Urethral carcinoma in situ: recognition and management

Purpose Urethral carcinoma in situ (CIS) is an uncommon malignancy that is poorly described in the published literature and is often under-recognized in the clinical setting. This short case series reports some challenges associated with the recognition and management of this disease. Methods A retr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International urology and nephrology 2017-04, Vol.49 (4), p.637-641
Hauptverfasser: Berjeaut, Ricardo H., Persaud, Maliza D. I., Sopko, Nikolai, Burnett, Arthur L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 641
container_issue 4
container_start_page 637
container_title International urology and nephrology
container_volume 49
creator Berjeaut, Ricardo H.
Persaud, Maliza D. I.
Sopko, Nikolai
Burnett, Arthur L.
description Purpose Urethral carcinoma in situ (CIS) is an uncommon malignancy that is poorly described in the published literature and is often under-recognized in the clinical setting. This short case series reports some challenges associated with the recognition and management of this disease. Methods A retrospective chart review was done over a 12-year period of patients presenting with urethral cancer to the Johns Hopkins Hospital. Four patients were identified with CIS of the anterior urethra, and their demographic and clinical data were recorded. Results Three patients presented with meatal lesions that were initially treated as infectious/inflammatory diseases before diagnoses of malignancy were determined following lesion biopsy. The fourth patient presented with painless hematuria and had a cystoscopy and biopsy of urethral polyps. All patients were treated surgically by sequential distal urethrectomy and various reconstructive procedures. Concurrent lymph node dissections were undertaken in two patients who had clinical or radiologic evidence of lymphadenopathy. One patient had persistent disease even after aggressive urethral resection, and he succumbed to his illness 2 years later. Conclusion This is the largest series of urethral CIS, a disease with potentially serious consequences. A high index of suspicion should be maintained when evaluating and managing these patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11255-017-1512-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881764280</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1881764280</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3c8a8caf65dd430abbba9e2c5597045b175d2ac64a6cfc67fbfbe4fc19155eb93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtKxDAUQIMozjj6AW6k4MZNNTdpHnUngy8YcOOsQ5qmY4c2HZN24d-b0lFEEFxlcc89lxyEzgFfA8biJgAQxlIMIgUGJKUHaA5M0JQwmR2iOaYYUuCEztBJCFuMcS4xPkYzIiEuUTZHfO1t_-Z1kxjtTe26Vie1S0LdD7eJt6bbuLqvO5doVyatdnpjW-v6U3RU6SbYs_27QOuH-9flU7p6eXxe3q1Sk2HWp9RILY2uOCvLjGJdFIXOLTGM5QJnrADBSqINzzQ3leGiKqrCZpWBHBizRU4X6Gry7nz3PtjQq7YOxjaNdrYbggIpQfCMSPwPlMc2XAKN6OUvdNsN3sWPRErkVIDIRyFMlPFdCN5WaufrVvsPBViN_dXUX8WUauyvRvPF3jwUrS2_N76CR4BMQIgjt7H-x-k_rZ8kMI7Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1879371790</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Urethral carcinoma in situ: recognition and management</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Berjeaut, Ricardo H. ; Persaud, Maliza D. I. ; Sopko, Nikolai ; Burnett, Arthur L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Berjeaut, Ricardo H. ; Persaud, Maliza D. I. ; Sopko, Nikolai ; Burnett, Arthur L.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Urethral carcinoma in situ (CIS) is an uncommon malignancy that is poorly described in the published literature and is often under-recognized in the clinical setting. This short case series reports some challenges associated with the recognition and management of this disease. Methods A retrospective chart review was done over a 12-year period of patients presenting with urethral cancer to the Johns Hopkins Hospital. Four patients were identified with CIS of the anterior urethra, and their demographic and clinical data were recorded. Results Three patients presented with meatal lesions that were initially treated as infectious/inflammatory diseases before diagnoses of malignancy were determined following lesion biopsy. The fourth patient presented with painless hematuria and had a cystoscopy and biopsy of urethral polyps. All patients were treated surgically by sequential distal urethrectomy and various reconstructive procedures. Concurrent lymph node dissections were undertaken in two patients who had clinical or radiologic evidence of lymphadenopathy. One patient had persistent disease even after aggressive urethral resection, and he succumbed to his illness 2 years later. Conclusion This is the largest series of urethral CIS, a disease with potentially serious consequences. A high index of suspicion should be maintained when evaluating and managing these patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-1623</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2584</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11255-017-1512-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28101735</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IURNAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Aged ; Carcinoma in Situ - diagnosis ; Carcinoma in Situ - drug therapy ; Carcinoma in Situ - surgery ; Diagnostic Errors ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Nephrology ; Retrospective Studies ; Urethral Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Urethral Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Urethral Neoplasms - surgery ; Urology ; Urology - Original Paper</subject><ispartof>International urology and nephrology, 2017-04, Vol.49 (4), p.637-641</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017</rights><rights>International Urology and Nephrology is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3c8a8caf65dd430abbba9e2c5597045b175d2ac64a6cfc67fbfbe4fc19155eb93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3c8a8caf65dd430abbba9e2c5597045b175d2ac64a6cfc67fbfbe4fc19155eb93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11255-017-1512-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11255-017-1512-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28101735$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berjeaut, Ricardo H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Persaud, Maliza D. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sopko, Nikolai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burnett, Arthur L.</creatorcontrib><title>Urethral carcinoma in situ: recognition and management</title><title>International urology and nephrology</title><addtitle>Int Urol Nephrol</addtitle><addtitle>Int Urol Nephrol</addtitle><description>Purpose Urethral carcinoma in situ (CIS) is an uncommon malignancy that is poorly described in the published literature and is often under-recognized in the clinical setting. This short case series reports some challenges associated with the recognition and management of this disease. Methods A retrospective chart review was done over a 12-year period of patients presenting with urethral cancer to the Johns Hopkins Hospital. Four patients were identified with CIS of the anterior urethra, and their demographic and clinical data were recorded. Results Three patients presented with meatal lesions that were initially treated as infectious/inflammatory diseases before diagnoses of malignancy were determined following lesion biopsy. The fourth patient presented with painless hematuria and had a cystoscopy and biopsy of urethral polyps. All patients were treated surgically by sequential distal urethrectomy and various reconstructive procedures. Concurrent lymph node dissections were undertaken in two patients who had clinical or radiologic evidence of lymphadenopathy. One patient had persistent disease even after aggressive urethral resection, and he succumbed to his illness 2 years later. Conclusion This is the largest series of urethral CIS, a disease with potentially serious consequences. A high index of suspicion should be maintained when evaluating and managing these patients.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Carcinoma in Situ - diagnosis</subject><subject>Carcinoma in Situ - drug therapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma in Situ - surgery</subject><subject>Diagnostic Errors</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</subject><subject>Nephrology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Urethral Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Urethral Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Urethral Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Urology</subject><subject>Urology - Original Paper</subject><issn>0301-1623</issn><issn>1573-2584</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtKxDAUQIMozjj6AW6k4MZNNTdpHnUngy8YcOOsQ5qmY4c2HZN24d-b0lFEEFxlcc89lxyEzgFfA8biJgAQxlIMIgUGJKUHaA5M0JQwmR2iOaYYUuCEztBJCFuMcS4xPkYzIiEuUTZHfO1t_-Z1kxjtTe26Vie1S0LdD7eJt6bbuLqvO5doVyatdnpjW-v6U3RU6SbYs_27QOuH-9flU7p6eXxe3q1Sk2HWp9RILY2uOCvLjGJdFIXOLTGM5QJnrADBSqINzzQ3leGiKqrCZpWBHBizRU4X6Gry7nz3PtjQq7YOxjaNdrYbggIpQfCMSPwPlMc2XAKN6OUvdNsN3sWPRErkVIDIRyFMlPFdCN5WaufrVvsPBViN_dXUX8WUauyvRvPF3jwUrS2_N76CR4BMQIgjt7H-x-k_rZ8kMI7Y</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Berjeaut, Ricardo H.</creator><creator>Persaud, Maliza D. I.</creator><creator>Sopko, Nikolai</creator><creator>Burnett, Arthur L.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Urethral carcinoma in situ: recognition and management</title><author>Berjeaut, Ricardo H. ; Persaud, Maliza D. I. ; Sopko, Nikolai ; Burnett, Arthur L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3c8a8caf65dd430abbba9e2c5597045b175d2ac64a6cfc67fbfbe4fc19155eb93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Carcinoma in Situ - diagnosis</topic><topic>Carcinoma in Situ - drug therapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma in Situ - surgery</topic><topic>Diagnostic Errors</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</topic><topic>Nephrology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Urethral Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Urethral Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Urethral Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Urology</topic><topic>Urology - Original Paper</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berjeaut, Ricardo H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Persaud, Maliza D. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sopko, Nikolai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burnett, Arthur L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health &amp; Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International urology and nephrology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berjeaut, Ricardo H.</au><au>Persaud, Maliza D. I.</au><au>Sopko, Nikolai</au><au>Burnett, Arthur L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Urethral carcinoma in situ: recognition and management</atitle><jtitle>International urology and nephrology</jtitle><stitle>Int Urol Nephrol</stitle><addtitle>Int Urol Nephrol</addtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>637</spage><epage>641</epage><pages>637-641</pages><issn>0301-1623</issn><eissn>1573-2584</eissn><coden>IURNAE</coden><abstract>Purpose Urethral carcinoma in situ (CIS) is an uncommon malignancy that is poorly described in the published literature and is often under-recognized in the clinical setting. This short case series reports some challenges associated with the recognition and management of this disease. Methods A retrospective chart review was done over a 12-year period of patients presenting with urethral cancer to the Johns Hopkins Hospital. Four patients were identified with CIS of the anterior urethra, and their demographic and clinical data were recorded. Results Three patients presented with meatal lesions that were initially treated as infectious/inflammatory diseases before diagnoses of malignancy were determined following lesion biopsy. The fourth patient presented with painless hematuria and had a cystoscopy and biopsy of urethral polyps. All patients were treated surgically by sequential distal urethrectomy and various reconstructive procedures. Concurrent lymph node dissections were undertaken in two patients who had clinical or radiologic evidence of lymphadenopathy. One patient had persistent disease even after aggressive urethral resection, and he succumbed to his illness 2 years later. Conclusion This is the largest series of urethral CIS, a disease with potentially serious consequences. A high index of suspicion should be maintained when evaluating and managing these patients.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>28101735</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11255-017-1512-3</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-1623
ispartof International urology and nephrology, 2017-04, Vol.49 (4), p.637-641
issn 0301-1623
1573-2584
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881764280
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Aged
Carcinoma in Situ - diagnosis
Carcinoma in Situ - drug therapy
Carcinoma in Situ - surgery
Diagnostic Errors
Humans
Lymph Node Excision
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Nephrology
Retrospective Studies
Urethral Neoplasms - diagnosis
Urethral Neoplasms - drug therapy
Urethral Neoplasms - surgery
Urology
Urology - Original Paper
title Urethral carcinoma in situ: recognition and management
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T08%3A57%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Urethral%20carcinoma%20in%20situ:%20recognition%20and%20management&rft.jtitle=International%20urology%20and%20nephrology&rft.au=Berjeaut,%20Ricardo%20H.&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=637&rft.epage=641&rft.pages=637-641&rft.issn=0301-1623&rft.eissn=1573-2584&rft.coden=IURNAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11255-017-1512-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1881764280%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1879371790&rft_id=info:pmid/28101735&rfr_iscdi=true