Effectiveness of amphibians as biodiversity surrogates in pond conservation

Amphibian decline has led to worldwide conservation efforts, including the identification and designation of sites for their protection. These sites could also play an important role in the conservation of other freshwater taxa. In 89 ponds in Switzerland, we assessed the effectiveness of amphibians...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology 2017-04, Vol.31 (2), p.437-445
Hauptverfasser: Ilg, Christiane, Oertli, Beat
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 445
container_issue 2
container_start_page 437
container_title Conservation biology
container_volume 31
creator Ilg, Christiane
Oertli, Beat
description Amphibian decline has led to worldwide conservation efforts, including the identification and designation of sites for their protection. These sites could also play an important role in the conservation of other freshwater taxa. In 89 ponds in Switzerland, we assessed the effectiveness of amphibians as a surrogate for 4 taxonomic groups that occur in the same freshwater ecosystems as amphibians: dragonflies, aquatic beetles, aquatic gastropods, and aquatic plants. The ponds were all of high value for amphibian conservation. Cross-taxon correlations were tested for species richness and conservation value, and Mantel tests were used to investigate community congruence. Species richness, conservation value, and community composition of amphibians were weakly congruent with these measures for the other taxonomic groups. Paired comparisons for the 5 groups considered showed that for each metric, amphibians had the lowest degree of congruence. Our results imply that site designation for amphibian conservation will not necessarily provide protection for freshwater biodiversity as a whole. To provide adequate protection for freshwater species, we recommend other taxonomic groups be considered in addition to amphibians in the prioritization and site designation process. La declinación de anfibios ha resultado en esfuerzos de conservación a nivel mundial, incluyendo a la identificación y designación de sitios para su protección. Estos sitios podrían desempeñar un papel importante en la conservación de otros taxones de agua dulce. Valoramos la efectividad de los anfibios como sustitutos de cuatro grupos taxonómicos que se encuentran en los mismos ecosistemas de agua dulce que los anfibios en 89 estanques en Suiza: libélulas, escarabajos acuáticos, gasterópodos acuáticos y plantas acuáticas. Todos los estanques tenían un valor alto de conservación. Las correlaciones entre taxones fueron evaluadas en riqueza de especies y valor de conservación. También se usaron pruebas de Mantel para investigar la congruencia de la comunidad. La riqueza de especies, el valor de conservación y la composición de la comunidad de anfibios fue congruente deforma débil con estas medidas para los otros grupos taxonómicos. Las comparaciones emparejadas para estos cinco grupos considerados mostraron que, por cada medida los anfibios tenían el grado más bajo de congruencia. Nuestros resultados implican que la designación de sitios para la conservación de anfibios no proporcionará necesariamente
doi_str_mv 10.1111/cobi.12802
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881769330</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44202385</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44202385</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4402-2bb1c03e7f26d51d796d4cebc8ebfd0169f140b2e9d5072b3c80a30a608a2f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0c1vFCEYBnBiNHatXrxrJvFiTKa-Lx8DHHVTtbFJL70TYEDZ7A4rzNTsfy912x48NHKAw_vjSeAh5DXCGbb10WeXzpAqoE_ICgVlPUqmn5IVKKV6pTQ9IS9q3QCAFsifkxMqBTCp6Ip8P48x-DndhCnU2uXY2d3-Z3LJTrWztXMpj21YapoPXV1KyT_sHGqXpm6fp7Hzeaqh3Ng55ekleRbttoZXd-cpuf5yfr3-1l9efb1Yf7rsPedAe-ocemBBRjqMAkeph5H74LwKLo6Ag47IwdGgRwGSOuYVWAZ2AGVpZOyUvD_G7kv-tYQ6m12qPmy3dgp5qQaVQjloxuA_KEepKQBv9N0_dJOXMrV3GNTtD4e24aNKSUFBCCqa-nBUvuRaS4hmX9LOloNBMLeVmdvKzN_KGn57F7m4XRgf6H1HDeAR_E7bcHgkyqyvPl_ch7453tnUOZeHO5zTNlSC_QGsvakU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1875205525</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of amphibians as biodiversity surrogates in pond conservation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Ilg, Christiane ; Oertli, Beat</creator><creatorcontrib>Ilg, Christiane ; Oertli, Beat</creatorcontrib><description>Amphibian decline has led to worldwide conservation efforts, including the identification and designation of sites for their protection. These sites could also play an important role in the conservation of other freshwater taxa. In 89 ponds in Switzerland, we assessed the effectiveness of amphibians as a surrogate for 4 taxonomic groups that occur in the same freshwater ecosystems as amphibians: dragonflies, aquatic beetles, aquatic gastropods, and aquatic plants. The ponds were all of high value for amphibian conservation. Cross-taxon correlations were tested for species richness and conservation value, and Mantel tests were used to investigate community congruence. Species richness, conservation value, and community composition of amphibians were weakly congruent with these measures for the other taxonomic groups. Paired comparisons for the 5 groups considered showed that for each metric, amphibians had the lowest degree of congruence. Our results imply that site designation for amphibian conservation will not necessarily provide protection for freshwater biodiversity as a whole. To provide adequate protection for freshwater species, we recommend other taxonomic groups be considered in addition to amphibians in the prioritization and site designation process. La declinación de anfibios ha resultado en esfuerzos de conservación a nivel mundial, incluyendo a la identificación y designación de sitios para su protección. Estos sitios podrían desempeñar un papel importante en la conservación de otros taxones de agua dulce. Valoramos la efectividad de los anfibios como sustitutos de cuatro grupos taxonómicos que se encuentran en los mismos ecosistemas de agua dulce que los anfibios en 89 estanques en Suiza: libélulas, escarabajos acuáticos, gasterópodos acuáticos y plantas acuáticas. Todos los estanques tenían un valor alto de conservación. Las correlaciones entre taxones fueron evaluadas en riqueza de especies y valor de conservación. También se usaron pruebas de Mantel para investigar la congruencia de la comunidad. La riqueza de especies, el valor de conservación y la composición de la comunidad de anfibios fue congruente deforma débil con estas medidas para los otros grupos taxonómicos. Las comparaciones emparejadas para estos cinco grupos considerados mostraron que, por cada medida los anfibios tenían el grado más bajo de congruencia. Nuestros resultados implican que la designación de sitios para la conservación de anfibios no proporcionará necesariamente protección para la biodiversidad de agua dulce en total. Para proporcionar la protección adecuada para las especies de agua dulce, recomendamos que otros grupos taxonómicos sean considerados además de los anfibios en la priorización y el proceso de designación de sitio.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-8892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-1739</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12802</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27503782</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>Amphibians ; Animals ; Aquatic ecosystems ; Aquatic molluscs ; Aquatic plants ; Aquatic reptiles ; Beetles ; Biodiversity ; Communities ; Community composition ; community congruence ; congruencia de comunidad ; congruencia entre taxones ; Conservation ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; conservation value ; cross‐taxon congruence ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystems ; Fresh water ; Freshwater ; Freshwater ecosystems ; Gastropoda ; habitat prioritization ; Inland water environment ; Insecta ; Insects ; macroinvertebrados ; macroinvertebrates ; Mantel test ; Marine molluscs ; Odonata ; plantas acuáticas ; Ponds ; priorización de hábitat ; Protection ; prueba de Mantel ; Reptiles &amp; amphibians ; Species richness ; surrogacy ; sustituciones ; Switzerland ; Taxa ; Taxonomy ; valor de conservación ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Conservation biology, 2017-04, Vol.31 (2), p.437-445</ispartof><rights>2017 Society for Conservation Biology</rights><rights>2016 Society for Conservation Biology</rights><rights>2016 Society for Conservation Biology.</rights><rights>2017, Society for Conservation Biology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4402-2bb1c03e7f26d51d796d4cebc8ebfd0169f140b2e9d5072b3c80a30a608a2f33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4402-2bb1c03e7f26d51d796d4cebc8ebfd0169f140b2e9d5072b3c80a30a608a2f33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44202385$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44202385$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580,58022,58255</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27503782$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ilg, Christiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oertli, Beat</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of amphibians as biodiversity surrogates in pond conservation</title><title>Conservation biology</title><addtitle>Conserv Biol</addtitle><description>Amphibian decline has led to worldwide conservation efforts, including the identification and designation of sites for their protection. These sites could also play an important role in the conservation of other freshwater taxa. In 89 ponds in Switzerland, we assessed the effectiveness of amphibians as a surrogate for 4 taxonomic groups that occur in the same freshwater ecosystems as amphibians: dragonflies, aquatic beetles, aquatic gastropods, and aquatic plants. The ponds were all of high value for amphibian conservation. Cross-taxon correlations were tested for species richness and conservation value, and Mantel tests were used to investigate community congruence. Species richness, conservation value, and community composition of amphibians were weakly congruent with these measures for the other taxonomic groups. Paired comparisons for the 5 groups considered showed that for each metric, amphibians had the lowest degree of congruence. Our results imply that site designation for amphibian conservation will not necessarily provide protection for freshwater biodiversity as a whole. To provide adequate protection for freshwater species, we recommend other taxonomic groups be considered in addition to amphibians in the prioritization and site designation process. La declinación de anfibios ha resultado en esfuerzos de conservación a nivel mundial, incluyendo a la identificación y designación de sitios para su protección. Estos sitios podrían desempeñar un papel importante en la conservación de otros taxones de agua dulce. Valoramos la efectividad de los anfibios como sustitutos de cuatro grupos taxonómicos que se encuentran en los mismos ecosistemas de agua dulce que los anfibios en 89 estanques en Suiza: libélulas, escarabajos acuáticos, gasterópodos acuáticos y plantas acuáticas. Todos los estanques tenían un valor alto de conservación. Las correlaciones entre taxones fueron evaluadas en riqueza de especies y valor de conservación. También se usaron pruebas de Mantel para investigar la congruencia de la comunidad. La riqueza de especies, el valor de conservación y la composición de la comunidad de anfibios fue congruente deforma débil con estas medidas para los otros grupos taxonómicos. Las comparaciones emparejadas para estos cinco grupos considerados mostraron que, por cada medida los anfibios tenían el grado más bajo de congruencia. Nuestros resultados implican que la designación de sitios para la conservación de anfibios no proporcionará necesariamente protección para la biodiversidad de agua dulce en total. Para proporcionar la protección adecuada para las especies de agua dulce, recomendamos que otros grupos taxonómicos sean considerados además de los anfibios en la priorización y el proceso de designación de sitio.</description><subject>Amphibians</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Aquatic molluscs</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Aquatic reptiles</subject><subject>Beetles</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>community congruence</subject><subject>congruencia de comunidad</subject><subject>congruencia entre taxones</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>conservation value</subject><subject>cross‐taxon congruence</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Fresh water</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater ecosystems</subject><subject>Gastropoda</subject><subject>habitat prioritization</subject><subject>Inland water environment</subject><subject>Insecta</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>macroinvertebrados</subject><subject>macroinvertebrates</subject><subject>Mantel test</subject><subject>Marine molluscs</subject><subject>Odonata</subject><subject>plantas acuáticas</subject><subject>Ponds</subject><subject>priorización de hábitat</subject><subject>Protection</subject><subject>prueba de Mantel</subject><subject>Reptiles &amp; amphibians</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>surrogacy</subject><subject>sustituciones</subject><subject>Switzerland</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>valor de conservación</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>0888-8892</issn><issn>1523-1739</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0c1vFCEYBnBiNHatXrxrJvFiTKa-Lx8DHHVTtbFJL70TYEDZ7A4rzNTsfy912x48NHKAw_vjSeAh5DXCGbb10WeXzpAqoE_ICgVlPUqmn5IVKKV6pTQ9IS9q3QCAFsifkxMqBTCp6Ip8P48x-DndhCnU2uXY2d3-Z3LJTrWztXMpj21YapoPXV1KyT_sHGqXpm6fp7Hzeaqh3Ng55ekleRbttoZXd-cpuf5yfr3-1l9efb1Yf7rsPedAe-ocemBBRjqMAkeph5H74LwKLo6Ag47IwdGgRwGSOuYVWAZ2AGVpZOyUvD_G7kv-tYQ6m12qPmy3dgp5qQaVQjloxuA_KEepKQBv9N0_dJOXMrV3GNTtD4e24aNKSUFBCCqa-nBUvuRaS4hmX9LOloNBMLeVmdvKzN_KGn57F7m4XRgf6H1HDeAR_E7bcHgkyqyvPl_ch7453tnUOZeHO5zTNlSC_QGsvakU</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Ilg, Christiane</creator><creator>Oertli, Beat</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of amphibians as biodiversity surrogates in pond conservation</title><author>Ilg, Christiane ; Oertli, Beat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4402-2bb1c03e7f26d51d796d4cebc8ebfd0169f140b2e9d5072b3c80a30a608a2f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Amphibians</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Aquatic molluscs</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Aquatic reptiles</topic><topic>Beetles</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>community congruence</topic><topic>congruencia de comunidad</topic><topic>congruencia entre taxones</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>conservation value</topic><topic>cross‐taxon congruence</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Fresh water</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater ecosystems</topic><topic>Gastropoda</topic><topic>habitat prioritization</topic><topic>Inland water environment</topic><topic>Insecta</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>macroinvertebrados</topic><topic>macroinvertebrates</topic><topic>Mantel test</topic><topic>Marine molluscs</topic><topic>Odonata</topic><topic>plantas acuáticas</topic><topic>Ponds</topic><topic>priorización de hábitat</topic><topic>Protection</topic><topic>prueba de Mantel</topic><topic>Reptiles &amp; amphibians</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>surrogacy</topic><topic>sustituciones</topic><topic>Switzerland</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>valor de conservación</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ilg, Christiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oertli, Beat</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ilg, Christiane</au><au>Oertli, Beat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of amphibians as biodiversity surrogates in pond conservation</atitle><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle><addtitle>Conserv Biol</addtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>437</spage><epage>445</epage><pages>437-445</pages><issn>0888-8892</issn><eissn>1523-1739</eissn><abstract>Amphibian decline has led to worldwide conservation efforts, including the identification and designation of sites for their protection. These sites could also play an important role in the conservation of other freshwater taxa. In 89 ponds in Switzerland, we assessed the effectiveness of amphibians as a surrogate for 4 taxonomic groups that occur in the same freshwater ecosystems as amphibians: dragonflies, aquatic beetles, aquatic gastropods, and aquatic plants. The ponds were all of high value for amphibian conservation. Cross-taxon correlations were tested for species richness and conservation value, and Mantel tests were used to investigate community congruence. Species richness, conservation value, and community composition of amphibians were weakly congruent with these measures for the other taxonomic groups. Paired comparisons for the 5 groups considered showed that for each metric, amphibians had the lowest degree of congruence. Our results imply that site designation for amphibian conservation will not necessarily provide protection for freshwater biodiversity as a whole. To provide adequate protection for freshwater species, we recommend other taxonomic groups be considered in addition to amphibians in the prioritization and site designation process. La declinación de anfibios ha resultado en esfuerzos de conservación a nivel mundial, incluyendo a la identificación y designación de sitios para su protección. Estos sitios podrían desempeñar un papel importante en la conservación de otros taxones de agua dulce. Valoramos la efectividad de los anfibios como sustitutos de cuatro grupos taxonómicos que se encuentran en los mismos ecosistemas de agua dulce que los anfibios en 89 estanques en Suiza: libélulas, escarabajos acuáticos, gasterópodos acuáticos y plantas acuáticas. Todos los estanques tenían un valor alto de conservación. Las correlaciones entre taxones fueron evaluadas en riqueza de especies y valor de conservación. También se usaron pruebas de Mantel para investigar la congruencia de la comunidad. La riqueza de especies, el valor de conservación y la composición de la comunidad de anfibios fue congruente deforma débil con estas medidas para los otros grupos taxonómicos. Las comparaciones emparejadas para estos cinco grupos considerados mostraron que, por cada medida los anfibios tenían el grado más bajo de congruencia. Nuestros resultados implican que la designación de sitios para la conservación de anfibios no proporcionará necesariamente protección para la biodiversidad de agua dulce en total. Para proporcionar la protección adecuada para las especies de agua dulce, recomendamos que otros grupos taxonómicos sean considerados además de los anfibios en la priorización y el proceso de designación de sitio.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub><pmid>27503782</pmid><doi>10.1111/cobi.12802</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0888-8892
ispartof Conservation biology, 2017-04, Vol.31 (2), p.437-445
issn 0888-8892
1523-1739
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881769330
source MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Amphibians
Animals
Aquatic ecosystems
Aquatic molluscs
Aquatic plants
Aquatic reptiles
Beetles
Biodiversity
Communities
Community composition
community congruence
congruencia de comunidad
congruencia entre taxones
Conservation
Conservation of Natural Resources
conservation value
cross‐taxon congruence
Ecosystem
Ecosystems
Fresh water
Freshwater
Freshwater ecosystems
Gastropoda
habitat prioritization
Inland water environment
Insecta
Insects
macroinvertebrados
macroinvertebrates
Mantel test
Marine molluscs
Odonata
plantas acuáticas
Ponds
priorización de hábitat
Protection
prueba de Mantel
Reptiles & amphibians
Species richness
surrogacy
sustituciones
Switzerland
Taxa
Taxonomy
valor de conservación
Wildlife conservation
title Effectiveness of amphibians as biodiversity surrogates in pond conservation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T10%3A15%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20amphibians%20as%20biodiversity%20surrogates%20in%20pond%20conservation&rft.jtitle=Conservation%20biology&rft.au=Ilg,%20Christiane&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=437&rft.epage=445&rft.pages=437-445&rft.issn=0888-8892&rft.eissn=1523-1739&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cobi.12802&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44202385%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1875205525&rft_id=info:pmid/27503782&rft_jstor_id=44202385&rfr_iscdi=true