Urethral carcinoma in situ: recognition and management
Purpose Urethral carcinoma in situ (CIS) is an uncommon malignancy that is poorly described in the published literature and is often under-recognized in the clinical setting. This short case series reports some challenges associated with the recognition and management of this disease. Methods A retr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International urology and nephrology 2017-04, Vol.49 (4), p.637-641 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 641 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 637 |
container_title | International urology and nephrology |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Berjeaut, Ricardo H. Persaud, Maliza D. I. Sopko, Nikolai Burnett, Arthur L. |
description | Purpose
Urethral carcinoma in situ (CIS) is an uncommon malignancy that is poorly described in the published literature and is often under-recognized in the clinical setting. This short case series reports some challenges associated with the recognition and management of this disease.
Methods
A retrospective chart review was done over a 12-year period of patients presenting with urethral cancer to the Johns Hopkins Hospital. Four patients were identified with CIS of the anterior urethra, and their demographic and clinical data were recorded.
Results
Three patients presented with meatal lesions that were initially treated as infectious/inflammatory diseases before diagnoses of malignancy were determined following lesion biopsy. The fourth patient presented with painless hematuria and had a cystoscopy and biopsy of urethral polyps. All patients were treated surgically by sequential distal urethrectomy and various reconstructive procedures. Concurrent lymph node dissections were undertaken in two patients who had clinical or radiologic evidence of lymphadenopathy. One patient had persistent disease even after aggressive urethral resection, and he succumbed to his illness 2 years later.
Conclusion
This is the largest series of urethral CIS, a disease with potentially serious consequences. A high index of suspicion should be maintained when evaluating and managing these patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11255-017-1512-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881764280</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1881764280</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3c8a8caf65dd430abbba9e2c5597045b175d2ac64a6cfc67fbfbe4fc19155eb93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtKxDAUQIMozjj6AW6k4MZNNTdpHnUngy8YcOOsQ5qmY4c2HZN24d-b0lFEEFxlcc89lxyEzgFfA8biJgAQxlIMIgUGJKUHaA5M0JQwmR2iOaYYUuCEztBJCFuMcS4xPkYzIiEuUTZHfO1t_-Z1kxjtTe26Vie1S0LdD7eJt6bbuLqvO5doVyatdnpjW-v6U3RU6SbYs_27QOuH-9flU7p6eXxe3q1Sk2HWp9RILY2uOCvLjGJdFIXOLTGM5QJnrADBSqINzzQ3leGiKqrCZpWBHBizRU4X6Gry7nz3PtjQq7YOxjaNdrYbggIpQfCMSPwPlMc2XAKN6OUvdNsN3sWPRErkVIDIRyFMlPFdCN5WaufrVvsPBViN_dXUX8WUauyvRvPF3jwUrS2_N76CR4BMQIgjt7H-x-k_rZ8kMI7Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1879371790</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Urethral carcinoma in situ: recognition and management</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Berjeaut, Ricardo H. ; Persaud, Maliza D. I. ; Sopko, Nikolai ; Burnett, Arthur L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Berjeaut, Ricardo H. ; Persaud, Maliza D. I. ; Sopko, Nikolai ; Burnett, Arthur L.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Urethral carcinoma in situ (CIS) is an uncommon malignancy that is poorly described in the published literature and is often under-recognized in the clinical setting. This short case series reports some challenges associated with the recognition and management of this disease.
Methods
A retrospective chart review was done over a 12-year period of patients presenting with urethral cancer to the Johns Hopkins Hospital. Four patients were identified with CIS of the anterior urethra, and their demographic and clinical data were recorded.
Results
Three patients presented with meatal lesions that were initially treated as infectious/inflammatory diseases before diagnoses of malignancy were determined following lesion biopsy. The fourth patient presented with painless hematuria and had a cystoscopy and biopsy of urethral polyps. All patients were treated surgically by sequential distal urethrectomy and various reconstructive procedures. Concurrent lymph node dissections were undertaken in two patients who had clinical or radiologic evidence of lymphadenopathy. One patient had persistent disease even after aggressive urethral resection, and he succumbed to his illness 2 years later.
Conclusion
This is the largest series of urethral CIS, a disease with potentially serious consequences. A high index of suspicion should be maintained when evaluating and managing these patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-1623</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2584</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11255-017-1512-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28101735</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IURNAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Aged ; Carcinoma in Situ - diagnosis ; Carcinoma in Situ - drug therapy ; Carcinoma in Situ - surgery ; Diagnostic Errors ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Nephrology ; Retrospective Studies ; Urethral Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Urethral Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Urethral Neoplasms - surgery ; Urology ; Urology - Original Paper</subject><ispartof>International urology and nephrology, 2017-04, Vol.49 (4), p.637-641</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017</rights><rights>International Urology and Nephrology is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3c8a8caf65dd430abbba9e2c5597045b175d2ac64a6cfc67fbfbe4fc19155eb93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3c8a8caf65dd430abbba9e2c5597045b175d2ac64a6cfc67fbfbe4fc19155eb93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11255-017-1512-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11255-017-1512-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28101735$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berjeaut, Ricardo H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Persaud, Maliza D. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sopko, Nikolai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burnett, Arthur L.</creatorcontrib><title>Urethral carcinoma in situ: recognition and management</title><title>International urology and nephrology</title><addtitle>Int Urol Nephrol</addtitle><addtitle>Int Urol Nephrol</addtitle><description>Purpose
Urethral carcinoma in situ (CIS) is an uncommon malignancy that is poorly described in the published literature and is often under-recognized in the clinical setting. This short case series reports some challenges associated with the recognition and management of this disease.
Methods
A retrospective chart review was done over a 12-year period of patients presenting with urethral cancer to the Johns Hopkins Hospital. Four patients were identified with CIS of the anterior urethra, and their demographic and clinical data were recorded.
Results
Three patients presented with meatal lesions that were initially treated as infectious/inflammatory diseases before diagnoses of malignancy were determined following lesion biopsy. The fourth patient presented with painless hematuria and had a cystoscopy and biopsy of urethral polyps. All patients were treated surgically by sequential distal urethrectomy and various reconstructive procedures. Concurrent lymph node dissections were undertaken in two patients who had clinical or radiologic evidence of lymphadenopathy. One patient had persistent disease even after aggressive urethral resection, and he succumbed to his illness 2 years later.
Conclusion
This is the largest series of urethral CIS, a disease with potentially serious consequences. A high index of suspicion should be maintained when evaluating and managing these patients.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Carcinoma in Situ - diagnosis</subject><subject>Carcinoma in Situ - drug therapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma in Situ - surgery</subject><subject>Diagnostic Errors</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</subject><subject>Nephrology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Urethral Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Urethral Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Urethral Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Urology</subject><subject>Urology - Original Paper</subject><issn>0301-1623</issn><issn>1573-2584</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtKxDAUQIMozjj6AW6k4MZNNTdpHnUngy8YcOOsQ5qmY4c2HZN24d-b0lFEEFxlcc89lxyEzgFfA8biJgAQxlIMIgUGJKUHaA5M0JQwmR2iOaYYUuCEztBJCFuMcS4xPkYzIiEuUTZHfO1t_-Z1kxjtTe26Vie1S0LdD7eJt6bbuLqvO5doVyatdnpjW-v6U3RU6SbYs_27QOuH-9flU7p6eXxe3q1Sk2HWp9RILY2uOCvLjGJdFIXOLTGM5QJnrADBSqINzzQ3leGiKqrCZpWBHBizRU4X6Gry7nz3PtjQq7YOxjaNdrYbggIpQfCMSPwPlMc2XAKN6OUvdNsN3sWPRErkVIDIRyFMlPFdCN5WaufrVvsPBViN_dXUX8WUauyvRvPF3jwUrS2_N76CR4BMQIgjt7H-x-k_rZ8kMI7Y</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Berjeaut, Ricardo H.</creator><creator>Persaud, Maliza D. I.</creator><creator>Sopko, Nikolai</creator><creator>Burnett, Arthur L.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Urethral carcinoma in situ: recognition and management</title><author>Berjeaut, Ricardo H. ; Persaud, Maliza D. I. ; Sopko, Nikolai ; Burnett, Arthur L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3c8a8caf65dd430abbba9e2c5597045b175d2ac64a6cfc67fbfbe4fc19155eb93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Carcinoma in Situ - diagnosis</topic><topic>Carcinoma in Situ - drug therapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma in Situ - surgery</topic><topic>Diagnostic Errors</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</topic><topic>Nephrology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Urethral Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Urethral Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Urethral Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Urology</topic><topic>Urology - Original Paper</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berjeaut, Ricardo H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Persaud, Maliza D. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sopko, Nikolai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burnett, Arthur L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health & Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International urology and nephrology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berjeaut, Ricardo H.</au><au>Persaud, Maliza D. I.</au><au>Sopko, Nikolai</au><au>Burnett, Arthur L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Urethral carcinoma in situ: recognition and management</atitle><jtitle>International urology and nephrology</jtitle><stitle>Int Urol Nephrol</stitle><addtitle>Int Urol Nephrol</addtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>637</spage><epage>641</epage><pages>637-641</pages><issn>0301-1623</issn><eissn>1573-2584</eissn><coden>IURNAE</coden><abstract>Purpose
Urethral carcinoma in situ (CIS) is an uncommon malignancy that is poorly described in the published literature and is often under-recognized in the clinical setting. This short case series reports some challenges associated with the recognition and management of this disease.
Methods
A retrospective chart review was done over a 12-year period of patients presenting with urethral cancer to the Johns Hopkins Hospital. Four patients were identified with CIS of the anterior urethra, and their demographic and clinical data were recorded.
Results
Three patients presented with meatal lesions that were initially treated as infectious/inflammatory diseases before diagnoses of malignancy were determined following lesion biopsy. The fourth patient presented with painless hematuria and had a cystoscopy and biopsy of urethral polyps. All patients were treated surgically by sequential distal urethrectomy and various reconstructive procedures. Concurrent lymph node dissections were undertaken in two patients who had clinical or radiologic evidence of lymphadenopathy. One patient had persistent disease even after aggressive urethral resection, and he succumbed to his illness 2 years later.
Conclusion
This is the largest series of urethral CIS, a disease with potentially serious consequences. A high index of suspicion should be maintained when evaluating and managing these patients.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>28101735</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11255-017-1512-3</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-1623 |
ispartof | International urology and nephrology, 2017-04, Vol.49 (4), p.637-641 |
issn | 0301-1623 1573-2584 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881764280 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Aged Carcinoma in Situ - diagnosis Carcinoma in Situ - drug therapy Carcinoma in Situ - surgery Diagnostic Errors Humans Lymph Node Excision Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Neoplasm Recurrence, Local Nephrology Retrospective Studies Urethral Neoplasms - diagnosis Urethral Neoplasms - drug therapy Urethral Neoplasms - surgery Urology Urology - Original Paper |
title | Urethral carcinoma in situ: recognition and management |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T08%3A57%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Urethral%20carcinoma%20in%20situ:%20recognition%20and%20management&rft.jtitle=International%20urology%20and%20nephrology&rft.au=Berjeaut,%20Ricardo%20H.&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=637&rft.epage=641&rft.pages=637-641&rft.issn=0301-1623&rft.eissn=1573-2584&rft.coden=IURNAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11255-017-1512-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1881764280%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1879371790&rft_id=info:pmid/28101735&rfr_iscdi=true |