CODE’s five-system orbit and clock solution—the challenges of multi-GNSS data analysis

This article describes the processing strategy and the validation results of CODE’s MGEX (COM) orbit and satellite clock solution, including the satellite systems GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, and QZSS. The validation with orbit misclosures and SLR residuals shows that the orbits of the new systems...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geodesy 2017-04, Vol.91 (4), p.345-360
Hauptverfasser: Prange, Lars, Orliac, Etienne, Dach, Rolf, Arnold, Daniel, Beutler, Gerhard, Schaer, Stefan, Jäggi, Adrian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 360
container_issue 4
container_start_page 345
container_title Journal of geodesy
container_volume 91
creator Prange, Lars
Orliac, Etienne
Dach, Rolf
Arnold, Daniel
Beutler, Gerhard
Schaer, Stefan
Jäggi, Adrian
description This article describes the processing strategy and the validation results of CODE’s MGEX (COM) orbit and satellite clock solution, including the satellite systems GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, and QZSS. The validation with orbit misclosures and SLR residuals shows that the orbits of the new systems Galileo, BeiDou, and QZSS are affected by modelling deficiencies with impact on the orbit scale (e.g., antenna calibration, Earth albedo, and transmitter antenna thrust). Another weakness is the attitude and solar radiation pressure (SRP) modelling of satellites moving in the orbit normal mode—which is not yet correctly considered in the COM solution. Due to these issues, we consider the current state COM solution as preliminary. We, however, use the long-time series of COM products for identifying the challenges and for the assessment of model-improvements. The latter is demonstrated on the example of the solar radiation pressure (SRP) model, which has been replaced by a more generalized model. The SLR validation shows that the new SRP model significantly improves the orbit determination of Galileo and QZSS satellites at times when the satellite’s attitude is maintained by yaw-steering. The impact of this orbit improvement is also visible in the estimated satellite clocks—demonstrating the potential use of the new generation satellite clocks for orbit validation. Finally, we point out further challenges and open issues affecting multi-GNSS data processing that deserves dedicated studies.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00190-016-0968-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881763892</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1881763892</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-31f6083ef5e6a747188e8f38aa489b787387492c6d60a4fd8325fb217d594fb63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL1OwzAURi0EEuXnAdgssbAY7Njxz4hKKUgVHYCFxXITGwJuDbkJUrc-BAuvx5PgqgwIieku5zu6OggdMXrKKFVnQCkzlFAmCTVSE72FBkzwgjBuxDYaUCMMUYqJXbQH8JxpVWo5QA_D6cXoa_UJODTvnsASOj_HqZ01HXaLGlcxVS8YUuy7Ji2-Vh_dk8fVk4vRLx494BTwvI9dQ8Y3t7e4dp3LMxeX0MAB2gkugj_8ufvo_nJ0N7wik-n4eng-IRU3RUc4C5Jq7kPppVNCMa29Dlw7J7SZKa24VsIUlawldSLUmhdlmBVM1aURYSb5PjrZeF_b9NZ76Oy8gcrH6BY-9WCzkCnJtSkyevwHfU59m_9dU0rTkoliLWQbqmoTQOuDfW2buWuXllG7rm03tW2ubde1rc6bYrOBzOYy7S_zv6Nvp0CChQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1878051426</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>CODE’s five-system orbit and clock solution—the challenges of multi-GNSS data analysis</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Prange, Lars ; Orliac, Etienne ; Dach, Rolf ; Arnold, Daniel ; Beutler, Gerhard ; Schaer, Stefan ; Jäggi, Adrian</creator><creatorcontrib>Prange, Lars ; Orliac, Etienne ; Dach, Rolf ; Arnold, Daniel ; Beutler, Gerhard ; Schaer, Stefan ; Jäggi, Adrian</creatorcontrib><description>This article describes the processing strategy and the validation results of CODE’s MGEX (COM) orbit and satellite clock solution, including the satellite systems GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, and QZSS. The validation with orbit misclosures and SLR residuals shows that the orbits of the new systems Galileo, BeiDou, and QZSS are affected by modelling deficiencies with impact on the orbit scale (e.g., antenna calibration, Earth albedo, and transmitter antenna thrust). Another weakness is the attitude and solar radiation pressure (SRP) modelling of satellites moving in the orbit normal mode—which is not yet correctly considered in the COM solution. Due to these issues, we consider the current state COM solution as preliminary. We, however, use the long-time series of COM products for identifying the challenges and for the assessment of model-improvements. The latter is demonstrated on the example of the solar radiation pressure (SRP) model, which has been replaced by a more generalized model. The SLR validation shows that the new SRP model significantly improves the orbit determination of Galileo and QZSS satellites at times when the satellite’s attitude is maintained by yaw-steering. The impact of this orbit improvement is also visible in the estimated satellite clocks—demonstrating the potential use of the new generation satellite clocks for orbit validation. Finally, we point out further challenges and open issues affecting multi-GNSS data processing that deserves dedicated studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0949-7714</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1394</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00190-016-0968-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Albedo ; Data processing ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Geodetics ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Global positioning systems ; GPS ; Original Article ; Satellites ; Solar physics ; Solar radiation</subject><ispartof>Journal of geodesy, 2017-04, Vol.91 (4), p.345-360</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016</rights><rights>Journal of Geodesy is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-31f6083ef5e6a747188e8f38aa489b787387492c6d60a4fd8325fb217d594fb63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-31f6083ef5e6a747188e8f38aa489b787387492c6d60a4fd8325fb217d594fb63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6227-1565</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00190-016-0968-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00190-016-0968-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27926,27927,41490,42559,51321</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Prange, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orliac, Etienne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dach, Rolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnold, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beutler, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaer, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jäggi, Adrian</creatorcontrib><title>CODE’s five-system orbit and clock solution—the challenges of multi-GNSS data analysis</title><title>Journal of geodesy</title><addtitle>J Geod</addtitle><description>This article describes the processing strategy and the validation results of CODE’s MGEX (COM) orbit and satellite clock solution, including the satellite systems GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, and QZSS. The validation with orbit misclosures and SLR residuals shows that the orbits of the new systems Galileo, BeiDou, and QZSS are affected by modelling deficiencies with impact on the orbit scale (e.g., antenna calibration, Earth albedo, and transmitter antenna thrust). Another weakness is the attitude and solar radiation pressure (SRP) modelling of satellites moving in the orbit normal mode—which is not yet correctly considered in the COM solution. Due to these issues, we consider the current state COM solution as preliminary. We, however, use the long-time series of COM products for identifying the challenges and for the assessment of model-improvements. The latter is demonstrated on the example of the solar radiation pressure (SRP) model, which has been replaced by a more generalized model. The SLR validation shows that the new SRP model significantly improves the orbit determination of Galileo and QZSS satellites at times when the satellite’s attitude is maintained by yaw-steering. The impact of this orbit improvement is also visible in the estimated satellite clocks—demonstrating the potential use of the new generation satellite clocks for orbit validation. Finally, we point out further challenges and open issues affecting multi-GNSS data processing that deserves dedicated studies.</description><subject>Albedo</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Geodetics</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Global positioning systems</subject><subject>GPS</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Solar physics</subject><subject>Solar radiation</subject><issn>0949-7714</issn><issn>1432-1394</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kL1OwzAURi0EEuXnAdgssbAY7Njxz4hKKUgVHYCFxXITGwJuDbkJUrc-BAuvx5PgqgwIieku5zu6OggdMXrKKFVnQCkzlFAmCTVSE72FBkzwgjBuxDYaUCMMUYqJXbQH8JxpVWo5QA_D6cXoa_UJODTvnsASOj_HqZ01HXaLGlcxVS8YUuy7Ji2-Vh_dk8fVk4vRLx494BTwvI9dQ8Y3t7e4dp3LMxeX0MAB2gkugj_8ufvo_nJ0N7wik-n4eng-IRU3RUc4C5Jq7kPppVNCMa29Dlw7J7SZKa24VsIUlawldSLUmhdlmBVM1aURYSb5PjrZeF_b9NZ76Oy8gcrH6BY-9WCzkCnJtSkyevwHfU59m_9dU0rTkoliLWQbqmoTQOuDfW2buWuXllG7rm03tW2ubde1rc6bYrOBzOYy7S_zv6Nvp0CChQ</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Prange, Lars</creator><creator>Orliac, Etienne</creator><creator>Dach, Rolf</creator><creator>Arnold, Daniel</creator><creator>Beutler, Gerhard</creator><creator>Schaer, Stefan</creator><creator>Jäggi, Adrian</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6227-1565</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>CODE’s five-system orbit and clock solution—the challenges of multi-GNSS data analysis</title><author>Prange, Lars ; Orliac, Etienne ; Dach, Rolf ; Arnold, Daniel ; Beutler, Gerhard ; Schaer, Stefan ; Jäggi, Adrian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-31f6083ef5e6a747188e8f38aa489b787387492c6d60a4fd8325fb217d594fb63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Albedo</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Geodetics</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Global positioning systems</topic><topic>GPS</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Solar physics</topic><topic>Solar radiation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Prange, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orliac, Etienne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dach, Rolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnold, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beutler, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaer, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jäggi, Adrian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of geodesy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Prange, Lars</au><au>Orliac, Etienne</au><au>Dach, Rolf</au><au>Arnold, Daniel</au><au>Beutler, Gerhard</au><au>Schaer, Stefan</au><au>Jäggi, Adrian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CODE’s five-system orbit and clock solution—the challenges of multi-GNSS data analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geodesy</jtitle><stitle>J Geod</stitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>345</spage><epage>360</epage><pages>345-360</pages><issn>0949-7714</issn><eissn>1432-1394</eissn><abstract>This article describes the processing strategy and the validation results of CODE’s MGEX (COM) orbit and satellite clock solution, including the satellite systems GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, and QZSS. The validation with orbit misclosures and SLR residuals shows that the orbits of the new systems Galileo, BeiDou, and QZSS are affected by modelling deficiencies with impact on the orbit scale (e.g., antenna calibration, Earth albedo, and transmitter antenna thrust). Another weakness is the attitude and solar radiation pressure (SRP) modelling of satellites moving in the orbit normal mode—which is not yet correctly considered in the COM solution. Due to these issues, we consider the current state COM solution as preliminary. We, however, use the long-time series of COM products for identifying the challenges and for the assessment of model-improvements. The latter is demonstrated on the example of the solar radiation pressure (SRP) model, which has been replaced by a more generalized model. The SLR validation shows that the new SRP model significantly improves the orbit determination of Galileo and QZSS satellites at times when the satellite’s attitude is maintained by yaw-steering. The impact of this orbit improvement is also visible in the estimated satellite clocks—demonstrating the potential use of the new generation satellite clocks for orbit validation. Finally, we point out further challenges and open issues affecting multi-GNSS data processing that deserves dedicated studies.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00190-016-0968-8</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6227-1565</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0949-7714
ispartof Journal of geodesy, 2017-04, Vol.91 (4), p.345-360
issn 0949-7714
1432-1394
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881763892
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Albedo
Data processing
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Geodetics
Geophysics/Geodesy
Global positioning systems
GPS
Original Article
Satellites
Solar physics
Solar radiation
title CODE’s five-system orbit and clock solution—the challenges of multi-GNSS data analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T05%3A50%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CODE%E2%80%99s%20five-system%20orbit%20and%20clock%20solution%E2%80%94the%20challenges%20of%20multi-GNSS%20data%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geodesy&rft.au=Prange,%20Lars&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=345&rft.epage=360&rft.pages=345-360&rft.issn=0949-7714&rft.eissn=1432-1394&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00190-016-0968-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1881763892%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1878051426&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true