Shape change in mouthguard sheets during thermoforming – part 2: effect of the anteroposterior position of the model on mouthguard thickness

Background/Aim Mouthguards can reduce the risk of sports‐related injuries, but the sheet material and thickness have a large effect on their efficacy and safety. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of model position in the molding machine on the reduction in mouthguard thickness. Mat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Dental traumatology 2017-04, Vol.33 (2), p.114-120
Hauptverfasser: Takahashi, Mutsumi, Araie, Yoshiaki, Satoh, Yoshihide, Iwasaki, Shin‐ichi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 120
container_issue 2
container_start_page 114
container_title Dental traumatology
container_volume 33
creator Takahashi, Mutsumi
Araie, Yoshiaki
Satoh, Yoshihide
Iwasaki, Shin‐ichi
description Background/Aim Mouthguards can reduce the risk of sports‐related injuries, but the sheet material and thickness have a large effect on their efficacy and safety. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of model position in the molding machine on the reduction in mouthguard thickness. Materials and methods Ethylene vinyl acetate sheets and olefin copolymer sheets were used for thermoforming by a pressure‐ or a vacuum‐forming machine. The working model was trimmed to the height of 25 mm at the maxillary central incisor and 20 mm at maxillary first molar. For both pressure forming and vacuum forming, the model was placed with the anterior rim of the model positioned 40, 30, 25, 20, or 10 mm from the front of the sheet frame. An additional test was carried out at 50 mm for vacuum forming. The sheet thickness after fabrication was determined for the incisal edge, labial surface, and buccal surface using a specialized caliper. The difference of the model position on the reduction in thickness in each forming device and sheet material was analyzed by one‐way analysis of variance and Bonferroni's multiple comparison tests. Result The reductions in thickness at the incisal edge and labial surface were about −60% and −50%, respectively, for the distance of 25 mm from the front of forming table. That position was the same as the height of the anterior part of the model for each molding machine and sheet material. The anterior thickness after molding became greater as the distance between the model and the sheet frame became smaller. Conclusion The results showed that the thickness reduction was large when the distance from the model to the frame was small. This demonstrates the importance of centering the sheet and the model to achieve the most stable molding when positioning the model in the forming unit.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/edt.12319
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881768138</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1881768138</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3869-b06b177ca175204d3ce1176c1a582d821f41b535cc08f63f4a1b3186db797c903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctu1TAQhi0EoqWw4AWQJTawOK0njm_sUCkXqRILyjpynMmJSxIH2xHqjidgwxvyJPhwTpFAQsKbGWs-fWPrJ-QxsFMo5wy7fAoVB3OHHINkbGOkUHcPfV1Lc0QepHTNGEhl2H1yVClTRlwck28fBrsgdYOdt0j9TKew5mG72tjRNCDmRLs1-nlL84BxCn2I0-724-t3utiYafWCYt-jyzT0O4baOWMMS0il-BBp6Xz2Yb6dT6HDkYY_NuXBu08zpvSQ3OvtmPDRoZ6Qj68vrs7fbi7fv3l3_vJy47iWZtMy2YJSzoISFas77hBASQdW6KrTFfQ1tIIL55juJe9rCy0HLbtWGeUM4yfk2d67xPB5xZSbySeH42hnDGtqQOvi08D1f6CikkoLtrM-_Qu9Dmucy0caMOWdCmolCvV8T7kYUorYN0v0k403DbBml2dT8mx-5VnYJwfj2k7Y_SZvAyzA2R744ke8-bepuXh1tVf-BCXMqv0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1920471475</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Shape change in mouthguard sheets during thermoforming – part 2: effect of the anteroposterior position of the model on mouthguard thickness</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Takahashi, Mutsumi ; Araie, Yoshiaki ; Satoh, Yoshihide ; Iwasaki, Shin‐ichi</creator><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Mutsumi ; Araie, Yoshiaki ; Satoh, Yoshihide ; Iwasaki, Shin‐ichi</creatorcontrib><description>Background/Aim Mouthguards can reduce the risk of sports‐related injuries, but the sheet material and thickness have a large effect on their efficacy and safety. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of model position in the molding machine on the reduction in mouthguard thickness. Materials and methods Ethylene vinyl acetate sheets and olefin copolymer sheets were used for thermoforming by a pressure‐ or a vacuum‐forming machine. The working model was trimmed to the height of 25 mm at the maxillary central incisor and 20 mm at maxillary first molar. For both pressure forming and vacuum forming, the model was placed with the anterior rim of the model positioned 40, 30, 25, 20, or 10 mm from the front of the sheet frame. An additional test was carried out at 50 mm for vacuum forming. The sheet thickness after fabrication was determined for the incisal edge, labial surface, and buccal surface using a specialized caliper. The difference of the model position on the reduction in thickness in each forming device and sheet material was analyzed by one‐way analysis of variance and Bonferroni's multiple comparison tests. Result The reductions in thickness at the incisal edge and labial surface were about −60% and −50%, respectively, for the distance of 25 mm from the front of forming table. That position was the same as the height of the anterior part of the model for each molding machine and sheet material. The anterior thickness after molding became greater as the distance between the model and the sheet frame became smaller. Conclusion The results showed that the thickness reduction was large when the distance from the model to the frame was small. This demonstrates the importance of centering the sheet and the model to achieve the most stable molding when positioning the model in the forming unit.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1600-4469</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-9657</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/edt.12319</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27960035</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Dental Models ; Dentistry ; elongation ; Equipment Design ; Ethylene ; Hot Temperature ; Humans ; Maxilla ; Mouth Protectors ; mouthguard ; Pressure ; Sports Equipment ; thermoforming ; thickness ; Tooth Injuries - prevention &amp; control ; Vacuum ; Vinyl acetate ; Vinyl Compounds ; working model</subject><ispartof>Dental traumatology, 2017-04, Vol.33 (2), p.114-120</ispartof><rights>2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley &amp; A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3869-b06b177ca175204d3ce1176c1a582d821f41b535cc08f63f4a1b3186db797c903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3869-b06b177ca175204d3ce1176c1a582d821f41b535cc08f63f4a1b3186db797c903</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fedt.12319$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fedt.12319$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27960035$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Mutsumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araie, Yoshiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satoh, Yoshihide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwasaki, Shin‐ichi</creatorcontrib><title>Shape change in mouthguard sheets during thermoforming – part 2: effect of the anteroposterior position of the model on mouthguard thickness</title><title>Dental traumatology</title><addtitle>Dent Traumatol</addtitle><description>Background/Aim Mouthguards can reduce the risk of sports‐related injuries, but the sheet material and thickness have a large effect on their efficacy and safety. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of model position in the molding machine on the reduction in mouthguard thickness. Materials and methods Ethylene vinyl acetate sheets and olefin copolymer sheets were used for thermoforming by a pressure‐ or a vacuum‐forming machine. The working model was trimmed to the height of 25 mm at the maxillary central incisor and 20 mm at maxillary first molar. For both pressure forming and vacuum forming, the model was placed with the anterior rim of the model positioned 40, 30, 25, 20, or 10 mm from the front of the sheet frame. An additional test was carried out at 50 mm for vacuum forming. The sheet thickness after fabrication was determined for the incisal edge, labial surface, and buccal surface using a specialized caliper. The difference of the model position on the reduction in thickness in each forming device and sheet material was analyzed by one‐way analysis of variance and Bonferroni's multiple comparison tests. Result The reductions in thickness at the incisal edge and labial surface were about −60% and −50%, respectively, for the distance of 25 mm from the front of forming table. That position was the same as the height of the anterior part of the model for each molding machine and sheet material. The anterior thickness after molding became greater as the distance between the model and the sheet frame became smaller. Conclusion The results showed that the thickness reduction was large when the distance from the model to the frame was small. This demonstrates the importance of centering the sheet and the model to achieve the most stable molding when positioning the model in the forming unit.</description><subject>Dental Models</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>elongation</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Ethylene</subject><subject>Hot Temperature</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Maxilla</subject><subject>Mouth Protectors</subject><subject>mouthguard</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Sports Equipment</subject><subject>thermoforming</subject><subject>thickness</subject><subject>Tooth Injuries - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Vacuum</subject><subject>Vinyl acetate</subject><subject>Vinyl Compounds</subject><subject>working model</subject><issn>1600-4469</issn><issn>1600-9657</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctu1TAQhi0EoqWw4AWQJTawOK0njm_sUCkXqRILyjpynMmJSxIH2xHqjidgwxvyJPhwTpFAQsKbGWs-fWPrJ-QxsFMo5wy7fAoVB3OHHINkbGOkUHcPfV1Lc0QepHTNGEhl2H1yVClTRlwck28fBrsgdYOdt0j9TKew5mG72tjRNCDmRLs1-nlL84BxCn2I0-724-t3utiYafWCYt-jyzT0O4baOWMMS0il-BBp6Xz2Yb6dT6HDkYY_NuXBu08zpvSQ3OvtmPDRoZ6Qj68vrs7fbi7fv3l3_vJy47iWZtMy2YJSzoISFas77hBASQdW6KrTFfQ1tIIL55juJe9rCy0HLbtWGeUM4yfk2d67xPB5xZSbySeH42hnDGtqQOvi08D1f6CikkoLtrM-_Qu9Dmucy0caMOWdCmolCvV8T7kYUorYN0v0k403DbBml2dT8mx-5VnYJwfj2k7Y_SZvAyzA2R744ke8-bepuXh1tVf-BCXMqv0</recordid><startdate>201704</startdate><enddate>201704</enddate><creator>Takahashi, Mutsumi</creator><creator>Araie, Yoshiaki</creator><creator>Satoh, Yoshihide</creator><creator>Iwasaki, Shin‐ichi</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201704</creationdate><title>Shape change in mouthguard sheets during thermoforming – part 2: effect of the anteroposterior position of the model on mouthguard thickness</title><author>Takahashi, Mutsumi ; Araie, Yoshiaki ; Satoh, Yoshihide ; Iwasaki, Shin‐ichi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3869-b06b177ca175204d3ce1176c1a582d821f41b535cc08f63f4a1b3186db797c903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Dental Models</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>elongation</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Ethylene</topic><topic>Hot Temperature</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Maxilla</topic><topic>Mouth Protectors</topic><topic>mouthguard</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Sports Equipment</topic><topic>thermoforming</topic><topic>thickness</topic><topic>Tooth Injuries - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Vacuum</topic><topic>Vinyl acetate</topic><topic>Vinyl Compounds</topic><topic>working model</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Mutsumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araie, Yoshiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satoh, Yoshihide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwasaki, Shin‐ichi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Dental traumatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Takahashi, Mutsumi</au><au>Araie, Yoshiaki</au><au>Satoh, Yoshihide</au><au>Iwasaki, Shin‐ichi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Shape change in mouthguard sheets during thermoforming – part 2: effect of the anteroposterior position of the model on mouthguard thickness</atitle><jtitle>Dental traumatology</jtitle><addtitle>Dent Traumatol</addtitle><date>2017-04</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>114</spage><epage>120</epage><pages>114-120</pages><issn>1600-4469</issn><eissn>1600-9657</eissn><abstract>Background/Aim Mouthguards can reduce the risk of sports‐related injuries, but the sheet material and thickness have a large effect on their efficacy and safety. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of model position in the molding machine on the reduction in mouthguard thickness. Materials and methods Ethylene vinyl acetate sheets and olefin copolymer sheets were used for thermoforming by a pressure‐ or a vacuum‐forming machine. The working model was trimmed to the height of 25 mm at the maxillary central incisor and 20 mm at maxillary first molar. For both pressure forming and vacuum forming, the model was placed with the anterior rim of the model positioned 40, 30, 25, 20, or 10 mm from the front of the sheet frame. An additional test was carried out at 50 mm for vacuum forming. The sheet thickness after fabrication was determined for the incisal edge, labial surface, and buccal surface using a specialized caliper. The difference of the model position on the reduction in thickness in each forming device and sheet material was analyzed by one‐way analysis of variance and Bonferroni's multiple comparison tests. Result The reductions in thickness at the incisal edge and labial surface were about −60% and −50%, respectively, for the distance of 25 mm from the front of forming table. That position was the same as the height of the anterior part of the model for each molding machine and sheet material. The anterior thickness after molding became greater as the distance between the model and the sheet frame became smaller. Conclusion The results showed that the thickness reduction was large when the distance from the model to the frame was small. This demonstrates the importance of centering the sheet and the model to achieve the most stable molding when positioning the model in the forming unit.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>27960035</pmid><doi>10.1111/edt.12319</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1600-4469
ispartof Dental traumatology, 2017-04, Vol.33 (2), p.114-120
issn 1600-4469
1600-9657
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881768138
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Dental Models
Dentistry
elongation
Equipment Design
Ethylene
Hot Temperature
Humans
Maxilla
Mouth Protectors
mouthguard
Pressure
Sports Equipment
thermoforming
thickness
Tooth Injuries - prevention & control
Vacuum
Vinyl acetate
Vinyl Compounds
working model
title Shape change in mouthguard sheets during thermoforming – part 2: effect of the anteroposterior position of the model on mouthguard thickness
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T14%3A58%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Shape%20change%20in%20mouthguard%20sheets%20during%20thermoforming%20%E2%80%93%20part%202:%20effect%20of%20the%20anteroposterior%20position%20of%20the%20model%20on%20mouthguard%20thickness&rft.jtitle=Dental%20traumatology&rft.au=Takahashi,%20Mutsumi&rft.date=2017-04&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=114&rft.epage=120&rft.pages=114-120&rft.issn=1600-4469&rft.eissn=1600-9657&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/edt.12319&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1881768138%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1920471475&rft_id=info:pmid/27960035&rfr_iscdi=true