taxones fueron evaluadas en riqueza de especies y valor de conservación. También se usaron pruebas de Mantel para investigar la congruencia de la comunidad. La riqueza de especies, el valor de conservación y la composición de la comunidad de anfibios fue congruente deforma débil con estas medidas para los otros grupos taxonómicos. Las comparaciones emparejadas para estos cinco grupos considerados mostraron que, por cada medida los anfibios tenían el grado más bajo de congruencia. Nuestros resultados implican que la designación de sitios para la conservación de anfibios no proporcionará necesariamente protección para la biodiversidad de agua dulce en total. Para proporcionar la protección adecuada para las especies de agua dulce, recomendamos que otros grupos taxonómicos sean considerados además de los anfibios en la priorización y el proceso de designación de sitio.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub><pmid>27503782</pmid><doi>10.1111/cobi.12802</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0888-8892 |
ispartof | Conservation biology, 2017-04, Vol.31 (2), p.437-445 |
issn | 0888-8892 1523-1739 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881769330 |
source | MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Amphibians Animals Aquatic ecosystems Aquatic molluscs Aquatic plants Aquatic reptiles Beetles Biodiversity Communities Community composition community congruence congruencia de comunidad congruencia entre taxones Conservation Conservation of Natural Resources conservation value cross‐taxon congruence Ecosystem Ecosystems Fresh water Freshwater Freshwater ecosystems Gastropoda habitat prioritization Inland water environment Insecta Insects macroinvertebrados macroinvertebrates Mantel test Marine molluscs Odonata plantas acuáticas Ponds priorización de hábitat Protection prueba de Mantel Reptiles & amphibians Species richness surrogacy sustituciones Switzerland Taxa Taxonomy valor de conservación Wildlife conservation |
title | Effectiveness of amphibians as biodiversity surrogates in pond conservation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T10%3A15%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20amphibians%20as%20biodiversity%20surrogates%20in%20pond%20conservation&rft.jtitle=Conservation%20biology&rft.au=Ilg,%20Christiane&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=437&rft.epage=445&rft.pages=437-445&rft.issn=0888-8892&rft.eissn=1523-1739&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cobi.12802&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44202385%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1875205525&rft_id=info:pmid/27503782&rft_jstor_id=44202385&rfr_iscdi=true |